Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome in dentistry: A systematic review

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 813-820

  Spin Neto, Rubens ^a   Gotfredsen, Erik ^a   Wenzel, Ann ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Cone beam CT; Dentistry; Diagnostic outcome; Image quality; Voxel size

Indexed keywords

3D SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONE-BEAM CT; DIAGNOSTIC OUTCOME; SEARCH STRATEGIES; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VOXEL SIZE;

DENTISTRY; IMAGE ACQUISITION; IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMATION SERVICES;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ANIMAL; CADAVER; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTISTRY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; JAW; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SWINE; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; CADAVER; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTISTRY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW; SWINE; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TOOTH;

EID: 84880159916     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9562-7     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Qu X, Li G, Zhang Z, Ma X: Detection accuracy of in vitro approximal caries by cone beam computed tomography images. Eur J Radiol 79:24-27, 2011
2. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Levin MD, Gane D: Essentials of maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography. Alpha Omegan 103:62-67, 2010
3. Scarfe WC, Farman AG: What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 52:707-730, 2008
4. Grauer D, Cevidanes LS, Proffit WR: Working with DICOM craniofacial images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:460-470, 2009
5. Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ: Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose cone beam CT. Eur J Radiol 56:413-417, 2005
6. White SC, Pharoah MJ: The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities. Dent Clin North Am 52:689-705, 2008
7. Kamburoglu K, Murat S, Kolsuz E, Kurt H, Yuksel S, Paksoy C: Comparative assessment of subjective image quality of cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Oral Sci 53:501-508, 2011
8. Hatcher DC: Operational principles for cone-beam computed tomography. J Am Dent Assoc 141:3-6, 2010
9. Palomo JM, Rao PS, Hans MG: Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105:773-782, 2008
10. Davies J, Johnson B, Drage N: Effective doses from cone beam CT investigation of the jaws. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41:30-36, 2012
11. Patcas R, Muller L, Ullrich O, Peltomaki T: Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 141:41-50, 2012
12. Anderson SW, Soto JA: Multi-detector row CT of acute non-traumatic abdominal pain: contrast and protocol considerations. Radiol Clin North Am 50:137-147, 2012
13. Miles KA: Perfusion CT for the assessment of tumour vascularity: which protocol. Br J Radiol 76:36-42, 2003
14. Neves FS, Vasconcelos TV, Vaz SL, Freitas DQ, Haiter-Neto F: Evaluation of reconstructed images with different voxel sizes of acquisition in the diagnosis of simulated external root resorption using cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 45:234-239, 2012
15. Hassan B, Couto Souza P, Jacobs R, de Azambuja Berti S, van der Stelt P: Influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three-dimensional surface models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 14:303-310, 2010
16. Waltrick KB, de Abreu Junior MJ, Correa M, Zastrow MD, D'Avila Dutra V: Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal on cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study. J Periodontol, 2012, doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.110524
17. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y: Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:16-17, 2010
18. da Silveira PF, Vizzotto MB, Liedke GS, da Silveira HL, Montagner F, da Silveira HE: Detection of vertical root fractures by conventional radiographic examination and cone beam computed tomography - an in vitro analysis. Dent Traumatol, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2012.01126.x
19. Melo SL, Bortoluzzi EA, Abreu Jr, M, Correa LR, Correa M: Diagnostic ability of a cone-beam computed tomography scan to assess longitudinal root fractures in prosthetically treated teeth. J Endod 36:1879-1882, 2010
20. Ozer SY: Detection of vertical root fractures by using cone beam computed tomography with variable voxel sizes in an in vitro model. J Endod 37:75-79, 2011
21. Wenzel A, Haiter-Neto F, Frydenberg M, Kirkevang LL: Variable-resolution cone-beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108:939-945, 2009
22. Dalili Z, Taramsari M, Mousavi Mehr SZ, Salamat F: Diagnostic value of two modes of cone-beam computed tomography in evaluation of simulated external root resorption: an in vitro study. Imaging Sci Dent 42:19-24, 2012
23. Kamburoglu K, Kursun S: A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT images of different voxel resolutions used to detect simulated small internal resorption cavities. Int Endod J 43:798-807, 2010
24. Liedke GS, da Silveira HE, da Silveira HL, Dutra V, de Figueiredo JA: Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to evaluate simulated external root resorption. J Endod 35:233-235, 2009
25. Cheng JG, Zhang ZL, Wang XY, Zhang ZY, Ma XC, Li G: Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions. Clin Oral Investig 16:1015-1021, 2011
26. Haiter-Neto F, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E: Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:18-22, 2008
27. Kamburoglu K, Murat S, Yuksel SP, Cebeci AR, Paksoy CS: Occlusal caries detection by using a cone-beam CT with different voxel resolutions and a digital intraoral sensor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:63-69, 2010
28. Librizzi ZT, Tadinada AS, Valiyaparambil JV, Lurie AG, Mallya SM: Cone-beam computed tomography to detect erosions of the temporomandibular joint: effect of field of view and voxel size on diagnostic efficacy and effective dose. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:25-30, 2011
29. Bauman R, Scarfe W, Clark S, Morelli J, Scheetz J, Farman A: Ex vivo detection of mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars using CBCT at four different isotropic voxel dimensions. Int Endod J 44:752-758, 2011
30. Al-Rawi B, Hassan B, Vandenberge B, Jacobs R: Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans. J Oral Rehabil 37:352-358, 2010
31. Maret D, et al: Effect of voxel size on accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41:649-655, 2012
32. Sun Z, Smith T, Kortam S, Kim DG, Tee BC, Fields H: Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:117-127, 2011
33. Torres MG, Campos PS, Segundo NP, Navarro M, Crusoe-Rebello I: Accuracy of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes. Implant Dent 21:150-155, 2012
34. Fourie Z, Damstra J, Gerrits PO, Ren Y: Accuracy and reliability of facial soft tissue depth measurements using cone beam computer tomography. Forensic Sci Int 199:9-14, 2010
35. Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH: Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:100-108, 2010
36. Yeni YN, Christopherson GT, Dong XN, Kim DG, Fyhrie DP: Effect of microcomputed tomography voxel size on the finite element model accuracy for human cancellous bone. J Biomech Eng 127:1-8, 2005
37. Chadwick JW, Lam EW: The effects of slice thickness and interslice interval on reconstructed cone beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 110:e37-e42, 2010
38. Spin-Neto R, Marcantonio Jr, E, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A: Exploring CBCT-based DICOM files. A systematic review on the properties of images used to evaluate maxillofacial bone grafts. J Digit Imaging 24:959-966, 2011
39. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB: Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: Cb Mercuray, Newtom 3G and i-Cat. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35:219-226, 2006
40. Ballrick JW, Palomo JM, Ruch E, Amberman BD, Hans MG: Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134:573-582, 2008
41. Leung CC, Palomo L, Griffith R, Hans MG: Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:109-119, 2010
42. Thomas RZ, Ruben JL, de Vries J, ten Bosch JJ, Huysmans MC: Transversal wavelength-independent microradiography, a method for monitoring caries lesions over time, validated with transversal microradiography. Caries Res 40:281-291, 2006
43. Hassan B, Metska ME, Ozok AR, van der Stelt P, Wesselink PR: Detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth by a cone beam computed tomography scan. J Endod 35:719-722, 2009
44. Farman AG: ALARA still applies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 100:395-397, 2005
45. Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MA: Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:268-273, 2008