Aortic valve stenosis: Non-invasive preoperative evaluation using 64-slice CT angiography

Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 799-808

  Ciolina, F ^a   Sedati, P ^b   Zaccagna, F ^a   Galea, N ^a   Noce, V ^a   Miraldi, F ^a   Cavarretta, E ^c   Francone, M ^a   Carbone, I ^a  

^a POLICLINICO UMBERTO I   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY CAMPUS BIO MEDICO   (Italy)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Angiography; Aortic aneurysm; Aortic valve stenosis; Computed tomography; Thoracic

Indexed keywords

IOMEPROL;

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CARDIAC GATED IMAGING; CINEANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY DEVICE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY CALCIFICATION; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDSYSTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RADIATION DOSE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THORACIC AORTA ANEURYSM; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA DISEASE; AORTA VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; AORTOGRAPHY; CALCINOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; THORACIC AORTA;

AGED; AORTA, THORACIC; AORTIC DISEASES; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; AORTOGRAPHY; CALCINOSIS; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTROPHY, LEFT VENTRICULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84940468720     PISSN: 00219509     EISSN: 1827191X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, Gardin JM, Gottdiener JS, Smith VE et al. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:630-4.
2. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, Munt BI, Fujioka M, Healy NL et al. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation 1997;95:2262-70.
3. Arsenault M, Masani N, Magni G, Yao J, Deras L, Pandian N. Variation of anatomic valve area during ejection in patients with valvular aortic stenosis evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry: comparison with traditional Doppler data. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1931-7.
4. Oh JK, Taliercio CP, Holmes DR Jr, Reeder GS, Bailey KR, Seward JB et al. Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Dopplercatheterization correlation in 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:1227-34.
5. Geibel A, Görnandt L, Kasper W, Bubenheimer P. Reproducibility of Doppler echocardiographic quantification of aortic and mitral valve stenosis: comparison between two echocardiography centers. Am J Cardiol 1991;65:1013-21.
6. Wiegers SE, Herrmann HC, Plappert T. Valvular heart disease. In: St John Sutton MG, Rutherford JD, et al., editors. Clinical cardiovascular imaging: a companion to Braunwald's heart disease. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2004. p. 280-338.
7. Bernard Y, Meneveau N, Vuillemenot A, Magnin D, Anguenot T, Schiele F et al. Planimetry of aortic valve area using multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography is not a reliable method for assessing severity of aortic stenosis. Heart 1997;78:68-73.
8. Cormier B, Lung B, Porte JM, Barbant S, Vahanian A. Value of multiplane transesophageal echocardiography in determining aortic valve area in aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:882-5.
9. Bonow RO, Carabello B, De Leon AC Jr, De Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD et al. 2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2008;118:e523-66l.
10. Carbone I, Francone M, Algeri E, Granatelli A, Napoli A, Kirchin MA et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2008;18:234-43.
11. American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents, Mark DB, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, Carr JJ, Gerber TC, Hecht HS et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2663-99.
12. Otto CM. Valvular aortic stenosis: disease severity and timing of intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2141-51.
13. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY, Joret C, Le Gal G, Mansourati J et al. Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2020-4.
14. LaissyJP, Messika-Zeitoun D, SerfatyJM, Sebban V, Schouman-Claeys E, Iung B et al. Comprehensive evaluation of preoperative patients with aortic valve stenosis: usefulness of cardiac multidetector computed tomography. Heart 2007;93:1121-5.
15. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989;2:358-67.
16. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, Van Der Lugt A, Raaijmakers RH, Mollet N, Pattynama PM et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology 2004;233:817-23.
17. Koos R, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM, Wildberger JE, Hoffmann R, Kuhl HP. Preliminary experience in the assessment of aortic valve calcification by ECG-gated multislice spiral computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 2005;102:195-200.
18. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner J, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:827-32.
19. Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Lachat M, Kobza R, Roos JE, Seifert B et al. Electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcification in aortic stenosis. Radiology 2002;225:120-8.
20. Habis M, Daoud B, Roger VL, Ghostine S, Caussin C, Ramadan R et al. Comparison of 64-slice computed tomography planimetry and Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of the aortic valve stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 2007; l6:2l6-24.
21. Shah RG, Novaro GM, Blandon RJ, Whiteman MS, Asher CR, Kirsch J. Aortic valve area: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of multi-detector computed tomography for aortic valve area measurements as compared to transthoracic echocardiography. IntJ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:601-9.
22. Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Friedrich GJ, Frick M, Alber H, Schachner T et al. Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1410-7
23. Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Bonatti J, Schachner T, Velik-Salchner C, Pachinger O et al. Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:197-203.
24. Tamborini G, Fusini L, Gripari P, Muratori M, Cefalù C, Maffessanti F et al. Feasibility and accuracy of 3DTEE versus CT for the evaluation of aortic valve annulus to left main ostium distance before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:579-88.
25. Ferda J, Linhartová K, Kreuzberg B. Comparison of the aortic valve calcium content in the bicuspid and tricuspid stenotic aortic valve using non-enhanced 64-detector-row-computed tomography with prospective ECG-triggering. Eur J Radiol 2008;68:471-5.
26. Mullany CJ. Aortic valve surgery in the elderly. Cardiol Rev 2000;8:333-9.
27. Larsen LH, Kofoed KF, Dalsgaard M, Kristensen T, Elming H, Steinbrüchel DA et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease using coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with aortic valve stenosis referred for surgical aortic valve replacement. IntJ Cardiol 2012; S0l67-5273:01163-1.
28. Lu TL, Huber CH, Rizzo E, Dehmeshki J, Von Segesser LK, Qanadli SD. Ascending aorta measurements as assessed by ECG-gated multi-detector computed tomography: a pilot study to establish normative values for transcatheter therapies. Eur Radiol 2009;19:664-9.
29. LaBounty TM, Sundaram B, Agarwal P, Armstrong WA, Kazerooni EA, Yamada E et al. Aortic valve area on 64-MDCT correlates with transesofageal echocardiography in aortic stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1652-8.
30. Li X, Tang L, Zhou L, Duan Y, Yanhui S, Yang R et al. Aortic valves stenosis and regurgitation: assessment with dual source computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:591-600.