Stylized facts as an instrument for literature review and cumulative information systems research

Communications of the Association for Information Systems

Volumn 37, Issue , 2015, Pages 225-256

  Houy, Constantin ^a   Fettke, Peter ^a   Loos, Peter ^a  

^a GERMAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DFKI   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cumulative research; Literature review; Research synthesis; Stylized facts; Theory development

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

APPLICATION EXAMPLES; CURRENT SITUATION; LITERATURE REVIEWS; RELATED DRAWBACKS; RESEARCH SYNTHESIS; SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE; STYLIZED FACTS; THEORY DEVELOPMENT;

INFORMATION USE;

EID: 84940395426     PISSN: 15293181     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17705/1cais.03710     Document Type: Article

References (140)

1. Alavi, M., & Joachimsthaler, E. A. (1992). Revisiting DSS implementation research: A meta-analysis of the literature and suggestions for researchers. MIS Quarterly, 16(1), 95-116.
2. Becker, J., Algermissen, L., & Niehaves, B. (2003). Prozessmodellierung in eGovernment-Projekten mit der eEPK. Paper presented at the EPK 2003—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Bamberg, Germany.
3. Benbasat, I., & Lim, L. H. (1993). The effects of group, task, context and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small Group Research, 24(4), 430-462.
4. Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., & Sutton, A. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: Sage.
5. Bourgeois, L. J. (1979). Toward a method of middle-range theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 4(3), 443-447.
6. Brüning, J., & Forbrig, P. (2008). Zur Automatischen Ermittlung von Testszenarien aus EPK-Schemata. Paper presented at the Workshops colocated with the MobIS2008 Conference: Including EPK2008, KobAS2008 and ModKollGP2008, Saarbrücken, Germany.
7. Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 67-77.
8. Carlile, P. R., & Christensen, C. M. (2005). The cycles of theory building in management research. Havard Business School Working Paper (Nr.05-057).
9. Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What is this thing called science? St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
10. Clark, G. L. (1998). Stylized facts and close dialogue: Methodology in economic geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(1), 73-87.
11. Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research - A guide for literature reviews (3. ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
12. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994). Research synthesis as a scientific enterprise. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis (pp. 3-14). New York, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation.
13. Cuntz, N., Freiheit, J., & Kindler, E. (2005). On the semantics of EPCs: Faster calculation for EPCs with small state spaces. Paper presented at the EPK 2005—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Hamburg, Germany.
14. Cuntz, N., & Kindler, E. (2004). On the semantics of EPCs: Efficient calculation and simulation. Paper presented at the EPK 2004—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten. Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
15. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefullness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
16. Dehnert, J. (2001). Four systematic steps towards sound business process models. Paper presented at the 2nd International Colloquium on Petri Net Technologies for Modelling Communication Based Systems, Berlin, Germany.
17. Dehnert, J. (2002). Making EPCs fit for workflow management. Paper presented at the EPK 2002—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Trier, Germany.
18. Dehnert, J., & Rittgen, P. (2001). Relaxed soundness of business processes. Paper presented at the 13th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAISE'01), Interlaken, Switzerland.
19. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
20. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
21. Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
22. Dubin, R. (1978). Theory building. London: Free Press.
23. Dünnebacke, D., & Rhensius, T. (2009). Unternehmensindividuelle Auswahl von Prozessmodellierungstools. ERP Management, 2, 47-51.
24. Fettke, P. (2009a). Ansätze der Informationsmodellierung und ihre betriebswirtschaftliche Bedeutung: Eine Untersuchung der Modellierungspraxis in Deutschland. Zfbf - Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 61(8), 550-580.
25. Fettke, P. (2009b). How conceptual modeling Is used. Communication of the Association for Information Systems, 22(15), 1-26.
26. Fettke, P., Houy, C., & Loos, P. (2010a). On the relevance of design knowledge for design-oriented business and information systems engineering. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 2(6), 347-358.
27. Fettke, P., Houy, C., & Loos, P. (2010b). On the relevance of design knowledge for design-oriented business and information systems engineering - Supplemental considerations and further application examples. In P. Loos (Ed.), Publications of the Institute for Information Systems (IWi) at the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)—IWi-Heft, Nr. 191. Saarbrücken.
28. Fettke, P., Houy, C., Vella, A. L., & Loos, P. (2012). Towards the reconstruction and evaluation of conceptual model quality discourses - Methodical framework and application in the context of model understandability. In I. Bider, T. Halpin, J. Krogstie, S. Nurcan, E. Proper, R. Schmidt, P. Soffer & S. Wrycza (Eds.), BPMDS 2012 and EMMSAD 2012, LNBIP 113 (pp. 406-421). Berlin: Springer.
29. Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2003). Ontologische Evaluierung von Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten. Paper presented at the EPK 2003—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Bamberg, Germany.
30. Fichtenbauer, C., Rumpfhuber, M., & Stary, C. (2002). Sprachgerechte unternehmensnahe Modellierung von Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten — Zur ädaquaten Aus- und Weiterbildung von Modellierer-Innen. Paper presented at the EPK 2002—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Trier, Germany.
31. Frank, U. (2006). Towards a pluralistic conception of research methods in information systems research (ICB-research report nr. 7). Essen: Institut für Informatik und Wirtschaftsinformatik (ICB) der Universität Duisburg-Essen.
32. Freese, L. (1980). Formal theorizing. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 187-212.
33. Gadatsch, A. (2009). Integriertes Geschäftsprozess- und Workflow-Management – Konzeption, Rollen und organisatorische Einbindung. HMD—Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 266, 35-42.
34. Gil, P. M. (2010). Stylised facts and other empirical evidence on firm dynamics, business cycle and growth. Research in Economics, 64(1), 73-80.
35. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.
36. Green, P., & Rosemann, M. (1999). An ontological analysis of integrated process modelling. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAISE), Heidelberg, Germany.
37. Green, P., & Rosemann, M. (2000). Integrated process modelling: An ontological evaluation. Information Systems, 25(2), 73-87.
38. Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611-642.
39. Gregor, S. (2009). Building theory in the sciences of the artificial. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST'09), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
40. Gregor, S., & Jones, D. (2007). The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(5), 312-335.
41. Gruhn, V., & Laue, R. (2005). Einfache EPK-Semantik durch praxistaugliche Stilregeln. Paper presented at the EPK 2005—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Hamburg, Germany.
42. Gruhn, V., & Laue, R. (2006). Validierung syntaktischer und anderer EPK-Eigenschaften mit PROLOG. Paper presented at the EPK 2006—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Wien, Austria.
43. Gruhn, V., & Laue, R. (2007). Forderungen an hierarchische EPK-Schemata. Paper presented at the EPK 2007—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GIWorkshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, St. Augustin, Germany.
44. Guzzo, R. A., Jackson, S. E., & Katzell, R. A. (1987). Meta-analysis analysis. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 9, 407-442.
45. Handfield, R. B., & Melnyk, S. A. (1998). The scientific theory-building process: a primer using the case of TQM. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 321-339.
46. Heine, B.-O., Meyer, M., & Strangfeld, O. (2005). Stylised facts and the contribution of simulation to the economic analysis of budgeting. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 8(4), 34.
47. Heine, B.-O., Meyer, M., & Strangfeld, O. (2007). The concept of stylized facts for the measurement and evaluation of scientific progress (in German). Die Betriebswirtschaft (DBW), 67(5), 583-601.
48. Helfat, C. E. (2007). Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management. Strategic Organization, 5(2), 185-192.
49. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105.
50. Holton, E. F., & Lowe, J. S. (2007). Toward a general research process for using Dubin's theory building model. Human Resource Development Review, 6(3), 297-320.
51. Houy, C., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2009). Stylized facts on event-driven process chains - Application of a method for theory building in information systems (in German). Paper presented at the EPK 2009—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GIWorkshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Berlin, Germany.
52. Houy, C., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2011a). On theoretical foundations of empirical business process management research. In F. Daniel, K. Barkaoui & S. Dustdar (Eds.), BPM 2011 Workshops, LNBIP 99 (pp. 320-332). Berlin: Springer.
53. Houy, C., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2011b). Stylized facts in design-oriented information systems research - General potential and first experiences (in German). Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Zürich, Switzerland.
54. Houy, C., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2013). The concept of stylized facts as an instrument for cumulative IS research. Paper presented at the Pre-ECIS-Workshop "Building up or Piling Up? The Literature Review in Information Systems Research", Utrecht, Netherlands.
55. Houy, C., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2014a). On the theoretical foundations of research into the understandability of business process models. Paper presented at the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Tel Aviv, Israel.
56. Houy, C., Frank, J., Niesen, T., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2014b). On the usage of theories in the field of Wirtschaftsinformatik - A quantitative literature analysis. Publications of the Institute for Information Systems (IWi) at the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)—IWi-Heft Nr. 198. Saarbrücken, Germany.
57. Kahl, T., & Kupsch, F. (2005). Transformation und Mapping von Prozessmodellen in verteilten Umgebungen mit der EPK. Paper presented at the EPK 2005—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Hamburg, Germany.
58. Kaldor, N. (1961). Capital accumulation and economic growth. Paper presented at the The Theory of Capital, Proceedings of a Conference Held by the International Economic Association, London, UK.
59. Keller, G., Nüttgens, M., & Scheer, A.-W. (1992). Semantische Prozeßmodellierung auf der Grundlage "Ereignisgesteuerter Prozeßketten (EPK)", Publications of the Institute for Information Systems (IWi) at the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)—IWi-Heft Nr. 89. Saarbrücken, Germany.
60. Kerssens-van Drongelen, I. (2001). The iterative theory-building process: Rationale, principles and evaluation. Management Decision, 39(7), 503-512.
61. King, W. R., & He, J. (2005). Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 665-686.
62. King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43, 740-755.
63. Kohli, R., & Devaraj, S. (2003). Measuring information technology payoff: A meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 127-145.
64. Kopp, O., Unger, T., & Leymann, F. (2006). Nautilus event-driven process chains: Syntax, semantics, and their mapping to BPEL. Paper presented at the EPK 2006—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Wien, Austria.
65. Kruczynski, K. (2008). Prozessmodellierung im Wettbewerb: EPK vs. BPMN. is report, 6, 30-35.
66. Krumnow, S., Decker, G., & Weske, M. (2008). Modellierung von EPKs im Web mit Oryx. Paper presented at the Workshops colocated with the MobIS2008 Conference: Including EPK2008, KobAS2008 and ModKollGP2008, Saarbrücken, Germany.
67. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68. Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Lamba, H. (2010). A queueing theory description of fat-tailed price returns in imperfect financial markets. The European Physical Journal B, 77(2), 297-304.
70. Lauth, B., & Sareiter, J. (2005). Wissenschaftliche Erkenntnis. Eine ideengeschichtliche Einführung in die Wissenschaftstheorie. Paderborn: mentis.
71. Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997). The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Management Review, 93-102.
72. Lim, S. H., Saldanha, T., Malladi, S., & Melville, N. P. (2009). Theories used in information systems research: Identifying theory networks in leading IS journals. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
73. List, B., & Korherr, B. (2006). An evaluation of conceptual business process modelling languages. Paper presented at the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Dijon, France.
74. Loos, P., & Fettke, P. (2001). Towards an integration of business process modeling and object-oriented software development. Paper presented at the Fifth International Symposium on Economic Informatics, Bucharest, Romania.
75. Loos, P., Fettke, P., Weißenberger, B. E., Zelewski, S., Heinzl, A., Frank, U., & Iivari, J. (2011). What in fact is the role of stylized facts in fundamental research of business and information systems engineering? Business and Information Systems Engineering, 3(2), 107-117.
76. Lorena, A., Marques, G. M., Kooijman, S. A. L. M., & Sousa, T. (2010). Stylized facts in microalgal growth: Interpretation in a dynamic energy budget context. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society B, 365, 3509–3521.
77. Lübke, D., Marx Gómez, J., & Schneider, K. (2005). Serviceorientierte Architekturen und Prozessmanagement. ERP Management, 3, 19-22.
78. Lux, T., & Schornstein, S. (2005). Genetic learning as an explanation of stylized facts for foreign exchange markets. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 41(1-2), 169-196.
79. Mendling, J., Brabenetz, A., & Neumann, G. (2004). Generating SVG graphics from EPML processes. Paper presented at the EPK 2004—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Luxemburg, Luxembourg.
80. Mendling, J., & Nüttgens, M. (2003a). EPC modelling based on implicit arc types. Paper presented at the Information Systems Technology and its Applications, International Conference ISTA'2003, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
81. Mendling, J., & Nüttgens, M. (2003b). EPC syntax validation with XML schema languages. Paper presented at the EPK 2003—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Bamberg, Germany.
82. Mendling, J., & Nüttgens, M. (2003c). Konzeption eines XML-basierten Austauschformates für Ereignisgesteuerte Prozessketten (EPK). Informationssystem Architekturen, Wirtschaftsinformatik Rundbrief der GI Fachgruppe WI-MobIS 10 (2003) 2.
83. Mendling, J., & Nüttgens, M. (2003d). XML-basierte Geschäftsprozessmodellierung. Paper presented at the 6th Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik 2003: Medien - Märkte Mobilität, Dresden, Germany.
84. Mendling, J., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2006). Towards EPC semantics based on state and context. Paper presented at the EPK 2006—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Wien, Austria.
85. Mendling, J., van Dongen, B. F., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2007). On the degree of behavioral similarity between business process models. Paper presented at the EPK 2007—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, St. Augustin, Germany.
86. Mendling, J., Verbeek, H. M. W., van Dongen, B. F., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Neumann, G. (2008). Detection and prediction of errors in EPCs of the SAP reference model. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 64(1), 312-329.
87. Mendling, J., & Ziemann, J. (2005). Transformation of BPEL processes to EPCs. Paper presented at the EPK 2005—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Hamburg, Germany.
88. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
89. Moldt, D., & Rodenhagen, J. (2000). Ereignisgesteuerte Prozeßketten und Petrinetze zur Modellierung von Workflows. Paper presented at the Visuelle Verhaltensmodellierung verteilter und nebenläufiger Software-Systeme, Proceedings des 8. Workshop des Arbeitskreises "Grundlagen objektorientierter Modellierung" (GROOM) der GI-Fachgruppe 2.1.9 ("Objektorientierte Softwareentwicklung"), Bericht Nr. 24/00-I, Münster, Germany.
90. Nüttgens, M., & Rump, F. J. (2002). Syntax und Semantik Ereignisgesteuerter Prozessketten (EPK). Paper presented at the Promise 2002—Prozessorientierte Methoden und Werkzeuge für die Entwicklung von Informationssystemen, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Fachgruppentreffens, Potsdam, Germany.
91. Ozturk, I. (2010). A literature survey on energy-growth nexus. Energy Policy, 38(1), 340-349.
92. Petsch, M., Schorcht, H., Nissen, V., & Himmelreich, K. (2008). Ein Transformationsmodell zur Überführung von Prozessmodellen in eine Simulationsumgebung. Paper presented at the MobIS 2008—Modellierung betrieblicher Informationssysteme – Modellierung zwischen SOA und Compliance Management, Saarbrücken, Germany.
93. Phillips, A. W. (1958). The relationship between unemployment and the rate of change of money wages in the United Kingdom 1861-1957. Economica, 25(100), 283-299.
94. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery (2. ed.). London: Hutchinson.
95. Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2008). The design theory nexus. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 731-755.
96. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., & Green, P. (2009). Business process modeling - A comparative analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(4), 333-363.
97. Reiter, M., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2013). A contribution to theory building for the successful implementation of ERP and BPR – An application of the method of stylized facts. Paper presented at the 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-46), Maui, USA.
98. Rittgen, P. (2000a). EMC - A modeling method for developing web-based applications. Paper presented at the International Conference of the International Resources Management Association (IRMA) 2000, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
99. Rittgen, P. (2000b). Paving the road to business process automation. Paper presented at the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) 2000, Vienna, Austria.
100. Rittgen, P. (2000c). Quo vadis EPK in ARIS? Ansätze zu syntaktischen Erweiterungen und einer formalen Semantik. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 42(1), 27-35.
101. Rodenhagen, J. (2002). Ereignisgesteuerte Prozessketten (EPK) — Multiinstanziierungsfähigkeit und referentielle Persistenz. Paper presented at the EPK 2002—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Trier, Germany.
102. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedure for social research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
103. Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2012). The new stylized facts about income and subjective well-being. Emotion, 12(6), 1181-1187.
104. Sarshar, K., & Loos, P. (2005a). Comparing the control-flow of EPC and Petri net from the end-user perspective. In W. M. P. van der Aalst, B. Benatallah, F. Casati & F. Curbera (Eds.), Business Process Management. LNCS 3649 (pp. 434-439). Berlin: Springer.
105. Sarshar, K., & Loos, P. (2005b). Modellierung überbetrieblicher Behandlungsprozesse durch Objekt-Petrinetze. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 47(3), 203-210.
106. Scheer, A.-W. (1998). ARIS – Business process modeling (2. ed.). Berlin: Springer.
107. Scheer, A.-W., & Thomas, O. (2005). Geschäftsprozessmodellierung mit der ereignisgesteuerten Prozesskette. Das Wirtschaftsstudium, 34(89), 1069-1078.
108. Schmidt, W., Fleischmann, A., & Gilbert, O. (2009). Subjektorientiertes Geschäftsprozessmanagement. HMD—Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 266, 52-62.
109. Schneider, K., & Schreiner, P. (2003). Ein methodischer Ansatz zur Messung der Kundenintegration in der Dienstleistungserbringung. Information Management & Consulting, 18(3), 51-57.
110. Schwerin, J. (2001). Dynamic of growth in transformational economies (in German). Köln: Böhlau.
111. Seel, C., & Vanderhaeghen, D. (2005). Meta-model based extensions of the EPC for inter-organisational process modelling. Paper presented at the EPK 2005—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Hamburg, Germany.
112. Seidlmeier, H., & Scherfler, G. (2007). Modellgetriebene Integration und Migration - vom Fachprozess zur ausführbaren Anwendung. HMD—Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 257, 93-105.
113. Simon, C., Freiheit, J., & Olbrich, S. (2006). Using BPEL processes defined by event-driven process chains. Paper presented at the EPK 2006—Geschäftsprozessmanagement it Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Wien, Austria.
114. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
115. Sloman, A. (1978). The computer revolution in philosophy: Philosophy, science and models of mind. Hassocks, Sussex, England: Harvester.
116. Snidal, D. (2008). Commentary on the special issue. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(2), 326-333.
117. Störrle, H. (2006). A comparison of (e)EPCs and UML 2 activity diagrams. Paper presented at the EPK 2006—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GIWorkshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Wien, Austria.
118. Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371-384.
119. Thagard, P. (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
120. Thomas, O., & Dollmann, T. (2006). Fuzzy-EPK-Modelle: Attributierung und Regelintegration. Paper presented at the EPK 2006—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Wien, Austria.
121. Thomas, O., & Fellmann, M. (2006). Semantische Integration von Ontologien und Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten. Paper presented at the EPK 2006—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Wien, Austria.
122. Thomas, O., Hüsselmann, C., & Adam, O. (2002). Fuzzy-Ereignisgesteuerte Prozessketten – Geschäftsprozessmodellierung unter Berücksichtigung unscharfer Daten. Paper presented at the EPK 2002—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Trier, Germany.
123. Thomas, O., Kaffai, B., & Loos, P. (2005). Referenzmodellbasiertes Event-Management mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten. Paper presented at the EPK 2005—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Hamburg, Germany.
124. Thomas, O., Seel, C., Seel, C., Kaffai, B., & Martin, G. (2004). EPK-Referenzmodelle für Verwaltungsverfahren. Paper presented at the EPK 2004—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Luxemburg, Luxembourg.
125. Treiber, M., Kesting, A., & Helbing, D. (2010). Three-phase traffic theory and two-phase models with a fundamental diagram in the light of empirical stylized facts. Transportation Research Part B, 44(89), 983-1000.
126. van der Aalst, W. M. P. (1999). Formalization and verification of event-driven process chains. Information & Software Technology, 41(10), 639-650.
127. van der Aalst, W. M. P., Desel, J., & Kindler, E. (2002). On the semantics of EPCs: A vicious circle. Paper presented at the EPK 2002—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Trier, Germany.
128. van Dongen, B. F., & Jansen-Vullers, M. H. (2005). EPC verification in the ARIS for MySAP reference model database. Paper presented at the EPK 2005—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, Hamburg, Germany.
129. van Dongen, B. F., Jansen-Vullers, M. H., Verbeek, H. M. W., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2007). Verification of the SAP reference models using EPC reduction, state-space analysis, and invariants. Computers in Industry, 58(6), 578-601.
130. van Hee, K., Oanea, O., & Sidorova, N. (2005). Colored Petri nets to verify extended event-driven process chains. In R. Meersman & Z. Tari (Eds.), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2005: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE, LNCS 3760 (pp. 183-201). Berlin: Springer.
131. vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2009a). Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. Paper presented at the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Verona, Italy.
132. vom Brocke, J., Sonnenberg, C., & Simons, A. (2009b). Wertorientierte Gestaltung von Informationssystemen: Konzeption und Anwendung einer Potenzialmodellierung am Beispiel Serviceorientierter Architekturen. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 51(3), 261-272.
133. Walls, J., Widmeyer, G., & Sawy, O. E. (1992). Building an information systems design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 36-59.
134. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 8-23.
135. Wehler, J. (2007). Boolean and free-choice semantics of event-driven process chains. Paper presented at the EPK 2007—Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Proceedings des GI-Workshops und Arbeitskreistreffens, St. Augustin, Germany.
136. Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516-531.
137. Weißenberger, B. E., & Löhr, B. W. (2007). Planning and organizational success: Stylized facts of the empirical controlling research in Germany from 1990 - 2007 (in German). Zeitschrift für Planung & Unternehmenssteuerung, 18(4), 335-363.
138. Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490-495.
139. Wolfswinkel, J. F., Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 45-55.
140. Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: A meta-analysis of the TAM. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2(3), 251-304.