Kinematic viscosity of unstimulated whole saliva in healthy young adults

European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 20, 2014, Pages 2988-2994

  Foglio Bonda, A ^a   Pattarino, F ^a   Foglio Bonda, P L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN PIEDMONT   (Italy)

Author keywords

Capillary viscometry; Human whole saliva; Kinematic viscosity; Salivary pH

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGING; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOUTH CAVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PH; SALIVA ANALYSIS; SALIVA PH; SALIVA VISCOSITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISCOMETER; VISCOMETRY; VISCOSITY; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; AGE; BIOMECHANICS; CHEMISTRY; COHORT ANALYSIS; REFERENCE VALUE; SALIVA; TEMPERATURE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; SALIVA; TEMPERATURE; VISCOSITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84941120288     PISSN: 11283602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. NORDBO H, DARWISH S, BHATNAGAR, RS. Salivary viscosity and lubrification: influence of pH and calcium. Scand J Dent Res 1984; 92: 306-314.
2. RANC H, ELKHYAT A, SERVAIS C, MAC-MARY S, LAUNAY B, HUMPERT PH. Friction coefficient and wettability of oral mucosal tissue: changes induced by a salivary layer. Colloids Surf A: Physiochem Eng Aspect 2006; 276: 155-161.
3. RANC H, SERVAIS C, CHAUVY PF, DEBAUD S, MISCHLER S. Effect of surface structure on friction al behaviour of a tongue/palate tribological system. Tribol Int 2006; 39: 1518-1526.
4. PRINZ JF, DE WIJK RA, HUNTJENS L. Load dependency of the coefficient of friction of oral mucosa. Food Hydrocolloids 2007; 21: 402-408.
5. INOUE H, ONO K, MASUDA W, INAGAKI T, YOKOTA M, INENAGA K. Rheological properties of human saliva and salivary mucins. J Oral Biosc 2008; 50: 134-141.
6. VEERMAN ECI, VALENTIJN-BENZ M, NIEUW AMERONGEN AV. Viscosity of human salivary mucins: effect of pH and ionic strength and role of sialic acid. J Biol Buccale 1989; 17: 297-306.
7. WATERMAN HA,BLOM C,HOLTERMAN HJ,S-GRAVENMADE EJ,MELLEMA J. Rheological properties of human saliva Arch Oral Biol 1988 33 589-596.
8. HIROTOMI T, YOSHIHARA A, OG AWA H, ITO K, IGARASHI A, MIYAZAKI H. A preliminary study on the relationship between stimulated saliva and periodontal conditions in community-dwelling elderly people. J Dent 2006; 34: 692-698.
9. SCHIPPER RG, SILLETTI E, VINGERHOEDS MH. Saliva as research material: biochemical, physiochemical and practical aspects. Arch Oral Biol 2007; 52: 1114-1135.
10. ROBERTS BJ. A study of the vis cosity of saliva at different shear rates in dentate and edentulous patients. J Dent 1977; 5: 303-309.
11. VISSINK A, WATERMAN HA, 'S-GRAVENMADE EJ, PANDERS AK, VERMEY A. Rheological properties o f saliva substitutes containing mucin, carboxymethylcellulose or polyethylenoxide. J Oral Pathol 1984; 13: 22-28.
12. VAN DER REIJDEN WA, VEERMAN ECI, VAN NIEUW AMERONGEN A. Rheological properties of commercially available polysaccharides with potential use in saliva substitutes. Biorheology 1994; 31: 631-642.
13. RANTONEN PJF, MEURMAN JH. Viscosity of whole saliva. Acta Odontol Scand 1998; 56: 210-214.
14. PREETHA A, BANNERJEE R. Comparison of artificial substitutes. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2005; 18: 178-186.
15. PARK MS, CHUNG JW, KIM YK, CHUNG SC, KHO HS. Viscosity and wettability of animal mucin solutions and human saliva. Oral Dis 2007; 13: 181-186.
16. MEHRAVARAN N, MOGHIMI H, MORTAZAVI SA. The Influence of various mucoadhesive polymers on in vitro performance of the resulting artificial saliva pump spray formulations. Iranian J Pharm Res 2009; 8: 3-13.
17. SAJEWICZ E. Effect of saliva viscosity on tribological behavior of tooth enamel. Tribol Int 2009; 42: 327-332.
18. FOGLIO-BONDA PL, MIGLIARIO M, ROCCHETTI V, PATTARINO F, FOGLIO-BONDA A. Daily and annually variation of unstimulated whole saliva flow rate and pH and their relation with body profile in healthy young adults. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013; 17: 2338-2345.
19. NAVAZESH M, MULLIGAN RA, KIPNIS V, DENNY PA, DENNY PC. Comparison of whole saliva flow rates and mucin concentrations in healthy Caucasian young and aged adults. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1275-127 8.
20. RICHARDSON CT, FELDMAN M. Salivary response to food in humans and its effect on gastric acid secretion. Am J Physiol 1986; 250: 85-91.
21. COLE AS, EASTOE JE. Bioch emestry and oral biology. 2nd ed. London.Wright, 1998; pp. 478-493.
22. SHIN S, KEUM DY. Viscosity measurement of non-Newtonian fluid foods with a mass-detecting capillary viscometer J Food Eng 2003; 58: 5-10.
23. PARVINEN T. Flow rate, pH, and lactobacillus and yeast counts of stimulated whole saliva in adults. Proc Finnish Dent Soc 1985; 81: 113-116.
24. FENOLL-PALOMARES C, MUNOZ-MONTAGUD JV, SANCHIZ V, HERREROS B, HERNÁNDEZ V, MÍ NGUEZ M, BENAGES A. Unstimulated salivary flow rate, pH and buffer capacity of saliva in healthy volunteers. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2004; 96: 773-783.
25. SRIVASTAVA N, BURNS MA. Analysis of non-Newtonian liquids using a microfluidic capillary viscometer. Anal Chem 2006; 78:1690-1696.
26. BONGAERTS JHH, ROSSETTI AD, STOKES AJR. The lubricating properties of human saliva. Tribol Lett 2007; 27: 277-287.
27. FU-LUNG L, DINTENFASS L. Effect of flow instability (and of blood anti-instability properties) on viscosity of blood measured in rotational viscometer. Biorheology 1981; 18: 191-205.
28. SCHWARZ WH. The rheology of saliva J Dent Res 1987 66 660-666.
29. ZUSSMAN E, YARIN AL, NAGLER RM. Age-And flow-dependency of salivary viscoelasticity. J Dent Res 2007; 86: 281-285.