Comprehensive evaluation of preoperative patients with aortic valve stenosis: Usefulness of cardiac multidetector computed tomography

Heart

Volumn 93, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1121-1125

  Laissy, Jean Pierre ^a   Messika Zeitoun, David ^a   Serfaty, Jean Michel ^a   Sebban, Vincent ^a   Schouman Claeys, Elisabeth ^a   Iung, Bernard ^a   Vahanian, Alec ^a  

^a BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IOBITRIDOL;

AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE VOLUME; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34548191253     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.107284     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients witn valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1231-43.
2. Bonow R, Carabello B, DeLeon A, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Circulation 1998;98:1949-84.
3. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos P, et al. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2002;106:2051-4.
4. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation, 2003;107:664-6.
5. Peltier M, Trojette F, Sarano ME, et al. Relation between cardiovascular risk factors and nonrheumatic severe calcific aortic stenosis among patients with a three-cuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 2003;91:97-9.
6. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY, et al. Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2020-4.
7. Reant P, Brunot S, Lafitte S, et al. Predictive value of noninvasive coronary angiography with multidetector computed tomography to detect significant coronary stenosis before valve surgery. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:1506-10.
8. Juergens KU, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, et al. Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1545-50.
9. Cowell SJ, Newby DE, Burton J, et al. Aortic valve calcification on computed tomography predicts the severity of aortic stenosis. Clin Radiol 2003;58:712-16.
10. Morgan-Hughes GJ, Owens PE, Roobottom CA, et al. Three dimensional volume quantification of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography. Heart 2003;89:1191-4.
11. Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Lachat M, et al. Electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcification in aortic stenosis. Radiology 2002;225:120-8.
12. Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A, et al. Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography. Radiology 2006;240:47-55.
13. Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Friedrich GJ, et al. Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1410-17.
14. Bouvier E, Logeart D, Sablayrolles JL, et al. Diagnosis of aortic valvular stenosis by multislice cardiac computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2006;27:3033-8.
15. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr 2006;7:79-108.
16. Altman D, Bland J. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983;32:307.
17. Iung B, Gohlke-Barwolf C, Tornos P, et al. Recommendations on the management of tne asymptomatic patient with valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1252-66.
18. Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM, Laissy JP, et al. Assessment of the mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:411-13.
19. Kupfahl C, Honold M, Meinhardt G, et al. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques. Heart 2004;90:893-901.
20. John AS, Dill T, Brandt RR, et al. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:519-26.
21. Bernard Y, Meneveau N, Vuillemenot A, et al. Planimetry of aortic valve area using multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography is not a reliable method for assessing severity of aortic stenosis. Heart 1997;78:68-73.
22. Cormier B, Iung B, Porte JM, et al. Value of multiplane transesophageal echocardiography in determining aortic valve area in aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:882-5.
23. Hohl C, Muhlenbruch G, Wildberger JE, et al. Estimation of radiation exposure in low-dose multislice computed tomography of the heart and comparison with a calculation program. Eur Radiol 2006:1-6.
24. Omran H, Schmidt H, Hackenbroch M, et al. Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde calheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study. Lancet 2003;361:1241-6.