Handling controversial arguments in bipolar argumentation systems

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 144, Issue , 2006, Pages 261-272

  Cayrol, Claudette ^a   Devred, Caroline ^b   Lagasquie Schiex, Marie Christine ^a  

^a IRIT   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ D'ARTOIS   (France)

Author keywords

Argumentation Frameworks

Indexed keywords

PROBLEM SOLVING;

ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; ARGUMENTATION SYSTEMS; BIPOLAR ARGUMENTATION;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84940553005     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. P. Krause, S. Ambler, M. Elvang-Gøransson, and J. Fox. A logic of argumentation for reasoning under uncertainty, Computational Intelligence, 11, 113-131, 1995.
2. H. Prakken and G. Vreeswijk. Logics for defeaseable argumentation. In D.M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edition, volume 4, pages 219-318. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002.
3. L. Amgoud, N. Maudet, and S. Parsons. Arguments, dialogue and negotiation. In 16th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2004), pages 338-342, 2004.
4. N. Karacapilidis and D. Papadias. Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the HERMES system. Information systems, 26(4):259-277, 2001.
5. B. Verheij. Deflog: on the logical interpretation of prima facie justified assumptions. Journal of Logic and Computation, 13:319-346, 2003.
6. P.M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2):321-358, 1995.
7. S. Coste-Marquis, C. Devred, and P. Marquis. Prudent semantics for argumentation frameworks. In The 17th IEEE International Conf. on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 2005), pages 568-572, 2005.
8. S. Coste-Marquis, C. Devred, and P. Marquis. Sémantiques prudentes pour les systèmes d'argumentation. In 15e congrès francophone AFRIF-AFIA Reconnaissance des Formes et Intelligence Artificielle (RFIA 2006), 2006.
9. C. Cayrol and M-C. Lagasquie-Schiex. On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In 8th European Conf. on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2005), volume LNAI 3571, pages 378-389, 2005.
10. C. Cayrol and M-C. Lagasquie-Schiex. Gradual valuation for bipolar argumentation frameworks. In 8th European Conf. on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2005), volume LNAI 3571, pages 366-377, 2005.
11. M.Mardi, C. Cayrol, andM-C. Lagasquie-Schiex. Bipolarité en argumentation : acceptabilité et algorithmes. Rapport interne IRIT 2005-20-R, IRIT-UPS, Octobre 2005.
12. C. Cayrol, S. Doutre, and J. Mengin. Dialectical proof theories for the credulous preferred semantics of argumentation framework. In 6th European Conf. on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU-2001), volume LNAI 2143, pages 668-679, 2001.
13. P.E. Dunne and T.J.M. Bench-Capon. Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency. Artificial Intelligence, 149(2):221-250, 2003.
14. S. Coste-Marquis, C. Devred, and P. Marquis. Contrained argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of the 10th International Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR' 06), pages 112-122, 2006.
15. P. Baroni and M. Giacomin. Solving semantic problems with odd-length cycles in argumentation. In Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty,7th European Conf., ECSQARU 2003, volume LNAI 2711, pages 440-451, 2003.
16. A.C. Kakas, P. Mancarella, and P.M. Dung. The acceptability semantics for logic programs. In Proc. of 11th International Conf. on Logic Programming (ICLP), pages 504-519, MIT Press, 1994.
17. A.C. Kakas and F. Toni. Computing Argumentation in Logic Programming. Journal of Logic and Computation, 9(4):515-562, 1999.
18. S. Doutre. Autour de la sémantique préféreé des systèmes d'argumentation. PhD thesis, Université Paul Sabatier de Toulouse, 2002.
19. S. Coste-Marquis, C. Devred, and P. Marquis. Inference from controversial arguments. In The 12th International Conf. on Logic for Programming Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning (LPAR 2005), LNAI 3835, pp. 606-620, 2005.
20. A.C. Kakas and P. Moraïtis. Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. In Proc. of International Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), pages 883-890. ACM Press, 2003.