The sense of agency is action-effect causality perception based on cross-modal grouping

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 280, Issue 1763, 2013, Pages

  Kawabe, Takahiro ^a   Roseboom, Warrick ^a   Nishida, Shin'ya ^a  

^a Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation   (Japan)

Author keywords

Causality; Cross modal integration; Perceptual grouping; Sense of agency

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY CUE; COGNITION; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSORY SYSTEM; SIGNALING; VISUAL CUE;

ADULT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TOUCH;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; CAUSALITY; HUMANS; PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TOUCH;

EID: 84892429441     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0991     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Haggard P, Chambon V. 2012 Sense of agency. Curr. Biol. 22, R390-R392. (doi:10.1016/j. cub. 2012.02.040)
2. Bays PM, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR. 2005 Perception of the consequences of self-action is temporally tuned and event driven. Curr. Biol. 15, 1125-1128. (doi:10.1016/j. cub.2005.05.023)
3. Blakemore S-J, Frith CD, Wolpert D. 1999 Spatiotemporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11, 551-559. (doi:10.1162/089892999563607)
4. Frith CD, Blakemore S-J, Wolpert DM. 2000 Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 355, 1771-1788. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0734)
5. Cunningham DW, Billock VA, Tsou BH. 2001 Sensorimotor adaptation to violations of temporal contiguity. Psychol. Sci. 12, 532-535. (doi:10.1111/ 1467-9280. d01-17)
6. Cunningham DW, Chatziastros A, von der Heyde M, Bülthoff HH. 2001 Driving in the future: temporal visuomotor adaptation and generalization. J. Vis. 1, 88-98. (doi:10.1167/1.2.3)
7. Ebert JP, Wegner DM. 2010 Time warp: authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events. Conscious. Cogn. 19, 481-489. (doi:10.1016/j. concog.2009.10.002)
8. Shanks DR, Pearson SM, Dickson A. 1989 Temporal contiguity and the judgment of causality by human subjects. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B 41, 139-159.
9. Wegner DM. 2004 Précis of the illusion of conscious will. Behav. Brain Sci. 27, 649-692. (doi:10.1017/ S0140525X04000159)
10. Wegner DM, Sparrow B, Winerman L. 2004 Vicarious agency: experiencing control over the movement of others. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86, 838-848. (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.838)
11. Wegner DM, Wheatley T. 1999 Apparent mental causation: sources of the experience of will. Am. Psychol. 54, 480-492. (doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54. 7.480)
12. Hume D. 1739/1888 A treatise of human nature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13. Michotte A. 1963 The perception of causality (TR. Miles, Elaine Miles, Trans). New York, NY: Basic Books.
14. Woods AJ, Lehet M, Chatterjee A. 2012 Context modulates the contribution of time and space in causal inference. Front. Psychol. 3, 1-9. (doi:10. 3389/fpsyg.2012.00371)
15. Buehner MJ, Humphreys GR. 2009 Causal binding of actions to their effects. Psychol. Sci. 20, 1221-1228. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02435. x)
16. Keetels M, Vroomen J. 2011 No effect of synesthetic congruency on temporal ventriloquism. Atten. Percep. Psychophys. 73, 209-218. (doi:10.3758/ s13414-010-0019-0)
17. Vroomen J, Keetels M. 2009 Sounds change fouddot masking. Acta Psychol. 130, 58-63. (doi:10. 1016/j. actpsy.2008.10.001)
18. Terao M, Watanabe J, Yagi A, Nishida S. 2008 Reduction of stimulus visibility compresses apparent time intervals. Nat. Neurosc. 11, 541-542.
19. Brainard DH. 1997 The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433-436. (doi:10.1163/15685689 7X00357)
20. Pelli DG. 1997 The VIDEOTOOLBOX software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 10, 437-442. (doi:10.1163/15685689 7X00366)
21. Roseboom W, Kawabe T, Nishida S. 2013 Direction of visual apparent motion driven by perceptual organization of cross-modal signals. J. Vis. 13, 1-13. (doi:10.1167/13.1.6)
22. Fujisaki W, Nishida S. 2009 Audio-tactile superiority over visuo-tactile and audio-visual combinations in temporal resolution of synchrony perception. Exp. Brain Res. 198, 245-259.
23. Haggard P, Clark S, Kalogeras J. 2002 Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 382-385. (doi:10.1038/nn827)
24. Berberian B, Sarrazin J-C, Le Blaye P, Haggard P. 2012 Automation technology and sense of control: a window on human agency. PLoS ONE 7, e34075. (doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0034075)
25. Cravo AM, Claessens PME, Baldo MV. 2009 Voluntary action and causality in temporal binding. Exp. Brain Res. 199, 95-99. (doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1969-0)
26. Eagleman DM, Holcombe AO. 2003 Causality and the perception of time. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 323-325. (doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01945-9)
27. Donohue S, Roberts KC, Grent-'t-Jong T, Woldorff MG. 2011 The cross-modal spread of attention reveals differential constraints for the temporal and spatial linking of visual and auditory stimulus events. J. Neurosci. 31, 7982-7990. (doi:10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.5298-10.2011)
28. Lange K, Roder B. 2006 Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 715-729. (doi:10.1162/jocn.2006. 18.5.715)
29. Olivers CNL, Van der Burg EV. 2008 Bleeping you out of the blink: sound saves vision from oblivion. Brain Res. 1242, 191-199. (doi:10.1016/j. brainres. 2008.01.070)
30. Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Newen A. 2008 Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Conscious. Cogn. 17, 219-239. (doi:10.1016/j. concog.2007.03.010)
31. Burr D, Banks M, Morrone MC. 2009 Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration. Exp. Brain Res. 198, 49-57. (doi:10.1007/ s00221-009-1933-z)
32. Roseboom W, Nishida S, Arnold DH. 2009 The sliding window of audio-visual simultaneity. J. Vis. 9, 1-8. (doi:10.1167/9.12.4)
33. Roseboom W, Nishida S, Fujisaki W, Arnold DH. 2011 Audio-visual speech timing sensitivity is enhanced in cluttered conditions. PLoS ONE 6, e18309. (doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0018309)
34. Arnold DH, Nancarrow K, Yarrow K. 2012 The critical events for motor-sensory temporal recalibration. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 235. (doi:10.3389/fnhum. 2012.00235)
35. Balslev D, Cole J, Miall C. 2007 Proprioception contributes to the sense of agency during visual observation of hand movements: evidence from temporal judgments of action. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 1535-1541. (doi:10.1162/jocn.2007. 19.9.1535)
36. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI. 1995 An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269, 1880-1882. (doi:10.1126/science. 7569931)
37. Waszak F, Cardoso-Leite P, Hughes G. 2012 Action effect anticipation: neurophysiological basis and functional consequences. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 943-959. (doi:10.1016/j. neubiorev.2011.11.004)
38. Hearing C, Kiesel A. 2012 Mine is earlier than yours: causal beliefs influence the perceive time of action affects. Front. Psychol. 3, 393.
39. Desantis A, Weiss C, Schütz-Bosbach S, Waszak F. 2012 Believing and perceiving: authorship belief modulates sensory attenuation. PLoS ONE 7, e37959. (doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0037959)
40. Ernst MO, Banks MS. 2002 Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415, 429-433. (doi:10.1038/415429a)
41. Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Voss M. 2013 The experience of agency: an interplay between prediction and postdiction. Frontiers Psychol. 4, 127. (doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00127).