Gradual valuation for bipolar argumentation frameworks

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3571 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 366-377

  Cayrol, C ^a   Lagasquie Schiex, M C ^a  

^a IRIT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; SPEECH ANALYSIS; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

BIPOLAR ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; INTERACTION;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 26944469567     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11518655_32     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77 (1995) 321-357
2. Fox, J., Parsons, S.: On using arguments for reasoning about values and actions. In: Proc. of AAAI-Symposium on qualitative preferences in deliberation and practical reasoning. (1997) 55-63
3. th ECSQARU-FAPR, LNAI 1244. (1997) 466-480
4. th ECAI. (2000) 338-342
5. Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Agents that reason and negociate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 8 (1998) 261-292
6. Karacapilidis, N., Papadias, D.: Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system. Information systems 26 (2001) 259-277
7. th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. (1997) 10-18
8. th NMR. (2002) 416-425
9. th ICMAS. (2000) 31-38
10. th KR. (2004)
11. Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Volume 104. Journal of Artificial Intelligence (1998)
12. Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sonenbcrg, L.: Argumentation-based negotiation. Knowledge engineering review (2004)
13. Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N., Sierra, C.: Persuasive negotiation for autonomous agents: a rhetorical approach. In: CMNA. (2003)
14. Rahwan, I., Soncnberg, L., Dignum, F.: Towards interest-based negotiation. In: AAMAS'2003. (2003)
15. Jakobovits, H., Vermeir, D.: Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks. Journal of logic and computation 9(2) (1999) 215-261
16. Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artificial Intelligence 128 (1-2) (2001) 203-235
17. Pollock, J.L.: Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification. Artificial Intelligence 133 (2001) 233-282
18. Hunter, A.: Making argumentation more believable. In: Proc. of AAAI-04. (2004)
19. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Automated Reasoning 29 (2002) 125-169
20. Bench-Capon, T.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13 (2003) 429-448
21. Simari, G., Loui, R.: A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence 53 (1992) 125-157
22. Geffner, H., Pearl, J.: Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 53 (1992) 209-244
23. th UAI. (1993) 114-121
24. th UAI. (1993) 411-419
25. Dung, P., Son, T.C.: An argument-based approach to reasoning with specificity. Artificial Intelligence 133 (2001) 35-85
26. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 (1997) 25-75
27. Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: Abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (1996) 275-296
28. Krause, P., Ambler, S., Elvang, M., Fox, J.: A logic of argumentation for reasoning under uncertainty. Computational Intelligence 11 (1) (1995) 113-131
29. th NMR - Uncertainty Frameworks subworkshop. (2000) 391-398
30. Pollock, J.L.: How to reason defeasibly. Artificial Intelligence 57 (1992) 1-42
31. tH NMR, Uncertainty Framework subworkshop. (2004) 1-9
32. th KR. (1994) 75-86
33. th KR. (1994) 530-539
34. Lang, J., Van der Torre, L., Weydert, E.: Utilitarian desires. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agents Systems 5(3) (2002) 329-363
35. th KR. (2002) 158-169
36. Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Gradual handling of contradiction in argumentation frameworks. In: Intelligent Systems for Information Processing: From representation to Applications. Elsevier (2003) 179-190
37. Amgoud, L.: Contribution À l'intÉgration des préférences dans le raisonnement argumentatif. PhD thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse (1999)