Personalizing the electrode to neuromodulate an extended cortical region

Brain Stimulation

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 555-560

  Cancelli, A ^a,c   Cottone, C ^a,d   Di Giorgio, M ^a   Carducci, F ^e   Tecchio, F ^a,b  

^a FATEBENEFRATELLI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b IRCCS SAN RAFFAELE PISANA   (Italy)

^c CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^d Department of Neuroscience and Imaging G d'Annunzio University of Chieti e Pescara   (Italy)

^e SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cortical target; Electrode personalization; Neuronavigation; Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALTERNATING CURRENT; ARM; ARTICLE; CENTRAL SULCUS; CORTICAL ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; LEG; MALE; NERVE CELL EXCITABILITY; NEUROMODULATION; NEURONAVIGATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SCALP; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; DEVICES; ELECTRODE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTRODES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURONAVIGATION; SCALP; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84940109066     PISSN: 1935861X     EISSN: 18764754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.398     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Marshall L, Molle M, Hallschmid M, Born J. Transcranial direct current stimulation during sleep improves declarative memory. J Neurosci 2004;24:9985e92.
2. Stagg CJ, Bachtiar V, O'Shea J, et al. Cortical activation changes underlying stimulation-inducedbehavioural gains in chronic stroke. Brain 2012;135:276e84.
3. Shafi MM, Westover MB, Fox MD, Pascual-Leone A. Exploration and modulation of brain network interactions with noninvasive brain stimulation in combination with neuroimaging. Eur J Neurosci 2012;35:805e25.
4. Nitsche MA, Doemkes S, Karakose T, et al. Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 2007;97:3109e17.
5. Datta A, Bikson M, Fregni F. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: high-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow. Neuroimage 2010;52:1268e78.
6. Rahman A, Reato D, Arlotti M, et al. Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects. J Physiol 2013;591:2563e78.
7. Dmochowski JP, Bikson M, Datta A, Richardson J, Fridriksson J, Parra LC. On the role of electric field orientation in optimal design of transcranial current stimulation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012;2012:6426e9.
8. Gabriel S, Lau RW, Gabriel C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. Phys Med Biol 1996;41:19.
9. Goncalve S, de Munck J, Verbunt J, Heethaar R, da Silva F. In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and the combined analysis of SEF/SEP data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003;50:4.
10. Nicholson PW. Specific impedance of cerebral white matter. Exp Neurol 1965;13:15.
11. Oostendorp T, Delbeke J, Stegeman D. The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002;47:6.
12. Parazzini M, Rossi E, Ferrucci R, Liorni I, Priori A, Ravazzani P. Modelling the electric field and the current density generated by cerebellar transcranial DC stimulation in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2014;125:577e84.
13. Sillay KA, Rutecki P, Cicora K, et al. Long-term measurement of impedance in chronically implanted depth and subdural electrodes during responsive neurostimulation in humans. Brain Stimulation 2013;6:718e26.
14. Wagner T, Eden U, Rushmore J, et al. Impact of brain tissue filtering on neurostimulation fields: a modeling study. Neuroimage 2014;85(Pt 3):1048e57.
15. Tecchio F, Cancelli A, Cottone C, et al. Regional personalized electrodes to select transcranial current stimulation target. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:131.
16. Feurra M, Bianco G, Santarnecchi E, Del Testa M, Rossi A, Rossi S. Frequencydependent tuning of the human motor system induced by transcranial oscillatory potentials. J Neurosci 2011;31:12165e70.
17. Bastani A, Jaberzadeh S. a-tDCS differential modulation of corticospinal excitability: the effects of electrode size. Brain Stimulation 2013;6:932e7.
18. Brunoni AR, Fregni F, Pagano RL. Translational research in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a systematic review of studies in animals. Rev Neurosci 2011;22:471e81.
19. Faria P, Hallett M, Miranda PC. A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS. J Neural Eng 2011;8:066017.
20. Bikson M, Datta A, Rahman A, Scaturro J. Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: role of "return" electrode's position and size. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:1976e8.
21. Moliadze V, Atalay D, Antal A, Paulus W. Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities. Brain Stimul 2012;5:505e11.
22. Moliadze V, Antal A, Paulus W. Electrode-distance dependent after-effects of transcranial direct and random noise stimulation with extracephalic reference electrodes. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:2165e71.
23. Davidson T, Tremblay F. Hemispheric differences in corticospinal excitability and in transcallosal inhibition in relation to degree of handedness. PLoS One 2013:8.
24. Tecchio F, Zappasodi F, Pasqualetti P, et al. Age dependence of primary motor cortex plasticity induced by paired associative stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119:675e82.
25. Tecchio F, Cancelli A, Cottone C, et al. Multiple sclerosis fatigue relief by bilateral somatosensory cortex neuromodulation. J Neurol 2014 Aug;261(8):1552e8.
26. Artola A, Brocher S, Singer W. Different voltage-dependent thresholds for inducing long-term depression and long-term potentiation in slices of rat visual cortex. Nature 1990;347:69e72.
27. Bar-Ilan L, Gidon A, Segev I. The role of dendritic inhibition in shaping the plasticity of excitatory synapses. Front Neural Circuits 2012;6:118.
28. Le Roux N, Amar M, Baux G, Fossier P. Homeostatic control of the excitationinhibition balance in cortical layer 5 pyramidal neurons. Eur J Neurosci 2006;24:3507e18.
29. Engel AK, Gerloff C, Hilgetag CC, Nolte G. Intrinsic coupling modes: multiscale interactions in ongoing brain activity. Neuron 2013;80:867e86.
30. Polania R, Nitsche MA, Korman C, Batsikadze G, Paulus W. The importance of timing in segregated theta phase-coupling for cognitive performance. Curr Biol 2012;22:1314e8.
31. Struber D, Rach S, Trautmann-Lengsfeld SA, Engel AK, Herrmann CS. Antiphasic 40 Hz oscillatory current stimulation affects bistable motion perception. Brain Topogr 2014;27:158e71.
32. Engel AK, Fries P, Singer W. Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001;2:704e16.
33. Siegel M, Donner TH, Engel AK. Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012;13:121e34.
34. Polania R, Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Modulating functional connectivity patterns and topological functional organization of the human brain with transcranial direct current stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 2011;32:1236e49.
35. Edwards D, Cortes M, Datta A, Minhas P, Wassermann EM, Bikson M. Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS. Neuroimage 2013;74:266e75.