Patterns of sweet taste liking: A pilot study

Nutrients

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 7298-7311

  Asao, Keiko ^a,b   Miller, Jason ^a   Arcori, Leann ^a   Lumeng, Julie C ^c   Han Markey, Theresa ^d   Herman, William H ^a,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Liking; Sucrose; Sweet taste; Taste

Indexed keywords

SUCROSE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PILOT STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWEETNESS; TASTE ACUITY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ADOLESCENT; DECISION MAKING; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECTS; FOOD PREFERENCE; MIDDLE AGED; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; SUCROSE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84940842359     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20726643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/nu7095336     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Drewnowski, A. Taste preferences and food intake. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1997, 17, 237-253. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Salbe, A.; DelParigi, A.; Pratley, R.; Drewnowski, A.; Tataranni, P.A. Taste preferences and body weight changes in an obesity-prone population. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 372-378. [PubMed]
3. Thai, P.K.; Tan, E.C.; Tan, W.L.; Tey, T.H.; Kaur, H.; Say, Y.H. Sweetness intensity perception and pleasantness ratings of sucrose, aspartame solutions and cola among multi-ethnic Malaysian subjects. Food Qual. Preference 2011, 22, 281-289. [CrossRef]
4. Grinker, J. Obesity and sweet taste. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1978, 31, 1078-1087. [PubMed]
5. Malcolm, R.; Oneil, P.; Hirsch, A.; Currey, H.; Moskowitz, G. Taste hedonics and thresholds in obesity. Int. J. Obes. 1980, 4, 203-212. [PubMed]
6. Lanfer, A.; Knof, K.; Barba, G.; Veidebaum, T.; Papoutsou, S.; de Henauw, S.; Soos, T.; Moreno, L.A.; Ahrens, W.; Lissner, L. Taste preferences in association with dietary habits and weight status in European children: Results from the IDEFICS study. Int. J. Obes. 2012, 36, 27-34. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Coldwell, S.E.; Mennella, J.A.; Duffy, V.B.; Pelchat, M.L.; Griffith, J.W.; Smutzer, G.; Cowart, B.J.; Breslin, P.A.; Bartoshuk, L.M.; Hastings, L.; et al. Gustation assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology 2013, 80, S20-S24. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Mennella, J.A.; Lukasewycz, L.D.; Griffith, J.W.; Beauchamp, G.K. Evaluation of the Monell forced-choice, paired-comparison tracking procedure for determining sweet taste preferences across the lifespan. Chem. Senses 2011, 36, 345-355. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Asao, K.; Luo, W.; Herman, W.H. Reproducibility of the measurement of sweet taste preferences. Appetite 2012, 59, 927-932. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Looy, H.; Callaghan, S.; Weingarten, H.P. Hedonic response of sucrose likers and dislikers to other gustatory stimuli. Physiol. Behav. 1992, 52, 219-225. [CrossRef]
11. Johnson, W.; Keane, T.; Bonar, J.; Downey, C. Hedonic ratings of sucrose solutions-Effects of body-weight, weight-loss and dietary restriction. Addict. Behav. 1979, 4, 231-236. [CrossRef]
12. Thompson, D.A.; Moskowitz, H.R.; Campbell, R.G. Taste and olfaction in human obesity. Physiol. Behav. 1977, 19, 335-337. [CrossRef]
13. Thompson, D.A.; Moskowitz, H.R.; Campbell, R.G. Effects of body weight and food intake on pleasantness ratings for a sweet stimulus. J. Appl. Physiol. 1976, 41, 77-83. [PubMed]
14. Yeomans, M.R.; Tepper, B.J.; Rietzschel, J.; Prescott, J. Human hedonic responses to sweetness: Role of taste genetics and anatomy. Physiol. Behav. 2007, 91, 264-273. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Pangborn, R. Individual variation in affective responses to taste stimuli. Psychon. Sci. 1970, 21, 125-126. [CrossRef]
16. Lundgren, B.; Jonsson, B.; Pangborn, R.M.; Sontag, A.M.; Barylko-Pikielna, N.; Pietrzak, E.; Garruti, R.S.; Moraes, M.A.C.; Yoshida, M. Taste discrimination vs. hedonic response to sucrose in coffee beverage. An interlaboratory study. Chem. Senses 1978, 3, 249-265. [CrossRef]
17. Witherly, S.A.; Pangborn, R.M.; Stern, J.S. Gustatory responses and eating duration of obese and lean adults. Appetite 1980, 1, 53-63. [CrossRef]
18. Kim, J.-Y.; Prescott, J.; Kim, K.-O. Patterns of sweet liking in sucrose solutions and beverages. Food Qual. Preference 2014, 36, 96-103. [CrossRef]
19. Kampov-Polevoy, A.B.; Tsoi, M.V.; Zvartau, E.E.; Neznanov, N.G.; Khalitov, E. Sweet liking and family history of alcoholism in hospitalized alcoholic and non-alcoholic patients. Alcohol Alcohol. 2001, 36, 165-170. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20. Kampov-Polevoy, A.; Garbutt, J.C.; Janowsky, D. Evidence of preference for a high-concentration sucrose solution in alcoholic men. Am. J. Psychiatry 1997, 154, 269-270. [PubMed]
21. Lange, L.A.; Kampov-Polevoy, A.B.; Garbutt, J.C. Sweet liking and high novelty seeking: Independent phenotypes associated with alcohol-related problems. Alcohol Alcohol. 2010, 45, 431-436. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Bogucka-Bonikowska, A.; Scinska, A.; Koros, E.; Polanowska, E.; Habrat, B.; Woronowicz, B.; Kukwa, A.; Kostowski, W.; Bienkowski, P. Taste responses in alcohol-dependent men. Alcohol Alcohol. 2001, 36, 516-519. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Bogucka-Bonikowska, A.; Baran-Furga, H.; Chmielewska, K.; Habrat, B.; Scinska, A.; Kukwa, A.; Koros, E.; Kostowski,W.; Polanowska, E.; Bienkowski, P. Taste function in methadone-maintained opioid-dependent men. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002, 68, 113-117. [CrossRef]
24. Janowsky, D.S.; Pucilowski, O.; Buyinza, M. Preference for higher sucrose concentrations in cocaine abusing-dependent patients. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2003, 37, 35-41. [CrossRef]
25. Turner-McGrievy, G.; Tate, D.F.; Moore, D.; Popkin, B. Taking the bitter with the sweet: Relationship of supertasting and sweet preference with metabolic syndrome and dietary intake. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78, S336-S342. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Looy, H.; Weingarten, H.P. Effects of metabolic state on sweet taste reactivity in humans depend on underlying hedonic response profile. Chem. Senses 1991, 16, 123-130. [CrossRef]
27. Cabanac, M. Sensory Pleasure. Q. Rev. Biol. 1979, 54, 1-29. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Drewnowski, A. Sweetness and obesity. In Sweetness; Dobbing, J., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 1987; pp. 177-192.
29. CRC Handbook. Concentrative properties of aqueous solutions: Density, refractive index freezing point depression, and viscosity. In CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 92nd ed.; Haynes, W.M., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012.
30. Marsh-Richard, D.M.; Hatzis, E.S.; Mathias, C.W.; Venditti, N.; Dougherty, D.M. Adaptive Visual Analog Scales (AVAS): A modifiable software program for the creation, administration, and scoring of visual analog scales. Behav. Res. Methods 2009, 41, 99-106. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Hankinson, S.E.; Manson, J.E.; Spiegelman, D.; Willett, W.C.; Longcope, C.; Speizer, F.E. Reproducibility of plasma hormone levels in postmenopausal women over a 2-3-year period. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 1995, 4, 649-654. [PubMed]
32. The SAS ICC9 Macro. Available online: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/donna-spiegelman/ software/icc9/ (accessed on 19 August 2015).
33. Ward, J.H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1963, 58, 236-244. [CrossRef]
34. SAS institute Inc. Cubic clustering criterion. In SAS Technical Report; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 1983; p. 56.
35. SAS, version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2002.
36. Kampov-Polevoy, A.B.; Ziedonis, D.; Steinberg, M.L.; Pinsky, I.; Krejci, J.; Eick, C.; Boland, G.; Khalitov, E.; Crews, F.T. Association between sweet preference and paternal history of alcoholism in psychiatric and substance abuse patients. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2003, 27, 1929-1936. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Kampov-Polevoy, A.B.; Garbutt, J.C.; Khalitov, E. Family history of alcoholism and response to sweets. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2003, 27, 1743-1749. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Colantuoni, C.; Schwenker, J.; McCarthy, J.; Rada, P.; Ladenheim, B.; Cadet, J.L.; Schwartz, G.J.; Moran, T.H.; Hoebel, B.G. Excessive sugar intake alters binding to dopamine and mu-opioid receptors in the brain. Neuroreport 2001, 12, 3549-3552. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. Johnson, P.M.; Kenny, P.J. Dopamine D2 receptors in addiction-like reward dysfunction and compulsive eating in obese rats. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13, 635-641. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40. Lawless, H.T.; Heymann, H. Principles of good practice. In Sensory Evaluation of Food; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 57-77.
41. Greene, L.S.; Desor, J.A.; Maller, O. Heredity and experience: Their relative importance in the development of taste preference in man. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1975, 89, 279-284. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Desor, J.A.; Greene, L.S.; Maller, O. Preferences for sweet and salty in 9- to 15-year-old and adult humans. Science 1975, 190, 686-687. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Pepino, M.Y.; Mennella, J.A. Effects of cigarette smoking and family history of alcoholism on sweet taste perception and food cravings in women. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2007, 31, 1891-1899. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Nutrition andWeight Status. Available online: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives 2020/overview.aspx?topicId=29 (accessed on 26 April 2013).