Illumina MiSeq phylogenetic amplicon sequencing shows a large reduction of an uncharacterised succinivibrionaceae and an increase of the Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii clade in feed restricted cattle

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  McCabe, Matthew Sean ^a   Cormican, Paul ^a   Keogh, Kate ^a   O'Connor, Aaron ^b   O'Hara, Eoin ^a   Palladino, Rafael Alejandro ^c   Kenny, David Anthony ^a   Waters, Sinéad Mary ^a  

^a ANIMAL AND GRASSLAND RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN; METHANE; VOLATILE FATTY ACID; ARCHAEAL DNA; BACTERIAL DNA;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIAL STRUCTURES; BACTERIUM DETECTION; BOVINE; CLADISTICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET RESTRICTION; DNA EXTRACTION; DNA LIBRARY; FRACTIONATION; GENETIC MARKER; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; GROWTH RATE; ILLUMINA MISEQ PHYLOGENETIC AMPLICON SEQUENCING; METHANOBREVIBACTER; METHANOBREVIBACTER GOTTSCHALKII; NONHUMAN; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SUCCINIVIBRIONACEAE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ANIMAL MODEL; BIOSYNTHESIS; FOOD DEPRIVATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INTESTINE FLORA; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MALE; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; RUMEN;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; CATTLE; DNA, ARCHAEAL; DNA, BACTERIAL; FATTY ACIDS, VOLATILE; FOOD DEPRIVATION; GASTROINTESTINAL MICROBIOME; MALE; METHANE; METHANOBREVIBACTER; MODELS, ANIMAL; PHYLOGENY; RUMEN; SUCCINIVIBRIONACEAE;

EID: 84941992162     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133234     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Flint HJ. The rumen microbial ecosystem-some recent developments. Trends Microbiol. 1997; 5: 483-488. PMID: 9447660
2. Del Pozo MV, Fernandez-Arrojo L, Gil-Martinez J, Montesinos A, Chernikova TN, Nechitaylo TY et al. Microbial beta-glucosidases from cow rumen metagenome enhance the saccharification of lignocellulose in combination with commercial cellulase cocktail. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012; 5: 73. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-73 PMID: 22998985
3. Jami E, Mizrahi I. Composition and similarity of bovine rumen microbiota across individual animals. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3).
4. Czerkawski JW. An introduction to rumen studies. New York: Pergamon Press; 1986.
5. Bergman EN. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiol Rev. 1990; 70(2): 567-90. PMID: 2181501
6. Blaxter KL, Clapperton JL. Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. Br J Nutr. 1965; 19: 511-22. PMID: 5852118
7. Shi W, Moon C, Leahy S. Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome. Genome Research. 2014; 24: 1517-1525. doi: 10.1101/gr.168245.113 PMID: 24907284
8. Christophersen CT, Wright ADG, Vercoe PE. In vitro methane emission and acetate:propionate ratio are decreased when artificial stimulation of the rumen wall is combined with increasing grain diets in sheep. J Anim Sci. 2008; 86: 384-389. PMID: 18042816
9. Hungate RE. The Rumen and Its Microbes. New York: Academic Press Inc; 1966.
10. Dinius DA, Simpson ME, Marsh PB. Effect of monensin fed with forage on digestion and the ruminal ecosystem of steers. J Anim Sci. 1976; 42: 229-234. PMID: 2571
11. Creevey CJ, Kelly WJ, Henderson G, Leahy SC. Determining the culturability of the rumen bacterial microbiome. Microbial Biotechnology. 2014; 7: 467-479. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12141 PMID: 24986151
12. Hess M, Sczyrba A, Egan R, Kim TW, Chokhawala H, Schroth G et al. Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science. 2011; 331: 463-467. doi: 10.1126/science.1200387 PMID: 21273488
13. Hogg BW. Compensatory growth in ruminants. In: Pearson A. M. and Dutson T. R. (Ed.) Growth Regulation in Farm Animals. New York: Elsevier Applied Science;1991.
14. Keogh K, Waters SM, Kelly AK, Kenny DA. Effect of feed restriction and subsequent compensatory growth on the weight of non-carcass parts of Holstein Friesian bulls. Proceedings of the Agricultural Research Forum Tullamore. 2012; p44.
15. Brotz PG, Schaefer DM. Simultaneous determination of lactic and volatile fatty acids in microbial fermentation extracts by gas-liquid chromatography. J Microbiol Methods. 1987; 6: 139-144.
16. Yu Z, Morrison M. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques. 2004; 36: 808-812. PMID: 15152600
17. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA,Turnbaugh PJ. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108: 4516-4522.
18. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012; 6: 1621-1624. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.8 PMID: 22402401
19. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim-galore/
20. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Methods. 2010; 7: 335-336. doi: 10. 1038/nmeth.f.303 PMID: 20383131
21. De Santis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a chimerachecked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72: 5069-5072. PMID: 16820507
22. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microb. 2007; 73: 5261-5267.
23. Oliphant TE. Python for Scientific Computing. Computing in Science & Engineering. 2007; 9: 90.
24. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological). 1995; 57: 289-300.
25. http://www.multid.se/
26. Minitab 17 Statistical Software. [Computer software]. State College, PA: Minitab, Inc. 2010; (www. minitab.com).
27. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, 2012; URL http://www.R-project.org/
28. Galyean ML, Owens FN. Effects of diet composition and level of feed intake on site and extent of digestion in ruminants. In: Tsuda T, Sasaki T, Kawashima R, editors. Physiological aspects of digestion and metabolism in ruminants. San Diego, California, USA: Academic Press; 1991. p. 483-514.
29. Michalet-Doreau B, Doreau M. Influence of drastic underfeeding on ruminal digestion in sheep. Anim Res. 2001; 50: 451-462.
30. Keogh K, Kenny DA, Kelly AK, Cormican P, Waters SM. Effect of feed restriction and subsequent compensatory growth on the transcriptional profile of hepatic tissue in Holstein Friesian bulls. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, Nottingham. 2014; p. 89.
31. O'Shea E, Waters SM, Kelly AK, Cormican P, Keogh K, Kenny DA. The effect of feed restriction and realimentation on the rumen epithelial transcriptome of cattle. Proceedings of the Agricultural Research Forum Tullamore. 2014; p.148.
32. Keogh K, Kenny DA, Kelly AK, Cormican P, Waters SM. Feed restriction and subsequent re-alimentation affect the expression of oxidative phosphorylation genes in skeletal muscle of Holstein Friesian bulls. Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Vancouver. 2014; 17th to 22nd August.
33. Meiske JC, Salshury RI, Hoefer JA, Luecke RW. The effect of starvation and subsequent refeeding on some activities of rumen microorganisms in vitro. 1958; J Animal Sci. 17: 774.
34. Warner ACI. Some factors influencing the rumen microbial population. J Gen Microbiol. 1962; 28: 129. PMID: 14005007
35. Zhang S, Aschenbach JR, Barreda DR, Penner GB. Recovery of absorptive function of the reticulorumen and total tract barrier function in beef cattle after short-term feed restriction. J Anim Sci. 2013; 91: 1696-1706. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5774 PMID: 23408814
36. Klappenbach JA, Saxman PR. rrndb: the Ribosomal RNA Operon Copy Number Database. Nucleic Acids Research. 2001; 29: 181-184. PMID: 11125085
37. Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E. The Prokaryotes. Volume 3. 3rd ed: Springer-Verlag; 2006 p. 419-429.
38. Kim M, Morrison M, Yu Z. Phylogenetic diversity of bacterial communities in bovine rumen as affected by diets and microenvironments. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2011; 56: 453-458.
39. Li M, Zhou M, Adamowicz E, Basarab JA, Guan L. Characterization of bovine ruminal epithelial bacterial communities using 16S rRNA sequencing, PCR-DGGE, and qRT-PCR analysis. Vet Microbiol. 2012; 155: 72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.08.007 PMID: 21890283
40. Reti KL, Thomas MC, Yanke LJ, Selinger LB, Inglis GD. Effect of antimicrobial growth promoter administration on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle. Gut Pathog. 2013; 5: 8. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-5-8 PMID: 23578222
41. Pope PB, Smith W, Denman SE, Tringe SG, Barry K, Hugenholtz P et al. Isolation of Succinivibrionaceae implicated in low methane emissions from Tammar wallabies. Science. 2011; 333: 646-648. doi: 10.1126/science.1205760 PMID: 21719642
42. Lee PC, Lee WG, Kwon S, Lee SY, Chang HN. Succinic acid production by Anaerobiospirillum succiniciproducens: Effects of the H2/CO2 supply and glucose concentration. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1999; 24: 549-554.
43. Hippe H, Hagelstein A, Kramer I, Swiderski J, Stackebrandt E. Phylogenetic analysis of Formivibrio citricus, Anaerobiospirillum thomasii, Propionivibrio dicarboxylicus, Succinimonas amylolytica and Succinivibrio dextrinosolvens and proposal of Succinivibrionaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999; 49: 779-782. PMID: 10319502
44. Johnson KA, Johnson DE. Methane emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci. 1995; 73: 2483-2492. PMID: 8567486
45. Janssen PH. Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2010; 160: 1-22.
46. Janssen PH, Kirs M. Structure of the archaeal community of the rumen. Applied Environ Microb. 2008; 74: 3619-3625.
47. Rea S, Bowman JP, Popovski S, Pimm C, Wright A-DG. Methanobrevibacter millerae sp nov and Methanobrevibacter olleyae sp nov., methanogens from the ovine and bovine rumen that can utilize formate for growth. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2007; 57: 450-456. PMID: 17329767
48. Li Z, Wright A-DG, Liu H, Fan Z, Yang F, Zhang Z, et al. Response of the rumen microbiota of Sika deer (Cervus nippon) fed different concentrations of tannin rich plants. PLoS One. 2015; 10.
49. Leahy SC, Kelly WJ, Altermann E, Ronimus RS, Yeoman CJ, Pacheco DM, et al. The genome sequence of the rumen methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium reveals new possibilities for controlling ruminant methane emissions. PLoS One. 2010; 5
50. Reeve JN, Nolling J, Morgan RM, Smith DR. Methanogenesis: genes, genomes, and who's on first? J Bacteriol. 1997; 179: 5975-5986. PMID: 9324240
51. Poulsen M, Schwab C, Jensen BB, Engberg RM, Spang A, Canibe N. et al. Methylotrophic methanogenic Thermoplasmata implicated in reduced methane emissions from bovine rumen. Nature Communications. 2013; 4: 1428. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2432 PMID: 23385573
52. Borrel G, Parisot N, Harris HMB, Peyretaillade E, Gaci N, Tottey W, et al. Comparative genomics highlights the unique biology of Methanomassiliicoccales, a Thermoplasmatales-related seventh order of methanogenic archaea that encodes pyrrolysine. BMC Genomics. 2014; 15: 679. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-679 PMID: 25124552
53. Blackburn TH, Hungate RE. Succinic acid turnover and propionate production in the bovine rumen. Appl Microbiol. 1962; 11: 132-135.
54. Russell JB, Hespell RB. Microbial rumen fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science. 64: 1981; 1153-1169. PMID: 7024344
55. van Gylswyk NO. Succiniclasticum ruminis gen. nov., sp. nov., a ruminal bacterium converting succinate to propionate as the sole energy-yielding mechanism. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995; 45: 297-300. PMID: 7537062
56. Scheifinger CC, Wolin MJ. Propionate formation from cellulose and soluble sugars by combined cultures of Bacteroides succinogenes and Selenomonas ruminantium. 1973; Appl Microbiol. 26: 789-795. PMID: 4796955
57. Evans JD, Martin SA. Factors affecting lactate and malate utilization by Selenomonas ruminantium. Appl Environ Microb. 1997; 63: 4853-4858.
58. Caldwell DR, Bryant MP. Medium without rumen fluid for non selective enumeration and isolation of rumen bacteria Appl Microbiol. 1966; 14: 794-801. PMID: 5970467