IPeak: An open source tool to combine results from multiple MS/MS search engines

Proteomics

Volumn 15, Issue 17, 2015, Pages 2916-2920

  Wen, Bo ^a,b   Du, Chaoqin ^a   Li, Guilin ^a   Ghali, Fawaz ^c   Jones, Andrew R ^c   Käll, Lukas ^d   Xu, Shaohang ^a   Zhou, Ruo ^a   Ren, Zhe ^a   Feng, Qiang ^a,e   Xu, Xun ^a   Wang, Jun ^a,e,f,g,h  

^a BGI SHENZHEN   (China)

^b BGI Genomics Co Ltd   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^d ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^f KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^g MACAU UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Macao)

^h UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Mass spectrometry; Peptide identification; Shotgun proteomics

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; SEARCH ENGINE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; PEPTIDES; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; PROTEOMICS; SEARCH ENGINE; SOFTWARE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84940580015     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400208     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aebersold, R., Mann, M., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003, 422, 198-207.
2. Eng, J. K., McCormack, A. L., Yates Iii, J. R., An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 5, 976-989.
3. Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J., Creasy, D. M., Cottrell, J. S., Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3551-3567.
4. Fenyo, D., Beavis, R. C., A method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectrometry-based protein identifications using general scoring schemes. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 768-774.
5. Geer, L. Y., Markey, S. P., Kowalak, J. A., Wagner, L. et al., Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 2004, 3, 958-964.
6. Kim, S., Pevzner, P. A., MS-GF+: universal database search tool for mass spectrometry. Nature Commun. 2014, 5, 5277.
7. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Kolker, E., Aebersold, R., Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 5383-5392.
8. Kall, L., Canterbury, J. D., Weston, J., Noble, W. S., MacCoss, M. J., Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat Methods 2007, 4, 923-925.
9. Brosch, M., Yu, L., Hubbard, T., Choudhary, J., Accurate and sensitive peptide identification with Mascot Percolator. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 3176-3181.
10. Xu, M., Li, Z., Li, L., Combining percolator with X!Tandem for accurate and sensitive peptide identification. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 3026-3033.
11. Wen, B., Li, G., Wright, J. C., Du, C. et al., OMSSAPercolator: an automated tool to validate OMSSA result with Percolator. Proteomics 2014, 14, 1011-1014.
12. Granholm, V., Kim, S., Navarro, J. C., Sjolund, E. et al., Fast and accurate database searches with MS-GF+Percolator. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 13, 890-897.
13. Edwards, N., Wu, X., Tseng, C.-W., An unsupervised, model-free, machine-learning combiner for peptide identifications from tandem mass spectra. Clin. Proteomics 2009, 5, 23-36.
14. Kwon, T., Choi, H., Vogel, C., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Marcotte, E. M., MSblender: a probabilistic approach for integrating peptide identifications from multiple database search engines. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 2949-2958.
15. Shteynberg, D., Deutsch, E. W., Lam, H., Eng, J. K. et al., iProphet: multi-level integrative analysis of shotgun proteomic data improves peptide and protein identification rates and error estimates. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2011, 10, M111 007690.
16. Jones, A. R., Siepen, J. A., Hubbard, S. J., Paton, N. W., Improving sensitivity in proteome studies by analysis of false discovery rates for multiple search engines. Proteomics 2009, 9, 1220-1229.
17. Searle, B. C., Turner, M., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Improving sensitivity by probabilistically combining results from multiple MS/MS search methodologies. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 245-253.
18. Ghali, F., Krishna, R., Lukasse, P., Martinez-Bartolome, S. et al., Tools (viewer, library and validator) that facilitate use of the peptide and protein identification standard format, termed mzIdentML. Mol. Cell. Proteomics: MCP 2013, 12, 3026-3035.
19. Reisinger, F., Krishna, R., Ghali, F., Rios, D. et al., jmzIdentML API: a Java interface to the mzIdentML standard for peptide and protein identification data. Proteomics 2012, 12, 790-794.
20. Barsnes, H., Huber, S., Sickmann, A., Eidhammer, I., Martens, L., OMSSA Parser: an open-source library to parse and extract data from OMSSA MS/MS search results. Proteomics 2009, 9, 3772-3774.
21. Muth, T., Vaudel, M., Barsnes, H., Martens, L., Sickmann, A., XTandem Parser: an open-source library to parse and analyse X!Tandem MS/MS search results. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1522-1524.
22. Granholm, V., Noble, W. S., Kall, L., On using samples of known protein content to assess the statistical calibration of scores assigned to peptide-spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 2671-2678.
23. Granholm, V., Navarro, J. F., Noble, W. S., Kall, L., Determining the calibration of confidence estimation procedures for unique peptides in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteomics 2012, 80C, 123-131.
24. Elias, J. E., Gygi, S. P., Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 207-214.