A review of surrogate models and their application to groundwater modeling

Water Resources Research

Volumn 51, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 5957-5973

  Asher, M J ^a   Croke, B F W ^a   Jakeman, A J ^a   Peeters, L J M ^b  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

groundwater models; meta models; model emulators; surrogate

Indexed keywords

FUEL ADDITIVES; GROUNDWATER; NUMERICAL METHODS; VECTOR SPACES;

COMPREHENSIVE CALIBRATIONS; DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH; DISTRIBUTED GROUNDWATER MODELS; GROUNDWATER MODELING; GROUNDWATER MODELS; INPUT-OUTPUT MAPPING; META MODEL; SURROGATE;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CALIBRATION; GROUNDWATER; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84941985522     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: 19447973     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/2015WR016967     Document Type: Article

References (144)

1. Andreu, J., J. Capilla, and, E. Sanchís, (1996), Aquatool, a generalized decision-support system for water-resources planning and operational management, J. Hydrol., 177 (3), 269-291.
2. Antoulas, A., (2005), An overview of approximation methods for large-scale dynamical systems, Annu. Rev. Control, 29 (2), 181-190, doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2005.08.002.
3. Arbogast, T., (2002), Implementation of a locally conservative numerical subgrid upscaling scheme for two-phase Darcy flow, Comput. Geosci., 6 (3-4), 453-481.
4. Ashby, S. F., and, R. D. Falgout, (1996), A parallel multigrid preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm for groundwater flow simulations, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 124 (1), 145-159.
5. Bastian, P., and, V. Reichenberger, (2000), Multigrid for higher order discontinuous Galerkin finite elements applied to groundwater flow, technical report 2000-37, Univ. Heidelberg, Heidelberg.
6. Baú, D. A., (2012), Planning of groundwater supply systems subject to uncertainty using stochastic flow reduced models and multi-objective evolutionary optimization, Water Resour. Manage., 26 (9), 2513-2536.
7. Baú, D. A., and, A. S. Mayer, (2006), Stochastic management of pump-and-treat strategies using surrogate functions, Adv. Water Resour., 29 (12), 1901-1917.
8. Bieker, H. P., et al., (2007), Real-time production optimization of oil and gas production systems: A technology survey, SPE Prod. Oper., 22 (04), 382-391.
9. Blanning, R. W., (1975), The construction and implementation of metamodels, Simulation, 24 (6), 177-184.
10. Boyce, S. E., and, W. W.-G. Yeh, (2014), Parameter-independent model reduction of transient groundwater flow models: Application to inverse problems, Adv. Water Resour., 69, 168-180.
11. Breiman, L., (2001), Random forests, Mach. Learning, 45 (1), 5-32.
12. Buffa, A., Y. Maday, A. T. Patera, C. Prudhomme, and, G. Turinici, (2012), A priori convergence of the greedy algorithm for the parametrized reduced basis method, ESAIM: Math. Modell. Numer. Anal., 46 (03), 595-603.
13. Cardoso, M., L. Durlofsky, and, P. Sarma, (2009), Development and application of reduced-order modeling procedures for subsurface flow simulation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 77 (9), 1322-1350.
14. Castelletti, A., S. Galelli, M. Ratto, R. Soncini-Sessa, and, P. Young, (2012), A general framework for dynamic emulation modelling in environmental problems, Environ. Modell. Software, 34, 5-18.
15. Chen, Y., J. S. Hesthaven, Y. Maday, and, J. Rodriguez, (2010), Certified reduced basis methods and output bounds for the harmonic Maxwell's equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 32 (2), 970-996, doi: 10.1137/09075250X.
16. Cheng, W.-C., M. Putti, D. R. Kendall, and, W. W.-G. Yeh, (2011), A real-time groundwater management model using data assimilation, Water Resour. Res., 47, W06528, doi: 10.1029/2010WR009770.
17. Chinesta, F., P. Ladeveze, and, E. Cueto, (2011), A short review on model order reduction based on proper generalized decomposition, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 18 (4), 395-404.
18. Cliffe, K., M. Giles, R. Scheichl, and, A. L. Teckentrup, (2011), Multilevel Monte Carlo methods and applications to elliptic PDEs with random coefficients, Comput. Visualization Sci., 14 (1), 3-15.
19. Craig, J. R., and, W. W. Read, (2010), The future of analytical solution methods for groundwater flow and transport simulation, in XVIII International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources, edited by J. Carrera, pp. 1-8, Int. Cent. for Numer. Methods in Eng., Barcelona.
20. Demissie, Y. K., A. J. Valocchi, B. S. Minsker, and, B. A. Bailey, (2009), Integrating a calibrated groundwater flow model with error-correcting data-driven models to improve predictions, J. Hydrol., 364 (3), 257-271.
21. Diersch, H., (2005), FEFLOW finite element subsurface flow and transport simulation system, in Reference Manual, 292 pp., WASY GmbH Inst. Water Resour. Plann. Syst. Res., Berlin.
22. Doherty, J., and, S. Christensen, (2011), Use of paired simple and complex models to reduce predictive bias and quantify uncertainty, Water Resour. Res., 47, W12534, doi: 10.1029/2011WR010763.
23. Doherty, J., and, C. Simmons, (2013), Groundwater modelling in decision support: Reflections on a unified conceptual framework, Hydrogeol. J., 21 (7), 1531-1537, doi: 10.1007/s10040-013-1027-7.
24. Dong, Y., and, G. Li, (2009), A parallel PCG solver for MODFLOW, Groundwater, 47 (6), 845-850.
25. Dunbar, W. S., and, A. D. Woodbury, (1989), Application of the Lanczos algorithm to the solution of the groundwater flow equation, Water Resour. Res., 25 (3), 551-558.
26. Efendiev, Y., and, T. Hou, (2007), Multiscale finite element methods for porous media flows and their applications, Appl. Numer. Math., 57 (5), 577-596.
27. Efendiev, Y., A. Datta-Gupta, V. Ginting, X. Ma, and, B. Mallick, (2005), An efficient two-stage Markov chain Monte Carlo method for dynamic data integration, Water Resour. Res., 41, W12423, doi: 10.1029/2004WR003764.
28. Efendiev, Y., J. Galvis, and, F. Thomines, (2012), A systematic coarse-scale model reduction technique for parameter-dependent flows in highly heterogeneous media and its applications, Multiscale Modell. Simul., 10 (4), 1317-1343.
29. Efendiev, Y., J. Galvis, R. Lazarov, M. Moon, and, M. Sarkis, (2013), Generalized multiscale finite element method. Symmetric interior penalty coupling, J. Comput. Phys., 255, 1-15.
30. Erhel, J., J.-R. de Dreuzy, A. Beaudoin, E. Bresciani, and, D. Tromeur-Dervout, (2009), A parallel scientific software for heterogeneous hydrogeology, Parallel Comput. Fluid Dyn., 67, 39-48.
31. Espig, M., W. Hackbusch, A. Litvinenko, H. G. Matthies, and, E. Zander, (2013), Efficient analysis of high dimensional data in tensor formats, in Sparse Grids and Applications, edited by, J. Garcke, and, M. Griebel, vol. 88, pp. 31-56, Springer, Heidelberg.
32. Espinet, A. J., and, C. A. Shoemaker, (2013), Comparison of optimization algorithms for parameter estimation of multi-phase flow models with application to geological carbon sequestration, Adv. Water Resour., 54, 133-148.
33. Estabragh, A., M. Pereshkafti, and, A. Javadi, (2013), Comparison between analytical and numerical methods in evaluating the pollution transport in porous media, Geotech. Geol. Eng., 31 (1), 93-101.
34. Fallah-Mehdipour, E., O. B. Haddad, and, M. Mariño, (2013), Prediction and simulation of monthly groundwater levels by genetic programming, J. Hydro-environ. Res., 7 (4), 253-260.
35. Farthing, M. W., K. Fowler, X. Fu, A. Davis, and, C. Miller, (2012), Effects of model resolution on optimal design of subsurface flow and transport problems, Adv. Water Resour., 38, 27-37.
36. Fienen, M. N., and, R. J. Hunt, (2015), High-throughput computing versus high-performance computing for groundwater applications, Groundwater, 53 (2), 180-184.
37. Fienen, M. N., J. P. Masterson, N. G. Plant, B. T. Gutierrez, and, E. R. Thieler, (2013), Bridging groundwater models and decision support with a Bayesian network, Water Resour. Res., 49, 6459-6473, doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20496.
38. Forrester, A. I., and, A. J. Keane, (2009), Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization, Prog. Aerospace Sci., 45, 50-79, doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.11.001.
39. Frangos, M., Y. Marzouk, K. Willcox, and, B. van Bloemen Waanders, (2010), Surrogate and reduced-order modeling: A comparison of approaches for large-scale statistical inverse problems, in Large-Scale Inverse Problems and Quantification of Uncertainty, edited by, L. Biegler, et al., pp. 123-149, John Wiley, Chichester, UK
40. Franssen, H. H., and, W. Kinzelbach, (2009), Ensemble Kalman filtering versus sequential self-calibration for inverse modelling of dynamic groundwater flow systems, J. Hydrol., 365 (34), 261-274, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.033.
41. Franssen, H. H., A. Alcolea, M. Riva, M. Bakr, N. Van der Wiel, F. Stauffer, and, A. Guadagnini, (2009), A comparison of seven methods for the inverse modelling of groundwater flow. Application to the characterisation of well catchments, Adv. Water Resour., 32 (6), 851-872.
42. Galbally, D., K. Fidkowski, K. Willcox, and, O. Ghattas, (2010), Non-linear model reduction for uncertainty quantification in large-scale inverse problems, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 81 (12), 1581-1608.
43. Ganapathysubramanian, B., and, N. Zabaras, (2007), Modeling diffusion in random heterogeneous media: Data-driven models, stochastic collocation and the variational multiscale method, J. Comput. Phys., 226 (1), 326-353.
44. Garcet, J. P., A. Ordonez, J. Roosen, and, M. Vanclooster, (2006), Metamodelling: Theory, concepts and application to nitrate leaching modelling, Ecol. Modell., 193 (3), 629-644.
45. Ghanem, R., and, S. Dham, (1998), Stochastic finite element analysis for multiphase flow in heterogeneous porous media, Transp. Porous Media, 32 (3), 239-262.
46. Ghommem, M., M. Presho, V. M. Calo, and, Y. Efendiev, (2013), Mode decomposition methods for flows in high-contrast porous media. Global-local approach, J. Comput. Phys., 253, 226-238, doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.06.033.
47. Guadagnini, A., and, S. P. Neuman, (1999), Nonlocal and localized analyses of conditional mean steady state flow in bounded, randomly nonuniform domains: 1. Theory and computational approach, Water Resour. Res., 35 (10), 2999-3018, doi: 10.1029/1999WR900160.
48. Gugercin, S., and, A. Antoulas, (2000), A comparative study of 7 algorithms for model reduction, in Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 3, edited by A. Antoulas and A. Varga, pp. 2367-2372, IEEE, Sydney.
49. Gugercin, S., and, K. Willcox, (2008), Krylov projection framework for Fourier model reduction, Automatica, 44 (1), 209-215, doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2007.05.007.
50. Hajibeygi, H., G. Bonfigli, M. A. Hesse, and, P. Jenny, (2008), Iterative multiscale finite-volume method, J. Comput. Phys., 227 (19), 8604-8621.
51. Harbaugh, A. W., (2005), MODFLOW-2005, the US geological survey modular ground-water model: The ground-water flow process, U.S. Geol. Surv. Tech. Methods, 6-A16, 1-99.
52. Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman, T. Hastie, J. Friedman, and, R. Tibshirani, (2009), The Elements of Statistical Learning, vol. 2, Springer, NY
53. Hay, A., I. Akhtar, and, J. T. Borggaard, (2012), On the use of sensitivity analysis in model reduction to predict flows for varying inflow conditions, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 68 (1), 122-134, doi: 10.1002/fld.2512.
54. He, X., L. Jiang, and, J. David Moulton, (2013), A stochastic dimension reduction multiscale finite element method for groundwater flow problems in heterogeneous random porous media, J. Hydrol., 478, 77-88.
55. Hemker, T., K. R. Fowler, M. W. Farthing, and, O. von Stryk, (2008), A mixed-integer simulation-based optimization approach with surrogate functions in water resources management, Opt. Eng., 9 (4), 341-360.
56. Herzog, M., A. Gilg, M. Paffrath, P. Rentrop, and, U. Wever, (2008), Intrusive versus non-intrusive methods for stochastic finite elements, in From Nano to Space, edited by, M. H. Breitner, G. Denk, and, P. Rentrop, pp. 161-174, Springer, Berlin.
57. Hill, M. C., (2006), The practical use of simplicity in developing ground water models, Groundwater, 44 (6), 775-781.
58. Hou, T. Y., and, X.-H. Wu, (1997), A multiscale finite element method for elliptic problems in composite materials and porous media, J. Comput. Phys., 134 (1), 169-189.
59. Hughes, T. J., G. R. Feijõo, L. Mazzei, and, J.-B. Quincy, (1998), The variational multiscale method: A paradigm for computational mechanics, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 166 (1), 3-24.
60. Hussain, M. F., R. R. Barton, and, S. B. Joshi, (2002), Metamodeling: Radial basis functions versus polynomials, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 138 (1), 142-154.
61. Jakeman, A. J., R. A. Letcher, and, J. P. Norton, (2006), Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models, Environ. Modell. Software, 21 (5), 602-614.
62. Jakeman, J. D., and, S. G. Roberts, (2013), Local and dimension adaptive stochastic collocation for uncertainty quantification, in Sparse Grids and Applications, edited by, J. Garcke, and, M. Griebel, pp. 181-203, Springer, Heidelberg.
63. Jenny, P., S. Lee, and, H. Tchelepi, (2003), Multi-scale finite-volume method for elliptic problems in subsurface flow simulation, J. Comput. Phys., 187 (1), 47-67.
64. Jones, D. R., M. Schonlau, and, W. J. Welch, (1998), Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions, J. Global Opt., 13 (4), 455-492.
65. Kavetski, D., and, G. Kuczera, (2007), Model smoothing strategies to remove microscale discontinuities and spurious secondary optima in objective functions in hydrological calibration, Water Resour. Res., 43, W03411, doi: 10.1029/2006WR005195.
66. Keating, E. H., J. Doherty, J. A. Vrugt, and, Q. Kang, (2010), Optimization and uncertainty assessment of strongly nonlinear groundwater models with high parameter dimensionality, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10517, doi: 10.1029/2009WR008584.
67. Kennedy, M. C., and, A. O'Hagan, (2001), Bayesian calibration of computer models, J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B, 63 (3), 425-464.
68. Kitanidis, P. K., and, J. Lee, (2014), Principal component geostatistical approach for large-dimensional inverse problems, Water Resour. Res., 50, 5428-5443, doi: 10.1002/2013WR014630.
69. Knezevic, D. J., and, J. W. Peterson, (2011), A high-performance parallel implementation of the certified reduced basis method, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 200 (13), 1455-1466.
70. Kourakos, G., and, A. Mantoglou, (2009), Pumping optimization of coastal aquifers based on evolutionary algorithms and surrogate modular neural network models, Adv. Water Resour., 32 (4), 507-521.
71. Laloy, E., B. Rogiers, J. A. Vrugt, D. Mallants, and, D. Jacques, (2013), Efficient posterior exploration of a high-dimensional groundwater model from two-stage Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation and polynomial chaos expansion, Water Resour. Res., 49, 2664-2682, doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20226.
72. LaVenue, A. M., and, J. F. Pickens, (1992), Application of a coupled adjoint sensitivity and kriging approach to calibrate a groundwater flow model, Water Resour. Res., 28 (6), 1543-1569.
73. Le Maitre, O., O. Knio, H. Najm, and, R. Ghanem, (2004), Uncertainty propagation using Wiener-Haar expansions, J. Comput. Phys., 197 (1), 28-57.
74. Leube, P. C., W. Nowak, and, G. Schneider, (2012), Temporal moments revisited: Why there is no better way for physically based model reduction in time, Water Resour. Res., 48, W11527, doi: 10.1029/2012WR011973.
75. Lieberman, C., K. Willcox, and, O. Ghattas, (2010), Parameter and state model reduction for large-scale statistical inverse problems, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 32 (5), 2523-2542.
76. Lunati, I., and, P. Jenny, (2008), Multiscale finite-volume method for density-driven flow in porous media, Comput. Geosci., 12 (3), 337-350.
77. Mansour, M., and, A. Spink, (2013), Grid refinement in Cartesian coordinates for groundwater flow models using the divergence theorem and Taylor's series, Groundwater, 51 (1), 66-75.
78. Mariethoz, G., P. Renard, and, J. Caers, (2010), Bayesian inverse problems and optimization with iterative spatial resampling, Water Resour. Res., 46, W11530, doi: 10.1029/2010WR009274.
79. Marzouk, Y. M., and, H. N. Najm, (2009), Dimensionality reduction and polynomial chaos acceleration of Bayesian inference in inverse problems, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (6), 1862-1902.
80. Matott, L. S., and, A. J. Rabideau, (2008), Calibration of complex subsurface reaction models using a surrogate-model approach, Adv. Water Resour., 31 (12), 1697-1707.
81. Matott, L. S., A. J. Rabideau, and, J. R. Craig, (2006), Pump-and-treat optimization using analytic element method flow models, Adv. Water Resour., 29 (5), 760-775.
82. Matott, L. S., J. E. Babendreier, and, S. T. Purucker, (2009), Evaluating uncertainty in integrated environmental models: A review of concepts and tools, Water Resour. Res., 45, W06421, doi: 10.1029/2008WR007301.
83. Matthies, H. G., and, A. Keese, (2005), Galerkin methods for linear and nonlinear elliptic stochastic partial differential equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 194 (12), 1295-1331.
84. McPhee, J., and, W. W.-G. Yeh, (2008), Groundwater management using model reduction via empirical orthogonal functions, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 134 (2), 161-170.
85. Mehl, S., and, M. C. Hill, (2010), Grid-size dependence of Cauchy boundary conditions used to simulate stream-aquifer interactions, Adv. Water Resour., 33 (4), 430-442.
86. Mehl, S. W., and, M. C. Hill, (2005), MODFLOW-2005, the US geological survey modular ground-water model: Documentation of shared node local grid refinement (LGR) and the boundary flow and head (BFH) package, U.S. Geol. Surv. Tech. Methods, 6-A21, 13 pp.
87. Miller, C. T., C. N. Dawson, M. W. Farthing, T. Y. Hou, J. Huang, C. E. Kees, C. Kelley, and, H. P. Langtangen, (2013), Numerical simulation of water resources problems: Models, methods, and trends, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 405-437.
88. Mills, R. T., G. E. Hammond, P. C. Lichtner, V. Sripathi, G. K. Mahinthakumar, and, B. F. Smith, (2009), Modeling subsurface reactive flows using leadership-class computing, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 180, 12 -62.
89. Mugunthan, P., C. A. Shoemaker, and, R. G. Regis, (2005), Comparison of function approximation, heuristic, and derivative-based methods for automatic calibration of computationally expensive groundwater bioremediation models, Water Resour. Res., 41, W11427, doi: 10.1029/2005WR004134.
90. Najm, H. N., (2009), Uncertainty quantification and polynomial chaos techniques in computational fluid dynamics, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 41, 35-52.
91. Nan, T., and, J. Wu, (2011), Groundwater parameter estimation using the ensemble Kalman filter with localization, Hydrogeol. J., 19 (3), 547-561.
92. Narayan, A., C. Gittelson, and, D. Xiu, (2014), A stochastic collocation algorithm with multifidelity models, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 36 (2), A495-A521.
93. Nouy, A., (2007), A generalized spectral decomposition technique to solve a class of linear stochastic partial differential equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 196 (4548), 4521-4537, doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2007.05.016.
94. O'Hagan, A., (2006), Bayesian analysis of computer code outputs: A tutorial, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 91 (10), 1290-1300.
95. O'Hagan, A., (2013), Polynomial chaos: A tutorial and critique from a statistician's perspective, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantification, 20, 1-20.
96. Oliver, D. S., and, Y. Chen, (2011), Recent progress on reservoir history matching: A review, Comput. Geosci., 15 (1), 185-221.
97. Panday, S., P. Huyakorn, R. Therrien, and, R. Nichols, (2013), MODFLOW-USG version 1: An unstructured grid version of MODFLOW for simulating groundwater flow, Adv. Water Resour., 25 (5), 497-511.
98. Pasetto, D., A. Guadagnini, and, M. Putti, (2011), POD-based Monte Carlo approach for the solution of regional scale groundwater flow driven by randomly distributed recharge, Adv. Water Resour., 34 (11), 1450-1463.
99. Pasetto, D., M. Putti, and, W. W.-G. Yeh, (2013), A reduced-order model for groundwater flow equation with random hydraulic conductivity: Application to Monte Carlo methods, Water Resour. Res., 49, 3215-3228, doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20136.
100. Pasetto, D., A. Guadagnini, and, M. Putti, (2014), A reduced-order model for Monte Carlo simulations of stochastic groundwater flow, Comput. Geosci., 18 (2), 157-169.
101. Razavi, S., B. A. Tolson, and, D. H. Burn, (2012a), Review of surrogate modeling in water resources, Water Resour. Res., 48, W07401, doi: 10.1029/2011WR011527.
102. Razavi, S., B. A. Tolson, and, D. H. Burn, (2012b), Numerical assessment of metamodelling strategies in computationally intensive optimization, Environ. Modell. Software, 34, 67-86.
103. Regis, R. G., and, C. A. Shoemaker, (2005), Constrained global optimization of expensive black box functions using radial basis functions, J. Global Opt., 31 (1), 153-171.
104. Regis, R. G., and, C. A. Shoemaker, (2007), A stochastic radial basis function method for the global optimization of expensive functions, INFORMS J. Comput., 19 (4), 497-509.
105. Regis, R. G., and, C. A. Shoemaker, (2012), A quasi-multistart framework for global optimization of expensive functions using response surface models, J. Global Opt., 56, 1719-1753.
106. Rewieński, M., and, J. White, (2006), Model order reduction for nonlinear dynamical systems based on trajectory piecewise-linear approximations, Linear Algebra Appl., 415 (2), 426-454.
107. Roach, J., and, V. Tidwell, (2009), A compartmental-spatial system dynamics approach to ground water modeling, Groundwater, 47 (5), 686-698, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00580.x.
108. Robinson, T., M. Eldred, K. Willcox, and, R. Haimes, (2008), Surrogate-based optimization using multifidelity models with variable parameterization and corrected space mapping, AIAA J., 46 (11), 2814-2822.
109. Sacks, J., et al., (1989), Design and analysis of computer experiments, Stat. Sci., 4 (4), 409-423.
110. Sahuquillo, A., (1983), An eigenvalue numerical technique for solving unsteady linear groundwater models continuously in time, Water Resour. Res., 19 (1), 87-93.
111. Saied, F., and, G. Mahinthakumar, (1998), Efficient parallel multigrid based solvers for large scale groundwater flow simulations, Comput. Math. Appl., 35 (7), 45-54.
112. Sangalli, G., (2003), Capturing small scales in elliptic problems using a residual-free bubbles finite element method, Multiscale Modell. Simul., 1 (3), 485-503.
113. Shafii, M., B. Tolson, and, L. Matott, (2014), Uncertainty-based multi-criteria calibration of rainfall-runoff models: A comparative study, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 28 (6), 1493-1510, doi: 10.1007/s00477-014-0855-x.
114. Shi, L., L. Zeng, D. Zhang, and, J. Yang, (2012), Multiscale-finite-element-based ensemble Kalman filter for large-scale groundwater flow, J. Hydrol., 468-469, 22-34.
115. Siade, A. J., M. Putti, and, W. W.-G. Yeh, (2010), Snapshot selection for groundwater model reduction using proper orthogonal decomposition, Water Resour. Res., 46, W08539, doi: 10.1029/2009WR008792.
116. Siade, A. J., M. Putti, and, W. W.-G. Yeh, (2012), Reduced order parameter estimation using quasilinearization and quadratic programming, Water Resour. Res., 48, W06502, doi: 10.1029/2011WR011471.
117. Stone, N., (2011), Gaussian process emulators for uncertainty analysis in groundwater flow, PhD thesis, Univ. of Nottingham, Nottingham.
118. Sudret, B., (2008), Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 93 (7), 964-979.
119. Sun, A. Y., (2008), State-of-the-art multiscale approaches for flow and transport modeling: A literature review, Tech. Rep. 2008-1, U.S. Nucl. Regul. Commiss., Cent. for Nucl. Waste Regul. Anal., San Antonio, Tex.
120. Thum, P., W. Hesch, and, K. Stüben, (2011), LMG2: Accelerating the SAMG multigrid-solver in MODFLOW, paper presented at MODFLOW and MORE Conference, Colo., Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colo.
121. Tonkin, M. J., and, J. Doherty, (2005), A hybrid regularized inversion methodology for highly parameterized environmental models, Water Resour. Res., 41, W10412, doi: 10.1029/2005WR003995.
122. Vermeulen, P., C. Te Stroet, and, A. Heemink, (2006), Limitations to upscaling of groundwater flow models dominated by surface water interaction, Water Resour. Res., 42, W10406, doi: 10.1029/2005WR004620.
123. Viana, F. A., R. T. Haftka, and, V. Steffen Jr,. (2009), Multiple surrogates: How cross-validation errors can help us to obtain the best predictor, Struct. Multidisciplinary Optim., 39 (4), 439-457.
124. Vilhelmsen, T. N., S. Christensen, and, S. W. Mehl, (2012), Evaluation of MODFLOW-LGR in connection with a synthetic regional-scale model, Groundwater, 50 (1), 118-132.
125. Villa-Vialaneix, N., M. Follador, M. Ratto, and, A. Leip, (2012), A comparison of eight metamodeling techniques for the simulation of N2O fluxes and N leaching from corn crops, Environ. Modell. Software, 34, 51-66, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.05.003.
126. Vrugt, J. A., H. V. Gupta, W. Bouten, and, S. Sorooshian, (2003), A shuffled complex evolution metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters, Water Resour. Res., 39 (8), 1201, doi: 10.1029/2002WR001642.
127. Vuik, C., A. Segal, and, J. Meijerink, (1999), An efficient preconditioned cg method for the solution of a class of layered problems with extreme contrasts in the coefficients, J. Comput. Phys., 152 (1), 385-403.
128. Wan, X., and, G. E. Karniadakis, (2005), An adaptive multi-element generalized polynomial chaos method for stochastic differential equations, J. Comput. Phys., 209 (2), 617-642.
129. Watson, T. A., J. E. Doherty, and, S. Christensen, (2013), Parameter and predictive outcomes of model simplification, Water Resour. Res., 49, 3952-3977, doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20145.
130. Weinan, E., and, B. Engquist, (2003), Multiscale modeling and computation, Notices Am. Math. Soc., 50 (9), 1062-1070.
131. Weinan, E., et al., (2002), The heterogeneous multi-scale method, Commun. Math. Sci., 1, 87-132.
132. Weinan, E., B. Engquist, X. Li, W. Ren, and, E. Vanden-Eijnden, (2007), Heterogeneous multiscale methods: A review, Commun. Comput. Phys., 2 (3), 367-450.
133. Wen, X.-H., and, J. J. Gõmez-Hernández, (1996), Upscaling hydraulic conductivities in heterogeneous media: An overview, J. Hydrol., 183 (1), ix-xxxii.
134. Willcox, K., and, A. Megretski, (2005), Fourier series for accurate, stable, reduced-order models in large-scale linear applications, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 26 (3), 944-962.
135. Willcox, K., and, J. Peraire, (2002), Balanced model reduction via the proper orthogonal decomposition, AIAA J., 40 (11), 2323-2330.
136. Winter, C., D. Tartakovsky, and, A. Guadagnini, (2003), Moment differential equations for flow in highly heterogeneous porous media, Surv. Geophys., 24 (1), 81-106, doi: 10.1023/A:1022277418570.
137. Woodbury, A. D., W. S. Dunbar, and, B. Nour-Omid, (1990), Application of the Arnoldi algorithm to the solution of the advection-dispersion equation, Water Resour. Res., 26 (10), 2579-2590, doi: 10.1029/WR026i010p02579.
138. Xiu, D., and, J. S. Hesthaven, (2005), High-order collocation methods for differential equations with random inputs, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 27 (3), 1118-1139.
139. Xiu, D., and, G. E. Karniadakis, (2002), The Wiener-Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 24 (2), 619-644.
140. Xu, T., A. J. Valocchi, J. Choi, and, E. Amir, (2012), Improving groundwater flow model prediction using complementary data-driven models, paper presented at 19th International Conference on Water Resources, Univ. of Ill., Urbana-Champaign.
141. Yan, S., and, B. Minsker, (2006), Optimal groundwater remediation design using an adaptive neural network genetic algorithm, Water Resour. Res., 42, W05407, doi: 10.1029/2005WR004303.
142. Yoon, H., S.-C. Jun, Y. Hyun, G.-O. Bae, and, K.-K. Lee, (2011), A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer, J. Hydrol., 396 (1), 128-138.
143. Young, P. C., and, M. Ratto, (2011), Statistical emulation of large linear dynamic models, Technometrics, 53 (1), 29-43, doi: 10.1198/TECH.2010.07151.
144. Zhou, H., J. J. Gõmez-Hernández, and, L. Li, (2014), Inverse methods in hydrogeology: Evolution and recent trends, Adv. Water Resour., 63, 22-37.