Impact of brain tissue filtering on neurostimulation fields: A modeling study

NeuroImage

Volumn 85, Issue , 2014, Pages 1048-1057

  Wagner, Tim ^a,b   Eden, Uri ^c   Rushmore, Jarrett ^d   Russo, Christopher J ^b   Dipietro, Laura ^e   Fregni, Felipe ^f   Simon, Stephen ^a,d   Rotman, Stephen ^f   Pitskel, Naomi B ^f   Ramos Estebanez, Ciro ^f   Pascual Leone, Alvaro ^f,h   Grodzinsky, Alan J ^e,g   Zahn, Markus ^g   Valero Cabré, Antoni ^d,i,j  

^a Highland Instruments   (United States)

^b HARVARD MIT DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c USA   (United States)

^d BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^f HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^g Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science   (United States)

^h BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ CNRS   (France)

^j UNIVERSITAT OBERTA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

more..

Author keywords

Cellular models; DBS; Neuromodulation; Neurostimulation; TMS

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN TISSUE; CONDUCTANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FILTRATION; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; IN VIVO STUDY; MOTONEURON; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; WAVEFORM; WHITE MATTER;

CELLULAR MODELS; CEREBRAL SPINAL FLUID; CSF; DBS; DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION; FEM; FINITE ELEMENT MODEL; HEWLETT PACKARD; HP; IACUC; INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MRI; NEUROMODULATION; NEUROSTIMULATION; RMS; ROOT MEAN SQUARED; TMS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VOA; VOLUMES OF ACTIVATION;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; CATS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84889673825     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.079     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. (IFAP) Dielectric properties of body tissues in the frequency range of 10Hz to 100GHz - work reported from the Brooks Air Force Base Report "compilation of the dielectric properties of body tissues at RF and microwave frequencies" by C. Gabriel I.F.A.P. http://niremf.ifac.cnr.it/tissprop/.
2. Agin D. Electroneutrality and electrodiffusion in the squid axon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1967, 57:1232-1238.
3. Akhtari M., Bryant H.C., Mamelak A.N., Flynn E.R., Heller L., Shih J.J., Mandelkern M., Matlachov A., Ranken D.M., Best E.D., DiMauro M.A., Lee R.R., Sutherling W.W. Conductivities of three-layer live human skull. Brain Topogr. 2002, 14:151-167.
4. Bedard C., Kroger H., Destexhe A. Modeling extracellular field potentials and the frequency-filtering properties of extracellular space. Biophys. J. 2004, 86:1829-1842.
5. Behari J., Singh S. Bioelectric characteristics of unstressed in vivo bone. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1981, 19:49-54.
6. Bossetti C.A., Birdno M.J., Grill W.M. Analysis of the quasi-static approximation for calculating potentials generated by neural stimulation. J. Neural Eng. 2008, 5:44-53.
7. Burdette E.C., Friederich P.G., Seaman R.L., Larsen L.E. In situ permittivity of canine brain: regional variations and postmortem changes. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 1986, 38-50. (MTT-34).
8. Butson C.R., McIntyre C.C. Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2005, 116:2490-2500.
9. Datta A., Bansal V., Diaz J., Patel J., Reato D., Bikson M. Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimul. 2009, 2:201-207. (207 e201).
10. De Geeter N., Crevecoeur G., Dupre L., Van Hecke W., Leemans A. A DTI-based model for TMS using the independent impedance method with frequency-dependent tissue parameters. Phys. Med. Biol. 2012, 57:2169-2188.
11. Dissado L.A. Ion transport through nerves and tissues. Comments Mol. Cell. Biophys. 1987, 4:143-169.
12. Dissado L.A. A fractal interpretation of the dielectric response of animal tissues. Phys. Med. Biol. 1990, 35:1487-1503.
13. Foster K.R., Schwan H.P. Dielectric properties of tissues and biological materials: a critical review. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1989, 17:25-104.
14. Foster K.R., Schwan H.P. Dielectric properties of tissues. Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields 1996, 25-102. CRC Press, New York. C. Polk, E. Postow (Eds.).
15. Gabriel C., Gabriel S., Corthout E. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. Phys. Med. Biol. 1996, 41:2231-2249.
16. Gabriel S., Lau R.W., Gabriel C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10Hz to 20GHz. Phys. Med. Biol. 1996, 41:2251-2269.
17. Grant P.F., Lowery M.M. Effect of dispersive conductivity and permittivity in volume conductor models of deep brain stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 57:2386-2393.
18. Heller L., Hulsteyn D.B.v. Brain stimulation using electromagnetic sources: theoretical aspects. Biophys. J. 1992, 63:129-138.
19. Jones K.E., Bawa P. Computer simulation of the responses of human motoneurons to composite 1A EPSPS: effects of background firing rate. J. Neurophysiol. 1997, 77:405-420.
20. Kraszewski A., Stuchly M.A., Stuchly S.S., Smith A.M. In vivo and in vitro dielectric properties of animal tissues at radio frequencies. Bioelectromagnetics 1982, 3:421-432.
21. Kuncel A.M., Grill W.M. Selection of stimulus parameters for deep brain stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115:2431-2441.
22. Logothetis N.K., Kayser C., Oeltermann A. In vivo measurement of cortical impedance spectrum in monkeys: implications for signal propagation. Neuron 2007, 55:809-823.
23. Martinsen S.G.A. Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics 2000, Academic Press.
24. McCreery D., Agnew W. Neuronal and axonal injury during functional electrical stimulation; a review of the possible mechanisms. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 1990, 1489. IEEE.
25. McCreery D.B., Agnew W.F., Yuen T.G., Bullara L.A. Comparison of neural damage induced by electrical stimulation with faradaic and capacitor electrodes. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1988, 16:463-481.
26. McNeal D.R. Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1976, 23:329-337.
27. Miocinovic S., Lempka S.F., Russo G.S., Maks C.B., Butson C.R., Sakaie K.E., Vitek J.L., McIntyre C.C. Experimental and theoretical characterization of the voltage distribution generated by deep brain stimulation. Exp. Neurol. 2009, 216:166-176.
28. Miranda P.C., Mekonnen A., Salvador R., Ruffini G. The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation. Neuroimage 2013, 15(70):48-58. (Apr.).
29. Novak V., Kangarlu A., Abduljalil A., Novak P., Slivka A., Chakeres D., Robitaille P.M. Ultra high field MRI at 8Tesla of subacute hemorrhagic stroke. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2001, 25:431-435.
30. Pethig R., Kell D.B. The passive electrical properties of biological systems: their significance in physiology, biophysics, and biotechnology. Phys. Med. Biol. 1987, 32:933-970.
31. Peyman A., Holden S.J., Watts S., Perrott R., Gabriel C. Dielectric properties of porcine cerebrospinal tissues at microwave frequencies: in vivo, in vitro and systematic variation with age. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007, 52:2229-2245.
32. Plonsey R., Heppner D.B. Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. Bull. Math. Biophys. 1967, 29:657-664.
33. Press W., Teukolsky S., Vetterling W., Flannery B. Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing 2007, Cambridge University Press.
34. Rattay F. Analysis of models for extracellular fiber stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1989, 36:974-977.
35. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics 2010, Cengage Learning.
36. Roth B.J. Mechanisms for electrical stimulation of excitable tissue. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1994, 22:253-305.
37. Rushmore R.J., Valero-Cabre A., Lomber S.G., Hilgetag C.C., Payne B.R. Functional circuitry underlying visual neglect. Brain 2006, 129:1803-1821.
38. Saha S., Williams P.A. Comparison of the electrical and dielectric behavior of wet human cortical and cancellous bone tissue from the distal tibia. J. Orthop. Res. 1995, 13:524-532.
39. Schmid G., Neubauer G., Illievich U.M., Alesch F. Dielectric properties of porcine brain tissue in the transition from life to death at frequencies from 800 to 1900MHz. Bioelectromagnetics 2003, 24:413-422.
40. Schwan H.P. Die elektrischen eigenschaften von muskelgewebe bei niederfrequenz. Z. Naturforsch. 1954, 9b:245-251.
41. Schwan H.P. Determination of biological impedances. Physical Techniques in Biological Research 1963, 323-408. Academic Press, New York.
42. Schwan H.P. Alternating current electrode polarization*. Biophysik 1966, 3:181-201.
43. Schwan H.P. Electrode polarization impedance and measurements in biological materials. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1968, 148:191-209.
44. Schwan H.P. Linear and nonlinear electrode polarization and biological materials. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1992, 20:269-288.
45. Schwan H.P., Ferris C.D. Four-electrode null techniques for impedance measurement with high resolution. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1968, 481-485.
46. Singh B., Smith C.W., Hughes R. In vivo dielectric spectrometer. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1979, 17:45-60.
47. Stuchly M.A., Athey T.W., Stuchly S.S., Samaras G.M., Taylor G. Dielectric properties of animal tissues in vivo at frequencies 10MHz-1GHz. Bioelectromagnetics 1981, 2:93-103.
48. Surowiec A., Stuchly S.S., Swarup A. Postmortem changes of the dielectric properties of bovine brain tissues at low radiofrequencies. Bioelectromagnetics 1986, 7:31-43.
49. Tay G. Measurement of Current Density Distribution Induced In Vivo During Magnetic Stimulation 1992, 211. Marquette University, Milwaukee.
50. Tay G.C.M., Battocletti J., Sances A., Swiontek T., Kurakami C. Measurement of magnetically induced current density in saline and in vivo. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1989. Images of the Twenty-First Century. Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE 1989, 4:1167-1168.
51. Tehovnik E.J. Electrical stimulation of neural tissue to evoke behavioral responses. J. Neurosci. Methods 1996, 65:1-17.
52. Tracey B., Williams M. Computationally efficient bioelectric field modeling and effects of frequency-dependent tissue capacitance. J. Neural Eng. 2011, 8:036017.
53. Traub R.D. Motorneurons of different geometry and the size principle. Biol. Cybern. 1977, 25:163-176.
54. Wagner T.A., Zahn M., Grodzinsky A.J., Pascual-Leone A. Three-dimensional head model simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2004, 51:1586-1598.
55. Wagner T., Valero-Cabre A., Pascual-Leone A. Noninvasive human brain stimulation. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 9:527-565.
56. Wei X.F., Grill W.M. Impedance characteristics of deep brain stimulation electrodes in vitro and in vivo. J. Neural Eng. 2009, 6:046008.
57. Yamamoto T., Yamamoto Y. Electrical properties of the epidermal stratum corneum. Med. Biol. Eng. 1976, 14:151-158.