Comparison of the influence of FOV sizes and different voxel resolutions for the assessment of periodontal defects

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 44, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Kolsuz, M E ^a   Bagis, N ^a   Orhan, K ^a   Avsever, H ^b   Demiralp, K O ^c  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

^c MINISTRY OF HEALTH   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Coxel size; Diagnosis; Periodontal diseases; Radiology

Indexed keywords

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; JAW; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; RADIOGRAPHY; SKULL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; PERIODONTAL DISEASES; SKULL;

EID: 84940398415     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: 1476542X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20150070     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. de Faria Vasconcelos K, Evangelista KM, Rodrigues CD, Estrela C, de Sousa TO, Silva MA. Detection of periodontal bone loss using cone beam CT and intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41: 64-9. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/13676777
2. Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 1261-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050367
3. Noujeim M, Prihoda T, Langlais R, Nummikoski P. Evaluation of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography in the detection of simulated interradicular bone lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 156-62. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/61676894
4. Aljehani YA. Diagnostic applications of cone-beam CT for periodontal diseases. Int J Dent 2014; 2014: 865079. doi: 10.1155/ 2014/865079.
5. Mol A, Balasundaram A. In vitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 319-24. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/26475758
6. Al-Rawi B, Hassan B, Vandenberge B, Jacobs R. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 352-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02065.x
7. Neves FS, de Freitas DQ, Campos PS, de Almeida SM, Haiter-Neto F. In vitro comparison of cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes for detection of simulated external root resorption. J Oral Sci 2012; 54: 219-25.
8. Fuhrmann RAW, Wehrbein H, Langen HJ, Diedrich PR. Assessment of the dentate alveolar process with high resolution computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 50-4. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.24.1.8593909
9. Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Yang J. Diagnostic validity (or acuity) of 2D CCD versus 3D CBCT-images for assessing periodontal breakdown. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.03.012
10. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, et al. Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 420-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.049
11. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 219-26. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/14340323
12. Ballrick JW, Palomo JM, Ruch E, Amberman BD, Hans MG. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 573-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.025
13. Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome in dentistry: a systematic review. J Digit Imaging 2012; 26: 813-20. doi: 10.1007/ s10278-012-9562-7
14. Da Silveira PF, Fontana MP, Oliveira HW, Vizzotto MB, Montagner F, Silveira HL, et al. CBCT-based volume of simulated root resorption-influence of FOV and voxel size. Int Endod J Oct 2014. Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1111/iej.12390
15. Braun X, Ritter L, Jervøe-Storm PM, Frentzen M. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT for periodontal lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 1229-36. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1106-0
16. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London, UK: Chapman & Hall; 1991. pp. 403-9.
17. Haiter-Neto F, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 18-22. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/87103878
18. Hatcher DC. Operational principles for cone-beam computed tomography. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141: 3S-6S. doi: 10.14219/ jada.archive.2010.0359
19. Scarfe WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. Aust Dent J 2012; 57: 46-60. doi: 10.1111/ j.1834-7819.2011.01657.x
20. Wenzel A, Haiter-Neto F, Frydenberg M, Kirkevang LL. Variable-resolution cone beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: 939-45. doi: 10.1016/j. tripleo.2009.07.041
21. Melo SL, Bortoluzzi EA, Abreu M Jr, Corrëa LR, Corrëa M. Diagnostic ability of a cone-beam computed tomography scan to assess longitudinal root fractures in prosthetically treated teeth. J Endod 2010; 36: 1879-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.025
22. da Silveira PF, Vizzotto MB, Liedke GS, da Silveira HL, Montagner F, da Silveira HE. Detection of vertical root fractures by conventional radiographic examination and cone beam computed tomography-An in vitro analysis. Dent Traumatol 2013; 29: 41-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2012.01126.x
23. Özer SY. Detection of vertical root fractures by using cone beam computed tomography with variable voxel sizes in an in vitro model. J Endod 2011; 37: 75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.021
24. Liedke GS, da Silveira HE, da Silveira HL, Dutra V, de Figueiredo JA. Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to evaluate simulated external root resorption. J Endod 2009; 35: 233-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.005
25. Dalili Z, Taramsari M, Mousavi Mehr SZ, Salamat F. Diagnostic value of two modes of cone-beam computed tomography in evaluation of simulated external root resorption: an in vitro study. Imaging Sci Dent 2012; 42: 19-24. doi: 10.5624/isd.2012.42.1.19
26. Kamburǒglu K, Kursun S. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT images of different voxel resolutions used to detect simulated small internal resorption cavities. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 798-807. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01749.x
27. Kamburǒglu K, Murat S, Yüksel SP, Cebeci AR, Paksoy CS. Occlusal caries detection by using a cone-beam CT with different voxel resolutions and a digital intraoral sensor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: e63-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.048
28. Librizzi ZT, Tadinada AS, Valiyaparambil JV, Lurie AG, Mallya SM: Cone-beam computed tomography to detect erosions of the temporomandibular joint: effect of field of view and voxel size on diagnostic efficacy and effective dose. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: e25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.03.012
29. Sun Z, Smith T, Kortam S, Kim DG, Tee BC, Fields H. Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from conebeam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 117-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.08.016
30. Patcas R,Müller L, Ullrich O, Peltomäki T. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.034
31. Torres MG, Campos PS, Segundo NP, Navarro M, Crusoé-Rebello I. Accuracy of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes. Implant Dent 2012; 21: 150-5. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31824bf93c
32. Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.040
33. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 16.e1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.016
34. de-Azevedo-Vaz SL, Vasconcelos Kde F, Neves FS, Melo SL, Campos PS, Haiter-Neto F. Detection of periimplant fenestration and dehiscence with the use of two scan modes and the smallest voxel sizes of a cone-beam computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 115: 121-7. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.10.003