Comparison of Patient Function during the First Six Weeks after Direct Anterior or Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): A Randomized Study

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 94-97

  Christensen, Christian P ^a   Jacobs, Cale A ^a  

^a LEXINGTON CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Direct anterior approach; Function; Outcome; Posterior approach; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECT ANTERIOR TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; FEMALE; FEMORAL FIXATION DEVICE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS ASSESSMENT; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTERIOR TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; POWER ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; WALKING AID; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; HIP REPLACEMENT; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROCEDURES; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84940893853     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.038     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Laupacis A., Bourne R., Rorabeck C., et al. The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993, 75-A(11):1619.
2. Kurtz S.M., Lau E., Ong K., et al. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement. National projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:2606.
3. Jacobs C.A., Christensen C.P., Greenwald A.S., et al. Clinical performance of highly cross-linked polyethylenes in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89-A(12):2779.
4. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services EHR Incentive Programs [Accessed 8/11/2014]. http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/index.html.
5. Lombardi A.V., Nunley R.M., Berend K.R., et al. Do patients return to work after total knee arthorplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014, 472:138.
6. Restrepo C., Parvizi J., Pour A.E., et al. Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25(5):671.
7. Goebel S., Steinert A.F., Schillinger J., et al. Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach. Int Orthop 2012, 36(3):491.
8. Bergin P.F., Doppelt J.D., Kephart C.J., et al. Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(15):1392.
9. Spaans A.J., Hout J.A., Bolder S.B. High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach. Acta Orthop 2012, 83(4):342.
10. Hallert O., Li Y., Brismar H., et al. The direct anterior approach: initial experience of a minimally invasive technique for total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 2012, 25(7):17.
11. Barrett W.P., Turner S.E., Leopold J.P. Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty 2013.
12. Rathod P.A., Orishimo K.F., Kremenic I.J., et al. Similar improvement in gait parameters following direct anterior & posterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:1261.
13. Rodriguez J.A., Deshmukh A.J., Rathod P.A., et al. Does the direct anterior approach in THA offer faster rehabilitation and comparable safety to the posterior approach?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014, 472:455.
14. Zawadsky M.W., Paulus M.C., Murray P.J., et al. Early outcome comparison between the direct anterior approach and mini-incision posterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: 150 cases. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:1256.
15. Della Valle C.J., Dittle E., Moric M., et al. A prospective randomized trial of mini-posterior and two-incision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:3348.
16. Christensen C.P., Jacobs C.A., Jennings H.R. Effect of periarticular corticosteroid injections during total knee arthroplasty. A double-blind randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91-A(11):2550.
17. Kwon M.S., Kuskowski M., Mulhall K.J., et al. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 447:34.
18. Jacobs C.A., Christensen C.P. Correlations between Knee Society Function Scores and functional force measures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:2414.
19. Podsiadlo P., Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991, 39:142.
20. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Vol 2nd 1988, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
21. Christensen C.P., Karthikeyan T., Jacobs C.A. Greater prevalence of wound complications requiring reoperation with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29(9):1839.
22. Christensen C.P., Jacobs C.A. Clinical comparison of THA with a standard-length or short femoral component. Orthopedics 2013, 36(12):e1538.