Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Flipped Format General Chemistry Course

Journal of Chemical Education

Volumn 92, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1437-1448

  Weaver, Gabriela C ^a   Sturtevant, Hannah G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemical Education Research; Collaborative Cooperative Learning; Distance Learning Self Instruction; First Year Undergraduate General; Internet Web based Learning; Problem Solving Decision Making; Testing Assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84941063159     PISSN: 00219584     EISSN: 19381328     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00316     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Labov, J.; Singer, S.; George, M.; Schweingruber, H.; Hilton, M. Effective Practices in Undergraduate STEM Education, Part 1: Examining the Evidence CBE-Life Sci. Educ. 2009, 8 (3) 157-161 10.1187/cbe.09-06-0038
2. National Research Council. Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education: Summary of Two Workshops. Nielsen, N., Rapporteur, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2011.
3. Black, A.; Deci, E. The Effects of Instructors Autonomy Support and Students Autonomous Motivation on Learning Organic Chemistry: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective Sci. Educ. 2000, 84 (6) 740-756 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
4. Deci, E.; Vallerand, R.; Pelletier, L.; Ryan, R. Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective Educ. Psychologist 1991, 26 (3) 325-346 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4,6
5. Klein, H.; Noe, R.; Wang, C. Motivation to Learn and Course Outcomes: The Impact of Delivery Mode, Learning Goal Orientation, and Perceived Barriers and Enablers Personnel Psychol. 2006, 59 (3) 665-702 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00050.x
6. Reeve, J. A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement; Christenson, S.; Reschly, A.; Wylie, C., Eds.; Springer Science + Business Media: New York, 2012; pp 149-172.
7. Deci, E.; Ryan, R. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior; Plenum: New York, 1985.
8. Deci, E.; Ryan, R. The "What" and "Why" Of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior Psychol. Inquiry 2000, 11 (4) 227-268 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104, 01
9. Ryan, R.; Deci, E. Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being Am. Psychol. 2000, 55 (1) 68-78 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
10. Ryan, R.; Deci, E. Promoting Self-Determined School Engagement: Motivation, Learning, and Well-Being. In Handbook of Motivation at School; Wenzel, K.; Wigfield, A., Eds.; Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group: New York, 2009; pp 171-195.
11. Jang, H.; Reeve, J.; Ryan, R. M.; Kim, A. Can Self-Determination Theory Explain What Underlies the Productive, Satisfying Learning Experiences of Collectivistically Oriented Korean Students? J. Educ. Psychol. 2009, 101 (3) 644-661 10.1037/a0014241
12. Black, A.; Deci, E. The Effects of Instructors Autonomy Support and Students Autonomous Motivation on Learning Organic Chemistry: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective Sci. Educ. 2000, 84 (6) 740-756 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
13. Patrick, B.; Skinner, E.; Connell, J. What Motivates Childrens Behavior And Emotion? Joint effects of Perceived Control and Autonomy in the Academic Domain J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1993, 65 (4) 781-791 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.781
14. Kuh, G.; Kinzie, J.; Schuh, J.; Witt, E. Student Success in College: Creating Conditions that Matter; Association for the Study of Higher Education: Washington, DC, 2005.
15. National Research Council. Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering; Singer, S.; Nielsen, N.; Schweingruber, H., Eds.; Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2012.
16. Bergmann, J.; Sams, A. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day; International Society for Technology in Education: Arlington, VA, 2012.
17. Tucker, B. The Flipped Classroom. Educ. Next [Online] 2012, 12 (1), Article 11. http://educationnext.org/the-flipped-classroom/ (accessed Jun 11, 2014).
18. Lage, M. J.; Platt, G. J.; Treglia, M. Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment J. Econ. Educ. 2000, 31 (1) 30-43 10.1080/00220480009596759
19. Baker, J. W. The "Classroom Flip": Using Web Course Management Tools to Become the Guide by the Side. In Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning; Chambers, J., Ed.; Florida Community College at Jacksonville: Jacksonville, FL, 2000.
20. Kahn, S. Lets Use Video to Reinvent Education. Presented at TED2011 [Online], Long Beach, CA, March 2011. TED. http://www.ted.com/talks/salman-khan-let-s-use-video-to-reinvent-education.htm (accessed May 27, 2014).
21. Reay, J. Blended Learnings Fusion for the Future Knowl. Manag. Rev. 2001, 4 (3) 6
22. Rooney, J. E. Blended learning opportunities to enhance educational programming and meetings Association Management 2003, 55 (5) 26-32
23. Marsh, G.; McFadden, A.; Price, B. Blended Instruction: Adapting Conventional Instruction for Large Classes. Online J. Dist. Learn. Admin., 2003, 6 (4), Article 4. http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter64/marsh64.pdf (accessed June 15, 2015).
24. OBrien, S. The Medium Facilitates the Messages: Electronic Discourse and Literature Class Dynamics Comput. Compos. 1994, 11 (1) 79-86 10.1016/8755-4615(94)90009-4
25. Smith, J. Student Attitudes toward Flipping the General Chemistry Classroom Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2013, 14 (4) 607-614 10.1039/C3RP00083D
26. Teo, T. W.; Tan, K. C.; Yan, Y. K.; Teoa, Y. C.; Yeoa, L. W. How Flip Teaching Supports Undergraduate Chemistry Laboratory Learning Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2014, 15 (4) 550 10.1039/C4RP00003J
27. Christiansen, M. Inverted Teaching: Applying a New Pedagogy to a University Organic Chemistry Class J. Chem. Educ. 2014, 91 (11) 1845-1850 10.1021/ed400530z
28. Flynn, A. B. Structure and Evaluation of Flipped Chemistry Courses: Organic & Spectroscopy, Large and Small, First to Third Year, English and French Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2015, 16 (2) 198-211 10.1039/C4RP00224E
29. Beichner, R.; Saul, J.; Allain, R.; Deardorff, D.; Abbott, D. Introduction to SCALE-UP: Student-centered activities for large enrollment university physics Proc. Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. 2000, 5.411.1-5.411.12
30. Beichner, R.; Saul, J.; Abbott, D.; Morse, J.; Deardorff, D.; Allain, R.; Bonham, S.; Dancy, M.; Risley, J. Student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project. In Research-Based Reform in University Physics [Online], Redish, E. F.; Cooney, P. J., Eds.; American Association of Physics Teachers: College Park, MD, 2007; Reviews in PER Vol. 1, Article 4, http://www.per-central.org/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=4517 (accessed June 15, 2015).
31. Beichner, R. The SCALE-UP Project: A Student-Centered Active Learning Environment for Undergraduate Programs. Workshop on Linking Evidence and Promising Practices in STEM Undergraduate Education; NRC Promising Practices in Undergraduate STEM Education: Washington, DC, 2008.
32. Beichner, R.; Saul, J. Introduction to the SCALE-UP (Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs) project. In Research on Physics Education, Proceedings of the International School of Physics Conference "Enrico Fermi"; Redish, E.; Vicentini, M., Eds.; IOS Press: Amsterdam, 2003.
33. Oliver-Hoyo, M. T.; Allen, D.; Hunt, W. F.; Hutson, J.; Pitts, A. Effects of an Active Learning Environment: Teaching Innovations at a Research I Institution J. Chem. Educ. 2004, 81 (3) 441-448 10.1021/ed081p441
34. Oliver-Hoyo, M. T.; Allen, D. Attitudinal Effects of a Student-Centered Active Learning Environment J. Chem. Educ. 2005, 82 (6) 944-949 10.1021/ed082p944
35. Steelcase Homepage. http://www.steelcase.com/products/whiteboards/huddleboard/ (accessesd Jun 23, 2015).
36. Bloom, B. S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. David McKay Co: New York, 1956.
37. Wales, C. Alchemy in the Classroom J. Chem. Educ. 1970, 47 (5) 369-371 10.1021/ed047p369
38. Kolowich, S. Mixing Work and Play on Facebook. Inside Higher Education, October 6, 2010. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/10/06/facebook#sthash.cnyIWlir.yGBcvPdb.dpbs (accessed May 23, 2014).
39. Purdue Research Foundation. Mixable at Purdue University,2010. Purdue University Web site. http://www.itap.purdue.edu/studio/mixable/ (accessed May 23, 2014).
40. ACS Examinations Institute. First Term General Chemistry Paired Questions Exam, 2005. Division of Chemical Education Examinations Institute, American Chemical Society: Washington, DC; http://chemexams.chem.iastate.edu/exam/2005-first-term-general-chemistry-paired-questions (accessed June 16, 2015).
41. ACS Examinations Institute. General Chemistry 2nd Term Paired Question Exam, 2007. Division of Chemical Education Examinations Institute, American Chemical Society: Washington, DC; http://chemexams.chem.iastate.edu/exam/2007-general-chemistry-2nd-term-paired-question (accessed June 16, 2015).
42. Bornstein, R. Face Validity. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods; Lewis-Beck, M. S.; Bryman, A.; Liao, T. F., Eds.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 2004; pp 368-369.
43. Qualtrics Home Page. http://www.qualtrics.com/ (accessed Jun 23, 2015).
44. Holme, T. Department of Chemistry; Iowa State University, Ames, IA. Personal communication, January 2015.
45. Hambleton, R. K.; Swaminathan, H.; Rogers, H. J. Fundamentals of Item Response Theory; Sage: Newbury Park, CA, 1991.
46. ACS Division of Chemical Education Examinations Institute: Ordering Information. http://chemexams.chem.iastate.edu/instructors/ordering-information (accessed June 16, 2015).
47. Holme, T.; Murphy, K. Assessing Conceptual and Algorithmic Knowledge in General Chemistry with ACS Exams J. Chem. Educ. 2011, 88 (9) 1217-1222 10.1021/ed100106k
48. Nurrenbern, S.; Pickering, M. Concept Leaning versus Problem Solving: Is There a Difference? J. Chem. Educ. 1987, 64 (6) 508-510 10.1021/ed064p508
49. Sawrey, B. A. Concept Learning versus Problem Solving: Revisited J. Chem. Educ. 1990, 67 (3) 253-254 10.1021/ed067p253
50. Pickering, M. Further Studies on Concept Learning versus Problem Solving J. Chem. Educ. 1990, 67 (3) 254-255 10.1021/ed067p254
51. Sturtevant, H.; Weaver, G. First Year Results of a Longitudinal Evaluation of a Hybrid SCALE-UP Model for Large General Chemistry Courses. Proceedings of the 246th ACS National Meeting of the American Chemical Society; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2013.
52. Holme, T. Assessment and Quality Control in Chemistry Education J. Chem. Educ. 2003, 80 (6) 594-596 10.1021/ed080p594
53. Schell, J.; Lukoff, B.; Mazur, E. Catalyzing Learner Engagement Using Cutting-Edge Classroom Response Systems in Higher Education. In Increasing student engagement and retention using classroom technologies: Classroom response systems and mediated discourse technologies; Wankel, C.; Blessinger, P., Eds.; Emerald Publishing: Bingley, U.K., 2013; pp 233-261.
54. Asirvatham, M. Clickers in Action: Increasing Student Participation in General Chemistry; W. W. Norton & Co: New York, 2010.
55. Bruff, D. Teaching with Classroom Response Systems: Creating Active Learning Environments; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, 2009.
56. Keough, S. Clickers in the Classroom: A Review and a Replication J. Manage. Educ. 2012, 36 (6) 822-847 10.1177/1052562912454808
57. MacArthur, J.; Jones, L. A Review of Literature Reports of Clickers Applicable To College Chemistry Classrooms Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2008, 9 (3) 187-195 10.1039/B812407H
58. Crouch, C.; Mazur, E. Peer Instruction: Ten Years of Experience and Results Am. J. Phys. 2001, 69 (9) 970-977 10.1119/1.1374249
59. Kuh, G.; Schneider, C. High-impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter; Association of American Colleges and Universities: Washington, DC, 2008.