Principal Component Geostatistical Approach for large-dimensional inverse problems

Water Resources Research

Volumn 50, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 5428-5443

  Kitanidis, P K ^a   Lee, J ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

computational; data analysis; geostatistics; inversion; stochastic

Indexed keywords

COST REDUCTION; DATA REDUCTION; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; DIGITAL STORAGE; JACOBIAN MATRICES; NEWTON-RAPHSON METHOD; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TEXTBOOKS;

COMPUTATIONAL; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY; GEO-STATISTICS; GEOSTATISTICAL APPROACH; INVERSION; STOCHASTIC; TEXTBOOK IMPLEMENTATION; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATIONS;

INVERSE PROBLEMS;

EID: 84906101014     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: 19447973     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/2013WR014630     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ambikasaran, S., Y. Li, E. Darve, and, P. K. Kitanidis, (2013), Large-scale stochastic linear inversion using hierarchical matrices, Comput. Geosci., 17 (6), 913-927, doi: 10.1007/s10596-013-9364-0.
2. Berger, J. O., (2006), The case for objective Bayesian analysis, Bayesian Anal., 1 (3), 385-402.
3. Bui-Thanh, T., C. Burstedde, O. Ghattas, J. Martin, G. Stadler, and, L. C. Wilcox, (2012), Extreme-scale UQ for Bayesian inverse problems governed by PDEs, in Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, pp. 1-11, IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, Salt Lake City, Utah.
4. Butler, J. J. J., C. D. McElwee, and, G. C. Bohling, (1999), Pumping tests in networks of multilevel sampling wells; motivation and methodology, Water Resour. Res., 35 (11), 3553-3560.
5. Cardiff, M., W. Barrash, P. Kitanidis, B. Malama, A. Revil, S. Straface, and, E. Rizzo, (2009), A potential-based inversion of unconfined steady-state hydraulic tomography, Ground Water, 47 (2), 259-270, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584. 2008.00541.x.
6. Cardiff, M., W. Barrash, and, P. K. Kitanidis, (2013), Hydraulic conductivity imaging from 3-d transient hydraulic tomography at several pumping/observation densities, Water Resour. Res., 49, 7311-7326, doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20519.
7. Carlin, B. P., and, T. A. Louis, (2000), Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis, 2nd ed., Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, Fla.
8. Carrera, J., and, S. P. Neuman, (1986), Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 1. Maximum likelihood method incorporating prior information, Water Resour. Res., 22 (2), 199-210. (Pubitemid 16477839)
9. 2 fluxes, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D22306, doi: 10.1029/2012JD018176.
10. Evensen, G., (1994), Sequential data assimilation with a non-linear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics, J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C5), 10,143-10,162, doi: 10.1029/94JC00572.
11. Evensen, G., (2003), The ensemble Kalman filter: Theoretical formulation and practical implementation, Ocean Dyn., 53, 343-367, doi: 10.1007/s10236-003- 0036-9.
12. Evensen, G., (2006), Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter, Springer, N. Y.
13. Fong, W., and, E. Darve, (2009), The black-box fast multipole method, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (23), 8712-8725, doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.08.031.
14. Gavalas, G. R., P. C. Shah, and, J. H. Seinfeld, (1976), Reservoir history matching by Bayesian estimation, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 16, 337-350.
15. Golub, G. H., (1965), Numerical methods for solving linear least squares problems, Numer. Math., 17, 206-216.
16. Golub, G. H., and, C. F. Van Loan, (1989), Matrix Computations, 462 pp., Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Md.
17. Halko, N., P. G. Martinsson, and, J. A. Tropp, (2011), Finding structure with randomness: Probabilistic algorithms for constructing approximate matrix decompositions, SIAM Rev., 53 (2), 217-288.
18. Kitanidis, P. K., (1983), Statistical estimation of polynomial generalized covariance functions and hydrologic applications, Water Resour. Res., 19 (4), 909-921. (Pubitemid 15253093)
19. Kitanidis, P. K., (1993), Generalized covariance functions in estimation, Math. Geol., 25 (5), 525-540. (Pubitemid 23394845)
20. Kitanidis, P. K., (1995), Quasilinear geostatistical theory for inversing, Water Resour. Res., 31 (10), 2411-2419.
21. Kitanidis, P. K., (2010), Bayesian and geostatistical approaches to inverse problems, in Large-Scale Inverse Problems and Quantification of Uncertainty, edited by, L. Biegler, et al., pp. 71-85, John Wiley, Hoboken, N. J.
22. Kitanidis, P. K., and, R. W. Lane, (1985), Maximum likelihood parameter estimation of hydrologic spatial processes by the Gauss-Newton method, J. Hydrol., 79, 53-71. (Pubitemid 17269086)
23. Kitanidis, P. K., and, E. G. Vomvoris, (1983), A geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in groundwater modeling (steady state) and one-dimensional simulations, Water Resour. Res., 19 (3), 677-690. (Pubitemid 15253236)
24. Lee, J., and, P. K. Kitanidis, (2014), Large-scale hydraulic tomography and joint inversion of head and tracer data using the Principal Component Geostatistical Approach (PCGA), Water Resour. Res., doi: 10.1002/2014WR015483, in press.
25. Li, J. Y., S. Ambikasaran, E. Darve, and, P. K. Kitanidis, (2014), A Kalman filter powered by H2-matrices for quasi-continuous data assimilation problems, Water Resour. Res., 50, 3734-3749, doi: 10.1002/2013WR014607.
26. Li, W., and, O. A. Cirpka, (2006), Efficient geostatistical inverse methods for structured and unstructured grids, Water Resour. Res., 42, W06402, doi: 10.1029/2005WR004668.
27. Linde, N., A. Binley, A. Tryggvason, L. B. Pedersen, and, A. Revil, (2006), Improved hydrogeophysical characterization using joint inversion of cross-hole electrical resistance and ground-penetrating radar traveltime data, Water Resour. Res., 42, W12404, doi: 10.1029/2006WR005131.
28. Liu, X., and, P. K. Kitanidis, (2011), Large-scale inverse modeling with an application in hydraulic tomography, Water Resour. Res., 47, W02501, doi: 10.1029/2010WR009144.
29. Marzouk, Y. M., and, H. N. Najm, (2009), Dimensionality reduction and polynomial chaos acceleration of Bayesian inference in inverse problems, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (6), 1862-1902, doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.11.024.
30. Matheron, G., (1973), The intrinsic random functions and their applications, Appl. Probab., 5, 439-468.
31. Neuman, S. P., (1980), A statistical approach to the inverse problem of aquifer hydrology: 3. Improved method and added perspectives, Water Resour. Res., 16 (2), 331-346. (Pubitemid 11269183)
32. Nowak, W., S. Tenkleve, and, O. Cirpka, (2003), Efficient computation of linearized cross-covariance and auto-covariance matrices of interdependent quantities, Math. Geol., 35 (1), 53-66. (Pubitemid 38149279)
33. Pollock, D., and, O. A. Cirpka, (2012), Fully coupled hydrogeophysical inversion of a laboratory salt tracer experiment monitored by electrical resistivity tomography, Water Resour. Res., 48, W01505, doi: 10.1029/2011WR010779.
34. Rubin, Y., X. Chen, H. Murakami, and, M. Hahn, (2010), A Bayesian approach for inverse modeling, data assimilation, and conditional simulation of spatial random fields, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10523, doi: 10.1029/ 2009WR008799.
35. Saibaba, A. K., and, P. K. Kitanidis, (2012), Efficient methods for large-scale linear inversion using a geostatistical approach, Water Resour. Res., 48, W05522, doi: 10.1029/2011WR011778.
36. Saibaba, A. K., S. Ambikasaran, J. Y. Li, P. K. Kitanidis, and, E. F. Darve, (2012), Application of hierarchical matrices to linear inverse problems in geostatistics, Oil Gas Sci. Technol., 67 (5), 857-875, doi: 10.2516/ogst/2012064.
37. Slater, L., A. M. Binley, W. Daily, and, R. Johnson, (2000), Cross-hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection, J. Appl. Geophys., 44 (2), 85-102, doi: 10.1016/S0926-9851(00)00002-1. (Pubitemid 30327790)
38. Woodbury, A. D., and, Y. Rubin, (2000), A full-Bayesian approach to parameter inference from tracer travel time moments and investigation of scale effects at the Cape Cod experimental site, Water Resour. Res., 36 (1), 159-171. (Pubitemid 30042118)
39. Yadav, V., and, A. M. Michalak, (2013), Improving computational efficiency in large linear inverse problems: An example from carbon dioxide flux estimation, Geosci. Model Dev., 6 (3), 583-590, doi: 10.5194/gmd-6-583-2013.
40. Yeh, T.-C. J., and, X. Liu, (2000), Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method, Water Resour. Res., 36 (8), 2095-2105. (Pubitemid 30610900)
41. Zanini, A., and, P. K. Kitanidis, (2009), Geostatistical inversing for large-contrast transmissivity fields, Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 23 (5), 565-577, doi: 10.1007/s00477-008-0241-7.