EEG source localization: Sensor density and head surface coverage

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 256, Issue , 2015, Pages 9-21

  Song, Jasmine ^a   Davey, Colin ^a   Poulsen, Catherine ^a   Luu, Phan ^a,b   Turovets, Sergei ^a,b   Anderson, Erik ^a   Li, Kai ^a   Tucker, Don ^a,b  

^a Electrical Geodesics Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Dense array EEG; Epilepsy; FDM; Minimum norm; SLORETA; Source localization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIPOLE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EPILEPTIC DISCHARGE; EPILEPTIC FOCUS; GEOMETRY; HEAD; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LOW RESOLUTION BRAIN ELECTROMAGNETIC TOMOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NERVE CONDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSOR; SIMULATION; SPIKE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; HEAD; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84940497627     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.08.015     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Michel C.M., Lantz G., Spinelli L., de Peralta R.G., Landis T., Seeck M. 128-Channel EEG source imaging in epilepsy: clinical yield and localization precision. J Clin Neurophysiol 2004, 21(2):71-83.
2. Lantz G., de Peralta R.G., Spinelli L., Seeck M., Michel C. Epileptic source localization with high density EEG: how many electrodes are needed?. Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 114:63-69.
3. Holmes M.D. Dense array EEG: methodology and new hypothesis on epilepsy syndromes. Epilepsia 2008, 49:3-14.
4. Brodbeck V., Spinelli L., Lascano A., Wissmeier M., Vargas M., Vulliemoz S. Electroencephalographic source imaging: a prospective study of 152 operated epileptic patients. Brain 2011, 134:2887-2897.
5. Brunet D., Murray M.M., Michel C.M. Spatiotemporal analysis of multichannel EEG: CARTOOL. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011, 2011:813870. doi:10.1155/2011/813870.
6. Dale A.M., Sereno M.I. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J Cognit Neurosci 1993, 5:62-176.
7. Delorme A., Westerfield M., Makeig S. Medial prefrontal theta bursts precede rapid motor responses during visual selective attention. J Neurosci 2007, 27(44):11949-11959.
8. Hassan M., Dufor O., Merlet I., Berrou C., Wendling F. EEG source connectivity analysis: from dense array recordings to brain networks. PLOS ONE 2014, 9:e105041.
9. Jasper H.H. Report to committee on clinical examination in EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1958, 10:370-371.
10. Tucker D.M. Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the Geodesic Sensor Net. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993, 87:145-163.
11. Srinivasan R., Tucker D.M., Murias M. Estimating the spatial Nyquist of the human EEG. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1998, 30:8-19.
12. Geddes L.A., Baker L.E. The specific resistance of biological material-a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist. Med Biol Eng 1967, 5(3):271-293.
13. Oostendorp T.F., Delbeke J., Stegeman D.F. The conductivity of the human skull: results of in-vivo and in-vitro measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2000, 47(11):1487-1492.
14. Gonçalves S., de Munck J.C., Verbunt J.P., Bijma F., Heethaar R.M., da Silva F.L. In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and realistic models for the head. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003, 50(6):754-767.
15. Gutierrez D., Nehorai A., Muravchik C.H. Estimating brain conductivities and dipole source signals with EEG arrays. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004, 51(12):2113-2122.
16. Lai Y., Drongelen W., Ding L., Hecox K.E., Towle V.L., Frim D.M., He B. Estimation of in vivo human brain-to-skull conductivity ratio from simultaneous extra- and intra-cranial electrical potential recordings. Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 116:456-465.
17. Zhang Y., van Drongelen W., He B. Estimation of in vivo brain-to-skull conductivity ratio in humans. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 89:2239031-2239033.
18. Ryynänen O., Hyttinen J., Malmivuo J. Effect of measurement noise and electrode density on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution with different resistivity values for the skull. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006, 53(9):1851-1858.
19. Wang G., Ren D. Effect of brain-to-skull conductivity ratio on EEG source localization accuracy. BioMed Res Int 2013, 2013:459346.
20. Huiskamp G., Vroeijenstijn M., van Dijk R., Wieneke G., van Huffelen A.C. The need for correct realistic geometry in the inverse EEG problem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999, 46:1281-1287.
21. Song J., Morgan K., Sergei T., Li K., Davey C., Govyadinov P., Luu P., Smith K., Prior F., Larson-Prior L., Tucker D. Anatomically accurate head models and their derivatives for dense array EEG source localization, functional neurology. Rehabil Ergon 2013, 3(2):275-294.
22. Freeman W.J., Holmes M., Burke B., Vanhatalo S. Spatial spectra of scalp EEG and EMG from awake humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 114(6):1053-1068.
23. Odabaee M., Freeman W., Colditz P., Ramon C., Vanhatalo S. Spatial patterning of the neonatal EEG suggests a need for a high number of electrodes. Neuroimage 2013, 68:229-235.
24. Malmivuo J., Suihko V., Eskola H. Sensitivity distributions of EEG and MEG measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997, 44(3):196-208.
25. Malmivuo J.A., Suihko V.E. Effect of skull resistivity on the spatial resolutions of EEG and MEG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004, 51(7):1276-1280.
26. Ryynänen O., Hyttinen J., Laarne P., Malmivuo J. Effect of electrode density and measurement noise on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004, 51(9):1547-1554.
27. Luu P., Tucker D.M., Englander R., Lockfeld A., Lutsep H., Oken B. Localizing acute stroke-related EEG changes: assessing the effects of spatial undersampling. J Clin Neurophysiol 2001, 18(4):302-317.
28. Sperli F., Spinelli L., Seeck M., Kurian M., Michel C., Lantz G. EEG source imaging in pediatric epilepsy surgery: a new perspective in presurgical workup. Epilepsia 2006, 47(6):981-990.
29. Fitzgibbon S., Lewis T., Powers D., Whitham E., Willoughby J., Pope K. Surface laplacian of central scalp electrical signals is insensitive to muscle contamination. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2013, 60(2):4-9.
30. Moretti D.V., Babiloni F., Carducci F., Cincotti F., Remondini E., Rossini P.M., Salinari S., Babiloni C. Computerized processing of EEG-EOG-EMG artifacts for multi-centric studies in EEG oscillations and event-related potentials. Int J Psychophysiol 2003, 47(3):199-216.
31. Gao J., Yang Y., Sun J., Yu G. Automatic removal of various artifacts from EEG signals using combined methods. J Clin Neurophysiol 2010, 27(5):312-320.
32. Shackman A.J., McMenamin B.W., Slagter H.A., Maxwell J.S., Greischar L.L., Davidson R.J. Electromyogenic artifacts and electroencephalographic inferences. Brain Topogr 2009, 22:7-12.
33. McMenamin B.W., Shackman A.J., Greischar L.L., Davidson R.J. Electromyogenic artifacts and electroencephalographic inferences revisited. Neuroimage 2011, 54:4-9.
34. Olbrich S., Jodicke J., Sander C., Himmerich H., Hegerl U. ICA-based muscle artefact correction of EEG data: what is muscle and what is brain? Comment on McMenamin et al. Neuroimage 2011, 54:1-3.
35. Gross J., Baillet S., Barnes G.R., Henson R.N., Hillebrand A., Jensen O., Jerbi K., Litvak V., Maess B., Oostenveld R., Parkkonen L., Taylor J., van Wassenhove V., Wibral M., Schoffelen J.M. Good-practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. Neuroimage 2013, 65:349-363.
36. Pascual-Marqui R. Standardized low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find Clin Pharmacol 2002, 24D:5-12.
37. Mosher J.C., Leahy R.M., Lewis P.S. EEG and MEG. Forward solutions for inverse methods. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999, 46(3):245-259.
38. Berg P., Scherg M. A fast method for forward computation of multiple-shell spherical head models. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994, 90:58-64.
39. Zhang Z. A fast method to compute surface potentials generated by dipoles within multilayer anisotropic spheres. Phys Med Biol 1995, 40:335-349.
40. Hallez H., Vanrumste B., Grech R., Muscat J., Clercq W.D., Vergult A., D'Asseler Y., Camilleri K.P., Fabri S.G., Huffel S.V., Lemahieu I. Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis. J NeuroEng Rehabil 2007, 4:46.
41. He B., Yao D., Lian J. High-resolution EEG: on the cortical equivalent dipole layer imaging. Clin Neurophysiol 2002, 113:227-235.
42. Ary J.P., Klein S., Fender D.H. Location of sources of evoked scalp potentials: corrections for skull and scalp thicknesses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1981, 28(6):447-452.
43. Fuchs M., Drenckhahn R., Wischmann H.A., Wagner M.M. An improved boundary element method for realistic volume-conductor modeling. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998, 45(8):980-997.
44. Pascual-Marqui R.D., Michel C.M., Lehmann D. Low-resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 1994, 18:49-65.
45. Russell G.S., Eriksen K.J., Poolman P., Luu P., Tucker D.M. Geodesic photogrammetry for localizing sensor positions in dense array EEG. Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 116(5):1130-1140.
46. D. M. Tucker, S. E. Tucker, Method for mapping internal body tissue, US Patent 6,529,759 (March 2003), http://www.google.com/patents/US6529759.
47. Li K., Malony A., Tucker D.M. Automatic brain MR image segmentation by relative thresholding and morphological image analysis. First International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP) February 2006, 354-364.
48. K. Li, A. D. Malony, D. M. Tucker, Image segmentation method, US Patent App.12/587,225 (April 2011), http://www.google.com/patents/US20110081062.
49. Malony A., Salman A., Turovets S., Tucker D., Volkov V., Li K., Song J., Biersdorff S., Davey C., Hodge C., Hammond D. Computational Modeling of Human Head Electromagnetics for Source Localization of Milliscale Brain Dynamics. Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality (MMVR) 2011.
50. Smith K., Politte D., Reiker G., Nolan T., Hildebolt C., Mattson C., Tucker D., Prior F., Turovets S., Larson-Prior L. Automated measurement of pediatric cranial bone thickness and density from clinical computed tomography. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012, 4462-4465. 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346957.
51. Ferree T., Eriksen K.J., Tucker D.M. Region head tissue conductivity estimation for improved EEG analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2000, 47:1584-1592.
52. Rush S., Driscoll D. EEG-electrode sensitivity: an application reciprocity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1969, 16(1):15.
53. Salman A., Turovets S., Malony A., Volkov V. Multi-cluster mix-mode computational modeling of human head conductivity 2008, 119-130. International Workshop on OpenMP (IWOMP 2005/2006) LNCS 4315.
54. Turovets S., Poolman P., Salman A., Malony A., Tucker D. Conductivity analysis for high-resolution EEG. IEEE Computer Society International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics 2008, 386-393.
55. Ida N. Engineering electromagnetics 2015, Springer. 3rd ed.
56. Jin J.M. The finite element method in electromagnetics 2002, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 2nd ed.
57. Gaul L., Kögl M., Wagner M. Boundary element methods for engineers and scientists: an introductory course with advanced topics 2012, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://books.google.com/books?id=7ZR2cgAACAAJ.
58. Salman A., Malony A., Turovets S., Volkov V., Ozog D., Tucker D.M. Concurrency in electrical neuroinformatics: parallel computation for studying the volume conduction of brain electrical fields in human head tissues. Concurr Comput Pract Exp 2015.
59. Grech R., Cassar T., Muscat J., Camilleri K.P., Fabri S.G., Zervakis M., Xanthopoulos P., Sakkalis V., Vanrumste B. Review on solving the inverse problem in EEG source analysis. J NeuroEng Rehabil 2008, 5:25.
60. Baillet S., Mosher J.C., Leahy R.M. Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Process Mag 2001, 18:14-30.
61. Yao J., Dewald J.P.A. Evaluation of different cortical source localization methods using simulated and experimental EEG data. NeuroImage 2005, 25:369-382.
62. Fuchs M., Wagner M., Wischmann H.A., Köhler T., Theissen A., Drenckhahn R., Buchner H. Improving source reconstructions by combining bioelectric and biomagnetic data. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998, 107(2):93-111.
63. Mosher J.C., Leahy R.M., Recursive MUSIC: a framework for EEG and MEG source localization. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998, 45(11):1342-1354.
64. Mosher J.C., Leahy R.M. Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999, 47:332-340.
65. Veen B.D.V., van Drongelen W., Yuchtman M., Suzuki A. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997, 44(9):867-880.
66. de Peralta-Menendez R.G., Murray M.M., Michel C.M., Martuzzi R., Gonzalez-Andino S.L. Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints. NeuroImage 2004, 21:527-539.
67. Michel C.M., Murray M.M., Lantz G., Gonzalez S., Spinelli L., de Peralta R.G. EEG source imaging. Clin Neurophysiol 2004, 115:2195-2222.
68. Abascal J.F.P.J., Arridge S.R., Bayford R.H., Holder D.S. Comparison of methods for optimal choice of the regularization parameter for linear electrical impedance tomography of brain function. Physiol Meas 2008, 29(11):1319. 10.1088/0967-3334/29/11/007.
69. Hauk O., Wakeman D., Henson R. Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics. Neuroimage 2010, 54:1966-1974. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.053.
70. Engel J. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies 1993, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2nd ed.
71. Lehmann D., Skrandies W. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980, 48:609-621.
72. Laarne P.H., Tenhunen-Eskelinen M.L., Hyttinen J., Eskola H.J. Effect of EEG electrode density on dipole localization accuracy using two realistically shaped skull resistivity models. Brain Topogr 2000, 12:249-254.
73. Nunez P., Srinivasan R. Electric fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG 2005, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford. 2nd ed.
74. Song J., Davey C., Poulsen C., Sergei T., Luu P., Tucker D. Sensor density and head surface coverage in EEG source localization 2014, ISBI, Beijing, China.
75. Sohrabpour A., Lu Y., Kankirawatana P., Blount J., Kim H., He B. Effect of EEG electrode number on epileptic source localization in pediatric patients. Clin Neurophysiol 2015, 126(3):472-480.
76. Oostenveld R., Praamstra P. The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clin Neurophysiol 2001, 112:713-719.
77. Feng R., Hu J., Pan L., Wu J., Lang L., Jiang S., Guo X.G.J., Zhou L. Application of 256-channel dense array electroencephalographic source imaging in presurgical workup of temporal lobe epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol 2015.
78. Perrin F., Bertrand O., Giard M.H., Pernier J. Precautions in topographic mapping and in evoked potential map reading. J Clin Neurophysiol 1990, 7(4):498-506.
79. Yvert B., Bertrand O., Thevenet M., Echallier J., Pernier J. A systematic evaluation of the spherical model accuracy in EEG dipole localization. Electroencephologr Clin Neurophysiol 1997, 102:452-459.
80. Wipf D.P., Owen J.P., Attias H.T., Nagarajan K.S.S.S. Robust Bayesian estimation of the location, orientation, and time course of multiple correlated neural sources using MEG. Neuroimage 2010, 49:641-655.