An object-centered aftereffect of a latent material property: A squishiness visual aftereffect, not causality adaptation

Journal of Vision

Volumn 15, Issue 9, 2015, Pages

  Arnold, Derek H ^a   Petrie, Kirstie ^a   Gallagher, Regan ^a   Yarrow, Kielan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Elasticity; Visual aftereffect

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AFTERIMAGE; FACE; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; AFTERIMAGE; FACE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION;

EID: 84940498852     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/15.9.4     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anstis, S., & Ramachandran, V.S. (1987). Visual inertia in apparent motion. Vision Research, 27, 755-764.
2. Arnold, D.H., Nancarrow, K., & Yarrow, K. (2012).The critical events for motor-sensory temporal recalibration. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 235, doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00235.
3. Barlow, H.B., & Hill, R.M. (1963). Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall phenomenon and figural after-effects. Nature, 200, 1345-1347.
4. Blakemore, C.T., & Campbell, F.W. (1969). On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. The Journal of Physiology, 203, 237-260.
5. Burr, D., & Ross, J.R. (2008). A visual sense of number. Current Biology, 18, 425-428.
6. Calder, A.J., Jenkins, R., Cassel, A., & Clifford, C.W.G. (2008). Visual representation of eye gaze is coded by a nonopponent multichannel system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 244-261.
7. Chopin, A., & Mamassian, P. (2012). Predictive properties of visual adaptation. Current Biology, 22, 622-626.
8. Clifford, C.W. G., Wenderoth, P., & Spehar, B. (2000). A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 267, 1705-1710.
9. Durgin, F.H. (1995). Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 149-169.
10. Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 382.
11. Kanai, R., & Verstraten, F.A.J. (2005). Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: Motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization. Vision Research, 45, 3109-3116.
12. Kawabe, T., Roseboom, W., & Nishida, S. (2013). The sense of agency is action-effect causality perception based on cross-modal grouping. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 280, 20130991.
13. Kording. (2007). Decision theory: What "should"the nervous system do? Science, 318, 606-610.
14. Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books.
15. Mitchell, D.E., & Muir, D.W. (1976). Does the tilt after-effect occur in the oblique meridian? Vision Research, 16, 609-613.
16. Morgan, M. (2014). A bias-free measure of retinotopic tilt adaptation. Journal of Vision, 14(1):7, 1-7, doi: 10.1167/14.1.7. [PubMed] [Article].
17. Morgan, M., Melmoth, D., & Solomon, J.A. (2013). Linking hypotheses underlying Class A and Class B methods. Visual Neuroscience, 30(5-6), 197-206.
18. Motoyoshi, I. (2012). Visual aftereffects in 3D shape and material of a single object. Journal of Vision, 12(9): 229, doi:10.1167/12.9.229. [Abstract].
19. Motoyoshi, I., Nishida, S., Sharan, L., & Edelson, T. (2007). Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature, 447, 206-209.
20. Nishida, S. (2011). Advancement of motion psychophysics: Review 2001-2010. Journal of Vision, 11(5):11, 1-53, doi:10.1167/11.5.11. [PubMed] [Article].
21. Rolfs, M., Dambacher, M., & Cavanagh, P. (2013). Visual adaptation of the perception of causality. Current Biology, 23, 250-254.
22. Stetson, C., Cui, X., Montague, P.R., & Eagleman, D. (2006). Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation. Neuron, 51, 651-659.
23. Storrs, K., & Arnold, D.H. (2012). Not all face aftereffects are equal. Vision Research, 64, 7-16.
24. Thompson, P. (1981). Velocity after-effects: The effects of adaptation to moving stimuli on the perception of subsequently seen moving stimuli. Vision Research, 21, 337-345.
25. Webster, M.A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557-560.
26. Webster, M.A., & Mollon, J.D. (1991). Changes in colour appearance following post-receptoral adaptation. Nature, 349, 235-238.
27. Yarrow, K., Jahn, N., Durant, S., & Arnold, D.H. (2011). Shifts of criteria or neural timing? The assumptions underlying timing perception studies. Consciousness & Cognition, 20, 1518-1531.
28. Yarrow, K., Sverdrup-Stueland, I., Roseboom, W., & Arnold, D.H. (2013). Sensorimotor temporal recalibration within and across limbs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 39(6), 1678-1689. doi:10.1037/ a0032534.
29. Zhao, C., Seriés, P., Hancock, P.J. B., & Bednar, J.A. (2011). Similar neural adaptation mechanisms underlying face gender and tilt aftereffects. Vision Research, 51, 2021-2030.