Theorizing in nursing science

Routledge International Handbook of Advanced Quantitative Methods in Nursing Research

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 15-26

  Henly, Susan J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84941312820     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (100)

1. Abdellah, F. G., & Levine, E. (1965). Better patient care through nursing research. London: Macmillan.
2. Abhyankar, S., Demner-Fushman, D., Callaghan, F. M., & McDonald, C. J. (2014). Combining structured and unstructured data to identify a cohort of ICU patients who received dialysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21, 801-807.
3. Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16, 3-9.
4. American Education Research Association [AERA], American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
5. Beck, C. T. (Ed.). (2013). Routledge international handbook of qualitative nursing research. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
6. Berger, A., & Berger, C. (2004). Data mining as a tool for research and knowledge development in nursing. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 22, 123-131.
7. Bernstam, E.V., Smith, J. W., & Johnson, T. R. (2009). What is biomedical informatics? Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43, 104-111.
8. Bingenheimer, J. B., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). Statistical and substantive inferences in public health:Issues in the application of multilevel models. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 53-77.
9. Blum, R. L. (2014). The (dis)unity of nursing science. Nursing Philosophy, 14, 250-260.
10. Boker, S. M., Molenaar, P.C.M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2009). Issues in intraindividual variability: Individual differences in equilibria and dynamics. Psychology and Aging, 24, 858-862.
11. Brant, J. M., Beck, S., & Miaskowski, C. (2010). Building dynamic models and theories to advance the science of symptom management research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66, 228-240.
12. Cairns, R. B., Elder, G. H., Jr., & Costello, E. J. (Eds.) (1996). Developmental science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The data box: It's ordering of total resources in terms of possible relational systems. In Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 67-128). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
14. Chinn, P. L. (Ed.) (2012). Transitions [Special issue]. Advances in Nursing Science, 35 (3).
15. Chinn, P. L., & Kramer, M. K. (2011). Integrated theory and knowledge development in nursing (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
16. Cochrane, W. K. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
17. Cohen, J. E. (2004). Mathematics is biology's new microscope; biology is mathematics' new physics. PLoS Biology, 2 (12), e439.
18. Collins, L. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505-528.
19. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
20. Cudeck, R., & Harring, R. L. (2007). Analysis of nonlinear patterns of change with random coefficient models. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 615-637.
21. Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2007). Building path diagrams for multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 12, 283-297.
22. D'Avolio, L. W., Farwell, W. R., & Fiore, L. D. (2010). Comparative effectiveness research and medical informatics. American Journal of Medicine, 123 (12 Suppl. 1), e32-e37.
23. Dada, J. O., & Mendes, P. (2011). Multi-scale modelling and simulation in systems biology. Integrative Biology, 3, 86-96.
24. Dickoff, J., James, P., & Wiedenbach, E. (1968). Theory in a practice discipline. Part I: Practice oriented theory. Nursing Research, 17, 415-435.
25. Doane, G. H., & Varcoe, C. (2005). Toward compassionate action. Pragmatism and the inseparability of theory/practice. Advances in Nursing Science, 28 (1), 81-90.
26. Docherty, S. L., Sandelowski, M., & Preisser, J. S. (2006). Three months in the symptom life of a teenage girl undergoing treatment for cancer. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, 294-310.
27. Donaldson, S. K. (2003). Commentary. The science of human health-Domain structure. Biological Research for Nursing, 4, 165-169.
28. Donaldson, S. K., & Crowley, D. (1978). The discipline of nursing. Nursing Outlook, 26, 113-120.
29. Faniel, I. M., & Zimmerman, A. (2011). Beyond the data deluge: A research agenda for large-scale data sharing and reuse. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6, 58-69.
30. Fawcett, J. (1984). The metaparadigm of nursing: Present status and future refinements. Image-The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 16, 84-87.
31. Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Smyth, P. (1996). From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI Magazine, 17 (3), 37-54.
32. Floridi, L. (2005). Is semantic information meaningful data? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70, 351-370.
33. Founds, S. A. (2009). Introducing systems biology for nursing science. Biological Research for Nursing, 11, 73-80.
34. Genomic Nursing State of the Science Advisory Panel, Calzone, K. A., Jenkins, J., Bakos, A. D., Cashion, A. K., Donaldson, N., Webb, J. A. (2013). A blueprint for genomic nursing science. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 45, 96-104.
35. Gortner, S. R. (1983). The history and philosophy of nursing science and research. Advances in Nursing Science, 5 (2), 1-8.
36. Gottlieb, N. L., & Feeley, N. (1995). Nursing intervention studies. Issues related to time and timing in children and families. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 27, 13-29.
37. Grady, P. A. (2010). Translational research and nursing science. Nursing Outlook, 58, 164-166.
38. Grady, P. A. (2014, September). NINR: Advancing innovations for complex health issues. Paper presented at the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science State of the Congress, Washington, DC.
39. Graves, J. R., & Corcoran, S. (1989). The study of nursing informatics. Image-The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 21, 227-231.
40. Guergachi, A. A. (2003). Connecting traditional sciences with the OLAP and data mining paradigms. In V. Belur & V. Dasarathy (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE, 5098, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery: Theory, Tools, and Technology V, 226-234.
41. Hamburg, M. A., & Collins, F. S. (2010). The path to personalized medicine [Editorial]. New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 301-304.
42. Henly, S. J. (2007). Lost in time. The person in nursing research [Editorial]. Nursing Research, 56, 147.
43. Henly, S. J., Kallas, K. D., Klatt, C. M., & Swenson, K. K. (2003). The notion of time in symptom experiences. Nursing Research, 52, 410-417.
44. Henly, S. J., McCarthy, D. O., Wyman, J. F., Stone, P. W., Redeker, N. S., McCarthy, A.M., The Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science Idea Festival Advisory Committee. (in press). Nursing science:Emerging priorities and implications for nursing scientist education. Nursing Outlook, 63.
45. Henly, S. J., Wyman, J. F., & Findorff, M. J. (2011). Health and illness over time: The trajectory perspective in nursing science. Nursing Research, 60 (Suppl. 3), S5-S14.
46. Henly, S. J., Wyman, J. F., & Gaugler, J. E. (2011). Health trajectory research: A call to action for nursing science. Nursing Research, 60 (Suppl. 3), S79-S82.
47. Herland, M., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., & Wald, R. (2014). A review of data mining using big data in health informatics. Journal of Big Data, 1 (2).
48. Hey, T., & Trefethen, A. (2003). The data deluge: An e-science perspective. In F. Berman, G. C. Fox, & A.J.G. Hey (Eds.), Grid computing: Making the global infrastructure a reality (pp. 809-824). Chichester: Wiley.
49. Higdon, R., Haynes, W., Stanberry, L., Stewart, E., Yandl, G. Howard, C., Kolker, E. (2013). Unraveling the complexities of life sciences data. Big Data, 1, 42-49.
50. Hinshaw, A. S., Feetham, S. L., & Shaver, J.L.F. (Eds.). (1999). Handbook of clinical nursing research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Hoffmann, R. (2003). Why buy that theory? American Scientist, 91, 9-11.
52. Holzemer, W. L., & Henry, S. B. (1999). Therapeutic outcomes sensitive to nursing. In A. S. Hinshaw, S. L. Feetham, & J.L.F. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of clinical nursing research (pp. 185-198). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
53. Horowitz, R. I., Cullen, M. R., Abell, J., & Christian, J. B. (2013). (De)personalized medicine. Science, 339, 2255-2256.
54. Hyman, R., & Corbin, J. (Eds.) (2001). Chronic illness: Research and theory for nursing practice. New York, NY:Springer.
55. Institute of Medicine. (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
56. Institute of Medicine. (2004). Keeping patients safe: Transforming the work environment of nurses. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
57. Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Kass, R. E. (2011). Statistical inference: The big picture. Statistical Science, 26, 1-9.
59. Krieger, N. (2001). Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: An ecosocial perspective. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30, 668-677.
60. Lehmann, E. L. (2008). On the history and use of some standard statistical models. IMS Collections: Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of David A. Freeman, 2, 114-126.
61. Lehmann, E. H., & Casella, G. (1998). Theory of point estimation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
62. Liaschenko, J., & Fisher, A. (1999). Theorizing the knowledge that nurses use in the conduct of their work. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 13, 29-41.
63. Louis, G.M.B., & Sundaram, R. (2012). Exposome: Time for transformative research. Statistics in Medicine, 31, 2569-2575.
64. Marriner-Tomey, A., & Alligood, M. R. (2002). Nursing theorists and their work (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO:Mosby.
65. McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Temporal matters in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
66. Melnyk, B. M., & Morrison-Beedy, D. (2012). Intervention research. Designing, conducting, analyzing, and funding. New York, NY: Springer.
67. Molenaar, P.C.M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2, 201-218.
68. Mudunuri, U. S., Khouja, M., Repetski, S., Venkataraman, G., Che, A., Luke, B. T., Stephens, R. M. (2013). Knowledge and theme discovery across very large biological data sets using distributed queries: A prototype combining unstructured and structured data. PLOS ONE, 8 (12), e80503.
69. Murdoch, T. B., & Detsky, A. S. (2013). The inevitable application of big data to health care. JAMA, 309, 1351-1352.
70. Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882-891.
71. Nardini, C., Annoni, M., & Schiavone, G. (2012). Mechanistic understanding in clinical practice: Complementing evidence-based medicine with personalized medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18, 1000-1005.
72. National Institute of Nursing Research [NINR]. (2011). NINR strategic plan: Bringing science to life. (NIH Publication 11-7783). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
73. Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). Interindividual differences in intraindividual change. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 92-105). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
74. Nesselroade, J. R., & Rim, N. (2004). Studying intraindividual variability: What we have learned that will help us understand lives in context. Research in Human Development, 1 (1 & 2), 9-29.
75. Nicholl, L. H. (Ed.). (1986). Perspectives on nursing theory. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
76. Nightingale, F. (1860). Notes on nursing: What it is and what it is not. New York, NY: D. Appleton. (Republished in 1969, New York, NY: Dover)
77. Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Technical Report IHMC Cmap Tools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008. Pensacola, FL: Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
78. Olebaum, C. H. (1974). Hallmarks of adult wellness. American Journal of Nursing, 74, 1623-1625.
79. Polit, D. F., & Hungler, B. P. (1999). Nursing research. Principles and methods (6th ed.). Philadelphia, PA:Lippincott.
80. President's Information Technology Advisory Committee. (2005). Computational science: Ensuring America's competitiveness. Arlington, VA: National Coordination Office for Information Technology Research and Development.
81. Rapaport, S. M. (2012). Biomarkers intersect with the exposome. Biomarkers, 17, 483-489.
82. Raudenbush, S., & Xiao-Feng, L. (2001). Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change. Psychological Methods, 6, 387-401.
83. Reliability Concepts and Methods: Special Focus Section. (2015). Nursing Research, 64.
84. Risjord, M. (2010). Nursing knowledge: Science, practice, and philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
85. Schallom, L., Thimmesch, A. R., & Pierce, J. D. (2011). Systems biology in critical care nursing. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 30, 1-7.
86. Shaver, J. F. (1985). A biopsychosocial view of human health. Nursing Outlook, 42, 15-25.
87. Simmhan, Y. L., Plale, B., & Gannon, D. (2005). A survey of data provenance in e-science. ACM SIGMOD, 34 (3), 31-36.
88. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
89. Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling. Multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
90. Smith, J. A. (1981). The idea of health: A philosophical inquiry. Advances in Nursing Science, 3 (3), 43-50.
91. Smith, M. J., & Liehr, P. R. (2008). Middle range theory for nursing (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
92. Spanos, A. (2006). Where do statistical models come from? Revisiting the problem of specification. IMS Lecture Notes-Monograph Series. 2nd Lehmann Symposium-Optimality, 49, 98-119.
93. Spanos, A., & McGuirk, A. (2001). The model specification problem from a probabilistic reduction perspective. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 1168-1176.
94. Swan, M. (2013). The quantified self. Fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big Data, 1 (2), 85-99.
95. Topol, E. J., Schork, N. J., & Smith, J. M. (2011). Digital medicine and the Scripps Translational Science Institute. Clinical and Translational Science, 4, 8-9.
96. Webster, M. M., & Ward, A.J.W. (2011). Personality and social context. Biological Reviews, 86, 759-773.
97. Wheaton, B., & Gotlib, I. H. (1997). Trajectories and turning points over the life course: Concepts and themes. In I. H. Gotlib & B. Wheaton (Eds.), Stress and adversity over the life course. Trajectories and turning points (pp. 1-28). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
98. Yang, M., & Maxwell, S. (2014). Treatment effects in randomized longitudinal trials with different types of nonignorable dropout. Psychological Methods, 19, 188-210.
99. Yang, Z. R. (2010). Machine learning approaches to bioinformatics. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
100. Yao, Y. Y. (2004). Concept formation and learning: A cognitive informatics perspective. In C. Chang, W. Kinsner, Y. Wang, & D. M. Miller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (pp. 42-51). Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=9252