Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy May Enhance the Diagnostic Accuracy of Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Compared to Standard Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

European Urology

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 438-450

  Schoots, Ivo G ^a   Roobol, Monique J ^a   Nieboer, Daan ^a   Bangma, Chris H ^a   Steyerberg, Ewout W ^a   Hunink, M G Myriam ^a,b  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Diagnostic test accuracy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging guided targeted biopsy; Meta analysis; Prostate cancer; Systematic review; Transrectal ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING TARGETED BIOPSY; META ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED BIOPSY; TUMOR BIOPSY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; LARGE CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY; MALE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR;

BIOPSY, LARGE-CORE NEEDLE; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84940476871     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.037     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. K.K. Hodge, J.E. McNeal, M.K. Terris, and T.A. Stamey Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate J Urol 142 1989 71 74
2. K. Eichler, S. Hempel, J. Wilby, L. Myers, L.M. Bachmann, and J. Kleijnen Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review J Urol 175 2006 1605 1612
3. J.S. Jones, A. Patel, L. Schoenfield, J.C. Rabets, C.D. Zippe, and C. Magi-Galluzzi Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy J Urol 175 2006 485 488
4. P. Pepe, and F. Aragona Saturation prostate needle biopsy and prostate cancer detection at initial and repeat evaluation Urology 70 2007 1131 1135
5. J.S. Jones Saturation biopsy for detecting and characterizing prostate cancer BJU Int 99 2007 1340 1344
6. B.R. Lane, C.D. Zippe, R. Abouassaly, L. Schoenfield, C. Magi-Galluzzi, and J.S. Jones Saturation technique does not decrease cancer detection during followup after initial prostate biopsy J Urol 179 2008 1746 1750
7. K.A. Roehl, J.A. Antenor, and W.J. Catalona Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study J Urol 167 2002 2435 2439
8. J.C. Presti Jr., G.J. O'Dowd, M.C. Miller, R. Mattu, and R.W. Veltri Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study J Urol 169 2003 125 129
9. J.L. Wright, and W.J. Ellis Improved prostate cancer detection with anterior apical prostate biopsies Urol Oncol 24 2006 492 495
10. G.S. Merrick, W. Taubenslag, H. Andreini, and et al. The morbidity of transperineal template-guided prostate mapping biopsy BJU Int 101 2008 1524 1529
11. A.V. Taira, G.S. Merrick, R.W. Galbreath, and et al. Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 13 2010 71 77
12. C.M. Moore, N.L. Robertson, N. Arsanious, and et al. Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review Eur Urol 63 2013 125 140
13. A. van Hove, P.H. Savoie, C. Maurin, and et al. Comparison of image-guided targeted biopsies versus systematic randomized biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic literature review of well-designed studies World J Urol 32 2014 847 858
14. U. Mueller-Lisse, U. Mueller-Lisse, J. Scheidler, G. Klein, and M. Reiser Reproducibility of image interpretation in MRI of the prostate: application of the sextant framework by two different radiologists Eur Radiol 15 2005 1826 1833
15. N. Arumainayagam, S. Kumaar, H.U. Ahmed, and et al. Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in detecting recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy BJU Int 106 2010 991 997
16. A. Villers, L. Lemaitre, J. Haffner, and P. Puech Current status of MRI for the diagnosis, staging and prognosis of prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy and active surveillance Curr Opin Urol 19 2009 274 282
17. J.O. Barentsz, J. Richenberg, R. Clements, and et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 Eur Radiol 22 2012 746 757
18. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D.G. Altman Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement PLoS Med 6 2009 e1000097
19. P. Whiting, A.W. Rutjes, J.B. Reitsma, P.M. Bossuyt, and J. Kleijnen The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews BMC Med Res Methodol 3 2003 25
20. B.K. Park, H.M. Lee, C.K. Kim, H.Y. Choi, and J.W. Park Lesion localization in patients with a previous negative transrectal ultrasound biopsy and persistently elevated prostate specific antigen level using diffusion-weighted imaging at three tesla before rebiopsy Invest Radiol 43 2008 789 793
21. J. Haffner, L. Lemaitre, P. Puech, and et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection BJU Int 108 2011 E171 E178
22. B.K. Park, J.W. Park, S.Y. Park, and et al. Prospective evaluation of 3-T MRI performed before initial transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with high prostate-specific antigen and no previous biopsy Am J Roentgenol 197 2011 W876 W881
23. O. Belas, J. Klap, F. Cornud, and et al. Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI of the prostate: the end of randomized biopsies? Prog Urol 22 2012 583 589
24. D. Portalez, P. Mozer, F. Cornud, and et al. Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients Eur Urol 62 2012 986 996
25. E. Rud, E. Baco, and H.B. Eggesbo MRI and ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy using soft image fusion Anticancer Res 32 2012 3383 3390
26. D.N. Costa, B.N. Bloch, D.F. Yao, and et al. Diagnosis of relevant prostate cancer using supplementary cores from magnetic resonance imaging-prompted areas following multiple failed biopsies Magn Reson Imaging 31 2013 947 952
27. T. Durmus, C. Stephan, M. Grigoryev, G. Diederichs, M. Saleh, T. Slowinski, and et al. Detection of prostate cancer by real-time MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: 3T MRI and state of the art sonography RoFo 185 2013 428 433
28. G. Fiard, N. Hohn, J.L. Descotes, J.J. Rambeaud, J. Troccaz, and J.A. Long Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer: initial clinical experience with real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance and magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion Urology 81 2013 1372 1378
29. P. Puech, O. Rouviere, R. Renard-Penna, and et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy - prospective multicenter study Radiology 268 2013 461 469
30. M.M. Siddiqui, S. Rais-Bahrami, H. Truong, and et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy Eur Urol 64 2013 713 719
31. G.A. Sonn, E. Chang, S. Natarajan, and et al. Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen Eur Urol 65 2014 809 815
32. J.S. Wysock, A.B. Rosenkrantz, W.C. Huang, and et al. A prospective, blinded comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-ultrasound fusion and visual estimation in the performance of MR-targeted prostate biopsy: the PROFUS trial Eur Urol. 66 2014 343 351
33. Mozer P, Roupret M, Le Cossec C, et al. First round of targeted biopsies with magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion images compared to conventional ultrasound-guided trans-rectal biopsies for the diagnosis of localised prostate cancer. BJU Int. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.12690
34. M.R. Pokorny, M. de Rooij, E. Duncan, and et al. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies Eur Urol 66 2014 22 29
35. A.R. Rastinehad, B. Turkbey, S.S. Salami, and et al. Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy J Urol 191 2014 1749 1754
36. P.M. Bossuyt, J.B. Reitsma, D.E. Bruns, and et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration Ann Intern Med 138 2003 W1-12
37. M. de Rooij, E.H. Hamoen, J.J. Futterer, J.O. Barentsz, and M.M. Rovers Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis Am J Roentgenol 202 2014 343 351
38. P. Rouse, G. Shaw, H.U. Ahmed, A. Freeman, C. Allen, and M. Emberton Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging to rule-in and rule-out clinically important prostate cancer in men at risk: a cohort study Urol Int 87 2011 49 53
39. Y. Watanabe, A. Terai, T. Araki, and et al. Detection and localization of prostate cancer with the targeted biopsy strategy based on ADC Map: a prospective large-scale cohort study J Magn Reson Imaging 35 2012 1414 1421
40. J.I. Epstein, P.C. Walsh, M. Carmichael, and C.B. Brendler Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer JAMA 271 1994 368 374
41. P. Harnden, B. Naylor, M.D. Shelley, H. Clements, B. Coles, and M.D. Mason The clinical management of patients with a small volume of prostatic cancer on biopsy: what are the risks of progression? A systematic review and meta-analysis Cancer 112 2008 971 981
42. C.M. Moore, V. Kasivisvanathan, S. Eggener, and et al. Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group Eur Urol 64 2013 544 552