Changing salary structure and faculty composition within business schools: Differences across sectors and state funding levels

Economics of Education Review

Volumn 49, Issue , 2015, Pages 42-54

  Cheslock, John J ^a   Callie, Trina M ^b,c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c RAYTHEON COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Faculty salaries; Resource allocation; Salary wage differentials; State and federal aid

Indexed keywords

HIGHER EDUCATION; PRIVATE SECTOR; PUBLIC SECTOR; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; WAGE DETERMINATION; WAGE GAP;

EID: 84940491931     PISSN: 02727757     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alexander F. The silent crisis: The relative fiscal capacity of public universities to compete for faculty. The Review of Higher Education 2001, 24(2):113-129.
2. Archibald R., Feldman D. Why does college cost so much? 2011, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Baldwin R., Chronister J. Teaching without tenure: Policies and practices for a new era 2001, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
4. Bell L. More good news, so why the blues? The annual report on the economic status of the profession. Academe 2000, 86(2):1-4.
5. Bell L. Uncertain times. The annual report on the economic status of the profession. Academe 2001, 87(2):26-35.
6. Bettinger E., Long B. The increasing use of adjunct instructors at public institutions: Are we hurting students?. What's happening to public higher education 2006, Greenwood Press for the American Council on Education, Westport, CT. R. Ehrenberg (Ed.).
7. Bettinger E., Long B. Does cheaper mean better? The impact of using adjunct instructors on student outcomes. Review of Economics and Statistics 2010, 92(3):598-613.
8. Bowen H.R. The costs of higher education: How much do colleges and universities spend per student and how much should they spend? 1980, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
9. Brinkman P.T. Higher education cost functions. The economics of American universities 1990, 107-128. State University of New York Press, Albany. S.A. Hoenack, E.L. Collins (Eds.).
10. Brown J., Dimmock S., Kang J., Weisbenner S. How university endowments respond to financial market shocks: Evidence and implications. American Economic Review 2014, 104(3):931-962.
11. Callie T., Cheslock J. The hiring and compensation practices of business school deans. Review of Higher Education 2008, 32(1):25-49.
12. Carbone J., Winston G.C. Saving, wealth, performance, and revenues in U.S. colleges and universities. Review of Higher Education 2004, 28(1):97-128.
13. Card D., Mas A., Moretti E., Saez E. Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. American Economic Review 2012, 102(6):2981-3003.
14. Carrell S., West J. Does professor quality matter? Evidence from random assignment of students to professors. Journal of Political Economy 2010, 118(3):409-432.
15. Cheslock J.J., Gianneschi M. Replacing state appropriations with alternative revenue sources: The case of voluntary support. Journal of Higher Education 2008, 79(2):208-229.
16. Cheslock J.J., Rios-Agular C. Multilevel analysis in higher education research: A multidisciplinary approach. Higher education: Handbook of theory and research 2011, Volume 26:85-123. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. I.J. Smart (Ed.).
17. Commonfund Institute. 2009 higher education price index, 2009.
18. Cowell F.A. Measuring income inequality 1995, Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf, London. 2nd ed.
19. Cross J.G., Goldenberg E.N. Off-track profs: Nontenured teachers in higher education 2009, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Delaney J., Doyle W. State spending on higher education: Testing the balance wheel over time. Journal of Education Finance 2011, 36(4):343-368.
21. Ehrenberg R.G. Studying ourselves: The academic labor market. Journal of Labor Economics 2003, 21:267-287.
22. Ehrenberg R.G. Unequal progress. The Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession. Academe 2003, 89(2):21-33.
23. Ehrenberg R.G. Don't blame faculty for high tuition. The Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession. Academe 2004, 90(2):20-31.
24. Ehrenberg R.G., Kasper H., Rees D.I. Faculty turnover in American colleges and universities. Economics of Education Review 1991, 10:99-110.
25. Ehrenberg R.G., Zhang L. The changing nature of faculty employment. Recruitment, retention, and retirement in higher education: Building and managing the faculty of the future 2005, 32-52. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA. R. Clark, J. Ma (Eds.).
26. Friga P., Bettis R., Sullivan R. Changes in graduate management education and new business school strategies for the 21st century. Academy of Management Learning & Education 2003, 2(3):233-249.
27. Hobbs B., Weeks H., Finch J. Estimating the mark-to-market premium required to fill vacant business school faculty lines: The case of finance. Journal of Education for Business 2005, 80(5):253-258.
28. Jaeger A., Eagan M. Examining retention and contingent faculty use in a state system of public higher education. Educational Policy 2011, 25(3):507-537.
29. Kiley, K. Nowhere to turn, InsideHigherEd.com, January 17, 2013. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/01/17/moodys-report-calls-question-all-traditional-university-revenue-sources.
30. Kim E., Morse A., Zingales L. Are elite universities losing their competitive edge?. Journal of Financial Economics 2009, 93:353-381.
31. Lazear E.P. Raids and offer matching. Research in labor economics 1986, 8A:141-165. JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn., and London. R. Ehrenberg (Ed.).
32. Mangan, K., Universities must adjust to loss of public support, authors tell business deans. Chronicle of Higher Education. February 9, 2012. http://chronicle.com/article/Universities-Must-Adjust-to/130725/.
33. Monks J. Increasing earnings inequality in faculty labor markets 2003, Cornell Higher Education Research Institute (CHERI), Ithaca, NY, (Working Paper No. 40).
34. Monks J. The relative earnings of contingent faculty in higher education. Journal of Labor Research 2007, 28:487-501.
35. Palmer J., Franklin D. Grapevine summary of state higher education tax appropriations for fiscal year 2006 2006, Center for the Study of Education Policy, Illinois State University, Normal, IL.
36. Pfeffer J., Langton N. Wage inequality and the organization of work: The case of academic departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 1988, 33(4):588-606.
37. Porter S., Toutkoushian R., Moore J. Pay inequities for recently hired faculty, 1988-2004. The Review of Higher Education 2008, 31(4):465-487.
38. Ransom M. Seniority and monopsony in the academic labor market. American Economic Review 1993, 83(1):221-233.
39. Thornton S. It's not over yet. The annual report on the economic status of the profession. Academe 2011, 97(2):4-36.
40. Umbach P. How effective are they? Exploring the impact of contingent faculty on undergraduate education. The Review of Higher Education 2007, 30(2):91-123.
41. Winston G.C. Differentiation among U.S. colleges and universities. Review of Industrial Organization 2004, 24(4):331-354.
42. Zell D. The market-driven business school: Has the pendulum swung too far?. Journal of Management Inquiry 2001, 10(4):324-338.
43. Zhang L., Liu X. Faculty employment at four-year colleges and universities. Economics of Education Review 2010, 29:543-552.
44. Zoghi C. Why have public university professors done so badly?. Economics of Education Review 2003, 22(1):45-57.