Representations and Processes in the Production of Pronouns: Some Perspectives from Dutch

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 281-301

  Meyer, Antje S ^a   Bock, Kathryn ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Language production; pronouns; grammatical agreement

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001115569     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2649     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baayen R. H., Piepenbrock R., van Rijn H. The CELEX lexical database. 1993;Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.
2. Badecker W., Miozzo M., Zanuttini R. The two-stage model of lexical retrieval: Evidence from a case of anomia with selective preservation of grammatical gender. Cognition. 57:1995;193-216.
3. Bock J. K. Producing agreement. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 8:1995;56-61.
4. Bock J. K., Brewer W. F. Discourse structure and mental models. Carr T. H. The development of reading skills. 1985;55-75 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
5. Bock J. K., Levelt W. J. M. Language production: Grammatical encoding. Gernsbacher M. A. Handbook of psycholinguistics. 1994;945-984 Academic Press, San Diego.
6. Bock J. K., Miller C. A. Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology. 23:1991;45-93.
7. Bock J. K., Nicol J., Cutting J. C. The ties that bind: Creating number agreement in speech. Journal of Memory and Language. 40:1999;330-346.
8. Bosch P. Pronouns under control: A reply to Liliane Tasmowski and Paul Verluyten. Journal of Semantics. 5:1986;65-78.
9. Brysbaert M., Mitchell D. C. Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 49A:1996;664-695.
10. Cacciari C., Carreiras M., Cionini C. B. When words have two genders: Anaphor resolution for Italian functionally ambiguous words. Journal of Memory and Language. 37:1997;517-532.
11. Chang F. R. Active memory processes in visual comprehension: Clause effects and pronominal reference. Memory & Cognition. 8:1980;58-64.
12. Clark E. V. From gesture to word: On the natural history of deixis in language acquisition. Bruner J. S., Garton A. Human growth and development: Wolfson College lectures 1976. 1978;Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
13. Clark E. V., Sengul C. J. Strategies in the acquisition of deixis. Journal of Child Language. 5:1978;457-475.
14. Clark H. H., Sengul C. J. In search of referents for nouns and pronouns. Memory & Cognition. 7:1979;35-41.
15. Cloitre M., Bever T. G. Linguistic anaphors, levels of representations, and discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes. 3:1988;293-322.
16. Cowart W., Cairns H. S. Evidence for an anaphoric mechanism within syntactic processing: Some reference relations defy semantic and pragmatic constraints. Memory & Cognition. 15:1987;318-331.
17. Cuetos F., Mitchell D. C. Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition. 30:1988;73-105.
18. Dell G. S., McKoon G., Ratcliff R. The activation of antecedent information during the processing of anaphoric reference in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 22:1983;121-132.
19. Dell G. S., O'Seaghdha P. G. Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition. 42:1992;287-314.
20. Drosdowski G. Duden Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 1984;Dudenverlag, Mannheim.
21. Ehrlich K., Rayner K. Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: Eye movements and immediacy of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 22:1983;75-87.
22. Garnham A., Oakhill J., Ehrlich M.-F., Carreiras M. Representations and processes in the interpretation of pronouns: New evidence from Spanish and French. Journal of Memory and Language. 34:1995;41-62.
23. Garrod S. C., Sanford A. J. Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. Gernsbacher M. A. Handbook of psycholinguistics. 1994;675-698 Academic Press, San Diego.
24. Gernsbacher M. A. Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition. 32:1989;99-156.
25. Gernsbacher M. A. Comprehending conceptual anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes. 6:1991;81-105.
26. Greene S. B., Gerrig R. J., McKoon G., Ratcliff R. Unheralded pronouns and management by common ground. Journal of Memory and Language. 33:1994;511-526.
27. Gilboy E., Sopena J.-M., Clifton C. Jr., Frazier L. Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs. Cognition. 54:1995;131-167.
28. Hagoort P., Brown C., Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes. 8:1993;439-483.
29. Hemforth B., Konieczny L., Scheepers C. Syntactic attachment and anaphor resolution: Two sides of relative clause attachment. Crocker M., Pickering M., Clifton C. Architectures and mechanisms for language processing. 1999;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
30. Jarvella R. J. Syntactic processing of connected speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 10:1971;409-416.
31. Koriat A., Greenberg S. N. The extraction of phrase structure during reading: Evidence from letter detection errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1:1994;345-356.
32. Levelt W. J. M. Speaking: From intention to articulation. 1989;MIT Press, Cambridge.
33. McKoon G., Gerrig R. J., Greene S. B. Pronoun resolution without pronouns: Some consequences of memory-based text processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, and Cognition. 22:1996;919-932.
34. Meyer A. S. Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analyses: Achievements, limitations, and alternatives. Cognition. 42:1992;181-211.
35. Meyer A. S. Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language. 35:1996;477-496.
36. Miozzo M., Caramazza A. Retreival of lexical-syntactic features in tip-of-the-tongue states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 23:1997;1410-1423.
37. Mitchell D. C., Brysbaert M. Challenges to recent theories of crosslinguistic variation in parsing: Evidence from Dutch. Hillert D. Syntax and semantics: Sentence processing: A crosslinguistic perspective. 1998;313-335 Academic Press, Orlando.
38. Murphy G. L. Processes of understanding anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language. 24:1985;290-303.
39. Nicol, J. 1988, Coreference processing during sentence comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
40. Sachs J. S. Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception & Psychophysics. 2:1967;437-442.
41. Schmitt B. M., Meyer A. S., Levelt W. J. M. Lexical access in the production of pronouns. Cognition. 69:1999;313-335.
42. Stemberger J. P. The reliability and replicability of naturalistic speech error data: A comparison with experimentally induced errors. Baars B. J. Experimental slips and human error: Exploring the architecture of volition. 1992;195-215 Plenum, New York.
43. van Berkum J. J. A. The psycholinguistics of grammatical gender. 1996;Nijmegen Univ. Press, Nijmegen.
44. van Berkum J. J. A. Syntactic processes in speech production: The retrieval of grammatical gender. Cognition. 64:1997;115-152.
45. Vigliocco G., Antonini T., Garrett M. F. Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science. 8:1997;314-317.