Similar improvement in gait parameters following direct anterior & posterior approach total hip arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1261-1264

  Rathod, Parthiv A ^a   Orishimo, Karl F ^a   Kremenic, Ian J ^a   Deshmukh, Ajit J ^a   Rodriguez, José A ^a  

^a LENOX HILL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Direct anterior; Gait analysis; Hip arthroplasty; Posterior

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIOLOGICAL PROCEDURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; DIRECT POSTERIOR APPROACH TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; FEMALE; FEMUR CONDYLE; FOLLOW UP; GAIT; GREATER TROCHANTER; GROUND REACTION FORCE; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANGE OF MOTION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WEIGHT BEARING;

DIRECT ANTERIOR; GAIT ANALYSIS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; POSTERIOR;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; FEMALE; GAIT; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 84901021371     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.11.021     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ritter M.A., Harty L.D., Keating M.E., et al. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 385:95.
2. McCrory J.L., White S.C., Lifeso R.M. Vertical ground reaction forces: objective measures of gait following hip arthroplasty. Gait Posture 2001, 14(2):104.
3. Perron M., Malouin F., Moffet H., et al. Three-dimensional gait analysis in women with a total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2000, 15(7):504.
4. Ward S.R., Jones R.E., Long W.T., et al. Functional recovery of muscles after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 2008, 57:249.
5. Meneghini R.M., Smits S.A., Swinford R.R., et al. A randomized, prospective study of 3 minimally invasive surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty: comprehensive gait analysis. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(6 Suppl 1):68.
6. Bennett D., Ogonda L., Elliott D., et al. Comparison of immediate postoperative walking ability in patients receiving minimally invasive and standard-incision hip arthroplasty: a prospective blinded study. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(4):490.
7. Matta J.M., Shahrdar C., Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:115.
8. Berend K.R., Lombardi A.V., Seng B.E., et al. Enhanced early outcomes with the anterior supine intermuscular approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91(Suppl 6):107.
9. Meneghini R.M., Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., et al. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 453:293.
10. Klausmeier V., Lugade V., Jewett B.A., et al. Is there faster recovery with an anterior or anterolateral THA? A pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468(2):533.
11. Mayr E., Nogler M., Benedetti M.G., et al. A prospective randomized assessment of earlier functional recovery in THA patients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach: a gait analysis study. Clin Biomech 2009, 24(10):812.
12. Lugade V., Wu A., Jewett B., et al. Gait asymmetry following an anterior and anterolateral approach to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2010, 25(7):675.
13. Maffiuletti N.A., Impellizzeri F.M., Widler K., et al. Spatiotemporal parameters of gait after total hip replacement: anterior versus posterior approach. Orthop Clin North Am 2009, 40(3):407.
14. Reininga I.H., Stevens M., Wagenmakers R., et al. Comparison of gait in patients following a computer-navigated minimally invasive anterior approach and a conventional posterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Res 2013, 31(2):288.
15. Lovell T.P. Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:64.
16. Ranawat C.S., Ranawat A.S., Rasquinha V.J. Mastering the art of cemented femoral stem fixation. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:85.
17. Ranawat C.S., Rao R.R., Rodriguez J.A., et al. Correction of limb-length inequality during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:715.
18. Ounpuu S. The biomechanics of walking and running. Clin Sports Med 1994, 13(4):843.
19. Borg H., Kiviranta I., Anttila E., et al. External rotation strength deficit after hip resurfacing surgery. Disabil Rehabil 2009, 31(11):865.
20. Häkkinen A., Borg H., Kautiainen H., et al. Muscle strength and range of movement deficits 1year after hip resurfacing surgery using posterior approach. Disabil Rehabil 2010, 32(6):483.
21. Nene A., Mayagoitia R., Veltink P. Assessment of rectus femoris function during initial swing phase. Gait Posture 1999, 9(1):1.
22. Scott L., Ringwelsky D., Carroll N. Transfer of rectus femoris: effects of transfer site on moment arms about the knee and hip. J Biomech 1994, 27:1201.