Non-invasive Human Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience: A Primer

Neuron

Volumn 87, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 932-945

  Parkin, Beth L ^a   Ekhtiari, Hamed ^b,c   Walsh, Vincent F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Iranian Institute for Cognitive Sciences Studies ICSS   (Iran)

^c TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; DRUG DEPENDENCE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE EXCITABILITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STIMULUS RESPONSE; THERAPY EFFECT; TRANSCRANIAL ALTERNATING CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL RANDOM NOISE STIMULATION; TREATMENT DURATION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DEVICES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; IMAGE PROCESSING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84940501018     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.032     Document Type: Review

References (159)

1. Agosta S., Herpich F., Miceli G., Ferraro F., Battelli L. Contralesional rTMS relieves visual extinction in chronic stroke. Neuropsychologia 2014, 62:269-276.
2. Amassian V.E., Cracco R.Q., Maccabee P.J., Cracco J.B., Rudell A., Eberle L. Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1989, 74:458-462.
3. Amassian V.E., Cracco R.Q., Maccabee P.J., Cracco J.B., Rudell A.P., Eberle L. Unmasking human visual perception with the magnetic coil and its relationship to hemispheric asymmetry. Brain Res. 1993, 605:312-316.
4. Andrade A.C., Magnavita G.M., Allegro J.V.B.N., Neto C.E.B.P., Lucena R.D.C.S., Fregni F. Feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation use in children aged 5 to 12 years. J. Child Neurol. 2013, 29:1360-1365.
5. Antal A., Nitsche M.A., Kruse W., Kincses T.Z., Hoffmann K.P., Paulus W. Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16:521-527.
6. Batsikadze G., Moliadze V., Paulus W., Kuo M.F., Nitsche M.A. Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J. Physiol. 2013, 591:1987-2000.
7. Battelli L., Van Rullen R., Pascual-Leone A. The continuous wagon wheel illusion and the 'when' pathway of the right parietal lobe: An rTMS study. J. Vis. 2008, 8. 355-355.
8. Baudewig J., Siebner H.R., Bestmann S., Tergau F., Tings T., Paulus W., Frahm J. Functional MRI of cortical activations induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Neuroreport 2001, 12:3543-3548.
9. Bestmann S. The physiological basis of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:81-83.
10. Bestmann S., Feredoes E. Combined neurostimulation and neuroimaging in cognitive neuroscience: past, present, and future. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 2013, 1296:11-30.
11. Bestmann S., Baudewig J., Siebner H.R., Rothwell J.C., Frahm J. Subthreshold high-frequency TMS of human primary motor cortex modulates interconnected frontal motor areas as detected by interleaved fMRI-TMS. Neuroimage 2003, 20:1685-1696.
12. Bestmann S., Baudewig J., Siebner H.R., Rothwell J.C., Frahm J. Functional MRI of the immediate impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical and subcortical motor circuits. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 19:1950-1962.
13. Bestmann S., Baudewig J., Siebner H.R., Rothwell J.C., Frahm J. BOLD MRI responses to repetitive TMS over human dorsal premotor cortex. Neuroimage 2005, 28:22-29.
14. Bestmann S., de Berker A.O., Bonaiuto J. Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2015, 19:13-20.
15. Bikson M., Rahman A. Origins of specificity during tDCS: anatomical, activity-selective, and input-bias mechanisms. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:688.
16. Boggio P.S., Sultani N., Fecteau S., Merabet L., Mecca T., Pascual-Leone A., Basaglia A., Fregni F. Prefrontal cortex modulation using transcranial DC stimulation reduces alcohol craving: a double-blind, sham-controlled study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008, 92:55-60.
17. Boggio P.S., Liguori P., Sultani N., Rezende L., Fecteau S., Fregni F. Cumulative priming effects of cortical stimulation on smoking cue-induced craving. Neurosci. Lett. 2009, 463:82-86.
18. Boggio P.S., Campanhã C., Valasek C.A., Fecteau S., Pascual-Leone A., Fregni F. Modulation of decision-making in a gambling task in older adults with transcranial direct current stimulation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 31:593-597.
19. Brunoni A.R., Nitsche M.A., Bolognini N., Bikson M., Wagner T., Merabet L., Edwards D.J., Valero-Cabre A., Rotenberg A., Pascual-Leone A., et al. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimulat. 2012, 5:175-195.
20. Brunoni A.R., Shiozawa P., Truong D., Javitt D.C., Elkis H., Fregni F., Bikson M. Understanding tDCS effects in schizophrenia: a systematic review of clinical data and an integrated computation modeling analysis. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2014, 11:383-394.
21. Buch E.R., Mars R.B., Boorman E.D., Rushworth M.F. A network centered on ventral premotor cortex exerts both facilitatory and inhibitory control over primary motor cortex during action reprogramming. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:1395-1401.
22. Callaway N. Shocks to the brain improve mathematical abilities. Nature 2013, News 16 May 2013. 10.1038/nature.2013.13012.
23. Cappelletti M., Gessaroli E., Hithersay R., Mitolo M., Didino D., Kanai R., Cohen Kadosh R., Walsh V. Transfer of cognitive training across magnitude dimensions achieved with concurrent brain stimulation of the parietal lobe. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:14899-14907.
24. Carreiras M., Pattamadilok C., Meseguer E., Barber H., Devlin J.T. Broca's area plays a causal role in morphosyntactic processing. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:816-820.
25. Catmur C., Mars R.B., Rushworth M.F., Heyes C. Making mirrors: premotor cortex stimulation enhances mirror and counter-mirror motor facilitation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:2352-2362.
26. Cattaneo L. Tuning of ventral premotor cortex neurons to distinct observed grasp types: a TMS-priming study. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 207:165-172.
27. Cattaneo Z., Rota F., Vecchi T., Silvanto J. Using state-dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate letter selectivity in the left posterior parietal cortex: a comparison of TMS-priming and TMS-adaptation paradigms. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:1924-1929.
28. Cattaneo Z., Rota F., Walsh V., Vecchi T., Silvanto J. TMS-adaptation reveals abstract letter selectivity in the left posterior parietal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:2321-2325.
29. Cattaneo L., Sandrini M., Schwarzbach J. State-dependent TMS reveals a hierarchical representation of observed acts in the temporal, parietal, and premotor cortices. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:2252-2258.
30. Cattaneo Z., Devlin J.T., Salvini F., Vecchi T., Silvanto J. The causal role of category-specific neuronal representations in the left ventral premotor cortex (PMv) in semantic processing. Neuroimage 2010, 49:2728-2734.
31. Cattaneo Z., Bona S., Silvanto J. Cross-adaptation combined with TMS reveals a functional overlap between vision and imagery in the early visual cortex. Neuroimage 2012, 59:3015-3020.
32. Chaieb L., Paulus W., Antal A. Evaluating aftereffects of short-duration transcranial random noise stimulation on cortical excitability. Neural Plast. 2011, 2011:105927.
33. Chen R., Classen J., Gerloff C., Celnik P., Wassermann E.M., Hallett M., Cohen L.G. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1997, 48:1398-1403.
34. Chi R.P., Snyder A.W. Brain stimulation enables the solution of an inherently difficult problem. Neurosci. Lett. 2012, 515:121-124.
35. Chi R.P., Fregni F., Snyder A.W. Visual memory improved by non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Res. 2010, 1353:168-175.
36. Classen J., Stefan K. Changes in TMS measures induced by repetitive TMS. The Oxford Handbook of Transcranial Stimulation 2008, 185-200. Oxford University Press Inc. E.M. Wassermann, V. Walsh, T. Paus, S. Lisanby (Eds.).
37. Cohen Kadosh R., Soskic S., Iuculano T., Kanai R., Walsh V. Modulating neuronal activity produces specific and long-lasting changes in numerical competence. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:2016-2020.
38. Conti C.L., Nakamura-Palacios E.M. Bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex changes the drug-cued reactivity in the anterior cingulate cortex of crack-cocaine addicts. Brain Stimulat. 2014, 7:130-132.
39. Conti C.L., Moscon J.A., Fregni F., Nitsche M.A., Nakamura-Palacios E.M. Cognitive related electrophysiological changes induced by non-invasive cortical electrical stimulation in crack-cocaine addiction. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014, 17:1465-1475.
40. da Silva M.C., Conti C.L., Klauss J., Alves L.G., do Nascimento Cavalcante H.M., Fregni F., Nitsche M.A., Nakamura-Palacios E.M. Behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induced dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plasticity in alcohol dependence. J. Physiol. Paris 2013, 107:493-502.
41. Datta A., Baker J.M., Bikson M., Fridriksson J. Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient. Brain Stimulat. 2011, 4:169-174.
42. Davis N.J. Neurodoping: brain stimulation as a performance-enhancing measure. Sports Med. 2013, 43:649-653.
43. Davis N.J. Transcranial stimulation of the developing brain: a plea for extreme caution. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:600.
44. Dayan E., Censor N., Buch E.R., Sandrini M., Cohen L.G. Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16:838-844.
45. Dmochowski J.P., Datta A., Bikson M., Su Y., Parra L.C. Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target. J. Neural Eng. 2011, 8:046011.
46. Dmochowski J.P., Datta A., Huang Y., Richardson J.D., Bikson M., Fridriksson J., Parra L.C. Targeted transcranial direct current stimulation for rehabilitation after stroke. Neuroimage 2013, 75:12-19.
47. Donoghue J.P. Connecting cortex to machines: recent advances in brain interfaces. Nature Neurosci. 2002, 5:1085-1088.
48. Duecker F., Formisano E., Sack A.T. Hemispheric differences in the voluntary control of spatial attention: direct evidence for a right-hemispheric dominance within frontal cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2013, 25:1332-1342.
49. Dugué L., Marque P., VanRullen R. The phase of ongoing oscillations mediates the causal relation between brain excitation and visual perception. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:11889-11893.
50. Duncan K.J., Pattamadilok C., Devlin J.T. Investigating occipito-temporal contributions to reading with TMS. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:739-750.
51. Duque J., Olivier E., Rushworth M. Top-down inhibitory control exerted by the medial frontal cortex during action selection under conflict. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2013, 25:1634-1648.
52. Dzhelyova M.P., Ellison A., Atkinson A.P. Event-related repetitive TMS reveals distinct, critical roles for right OFA and bilateral posterior STS in judging the sex and trustworthiness of faces. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:2782-2796.
53. Edwards D., Cortes M., Datta A., Minhas P., Wassermann E.M., Bikson M. Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS. Neuroimage 2013, 74:266-275.
54. Ekhtiari H., Bashir S. Brain stimulation technology in addiction medicine; main problems waiting for solutions. Basic Clin. Neurosci. 2010, 1:3-4.
55. Ellison A., Cowey A. Differential and co-involvement of areas of the temporal and parietal streams in visual tasks. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1609-1614.
56. Ellison A., Lane A.R., Schenk T. The interaction of brain regions during visual search processing as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:2579-2584.
57. Fecteau S., Knoch D., Fregni F., Sultani N., Boggio P., Pascual-Leone A. Diminishing risk-taking behavior by modulating activity in the prefrontal cortex: a direct current stimulation study. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:12500-12505.
58. Fecteau S., Agosta S., Hone-Blanchet A., Fregni F., Boggio P., Ciraulo D., Pascual-Leone A. Modulation of smoking and decision-making behaviors with transcranial direct current stimulation in tobacco smokers: a preliminary study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014, 140:78-84.
59. Flöel A. tDCS-enhanced motor and cognitive function in neurological diseases. Neuroimage 2014, 85:934-947.
60. Fregni F., Liguori P., Fecteau S., Nitsche M.A., Pascual-Leone A., Boggio P.S. Cortical stimulation of the prefrontal cortex with transcranial direct current stimulation reduces cue-provoked smoking craving: a randomized, sham-controlled study. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2008, 69:32-40.
61. Gorini A., Lucchiari C., Russell-Edu W., Pravettoni G. Modulation of risky choices in recently abstinent dependent cocaine users: a transcranial direct-current stimulation study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:661.
62. Grundey J., Thirugnanasambandam N., Kaminsky K., Drees A., Skwirba A.C., Lang N., Paulus W., Nitsche M.A. Neuroplasticity in cigarette smokers is altered under withdrawal and partially restituted by nicotine exposition. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:4156-4162.
63. Guse B., Falkai P., Wobrock T. Cognitive effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review. J. Neural Transm. 2010, 117:105-122.
64. Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer. Neuron 2007, 55:187-199.
65. Hanslmayr S., Aslan A., Staudigl T., Klimesch W., Herrmann C.S., Bäuml K.H. Prestimulus oscillations predict visual perception performance between and within subjects. Neuroimage 2007, 37:1465-1473.
66. Hecht D., Walsh V., Lavidor M. Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates decision making in a probabilistic guessing task. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:4241-4245.
67. Hirnstein M., Bayer U., Ellison A., Hausmann M. TMS over the left angular gyrus impairs the ability to discriminate left from right. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:29-33.
68. Horvath J.C., Forte J.D., Carter O. Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review. Neuropsychologia 2015, 66:213-236.
69. Horvath J.C., Forte J.D., Carter O. Transcranial direct current stimulation demonstrates little-to-no reliable or significant effect on any cognitive/behavioral or neurophysiologic outcome measure: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Brain Stimulat. 2015, 2:318-319.
70. Huang Y.Z., Edwards M.J., Rounis E., Bhatia K.P., Rothwell J.C. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 2005, 45:201-206.
71. Ilmoniemi R.J., Virtanen J., Ruohonen J., Karhu J., Aronen H.J., Näätänen R., Katila T. Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity. Neuroreport 1997, 8:3537-3540.
72. Jacobson L., Koslowsky M., Lavidor M. tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp. Brain Res. 2012, 216:1-10.
73. Klauss J., Penido Pinheiro L.C., Silva Merlo B.L., Correia Santos G.D.A., Fregni F., Nitsche M.A., Miyuki Nakamura-Palacios E. A randomized controlled trial of targeted prefrontal cortex modulation with tDCS in patients with alcohol dependence. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014, 17:1793-1803.
74. Ko J.H., Monchi O., Ptito A., Bloomfield P., Houle S., Strafella A.P. Theta burst stimulation-induced inhibition of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reveals hemispheric asymmetry in striatal dopamine release during a set-shifting task: a TMS-[(11)C]raclopride PET study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:2147-2155.
75. Kounios J., Beeman M. The aha! moment the cognitive neuroscience of insight. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 18:210-216.
76. Kuo M.F., Paulus W., Nitsche M.A. Therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with direct currents (tDCS) in neuropsychiatric diseases. Neuroimage 2014, 85:948-960.
77. Lane A.R., Smith D.T., Schenk T., Ellison A. The involvement of posterior parietal cortex in feature and conjunction visuomotor search. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:1964-1972.
78. Lane A.R., Smith D.T., Schenk T., Ellison A. The involvement of posterior parietal cortex and frontal eye fields in spatially primed visual search. Brain Stimulat. 2012, 5:11-17.
79. Lane A.R., Ball K., Smith D.T., Schenk T., Ellison A. Near and far space: Understanding the neural mechanisms of spatial attention. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013, 34:356-366.
80. Levasseur-Moreau J., Brunelin J., Fecteau S. Non-invasive brain stimulation can induce paradoxical facilitation. Are these neuroenhancements transferable and meaningful to security services?. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:449.
81. Mahayana I.T., Tcheang L., Chen C.Y., Juan C.H., Muggleton N.G. The precuneus and visuospatial attention in near and far space: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain Stimulat. 2014, 7:673-679.
82. Mathewson K.E., Lleras A., Beck D.M., Fabiani M., Ro T., Gratton G. Pulsed out of awareness: EEG alpha oscillations represent a pulsed-inhibition of ongoing cortical processing. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2:99.
83. Meinzer M., Lindenberg R., Antonenko D., Flaisch T., Flöel A. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation temporarily reverses age-associated cognitive decline and functional brain activity changes. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:12470-12478.
84. Meng Z., Liu C., Yu C., Ma Y. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the frontal-parietal-temporal area attenuates smoking behavior. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2014, 54:19-25.
85. Minhas P., Bikson M., Woods A.J., Rosen A.R., Kessler S.K. Transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric brain: a computational modeling study. Conf. Proc. IEEE. Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2012, 2012:859-862.
86. Moliadze V., Schmanke T., Andreas S., Lyzhko E., Freitag C.M., Siniatchkin M. Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2015, 126:1392-1399.
87. Moreno-Duarte I., Morse L.R., Alam M., Bikson M., Zafonte R., Fregni F. Targeted therapies using electrical and magnetic neural stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain in spinal cord injury. Neuroimage 2014, 85:1003-1013.
88. Moser E.I., Kropff E., Moser M.B. Place cells, grid cells, and the brain's spatial representation system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 31:69-89.
89. Moser E.I., Roudi Y., Witter M.P., Kentros C., Bonhoeffer T., Moser M.B. Grid cells and cortical representation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15:466-481.
90. Mullin C.R., Steeves J.K. TMS to the lateral occipital cortex disrupts object processing but facilitates scene processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:4174-4184.
91. Nakamura-Palacios E.M., de Almeida Benevides M.C., da Penha Zago-Gomes M., de Oliveira R.W.D., de Vasconcellos V.F., de Castro L.N.P., et al. Auditory event-related potentials (P3) and cognitive changes induced by frontal direct current stimulation in alcoholics according to Lesch alcoholism typology. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012, 15:601-616.
92. Neubert F.X., Mars R.B., Buch E.R., Olivier E., Rushworth M.F. Cortical and subcortical interactions during action reprogramming and their related white matter pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:13240-13245.
93. Neubert F.X., Mars R.B., Olivier E., Rushworth M.F. Modulation of short intra-cortical inhibition during action reprogramming. Exp. Brain Res. 2011, 211:265-276.
94. Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 2001, 57:1899-1901.
95. Nitsche M.A., Nitsche M.S., Klein C.C., Tergau F., Rothwell J.C., Paulus W. Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003, 114:600-604.
96. Packer A.M., Roska B., Häusser M. Targeting neurons and photons for optogenetics. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16:805-815.
97. Papeo L., Lingnau A., Agosta S., Pascual-Leone A., Battelli L., Caramazza A. The origin of word-related motor activity. Cereb. Cortex 2015, 25:1668-1675.
98. Pasley B.N., Allen E.A., Freeman R.D. State-dependent variability of neuronal responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the visual cortex. Neuron 2009, 62:291-303.
99. Pedron S., Monnin J., Haffen E., Sechter D., Van Waes V. Repeated transcranial direct current stimulation prevents abnormal behaviors associated with abstinence from chronic nicotine consumption. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014, 39:981-988.
100. Phillips K.A., Epstein D.H., Preston K.L. Psychostimulant addiction treatment. Neuropharmacology 2014, 87:150-160.
101. Pitcher D. Discriminating facial expressions takes longer in the posterior superior temporal sulcus than in the occipital face area. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34:9173-9177.
102. Pitcher D., Walsh V., Yovel G., Duchaine B. TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:1568-1573.
103. Pitcher D., Garrido L., Walsh V., Duchaine B.C. Transcranial magnetic stimulation disrupts the perception and embodiment of facial expressions. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:8929-8933.
104. Pitcher D., Charles L., Devlin J.T., Walsh V., Duchaine B. Triple dissociation of faces, bodies, and objects in extrastriate cortex. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:319-324.
105. Pitcher D., Walsh V., Duchaine B. The role of the occipital face area in the cortical face perception network. Exp. Brain Res. 2011, 209:481-493.
106. Pitcher D., Duchaine B., Walsh V., Yovel G., Kanwisher N. The role of the occipital face area and lateral occipital area in the face inversion effect. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:3448-3453.
107. Pitcher D., Goldhaber T., Duchaine B., Walsh V., Kanwisher N. Two critical and functionally distinct stages of face and body perception. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:15877-15885.
108. Pitcher D., Duchaine B., Walsh V. Combined TMS and FMRI reveal dissociable cortical pathways for dynamic and static face perception. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24:2066-2070.
109. Plow E.B., Cattaneo Z., Carlson T.A., Alvarez G.A., Pascual-Leone A., Battelli L. The compensatory dynamic of inter-hemispheric interactions in visuospatial attention revealed using rTMS and fMRI. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:226.
110. Pripfl J., Lamm C. Focused transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates specific domains of self-regulation. Neurosci. Res. 2015, 91:41-47.
111. Ridding M.C., Ziemann U. Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non-invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects. J. Physiol. 2010, 588:2291-2304.
112. Romei V., Brodbeck V., Michel C., Amedi A., Pascual-Leone A., Thut G. Spontaneous fluctuations in posterior α-band EEG activity reflect variability in excitability of human visual areas. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:2010-2018.
113. Romei V., Rihs T., Brodbeck V., Thut G. Resting electroencephalogram alpha-power over posterior sites indexes baseline visual cortex excitability. Neuroreport 2008, 19:203-208.
114. Ronconi L., Basso D., Gori S., Facoetti A. TMS on right frontal eye fields induces an inflexible focus of attention. Cereb. Cortex 2014, 24:396-402.
115. Rossini P.M., Barker A.T., Berardelli A., Caramia M.D., Caruso G., Cracco R.Q., Dimitrijević M.R., Hallett M., Katayama Y., Lücking C.H., et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1994, 91:79-92.
116. Rossini P.M., Burke D., Chen R., Cohen L.G., Daskalakis Z., Di Iorio R., Di Lazzaro V., Ferreri F., Fitzgerald P.B., George M.S., et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2015, 126:1071-1107.
117. Rostami M., Golesorkhi M., Ekhtiari H. Methodological dimensions of transcranial brain stimulation with the electrical current in human. Basic Clin. Neurosci. 2013, 4:190-208.
118. Sack A.T. Does TMS need functional imaging?. Cortex 2010, 46:131-133.
119. Sack A.T., Kohler A., Bestmann S., Linden D.E., Dechent P., Goebel R., Baudewig J. Imaging the brain activity changes underlying impaired visuospatial judgments: simultaneous FMRI, TMS, and behavioral studies. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:2841-2852.
120. Sack A.T., Cohen Kadosh R., Schuhmann T., Moerel M., Walsh V., Goebel R. Optimizing functional accuracy of TMS in cognitive studies: a comparison of methods. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21:207-221.
121. Sadeh B., Pitcher D., Brandman T., Eisen A., Thaler A., Yovel G. Stimulation of category-selective brain areas modulates ERP to their preferred categories. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:1894-1899.
122. Sandrini M., Umiltà C., Rusconi E. The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience: a new synthesis of methodological issues. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011, 35:516-536.
123. Santarnecchi E., Feurra M., Galli G., Rossi A., Rossi S. Overclock your brain for gaming? Ethical, social and health care risks. Brain Stimulat. 2013, 6:713-714.
124. Sehm B., Ragert P. Why non-invasive brain stimulation should not be used in military and security services. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:553.
125. Shahbabaie A., Golesorkhi M., Zamanian B., Ebrahimpoor M., Keshvari F., Nejati V., Fregni F., Ekhtiari H. State dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on methamphetamine craving. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014, 17:1591-1598.
126. Shiozawa P., Leiva A.P.G., Castro C.D.C., da Silva M.E., Cordeiro Q., Fregni F., Brunoni A.R. Transcranial direct current stimulation for generalized anxiety disorder: a case study. Biol. Psychiatry 2014, 75:e17-e18.
127. Siebner H.R., Bergmann T.O., Bestmann S., Massimini M., Johansen-Berg H., Mochizuki H., Bohning D.E., Boorman E.D., Groppa S., Miniussi C., et al. Consensus paper: combining transcranial stimulation with neuroimaging. Brain Stimulat. 2009, 2:58-80.
128. Silson E.H., McKeefry D.J., Rodgers J., Gouws A.D., Hymers M., Morland A.B. Specialized and independent processing of orientation and shape in visual field maps LO1 and LO2. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16:267-269.
129. Silvanto J., Soto D. Causal evidence for subliminal percept-to-memory interference in early visual cortex. Neuroimage 2012, 59:840-845.
130. Silvanto J., Muggleton N.G., Cowey A., Walsh V. Neural activation state determines behavioral susceptibility to modified theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007, 26:523-528.
131. Silvanto J., Muggleton N., Walsh V. State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:447-454.
132. Sliwinska M.W., Khadilkar M., Campbell-Ratcliffe J., Quevenco F., Devlin J.T. Early and sustained supramarginal gyrus contributions to phonological processing. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3:161.
133. Sliwinska M.W., Vitello S., Devlin J.T. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for investigating causal brain-behavioral relationships and their time course. J. Vis. Exp. 2014, 89:e51735.
134. Sliwinska M.W., James A., Devlin J.T. Inferior parietal lobule contributions to visual word recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2015, 27:593-604.
135. Snowball A., Tachtsidis I., Popescu T., Thompson J., Delazer M., Zamarian L., Zhu T., Cohen Kadosh R. Long-term enhancement of brain function and cognition using cognitive training and brain stimulation. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:987-992.
136. Soto D., Llewelyn D., Silvanto J. Distinct causal mechanisms of attentional guidance by working memory and repetition priming in early visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:3447-3452.
137. Stagg C.J., Bestmann S., Constantinescu A.O., Moreno L.M., Allman C., Mekle R., Woolrich M., Near J., Johansen-Berg H., Rothwell J.C. Relationship between physiological measures of excitability and levels of glutamate and GABA in the human motor cortex. J. Physiol. 2011, 589:5845-5855.
138. Stewart L.M., Walsh V., Rothwell J.C. Motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:415-419.
139. Stokes M.G., Chambers C.D., Gould I.C., English T., McNaught E., McDonald O., Mattingley J.B. Distance-adjusted motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118:1617-1625.
140. Strafella A.P., Paus T., Barrett J., Dagher A. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human prefrontal cortex induces dopamine release in the caudate nucleus. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21. RC157-RC157.
141. Strafella A.P., Paus T., Fraraccio M., Dagher A. Striatal dopamine release induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain 2003, 126:2609-2615.
142. Studer B., Cen D., Walsh V. The angular gyrus and visuospatial attention in decision-making under risk. Neuroimage 2014, 103:75-80.
143. Tadin D., Silvanto J., Pascual-Leone A., Battelli L. Improved motion perception and impaired spatial suppression following disruption of cortical area MT/V5. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:1279-1283.
144. Taylor P.C.J., Thut G. Brain activity underlying visual perception and attention as inferred from TMS-EEG: a review. Brain Stimulat. 2012, 5:124-129.
145. Taylor P.C., Walsh V., Eimer M. The neural signature of phosphene perception. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2010, 31:1408-1417.
146. Terney D., Chaieb L., Moliadze V., Antal A., Paulus W. Increasing human brain excitability by transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:14147-14155.
147. Urgesi C., Berlucchi G., Aglioti S.M. Magnetic stimulation of extrastriate body area impairs visual processing of nonfacial body parts. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:2130-2134.
148. Urgesi C., Candidi M., Ionta S., Aglioti S.M. Representation of body identity and body actions in extrastriate body area and ventral premotor cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2007, 10:30-31.
149. Vallesi A., Shallice T., Walsh V. Role of the prefrontal cortex in the foreperiod effect: TMS evidence for dual mechanisms in temporal preparation. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:466-474.
150. van Dijk H., Schoffelen J.M., Oostenveld R., Jensen O. Prestimulus oscillatory activity in the alpha band predicts visual discrimination ability. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:1816-1823.
151. Vangeneugden J., Peelen M.V., Tadin D., Battelli L. Distinct neural mechanisms for body form and body motion discriminations. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34:574-585.
152. Vicario C.M., Nitsche M.A. Non-invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of brain diseases in childhood and adolescence: state of the art, current limits and future challenges. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2013, 7:94.
153. Waldvogel D., van Gelderen P., Muellbacher W., Ziemann U., Immisch I., Hallett M. The relative metabolic demand of inhibition and excitation. Nature 2000, 406:995-998.
154. Walsh V.Q. Ethics and social risks in brain stimulation. Brain Stimulat. 2013, 6:715-717.
155. Walsh V., Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Neurochronometrics of Mind 2003, MIT Press.
156. Wokke M.E., Scholte H.S., Lamme V.A. Opposing dorsal/ventral stream dynamics during figure-ground segregation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2014, 26:365-379.
157. Xu J., Fregni F., Brody A.L., Rahman A.S. Transcranial direct current stimulation reduces negative affect but not cigarette craving in overnight abstinent smokers. Front. Psychiatry 2013, 4:112.
158. Zaghi S., Thiele B., Pimentel D., Pimentel T., Fregni F. Assessment and treatment of pain with non-invasive cortical stimulation. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2011, 29:439-451.
159. Zhu F.F., Yeung A.Y., Poolton J.M., Lee T.M., Leung G.K., Masters R.S. Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Area Promotes Implicit Motor Learning in a Golf Putting Task. Brain Stimulat. 2015, 8:784-786.