Do suburban residents prefer the fastest or low-carbon travel modes? Combining public participation GIS and multimodal travel time analysis for daily mobility research

Applied Geography

Volumn 53, Issue , 2014, Pages 438-448

  Salonen, Maria ^a   Broberg, Anna ^b   Kyttä, Marketta ^b   Toivonen, Tuuli ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Carbon intensity; Daily mobility; PPGIS; Travel behaviour; Travel mode; Travel time

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940864955     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.028     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Brown G. An empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of public participation GIS (PPGIS) data. Applied Geography 2012, 34(0):289-294.
2. Brown G., Kyttä M. Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): a synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography 2014, 46:126-136.
3. Brown G.G., Reed P. Public participation GIS: a new method for use in national forest planning. Forest Science 2009, 55(2):166-182.
4. Buehler R. Determinants of transport mode choice: a comparison of Germany and the USA. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 19(4):644-657.
5. Buys L., Miller E. Conceptualising convenience: transportation practices and perceptions of inner-urban high density residents in Brisbane, Australia. Transport Policy 2011, 18(1):289-297.
6. Carse A., Goodman A., Mackett R.L., Panter J., Ogilvie D. The factors influencing car use in a cycle-friendly city: the case of Cambridge. Journal of Transport Geography 2013, 28:67-74.
7. Chaix B., Kestens Y., Perchoux C., Karusisi N., Merlo J., Labadi K. An interactive mapping tool to assess individual mobility patterns in neighborhood studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2012, 43(4):440-450.
8. Cullinane S. From bricks to clicks: the impact of online retailing on transport and the environment. Transport Reviews 2009, 29(6):759-776.
9. Domarchi C., Tudela A., González A. Effect of attitudes, habit and affective appraisal on mode choice: an application to university workers. Transportation 2008, 35(5):585-599.
10. Eluru N., Chakour V., El-Geneidy A.M. Travel mode choice and transit route choice behavior in Montreal: insights from McGill University members commute patterns. Public Transport 2012, 4(2):129-149.
11. Frändberg L., Vilhelmson B. More or less travel: personal mobility trends in the Swedish population focusing gender and cohort. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 19(6):1235-1244.
12. Gutiérrez J., García-Palomares J.C. New spatial patterns of mobility within the metropolitan area of Madrid: towards more complex and dispersed flow networks. Journal of Transport Geography 2007, 15(1):18-30.
13. Haugen K., Vilhelmson B. The divergent role of spatial access: the changing supply and location of service amenities and service travel distance in Sweden. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2013, 49:10-20.
14. Heinen E., Maat K. Are longitudinal data unavoidable? 2012.
15. Heinen E., Maat K., Van Wee B. Day-to-day choice to commute or not by bicycle 2011.
16. Hjorthol R., Gripsrud M. Home as a communication hub: the domestic use of ICT. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 17(2):115-123.
17. Jaakkola T. Paikkatietopohjainen menetelmä autoilun ajoaikojen ja kokonaismatka-aikojen mallintamiseen - esimerkkinä pääkaupunkiseutu (Master's thesis) 2013, Unpublished., Accessed 26.07.14. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/42212.
18. Jain J., Lyons G. The gift of travel time. Journal of Transport Geography 2008, 16(2):81-89.
19. Jäppinen S., Toivonen T., Salonen M. Modelling the potential effect of shared bicycles on public transport travel times in Greater Helsinki: an open data approach. Applied Geography 2013, 43:13-24.
20. Kahila M., Kyttä M. SoftGIS as a bridge builder in collaborative urban planning. Planning support systems: Best practices and new methods 2009, 389-411. Springer, New York. S. Geertman, J. Stillwell (Eds.).
21. Kalenoja H., Häyrynen J.-P. Keskustan pysäköinti osana liikennejärjestelmää - Tampereen keskustan pysäköintitutkimus 2003, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, (in Finnish, abstract in English) Accessed 12.03.13. http://www.tut.fi/verne/wpcontent/uploads/tampereen_keskustan_pysakointitutkimus.pdf.
22. Kennedy C. A comparison of the sustainability of public and private transportation systems: study of the Greater Toronto area. Transportation 2002, 29(4):459-493.
23. Knowles R.D. Transport shaping space: differential collapse in time-space. Journal of Transport Geography 2006, 14(6):407-425.
24. Kurri J., Laakso J.-M. Parking policy measures and their effects in the Helsinki metropolitan area. The Helsinki metropolitan area publication series C 2002:18 2002, Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council (YTV), Helsinki, (in English and Finnish).
25. Kyttä M., Kahila M. SoftGIS methodology. GIM International 2011, 25(3).
26. Kyttä M., Pahkasalo K., Vaattovaara M. Asuminen - eletty unelma. Asumisen unelmat ja arki 2010, 91-150. Gaudeamus, Tallinna, (in Finnish). A. Juntto (Ed.).
27. Lawson A.R., McMorrow K., Ghosh B. Analysis of the non-motorized commuter journeys in major Irish cities. Transport Policy 2013, 27:179-188.
28. Lei T.L., Church R.L. Mapping transit-based access: integrating GIS, routes and schedules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2010, 24(2):283-304.
29. Limtanakool N., Dijst M., Schwanen T. The influence of socioeconomic characteristics, land use and travel time considerations on mode choice for medium- and longer-distance trips. Journal of Transport Geography 2006, 14(5):327-341.
30. 2 emissions related to the accessibility of large retail stores in the Oulu region, Finland. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 19(2):346-354.
31. Macintyre S., Macdonald L., Ellaway A. Lack of agreement between measured and self-reported distance from public green parks in Glasgow, Scotland. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2008, 5.
32. Martens M. Adaptive cities in Europe; interrelationships between urban structure, mobility and regional planning strategies 2006, (PhD thesis), University of Amsterdam.
33. Martin D.J., Jordan H., Roderick P. Taking the bus: incorporating public transport timetable data into health care accessibility modelling. Environment and Planning A 2008, 40(10):2510-2525.
34. McCormack G.R., Cerin E., Leslie E., du Toit L., Owen N. Objective versus perceived walking distances to destinations: correspondence and predictive validity. Environment and Behavior 2008, 40(3):401-425.
35. McDonald N.C. Active transportation to school. Trends among U.S. schoolchildren, 1969-2001. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2007, 32(6):509-516.
36. Mokhtarian P.L., Chen C. TTB or not TTB, that is the question: a review and analysis of the empirical literature on travel time (and money) budgets. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2004, 38(9-10):643-675.
37. Mooney P., Corcoran P., Winstanley A.C. Towards quality metrics for OpenStreetMap 2010, 514-517. Paper presented at the 18th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS 2010, San Jose, CA.
38. Murakami E., Wagner D.P. Can using global positioning system (GPS) improve trip reporting?. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 1999, 7(2-3):149-165.
39. Næss P. Residential location affects travel behavior - but how and why? The case of Copenhagen metropolitan area. Progress in Planning 2005, 63(2):167-257.
40. Næss P. Accessibility, activity participation and location of activities: exploring the links between residential location and travel behaviour. Urban Studies 2006, 43(3):627-652.
41. Næss P. Urban form and travel behavior: experience from a Nordic context. Journal of Transport and Land Use 2012, 5(2):21-45.
42. Nurul Habib K.M., Zaman M.H. Effects of incorporating latent and attitudinal information in mode choice models. Transportation Planning and Technology 2012, 35(5):561-576.
43. Pocewicz A., Nielsen-Pincus M., Brown G., Schnitzer R. An evaluation of internet versus paper-based methods for public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS). Transactions in GIS 2012, 16(1):39-53.
44. Ratvio R. Elämää keskustassa ja kaupunkiseudun reunoilla. Urbaani ja jälkiesikasupungillinen elämäntyyli asumisen valinnoissa ja arkiliikkumisessa Helsingin seudulla 2012, A 15. (PhD thesis), Department of Geosciences and Geography, Helsinki.
45. Salonen M., Toivonen T. Modelling travel time in urban networks: comparable measures for private car and public transport. Journal of Transport Geography 2013, 31:143-153.
46. Salonen M., Toivonen T., Vaattovaara M. Arkiliikkumisen vaihtoehdoista monikeskuksistuvassa metropolissa. Kaksi näkökulmaa palvelujen saavutettavuuteen pääkaupunkiseudulla. Yhdyskuntasuunnittelu 2012, 50(3):8-27. (English abstract).
47. Scheiner J. Interrelations between travel mode choice and trip distance: trends in Germany 1976-2002. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 18(1):75-84.
48. Schmidt-Thomé K., Haybatollahi M., Kyttä M., Korpi J. The prospects for urban densification: a place-based study. Environmental Research Letters 2013, 8(2):025020.
49. Taipale S. The use of e-government services and the internet: the role of socio-demographic, economic and geographical predictors. Telecommunications Policy 2013, 37(4-5):413-422.
50. Thériault M., Vandersmissen M.H., Lee-Gosselin M., Leroux D. Modelling commuter trip length and duration within GIS: application to an O-D survey. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis 1999, 3(1):41-55.
51. Tight M., Timms P., Banister D., Bowmaker J., Copas J., Day A., et al. Visions for a walking and cycling focussed urban transport system. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 19(6):1580-1589.
52. Tran K., Barbeau S., Hillsman E., Labrador M.A. GO_Sync - a framework to synchronize crowd-sourced mapping contributors from online communities and transit agency bus stop inventories. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research 2013, 11(2):54-64.
53. Vilhelmson B. Daily mobility and the use of time for different activities. The case of Sweden. Geojournal 1999, 48(3):177-185.
54. Vredin Johansson M., Heldt T., Johansson P. The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2006, 40(6):507-525.
55. VTT - Technical Research Centre of Finland LIPASTO - a calculation system for traffic exhaust emissions and energy consumption in Finland Accessed 03.07.13. http://lipasto.vtt.fi/indexe.htm.
56. Watts L., Urry J. Moving methods, travelling times. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2008, 26(5):860-874.
57. WEF - World Economic Forum The global competitiveness report 2010-2011 2010.
58. Yang C., Raskin R., Goodchild M., Gahegan M. Geospatial cyberinfrastructure: past, present and future. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2010, 34(4):264-277.
59. Yiannakoulias N., Bland W., Svenson L.W. Estimating the effect of turn penalties and traffic congestion on measuring spatial accessibility to primary health care. Applied Geography 2013, 39:172-182.