A policy portfolio approach to biodiversity protection on private lands

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 217-232

  Doremus, Holly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Conservation policy; Economic incentives; Environmental policy; Regulation

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION BIOLOGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038185251     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00036-4     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Adelman D.E.Barton J.H.Environmental regulation for agriculture: towards a framework to promote sustainable intensive agriculture Stanford Environ. Law J. 21 2002 3
2. Ando A.W.Waiting to be protected under the Endangered Species Act: the political economy of regulatory delay J. Law Econ. 4 1999 29
3. Bean M.J.The Endangered Species Act and private land: four lessons learned from the past quarter century Environ. Law Rep. 28 1998 10701
4. Cardenas J.C.Stranlund J.Willis C.Local environmental control and institutional crowding out World Dev. 2810 2000 1719
5. Carlson A.E.Recycling norms Ca. Law Rev. 89 2001 1231
6. Chang, L., 2002. In Mongolia, incentives to keep leopards alive, Wall Street Journal, 17 June 2002.
7. Cheever F.Property rights and the maintenance of wildlife habitat: the case for conservation land transactions Idaho Law Rev. 382 2002 431
8. Coglianese C.Assessing consensus: the promise and performance of negotiated rulemaking Duke Law J. 466 1997 1255
9. Cooter R.Normative failure theory of law Cornell Law Rev. 82 1997 947
10. Dana D.A.Natural preservation and the race to develop Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 143 1995 655
11. Defenders of Wildlife, 2002. Conservation in America: State Government Incentives for Habitat Conservation. Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC.
12. Doremus H.Listing decisions under the Endangered Species Act: why better science isn't always better policy Wash. Univ. Law Q. 75 1997 1029
13. Doremus H.Restoring endangered species: the importance of being wild Harv. Environ. Law Rev. 23 1999 1
14. Doremus H.Adaptive management, the Endangered Species Act, and the institutional challenges of "new age" environmental protection Washburn Law J. 41 2001 50
15. Esty D.C.Environmental federalism Mich. Law Rev. 95 1996 570
16. Ferraro P.J.Global habitat protection: limitations of development interventions and a role for conservation performance payments Conserv. Biol. 154 2001 990
17. Fink R.J.The national wildlife refuges: theory, practice, and prospect Harv. Environ. Law Rev. 18 1994 1
18. Fischman R.L.Stumbling to Johannesburg: the United States' haphazard progress toward sustainable forestry law Environ. Law Rep. 32 2002 10291
19. Forest Stewardship Council, 2002. Forests certified by FSC-accredited certification bodies (http://www.fscoax.org/html/5-3-3.html).
20. Gardner R.C.Banking on entrepreneurs: wetlands, mitigation banking, and takings Iowa Law Rev. 81 1996 527
21. Groves, C.R., Kutner, L.S., Stoms, D.M., Murray, M.P., Scott, J.M., Schafale, M., Weakley, A.S., Pressey, R.L., 2000. Owning up to our responsibilities: who owns lands important for biodiversity. In: Stein, B.A., Kutner, L.S., Adams, J.S. (Eds.), Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 275-300.
22. Harter P.J.Assessing the assessors: the actual performance of negotiated rulemaking N. Y. Univ. Environ. Law J. 91 2000 32
23. Houck O.A.The Endangered Species Act and its implementation by the US Departments of Interior and Commerce Colorado Law Rev. 64 1993 277
24. Kahan D.M.What do alternative sanctions mean? Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 63 1996 591
25. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Keiter R.B.Biodiversity conservation and the intermixed ownership problem: from nature reserves to collaborative processes Idaho Law Rev. 382 2002 301
27. Kelman, S., 1981. What Price Incentives? Economists and the Environment. Auburn House, Boston.
28. Leeming F.C.Porter B.E.Dwyer W.O.Cobern M.K.Oliver D.P.Effects of participation in class activities on children's environmental attitudes and knowledge J. Environ. Educ. 28 1997 33
29. LeGault L.Pelletier L.G.Impact of an environmental education program on students' and parents' attitudes, motivation, and behaviours Can. J. Behav. Sci. 32 2000 243
30. Lehtonen, E., Kuuluvainen, J., Pouta, E., Rekola, M., Li, C.-.Z., 2003. Non-market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland, Environmental Science & Policy 6, 195.
31. Lueck, D., Michael, J.A., in press. Preemptive habitat destruction under the Endangered Species Act, J. Law Econ.
32. Mahoney J.D.Perpetual restrictions on land and the problem of the future VA. Law Rev. 88 2002 739
33. Mann, C.C., Plummer, M.L., 1995. Noah's Choice: The Future of Endangered Species. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
34. Martin P.H.Nabuurs G.-J.Aubinet M.Karjalainen T.Vine E.L.Kinsman J.Heath L.S.Carbon sinks in temperate forests Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 26 2001 435
35. McLaughlin N.A.The role of land trusts in biodiversity conservation on private lands Idaho Law Rev. 382 2002 453
36. Meretsky V.J.Wegner D.L.Stevens L.E.Balancing endangered species and ecosystems: a case study of adaptive management in Grand Canyon Environ. Manage. 25 2000 579
37. National Research Council, 1999. Perspectives on Biodiversity: Valuing Its Role in an Everchanging World. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
38. National Research Council, 2000. Ecological Indicators for the Nation. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
39. Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1997. Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program. Federal Register 62(182), 49358.
40. Neuman J.C.Chapman C.Wading into the water market: the first 5 years of the Oregon Water Trust J. Environ. Law Litigation 14 1999 135
41. Oates, W.E., Baumol, W.J., 1975. The instruments for environmental policy. In: Mills, E. (Ed.), Economic Analysis of Environmental Problems. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 95-128.
42. Olson, M., 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
43. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J., 1994. Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
44. Plum Creek Timber Co., 2000. Final Plum Creek Timber Company Native Fish Habitat Conservation Plan. Available on the internet at http://www.plumcreek.com/environment/HCP-fish.cfm.
45. Polasky S.Doremus H.When the truth hurts: endangered species policy on private land with imperfect information J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 35 1998 22
46. Rachlinski J.J.Protecting endangered species without regulating private landowners: the case of endangered plants Cornell J. Law Public Policy 81 1998 1
47. Reckard, E.S. 2001. Aiming to profit from preservation real estate. Los Angeles Times, 14 May 2001, at C1.
48. Reisner, M., 1997. Water Policy and Farmland Protection: A New Approach to Saving California's Best Agricultural Lands. American Farmland Trust, Washington, DC.
49. Repetto, R., Dower, R.C., Jenkins, R., Geoghegan, J., 1992. Green Fees: How a Tax Shift Can Work for the Environment and the Economy. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
50. Ruhl J.B.The Endangered Species Act and private property: a matter of timing and location Cornell J. Law Public Policy 81 1998 37
51. Salafsky N.Cauley H.Balachander B.Cordes B.Parks J.Margoluis C.Bhatt S.Encarnacion C.Russell D.Margoluis R.A systematic test of an enterprise strategy for community-based conservation Conserv. Biol. 156 2001 1585
52. Sax J.L.Property rights and the economy of nature: understanding Lucas vs. South Carolina Coastal Council Stanford Law Rev. 455 1993 1433
53. Shaffer, M.L., Stein, B.A., 2000. Safeguarding our precious heritage. In: Stein, B.A., Kutner, L.S., Adams, J.S. (Eds.), Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 301-321.
54. Stone C.D.What to do about biodiversity: property rights, public goods, and the earth's biological riches South. Ca. Law Rev. 683 1995 577
55. Sunstein C.R.Social norms and social roles Columbia Law Rev. 96 1996 903
56. Terstad J.Swedish experiences of incentives for the protection of nature Sci. Total Environ. 240 1999 189
57. Thompson B.H.Jr.People or prairie chickens: the uncertain search for optimal biodiversity Stanford Law Rev. 515 1999 1127
58. Thompson B.H.Jr.Providing biodiversity through policy diversity Idaho Law Rev. 382 2002 355
59. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2001. Bog turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii), northern population recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, MA.
60. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service, 1999. Announcement of final safe harbor policy. Federal Register 64, 32717.
61. U.S. General Accounting Office, 1995. Endangered Species Act: Information on Species Protection on Nonfederal Lands. U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, DC.
62. Uphoff N.Langholz J.Incentives for avoiding the tragedy of the commons Environ. Conserv. 25 1998 251
63. Volkman J.M.McConnaha W.E.Through a glass, darkly: Columbia River salmon, the Endangered Species Act, and adaptive management Environ. Law 23 1993 1249
64. Wilcove D.S.Chen L.Y.Management costs for endangered species Conserv. Biol. 12 1998 1405
65. Woody, T., 1995. Down the rat hole. The Recorder, 14 June 1995, at 1.
66. Yaffee, S.L., 1982. Prohibitive Policy: Implementing the Federal Endangered Species Act. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
67. Young, S., 2001. King pleased by success of forest certification. Bangor Daily News, 28 November 2001, at 1.
68. Zellmer S.B.Johnson S.A.Biodiversity in and around McElligot's pool Idaho Law Rev. 382 2002 473