ASCONA: Rapid Detection and Alignment of Protein Binding Site Conformations

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 55, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1747-1756

  Bietz, Stefan ^a   Rarey, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALIGNMENT; PROTEINS;

APPLICATION SCENARIO; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CONFORMATIONAL ENSEMBLE; MULTIPLE BINDING SITES; MULTIPLE CONFORMATIONS; PROTEIN-BINDING SITES; PROTEIN-LIGAND BINDING SITES; STRUCTURAL DEVIATIONS;

BINDING SITES;

LIGAND; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 84940182462     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00210     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Knegtel, R. M.; Kuntz, I. D.; Oshiro, C. M. Molecular Docking to Ensembles of Protein Structures J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 266, 424-440 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0776
2. Huang, S.-Y.; Zou, X. Ensemble Docking of Multiple Protein Structures: Considering Protein Structural Variations in Molecular Docking Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2007, 66, 399-421 10.1002/prot.21214
3. Rao, S.; Sanschagrin, P. C.; Greenwood, J. R.; Repasky, M. P.; Sherman, W.; Farid, R. Improving Database Enrichment Through Ensemble Docking J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 621-627 10.1007/s10822-008-9182-y
4. Craig, I. R.; Essex, J. W.; Spiegel, K. Ensemble Docking into Multiple Crystallographically Derived Protein Structures: An Evaluation Based on the Statistical Analysis of Enrichments J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 511-524 10.1021/ci900407c
5. Korb, O.; Olsson, T. S. G.; Bowden, S. J.; Hall, R. J.; Verdonk, M. L.; Liebeschuetz, J. W.; Cole, J. C. Potential and Limitations of Ensemble Docking J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012, 52, 1262-1274 10.1021/ci2005934
6. Carlson, H. A.; Masukawa, K. M.; Rubins, K.; Bushman, F. D.; Jorgensen, W. L.; Lins, R. D.; Briggs, J. M.; McCammon, J. A. Developing a Dynamic Pharmacophore Model for HIV-1 Integrase J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2100-2114 10.1021/jm990322h
7. Damm, K.; Carlson, H. Exploring Experimental Sources of Multiple Protein Conformations in Structure-Based Drug Design J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8225-8235 10.1021/ja0709728
8. Landon, M. R.; Amaro, R. E.; Baron, R.; Ngan, C. H.; Ozonoff, D.; Andrew McCammon, J.; Vajda, S. Novel Druggable Hot Spots in Avian Influenza Neuraminidase H5N1 Revealed by Computational Solvent Mapping of a Reduced and Representative Receptor Ensemble Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2008, 71, 106-116 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2007.00614.x
9. Todorov, N. P.; Buenemann, C. L.; Alberts, I. L. De Novo Ligand Design to an Ensemble of Protein Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2006, 64, 43-59 10.1002/prot.20928
10. Dean, P. M.; Firth-Clark, S.; Harris, W.; Kirton, S. B.; Todorov, N. P. SkelGen: A General Tool for Structure-Based Denovo Ligand Design Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2006, 1, 179-189 10.1517/17460441.1.2.179
11. Gutteridge, A.; Thornton, J. Conformational Change in Substrate Binding, Catalysis and Product Release: An Open and Shut Case? FEBS Lett. 2004, 567, 67-73 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.03.067
12. Zavodszky, M. I.; Kuhn, L. A. Side-Chain Flexibility in Protein-Ligand Binding: The Minimal Rotation Hypothesis Protein Sci. 2005, 14, 1104-1114 10.1110/ps.041153605
13. Gaudreault, F.; Chartier, M.; Najmanovich, R. Side-Chain Rotamer Changes upon Ligand Binding: Common, Crucial, Correlate with Entropy and Rearrange Hydrogen Bonding Bioinformatics 2012, 28, i423-i430 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts395
14. Fariselli, P.; Rossi, I.; Capriotti, E.; Casadio, R. The WWWH of Remote Homolog Detection: The State of the Art Briefings Bioinf. 2007, 8, 78-87 10.1093/bib/bbl032
15. Kalaimathy, S.; Sowdhamini, R.; Kanagarajadurai, K. Critical Assessment of Structure-Based Sequence Alignment Methods at Distant Relationships Briefings Bioinf. 2011, 12, 163-175 10.1093/bib/bbq025
16. Claussen, H.; Buning, C.; Rarey, M.; Lengauer, T. FlexE: Efficient Molecular Docking Considering Protein Structure Variations J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 308, 377-395 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4551
17. Verdonk, M. L.; Mortenson, P. N.; Hall, R. J.; Hartshorn, M. J.; Murray, C. W. Protein-Ligand Docking Against Non-Native Protein Conformers J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 2214-2225 10.1021/ci8002254
18. Corbeil, C. R.; Moitessier, N. Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 3. Impact of Input Ligand Conformation, Protein Flexibility, and Water Molecules on the Accuracy of Docking Programs J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 997-1009 10.1021/ci8004176
19. Francis-Lyon, P.; Gu, S.; Hass, J.; Amenta, N.; Koehl, P. Sampling the Conformation of Protein Surface Residues for Flexible Protein Docking BMC Bioinf. 2010, 11, 575 10.1186/1471-2105-11-575
20. Xu, M.; Lill, M. Utilizing Experimental Data for Reducing Ensemble Size in Flexible-Protein Docking J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 52, 187-198 10.1021/ci200428t
21. Kellenberger, E.; Schalon, C.; Rognan, D. How to Measure the Similarity between Protein Ligand-Binding Sites? Curr. Comput.-Aided Drug Des. 2008, 4, 209-220 10.2174/157340908785747401
22. Pérot, S.; Sperandio, O.; Miteva, M. A.; Camproux, A.-C.; Villoutreix, B. O. Druggable Pockets and Binding Site Centric Chemical Space: A Paradigm Shift in Drug Discovery Drug Discovery Today 2010, 15, 656-667 10.1016/j.drudis.2010.05.015
23. Nisius, B.; Sha, F.; Gohlke, H. Structure-Based Computational Analysis of Protein Binding Sites for Function and Druggability Prediction J. Biotechnol. 2012, 159, 123-134 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.12.005
24. Schmidtke, P.; Le Guilloux, V.; Maupetit, J.; Tufféry, P. Fpocket: Online Tools for Protein Ensemble Pocket Detection and Tracking Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, W582-W589 10.1093/nar/gkq383
25. Le Guilloux, V.; Schmidtke, P.; Tuffery, P. Fpocket: An Open Source Platform for Ligand Pocket Detection BMC Bioinf. 2009, 10, 168 10.1186/1471-2105-10-168
26. Craig, I. R.; Pfleger, C.; Gohlke, H.; Essex, J. W.; Spiegel, K. Pocket-Space Maps to Identify Novel Binding-Site Conformations in Proteins J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 2666-2679 10.1021/ci200168b
27. Taylor, W. R.; Orengo, C. A. Protein Structure Alignment J. Mol. Biol. 1989, 208, 1-22 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90084-3
28. Alexandrov, N. N.; Takahashi, K.; Go, N. Common Spatial Arrangements of Backbone Fragments in Homologous and Non-Homologous Proteins J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 225, 5-9 10.1016/0022-2836(92)91021-G
29. Holm, L.; Sander, C. Protein Structure Comparison by Alignment of Distance Matrices J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 233, 123-138 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1489
30. Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. Protein Structure Alignment by Incremental Combinatorial Extension (CE) of the Optimal Path Protein Eng., Des. Sel. 1998, 11, 739-747 10.1093/protein/11.9.739
31. Holm, L.; Park, J. DaliLite Workbench for Protein Structure Comparison Bioinformatics 2000, 16, 566-567 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.6.566
32. Schenk, G.; Margraf, T.; Torda, A. E. Protein Sequence and Structure Alignments within One Framework Algorithms Mol. Biol. 2008, 3, 4 10.1186/1748-7188-3-4
33. Ukkonen, E. Algorithms for Approximate String Matching Inform. Control 1985, 64, 100-118 10.1016/S0019-9958(85)80046-2
34. Galil, Z.; Park, K. An Improved Algorithm for Approximate String Matching SIAM J. Comput. 1990, 19, 989-999 10.1137/0219067
35. Levenshtein, V. I. Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions, and Reversals Soviet Phys.-Dokl. 1966, 10, 707-710
36. Ukkonen, E. Finding Approximate Patterns in Strings J. Algorithms 1985, 6, 132-137 10.1016/0196-6774(85)90023-9
37. Hartshorn, M. J.; Verdonk, M. L.; Chessari, G.; Brewerton, S. C.; Mooij, W. T. M.; Mortenson, P. N.; Murray, C. W. Diverse, High-Quality Test Set for the Validation of Protein-Ligand Docking Performance J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 726-741 10.1021/jm061277y
38. PDB Search Website. http://www.pdb.org/pdb/search/advSearch.do?search=new (accessed: 10/06/ 2015).
39. Hilbig, M.; Urbaczek, S.; Groth, I.; Heuser, S.; Rarey, M. MONA-Interactive Manipulation of Molecule Collections J. Cheminf. 2013, 5, 38 10.1186/1758-2946-5-38
40. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 1997, 23, 3-25 10.1016/S0169-409X(96)00423-1
41. Cheng, L. S.; Amaro, R. E.; Xu, D.; Li, W. W.; Arzberger, P. W.; McCammon, J. A. Ensemble-based Virtual Screening Reveals Potential Novel Antiviral Compounds for Avian Influenza Neuraminidase J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 3878-3894 10.1021/jm8001197
42. Xu, M.; Lill, M. A. Utilizing Experimental Data for Reducing Ensemble Size in Flexible-Protein Docking J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 52, 187-198 10.1021/ci200428t
43. Bolstad, E. S.; Anderson, A. C. In Pursuit of Virtual Lead Optimization: Pruning Ensembles of Receptor Structures for Increased Efficiency and Accuracy During Docking Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2009, 75, 62-74 10.1002/prot.22214
44. Pettersen, E. F.; Goddard, T. D.; Huang, C. C.; Couch, G. S.; Greenblatt, D. M.; Meng, E. C.; Ferrin, T. E. UCSF Chimera-A Visualization System for Exploratory Research and Analysis J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1605-1612 10.1002/jcc.20084