Survey on anomaly detection using data mining techniques

Procedia Computer Science

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 708-713

  Agrawal, Shikha ^a   Agrawal, Jitendra ^a  

^a Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya   (India)

Author keywords

Anomaly detection; Classification; Clustering; Data mining; Intrusion detection system

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); INTRUSION DETECTION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

ANOMALY DETECTION; CLUSTERING; EXPOSED TO; HYBRID APPROACH; INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS; OR APPLICATIONS; UNKNOWN ATTACKS;

DATA MINING;

EID: 84941061963     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18770509     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.220     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Chandola V., Banerjee A., Kumar V., Anomaly detection: A survey, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR); 41(3);2009; p. 15.
2. Agarwal B., Mittal N., Hybrid Approach for Detection of Anomaly Network Traffic using Data Mining Techniques, Procedia Technology; 6; 2012; p. 996-1003.
3. Padhy N., Mishra P., Panigrahi R., The Survey of Data Mining Applications and Feature Scope; International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJCSEIT), 2(3);2012; p. 43-58.
4. th USENIX Security Symposium, San Antonio, Texas; 1998; p. 79-94.
5. Lee W., Stolfo S. J., Mok K. W., Adaptive intrusion detection: A data mining approach; Artificial Intelligence Review; 14(6);2000; p. 533-567.
6. Phua C, Lee V., Smith K., Gayler R., A comprehensive survey of data mining-based fraud detection; research; 2010; p. 1-14.
7. Chauhan A., Mishra G., Kumar G., Survey on Data mining Techniques in Intrusion Detection; International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research; 2(7), 2011; p. 1-4.
8. Xu L., Yeh Y. R., Lee Y. J., Li J., A Hierarchical Framework Using Approximated Local Outlier Factor for Efficient Anomaly Detection; Procedia Computer Science; 19; 2013; p. 1174-1181.
9. T. Pang-Ning, M. Steinbach, V. Kumar, Introduction to data mining, Library of Congress, 2006.
10. Munz, G., Li S., Carle G., Traffic Anomaly Detection Using K-Means Clustering; GI/ITG Workshop MMBnet; 2007; p. 1-8.
11. Syarif I., Prugel-Bennett A., Wills G., Data mining approaches for network intrusion detection from dimensionality reduction to misuse and anomaly detection; Journal of Information Technology Review; 3(2);2012; p. 70-83.
12. nd edition, Morgan Kaufmann, 2006.
13. Berkhin P., A survey of clustering data mining techniques;Grouping multidimensional data; Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2006; p. 25-71.
14. Dokas P., Ertoz L., Kumar V., Lazarevic A., Srivastava J., Tan P. N., Data mining for network intrusion detection, In Proceedings of NSF Workshop on Next Generation Data Mining; 2002; p. 21-30
15. Garcia-Teodoro P., Diaz-Verdejo J., Maciá-Fernández G., Vázquez E., Anomaly-based network intrusion detection: Techniques, systems and challenges; Computers and security; 28(1);2009; p. 18-28.
16. Wu S. Y., Yen E., Data mining-based intrusion detectors; Expert Systems with Applications; 36(3);2009; p. 5605-5612.
17. Kaur N., Survey paper on Data Mining techniques of Intrusion Detection; International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research; 2(4);2013; p. 799-804.
18. Tang D. H., Cao Z., Machine Learning-based Intrusion Detection Algorithm; Journal of Computational Information Systems; 5(6);2009; p. 1825-1831.
19. Amor N. B., Benferhat S., Elouedi Z., Naive Bayes vs decision trees in intrusion detection systems, In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Applied computing; 2004; p. 420-424
20. Kou Y., Lu C. T., Sirwongwattana S., Huang Y. P., Survey of fraud detection techniques; In Proceedings of the IEEE International conference Networking, sensing and control; 2; 2004; p. 749-754.
21. Tsai C. F., Hsu Y. F., Lin C. Y., Lin W. Y., Intrusion detection by machine learning: A review; Expert Systems with Applications; 36(10);2009; p. 11994-12000.
22. Farid D. M., Harbi N., Rahman M. Z., Combining naive bayes and decision tree for adaptive intrusion detection; International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA); 2(2);2010; p. 12-25.
23. Fu S., Liu J., Pannu H., A Hybrid Anomaly Detection Framework in Cloud Computing Using One-Class and Two-Class Support Vector Machines; In Advanced Data Mining and Applications; Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012; p. 726-738.
24. Yasami Y., Mozaffari S. P., A novel unsupervised classification approach for network anomaly detection by k-Means clustering and ID3 decision tree learning methods; The Journal of Supercomputing; 53(1);2010; p. 231-245.
25. Tang D. H., Cao Z., Machine Learning-based Intrusion Detection Algorithms; Journal of Computational Information Systems; 5(6);2009; p. 1825-1831.
26. Chitrakar R., Chuanhe H., Anomaly based Intrusion Detection using Hybrid Learning Approach of combining k-Medoids Clustering and Naïve Bayes Classification, In Proceedings of 8th IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM); 2012; p 1-5.
27. Chitrakar R., Chuanhe, H., Anomaly detection using Support Vector Machine classification with k-Medoids clustering; In Proceedings of IEEE Third Asian Himalayas International Conference on Internet (AH-ICI); 2012; p. 1-5.
28. Peddabachigari S., Abraham A., Grosan C, Thomas J., Modeling intrusion detection system using hybrid intelligent systems; Journal of network and computer applications; 30(1);2007; p. 114-132.
29. Patcha A., Park J. M., An overview of anomaly detection techniques: Existing solutions and latest technological trends; Computer Networks; 51(12);2007; p. 3448-3470.