Should conservation of biodiversity involve private land? A Q methodological study in Poland to assess stakeholders' attitude

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2689-2704

  Kamal, Sristi ^a   Grodzinska Jurczak, Malgorzata ^a  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Conservation; Human subjectivity; Private protected areas; Q methodology

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; PRIVATE LAND; PROTECTED AREA; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; STAKEHOLDER;

POLAND;

EID: 84940232715     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-014-0744-0     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alers M, Bovarnick A, Boyle T, Mackinnon K, Sobrevila C (2007) Reducing threats to protected areas: lessons from the field. IOP World Bank and UNDP. http://siteresources. worldbank. org/INTBIODIVERSITY/Resources/ReducingThreats-web. pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2013.
2. Brown SR (1980) Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press, New Haven.
3. Brown SR (1996) Q methodology and qualitative research. Health Res 6(4): 561-567.
4. Cent J, Kobierska H, Grodzińska-Jurczak M, Bell S (2007) Who is responsible for Natura 2000 in Poland? - a potential role of NGOs in establishing the programme. Int J Environ Sustain Dev 6: 422-435.
5. Central Statistical Office Poland (2012) Chapter 1: Environment and environmental protection. In Concise statistical yearbook of, Poland, pp 25-62.
6. Cross RM (2005) Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology. Health Educ Res 20(2): 206-213.
7. Deignan T (2009) Enquiry-based learning: perspectives on practice. Teach High Educ 14: 13-28.
8. Doremus H (2003) A policy portfolio approach to biodiversity protection on private lands. Environ Sci Policy 6: 217-232.
9. European Commission (2013) Natura 2000 network. IOP European Commission: Environment. http://ec. europa. eu/environment/nature/natura2000/. Accessed 20 Nov 2013.
10. Environmental Law Institute (2003) Legal tools and incentives for private lands in Latin America: building models for success. Washington DC: Environmental Law Institute. https://cmsdata. iucn. org/downloads/spn___legal_tools_and_incentives_for_private_lands_conservation. pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2013.
11. Figgis P (2004) Conservation on private lands: the Australian experience. IUCN, Gland and Cambridge, p 1-31.
12. Figgis P, Humann D, Looker, M (2005) Conservation on private land in Australia. Parks: protected areas programme-Private Protected Areas 15(2): 19-29.
13. Fishburn IS, Kareiva P, Gaston KJ, Armsworth PR (2009) The growth of easements as a conservation tool. PLoS One. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0004996.
14. George S (2002) State Government incentives for habitat conservation-a status report. Defenders of wildlife, USA. http://www. defenders. org/resources/publications/programs_and_policy/biodiversity_partners/conservation_in_america_state_profiles. pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2013.
15. Grodzińska-Jurczak M, Cent J (2010) Udział społeczny szansa{ogonek} dla realizacji programu Natura 2000 w Polsce. Public participatory approach-a chance for Natura 2000 implementation in Poland. Chrońmy Przyrode{ogonek} Ojczysta{ogonek} 66(5): 341-352.
16. Grodzińska-Jurczak M, Cent J (2011) Expansion of nature conservation areas: problems with Natura 2000 implementation in Poland? Environ Manag 47: 11-27.
17. Grodzinska-Jurczak M, Strzelecka M, Kamal S, Gutowska J (2012) Effectiveness of nature conservation-a case of Natura 2000 sites in Poland. In: Sladonja B (ed) Protected area management. In Tech, Rijeka, pp 183-202.
18. Joppa LN, Loarla SR, Pimm SL (2008) On the protection of protected areas. PNAS 105(18): 6673-6678.
19. Kamal S, Grodzinska-Jurczak M, Brown G (2014a) Conservation on private land: a review of global strategies with a proposed classification system. J Environ Plan Manag. doi: 10. 1080/09640568. 2013. 875463.
20. Kamal S, Kocor M, Grodzinska-Jurczak M (2014 b) Quantifying human subjectivity: when quality meets quantity. Qual Sociol Rev 10(3) (In press).
21. Knight AT, Cowling RM, Campbell BM (2006) An operational model for implementing conservation action. Conserv Biol 20(2): 408-419.
22. Knight AT, Cowling RM (2007) Embracing opportunism in the selection of priority conservation areas. Conserv Biol 211: 124-1126.
23. Knight AT, Cowling RM, Difford M, Campbell BM (2010) Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land. Conserv Biol 24: 1348-1358.
24. Krug W (2001) Private supply of protected land in Southern Africa: A review of markets, approaches, barriers and issues. World Bank/OECD international workshop on market creation for biodiversity products and services. http://earthmind. net/values/docs/private-protected-land-southern-africa. pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2013.
25. Land Trust Alliance (2013) Total acres conserved by local and national land trusts in 2010. IOP Land Trust Alliance http://www. landtrustalliance. org/land-trusts/land-trust-census/data-tables. Accessed 01 Dec 2013.
26. Langholz J, Lassoie J (2001) Perils and promise of privately owned protected areas. Bioscience 51(10): 79-80.
27. Leva CED (2002) The conservation of nature and natural resources through legal and market-based instruments. Rev Eur Community Int Environ Law 11(1): 84-95.
28. Logo E (2013) Q-Method based environmental awareness measurement in transportation. Int J Traffic Transp Eng 3(1): 45-53.
29. Mascia MB (2003) Conservation and the social science. Editorial. Conserv Biol 17(3): 649-650.
30. Marshall MN (1996) Sampling for qualitative research. Fam Pract 13(6): 522-525.
31. Paloniemi R, Tikka PM (2008) Ecological and social aspects of biodiversity conservation on private lands. Environ Sci Policy 11: 336-346.
32. Risdon A, Eccleston C, Crombez G, McCracken L (2003) How can we learn to live with pain? A Q methodological analysis of the diverse understandings of acceptance of chronic pain. Soc Sci Med 56: 375-386.
33. Spurgeon L, Humphreys G, James G, Sackley C (2012) A Q-methodology study of patients' subjective experiences of TIA. Stroke Res Treat 2012: 1-10.
34. Smith G, Phillips E, Doret G (2006) Biodiversity conservation on private land. In 42nd ISoCaRP council case studies, Sydney. http://www. isocarp. net/Data/case_studies/828. pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2013.
35. Tikka PM, Kauppi P (2003) Introduction to special issue: protecting nature on private lands - from conflict to agreements. Environ Sci Policy 6: 193-194.
36. The Nature Conservancy (2011) Private lands conservation. IOP The nature conservancy, USA. http://www. nature. org/about-us/private-lands-conservation/index. htm. Accessed 15 Nov 2013.
37. Tryjanowski P, Sparks TH, Jerzak L, Rosin ZM, Skórka P (2014) A paradox for conservation: electricity pylons benefit avian diversity in intensively used farmland. Conserv Lett 7: 34-40.
38. Tryjanowski P, Hartel T, Báldi A, Szymański P, Tobolka M, Herzon I, Goławski A, Konvička M, Hromada M, Jerzak L, Kujawa K, Lenda M, Orłowski M, Panek M, Skórka P, Sparks TH, Tworek S, Wuczyński A, Żmihorski M (2011) Conservation of farmland birds faces different challenges in Western and Central-Eastern Europe. Acta Ornithol 46: 1-12.
39. van Exel J, De Graaf G (2005) Q Methodology: a sneak preview. http://qmethod. org/articles/vanExel. pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2013.
40. Watts S, Stenner P (2005) The subjective experience of partnership love: a Q methodological study. Br J Soc Psycol 44: 85-107.
41. Watts S, Stenner P (2012) Doing Q methodological research. theory, method and interpretation. Sage, London.
42. Webler T, Danielson S, Tuler S (2009) Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. IOP Greenfield MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute http://www. seri-us. org/sites/default/files/Qprimer. pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2013.