Mimicry Is Presidential: Linguistic Style Matching in Presidential Debates and Improved Polling Numbers

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 41, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1311-1319

  Romero, Daniel M ^a,b   Swaab, Roderick I ^c   Uzzi, Brian ^b   Galinsky, Adam D ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INSEAD   (France)

^d Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

accommodation theory; language style matching; third party reactions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMITATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEGOTIATING; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84941755115     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167215591168     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. A.L.AlterD.M.Oppenheimer (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219-235.
2. C.C.BallewA.Todorov (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 17948-17953.
3. I.M.BeggA.AnasS.Farinacci (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446-458.
4. J.M.BrettM.OlekalnsR.FriedmanN.GoatesC.AndersonC.C.Lisco (2007). Sticks and stones: Language, face, and online dispute resolution. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 85-99.
5. W.Bruine de Bruin (2005). Save the last dance for me: Unwanted serial position effects in jury evaluations. Acta Psychologica, 118, 245-260.
6. N.CouplandH.Giles (1988). Introduction the communicative contexts of accomodation. Language & Communication, 8(3), 175-182.
7. C.Danescu-Niculescu-MizilL.LeeB.PangJ.Kleinberg (2012). Echoes of power: Language effects and power differences in social interaction. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 699-708). New York, NY: ACM.
8. S.B.DayD.Gentner (2007). Nonintentional analogical inference in text comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 35, 39-49.
9. A.D.GalinskyW.W.MadduxD.GilinJ.B.White (2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective-taking and empathy in negotiations. Psychological Science, 19(4), 378-384.
10. S.GarrodM.J.Pickering (2004). Why is conversation so easy?Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 8-11.
11. J.G.Geer (1988). The effects of presidential debates on the electorate’s preferences for candidates. American Politics Research, 16, 486-501.
12. H.GilesN.Coupland (1991). Language: Context and consequences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
13. A.L.GonzalesJ.T.HancockJ.W.Pennebaker (2010). Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37, 3-19.
14. C.W.J.Granger (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424-438.
15. S.W.GregoryS.Webster (1996). A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1231-1240.
16. C.J.GroomJ.W.Pennebaker (2002). Words. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 615-621.
17. J.T.HancockL.CurryS.GoorhaM.T.Woodworth (2008). On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception. Discourse Processes, 45, 1-23.
18. L.HasherD.GoldsteinT.Toppino (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 107-112.
19. A.J.HealyN.MalhotraC.H.Mo (2012). Irrelevant events affect voters’ evaluations of government performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 12804-12809.
20. T.M.Holbrook (1999). Political learning from presidential debates. Political Behavior, 21, 67-89.
21. M.E.IrelandJ.W.Pennebaker (2010). Language style matching in writing: Synchrony in essays, correspondence, and poetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 549-571.
22. M.E.IrelandR.B.SlatcherP.W.EastwickL.E.ScissorsE.J.FinkelJ.W.Pennebaker (2011). Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22, 39-44.
23. E.KacewiczJ.W.PennebakerM.DavisM.JeonA.C.Graesser (2013). Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 125-143.
24. C.M.KelleyD.S.Lindsay (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 1-24.
25. K.KenskiK.H.Jamieson (2008). Presidential and vice presidential debates in 2008: A profile of audience composition. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 307-324.
26. K.KenskiN.J.Stroud (2005). Who watches presidential debates? A comparative analysis of presidential debate viewing in 2000 and 2004. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 213-228.
27. N.M.LairdJ.H.Ware (1982). Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics, 38, 963-974.
28. A.MantonakisP.RoderoI.LesschaeveR.Hastie (2009). Order in choice: Effects of serial position on preferences. Psychological Science, 20, 1309-1312.
29. D.F.McCaffreyJ.R.LockwoodK.MihalyT.R.Sass (2012). A review of Stata commands for fixed-effects estimation in normal linear models. The Stata Journal, 12, 406-432.
30. M.S.McGloneJ.Tofighbakhsh (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, 11, 424-428.
31. A.S.MeyerK.Bock (1999). Representations and processes in the production of pronouns: Some perspectives from Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 281-301.
32. G.Miller (2007). The art of virtual persuasion. Science, 317, 1343.
33. M.A.Neale (1997). New recruit. In J.M.Brett (Ed.), Negotiation and decision making exercises. Evanston, IL: Dispute Resolution Research Center.
34. K.G.NiederhofferJ.W.Pennebaker (2002). Linguistic style matching in social interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 337-360.
35. J.W.PennebakerR.J.BoothM.E.Francis (2007). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): A computerized text analysis program [Computer software]. Austin, TX: LIWC.net.
36. J.W.Pennebaker (2011). The secret life of pronouns: How our words reflect who we are. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
37. M.J.PickeringS.Garrod (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169-190.
38. B.H.RichardsonP.J.TaylorB.SnookS.M.ConchieC.Bennell (2014). Language style matching and police interrogation outcomes. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 357-366.
39. S.SaavedraJ.DuchB.Uzzi (2011). Tracking traders’ understanding of the market using e-communication data. PLoS ONE, 6(10), e26705.
40. I.SkurnikC.YoonD.C.ParkN.Schwarz (2005). How warnings about false claims become recommendations. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 713-724.
41. R.I.SwaabW.W.MadduxM.Sinaceur (2011). Early words that work: When and how virtual linguistic mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 616-621.
42. P.J.TaylorS.Thomas (2008). Linguistic style matching and negotiation outcome. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1, 263-281.
43. B.W.A.Whittlesea (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 6, 1235-1253.