On the role of electric field orientation in optimal design of transcranial current stimulation

Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 6426-6429

  Dmochowski, Jacek P ^a   Bikson, Marom ^a   Datta, Abhishek ^b   Richardson, Jessica ^c   Fridriksson, Julius ^c   Parra, Lucas C ^a  

^a CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b Soterix Medical   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AXIS OF SYMMETRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CURRENT FLOWS; ELECTRICAL CURRENT; ELECTRICAL STIMULATIONS; FIELD ORIENTATION; HEAD MODEL; HIGH RESOLUTION; IN-VITRO; INDUCED ELECTRIC FIELDS; MEMBRANE POLARIZATION; NEUROMODULATION; NONINVASIVE TECHNIQUE; OPTIMAL DESIGN; OPTIMAL PLACEMENTS; OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; REGION OF INTEREST; REGIONS OF INTEREST; STIMULATION PROTOCOLS; TARGET REGIONS; THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS; TRANSCRANIAL;

ALGORITHMS; ELECTRODES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; OPTIMIZATION; PATIENT REHABILITATION; TELEMETERING;

ELECTRIC FIELDS;

ARTICLE; BRAIN; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

BRAIN; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; STROKE;

EID: 84870780068     PISSN: 1557170X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347465     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. M. A. Nitsche and W. Paulus, "Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation," Journal of Physiology, 2010; 527.3:633-639.
2. D. Reato, A. Rahman, M. Bikson, and L. C. Parra, "Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing," Journal of Neuroscience, 2010; 33(45):15067-15079.
3. T. Radman, R. L. Ramos, J. C. Brumberg, M. Bikson, "Role of cortical cell type and morphology in sub- and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation." Brain Stimul., 2009; 2:215-228.
4. A. Datta, V. Bansal, J. Diaz, J. Patel, D. Reato, M. Bikson, "Gyri-precise head model of transcranial DC stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad." Brain Stimulation, 2009:2(4):201-207.
5. P. C. Miranda, M. Lomarev, and M. Hallett, "Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation," Clinican Neurophysiology, 2006;117:1623-1629.
6. R. N. Holdefer, R. Sadleir, and M. J. Russell, "Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation," Clinical Neurophysiology, 2006;117:1388-1397.
7. T. Wagner, F. Fregni, S. Fecteau, A. Grodzinsky, M. Zahn, and A. Pascual-Leone, "Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study," NeuroImage, 2007;35:1113-1124.
8. J. P. Dmochowski, A. Datta, M. Bikson, Y. Su, and L. C. Parra, "Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target," Journal of Neural Engineering (2011); 8:046011.
9. M. Grant, S. Boyd, and Y. Ye, "Disciplined Convex Programming." Chapter in Global Optimization: From Theory to Implementation, L. Liberti and N. Maculan (eds.), Springer, 2006:155-210.
10. J. M. Baker, C. Rorden, and J. Fridriksson, "Using transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia," Stroke, 2010;41:1229-1236.