Inference from controversial arguments

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3835 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 606-620

  Coste Marquis, Sylvie ^a   Devred, Caroline ^a   Marquis, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ARTOIS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; INFORMATION SCIENCE; SEMANTICS;

ARGUMENTATION; INFERENCE RELATIONS;

INFERENCE ENGINES;

EID: 33745437618     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11591191_42     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press (1958)
2. nd edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2002) 219-318
3. Bondarenko, A., Dung, P.M., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Art. Intelligence 93 (1997) 63-101
4. Kakas, A., Toni, F.: Computing argumentation in logic programming. J. of Logic and Computation 9 (1999) 515-562
5. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Art. Intelligence 77 (1995) 321-358
6. Pollock, J.: How to reason defeasibly. Art. Intelligence 57 (1992) 1-42
7. Simari, G., Loui, R.: A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Art. Intelligence 53 (1992) 125-157
8. Elvang-Gøransson, M., Fox, J., Krause, P.: Acceptability of arguments as logical uncertainty. In: ECSQARU'93. Volume 747 of LNCS. (1993) 85-90
9. Elvang-Gøransson, M., Fox, J., Krause, P.: Dialectic reasoning with inconsistent information. In: UAI'93. (1993) 114-121
10. Elvang-Gøransson, M., Hunter, A.: Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information. Data and Knowledge Engineering 16 (1995) 125-145
11. Vreeswijk, G.: Abstract argumentation systems. Art. Intelligence 90 (1997) 225-279
12. Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Art. Intelligence 128 (2001) 203-235
13. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. J. of Automated Reasoning 29 (2002) 125-169
14. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Ann. of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34 (2002) 197-215
15. Cayrol, C.: From non-monotonic syntax-based entailment to preference-based argumentation. In: ECSQARU'95. Volume 946 of LNAI. (1995)
16. Dimopoulos, Y., Nebel, B., Toni, F.: On the computional complexity of assumption-based argumentation for default reasoning. Art. Intelligence 141 (2002) 57-78
17. Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., G.Guida: Extending abstract argumentation systems theory. Art. Intelligence 120 (2000) 251-270
18. Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: Solving semantic problems with odd-length cycles in argumentation. In: ECSQARU'03. Volume 2711 of LNAI. (2003) 440-451
19. Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: A recursive approach to argumentation: motivation and perspectives. In: NMR'04. (2004) 50-58
20. Cayrol, C., Doutre, S., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C., Mengin, J.: Minimal defence: a refinement of the preferred semantics for argumentation frameworks. In: NMR'02. (2002) 408-415
21. Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Gradual handling of contradiction in argumentation frameworks. In: IPMU'02. (2002) 83-90
22. Dunne, P., Bench-Capon, T.: Complexity and combinatorial properties of argument systems. Technical report, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Liverpool (2001)
23. Doutre, S.: Autour de la sémantique préférée des systèmes d'argumentation. Thèse de doctorat d'université, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse (2002)
24. Papadimitriou, C.: Computational complexity. Addison-Wesley (1994)
25. Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Marquis, P.: Symmetric argumentation frameworks. In: ECSQARU'05. Volume 3571 of LNCS. (2005) 317-328
26. Dimopoulos, Y., Torres, A.: Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories. Theoretical Computer Science 170 (1996) 209-244
27. Dunne, P., Bench-Capon, T: Coherence in finite argument system. Art. Intelligence 141 (2002) 187-203
28. Vreeswijk, G., Prakken, H.: Credulous and sceptical argument games for preferred semantics. In: JELIA'00. (2000) 224-238
29. Cayrol, C., Doutre, S., Mengin, J.: On decision problems related to the preferred semantics for argumentation frameworks. J. of Logic and Computation 13 (2003) 377-403
30. Doutre, S., Mengin, J.: On sceptical vs credulous acceptance for abstract argument systems. In: NMR'04. (2004) 134-139
31. Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation framework. In: ECSQARU'05. Volume 3571 of LNCS. (2005) 378-389