Linear measurement accuracy using cone-beam computed tomography for human skull

Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research

Volumn 18, Issue 20, 2014, Pages 3252-3256

  Sun, Xiao lin ^a   Wang, Xue jin ^a   Chen, Zhi guo ^a   Jin, Lei ^a  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cephalometry; Cone beam computed tomography; Dental implantation; Skull

Indexed keywords

ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; LINEAR MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; RADIATION DOSE; SKULL; SKULL RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY;

EID: 84940347191     PISSN: 16738225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.20.025     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, et al. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(9):1558-1564.
2. Sukovic P.Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6 Suppl 1:31-36.
3. Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, et al. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(1):150-157.
4. El-Beialy AR, Fayed MS, El-Bialy AM, et al. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography measurements: Influence of head orientation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140(2):157-165.
5. Loubele M, Van Assche N, Carpentier K, et al. Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(4):512-518.
6. van Daatselaar AN, Dunn SM, Spoelder HJ, et al. Feasibility of local CT of dental tissues. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003;32(3): 173-180.
7. Araki K, Maki K, Seki K, et al. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical properties. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33(1):51-59.
8. Fatemitabar SA, Nikgoo A.Multichannel computed tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography: linear accuracy of in vitro measurements of the maxilla for implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25(3):499-505.
9. Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, et al. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT. Eur J Radiol. 2005;56(3):413-417.
10. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33(5):291-294.
11. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, et al. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37(2):80-93.
12. van Vlijmen OJ, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, et al. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117(3):300-305.
13. Draenert FG, Coppenrath E, Herzog P, et al. Beam hardening artifacts occur in dental implant scans with the NesTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol.2007;36:198-203.
14. Jacobs R, Lambrichts I, Liang X, et al. Neurovascularization of the anterior jaw bones revisited using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103(5):683-693.
15. Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, et al. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34(9):816-821.
16. Hassan B, vd Stelt PF, Sanderink G. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.2007;103:534-542.
17. Alsaadi G, Quirynen M, Komárek A, et al. Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of oral implant failures, up to abutment connection. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34(7):610-617.
18. Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, et al. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.Br J Radiol. 2009; 82(973):35-40.
19. Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(5):640.e1-5.
20. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, et al. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dento maxilla facial radiology. 2006;35(4):219-226.
21. Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(6):410-416.
22. Dalessandri D, Bracco P, Paganelli C, et al. Ex vivo measurement reliability using two different cbct scanners for orthodontic purposes. Int J Med Robot. 2012;8(2):230-242.
23. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography(CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2009;38:609-625.