On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3571 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 378-389

  Cayrol, C ^a   Lagasquie Schiex, M C ^a  

^a IRIT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SEMANTICS;

ACCEPTABILITY; BIPOLAR ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; COHERENCE REQUIREMENT;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 26944495285     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11518655_33     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non-monotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77 (1995) 321-357
2. Krause, P., Ambler, S., Elvang, M., Fox, J.: A logic of argumentation for reasoning under uncertainty. Computational Intelligence 11 (1) (1995) 113-131
3. th ECAI (European Conference of Artifical Intelligence), Berlin, Germany (2000) 338-342
4. Parsons, S., Sierra, G., Jennings, N.R.: Agents that reason and negociate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 8 (1998) 261-292
5. Karacapilidis, N., Papadias, D.: Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system. Information systems 26 (2001) 259-277
6. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34 (2002) 197-216
7. Verheij, B.: On the existence and multiplicity of extension in dialectical argumentation. In Benferhat, S., Giunchiglia, E., eds.: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR'2002). (2002) 416-425
8. Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: Logics for defeasible argumentation. In Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F., eds.: Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Volume 4. Kluwer Academic (2002) 218-319
9. Bench-Capon, T.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13 (2003) 429-448
10. Chesñevar, C.I., Maguitman, A.G., Loui, R.P.: Logical models of argument. ACM Computing surveys 32 (2000) 337-383
11. th NMR workshop (Non Monotonic Reasoning), Uncertainty Framework subworkshop, Whistler, BC, Canada (2004) 1-9
12. th KR, Bonn, Germany (1994) 75-86
13. th KR, Bonn, Germany (1994) 530-539
14. Lang, J., Van der Torre, L., Weydert, E.: Utilitarian desires. Journal of Autonomous Agents arid Multi-Agents Systems 5(3) (2002) 329-363
15. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Bipolar representation and fusion of preferences in the possibilistic logic framework. In: Proceedings of the eighth International Conference on Principle of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'02). (2002) 158-169
16. Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Gradual handling of contradiction in argumentation frameworks. In Bouchon-Meunier, B., L.Foulloy, Yager, R., eds.: Intelligent Systems for Information Processing: From representation to Applications. Elsevier (2003) 179-190
17. Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Arguments. Cambridge University Press, Mass. (1958)