Modelling and comparison of calcium looping and chemical solvent scrubbing retrofits for CO2 capture from coal-fired power plant

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 42, Issue , 2015, Pages 226-236

  Hanak, Dawid P ^a   Biliyok, Chechet ^a   Anthony, Edward J ^a   Manovic, Vasilije ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Calcium looping; Carbon capture; Coal fired power plant; Efficiency penalty reduction

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA; CALCIUM; CALCIUM COMPOUNDS; CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; COAL; COAL FUELED FURNACES; COST EFFECTIVENESS; EMISSION CONTROL; MINING; RETROFITTING; SECONDARY RECOVERY; SOLVENTS; STEAM ENGINEERING;

CALCIUM BASED SORBENT; CALCIUM LOOPING; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGES (CCS); CO2 EMISSION REDUCTION; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; PENALTY REDUCTION; POWER PLANT EFFICIENCY; SOLVENT REGENERATIONS;

FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS;

ABSORPTION; AMMONIA; CALCIUM; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; HIGH TEMPERATURE; SOLVENT;

EID: 84940035471     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. 2 with lime. Energy Fuels 2003, 17:308-315.
2. 2 capture with CaO. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:2861-2866.
3. 3. Chem. Eng. J. 2002, 90:303-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(02)00126-2.
4. AG L History and Technological Progress. Cryogenic Air Separation 2013, Linde AG, Engineering Division, Pullach, Germany.
5. 2 capture by CaO in a 300kWth circulating fluidized bed facility. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2014, 29:142-152. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.08.002.
6. 2 Capture Technologies 2011, vol. 213206 FP7. Politecnico di Milano-Alstom, UK.
7. 2 capture in a 1.7MWth calcium looping pilot. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2013, 18:237-245. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.07.014.
8. AspenTech Aspen Plus IGCC Model 2011, Aspen Technology, Inc, Burlington, MA, USA.
9. Baker E.H. The calcium oxide-carbon dioxide system in the pressure range 1-300 atmospheres. J. Chem. Soc. 1962, 464-470. 10.1039/JR9620000464.
10. 3 looping. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 11:25-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.07.021.
11. Bhown A.S., Freeman B.C. Analysis and status of post-combustion carbon dioxide capture technologies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:8624-8632.
12. Black J. Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity 2013, vol. DOE/2010/1. National Energy Technology Laboratory, http://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/Research/Energy%20Analysis/OE/BitBase_FinRep_Rev2a-3_20130919_1.pdf.
13. Boot-Handford M.E., Abanades J.C., Anthony E.J., Blunt M.J., Brandani S., Mac Dowell N., et al. Carbon capture and storage update. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 130-189. 10.1039/C3EE42350F.
14. 2 capture process with two circulating fluidized bed carbonator reactors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50:9685-9695. 10.1021/ie200579f.
15. Cormos C.-C., Cormos A.-M. Assessment of calcium-based chemical looping options for gasification power plants. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38:2306-2317. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.128.
16. 2 capture technology from lab to pilot scale at IFK, University of Stuttgart. Fuel 2014, 127:23-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.01.063.
17. 2 capture capacity of CaO in long series of carbonation/calcination cycles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45:8846-8851. 10.1021/ie0606946.
18. 2. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47:1630-1635. 10.1021/ie070937+.
19. Hanak D.P., Biliyok C., Yeung H., Białecki R. Heat integration and exergy analysis for a high ash supercritical coal-fired power plant integrated with a post-combustion carbon capture process. Fuel 2014, 134:126-139.
20. 2 capture from power generation systems. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8:2199-2249. 10.1039/C5EE01228G.
21. 2 capture technology for coal-fired power plants. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2015, 34:52-62.
22. 2 capture plant using chilled ammonia process. Appl. Energy 2015, 151:258-272. 10.1016/j.apenergy. 2015.04.059.
23. Hornick M.J., McDaniel J.E. Tampa Electric Polk Power Station Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Project-Final Technical Report 2002, vol. DE-FC-21-9. The U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
24. IEA Technology Roadmap: Carbon Capture and Storage 2013, International Energy Agency, Paris, France.
25. IEA Tracking Clean Energy Progress 2013. IEA Input to the Clean Energy Ministerial 2013, IEA Publications, Paris, France.
26. Kvamsdal H.M., Romano M.C., van der Ham L., Bonalumi D., van Os P., Goetheer E. Energetic evaluation of a power plant integrated with apiperazine-based CO2capture process. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2014, 28:343-355. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.07.004.
27. Lasheras A., Ströhle J., Galloy A., Epple B. Carbonate looping process simulation using a 1D fluidized bed model for the carbonator. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:686-693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.01.005.
28. 2 capture from flue gas using carbonation/calcination cycles. AIChE J. 2008, 54:1912-1925. 10.1002/aic.11486.
29. 2 capture process on a steam power plant with different cooling water temperatures. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 10:1-14. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.05.003.
30. 2 capture in pilot-scale dual fluidized beds. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89:1386-1395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.06.011.
31. 2 abatement costs to base plant efficiency. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:427-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.09.003.
32. 2 looping cycle performance of a high-purity limestone after thermal activation/doping. Energy Fuels 2008, 22:3258-3264. 10.1021/ef800316 h.
33. 2 capture-performance, cost and feasibility analysis. Energy Procedia 2013, 63:2199-2206.
34. Martínez I., Murillo R., Grasa G., Carlos Abanades J. Integration of a Ca looping system for CO2 capture in existing power plants. AIChE J. 2011, 57:2599-2607. 10.1002/aic.12461.
35. Metz B., Davidson O., de Coninck H., Loos M., Meyer L. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
36. Natunen M., Jäntti T., Goral D., Nuortimo K. First Operating Experiences of 55MWe Konin and 205MWe Polaniec CFB Boilers Firing 100% Biomass (Foster Wheeler Energia Oy) 2013, PowerGen Eur, Vienna, Austria.
37. 2 capture process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53:10721-10733. 10.1021/ie500606 v.
38. Pace D.K. Modeling and simulation verification and validation challenges. Johns Hopkins APL Tech. Dig. 2004, 25:163-172.
39. Perrin N., Dubettier R., Lockwood F., Tranier J.-P., Bourhy-Weber C., Terrien P. Oxycombustion for coal power plants: advantages, solutions and projects. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 74:75-82. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.03.074.
40. 2 capture process in greenfield power plants. Energy 2010, 35:4030-4041.
41. 2CPU) for CCS power plants. Fuel 2012, 101:254-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.07.039.
42. Ramezani M., Shah K., Doroodchi E., Moghtaderi B. Application of a novel calcium looping process for production of heat and carbon dioxide enrichment of greenhouses. Energy Convers. Manage. 2015, 103:129-138. 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.06.044.
43. 2 capture system using CaO. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 138:148-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.06.005.
44. Rodríguez N., Alonso M., Abanades J.C. Average activity of CaO particles in a calcium looping system. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156:388-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.10.055.
45. Romano M.C., Martínez I., Murillo R., Arstad B., Blom R., Ozcan D.C., Ahn H., Brandani S. Process simulation of Ca-looping processes: review and guidelines. Energy Procedia 2013, 37:142-150. 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.05.095.
46. 2 capture from power plant flue gas. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 69:257-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.10.041.
47. 2 capture in existing power plants. Energy Convers. Manage. 2008, 49:2809-2814. 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.03.022.
48. 2 capture system using CaO. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 147:252-258. 10.1016/j.cej.2008.07.010.
49. Roy C.J. Review of code and solution verification procedures for computational simulation. J. Comput. Phys. 2005, 205:131-156. 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.10.036.
50. 2 capture with CaO, Status of the technology and next steps towards large scale demonstration. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:852-859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.129.
51. 2 capture with CaO in a 1.7 MWt pilot facility. Energy Procedia 2013, 37:1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.05.078.
52. Sanpasertparnich T., Idem R., Bolea I., de Montigny D., Tontiwachwuthikul P. Integration of post-combustion capture and storage into a pulverized coal-fired power plant. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:499-510.
53. 2 from Combustion Processes. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1999, 77:62-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1205/026387699525882.
54. Stéphenne K. Start-up of World's First Commercial Post-Combustion Coal Fired CCS Project: Contribution of Shell Cansolv to Saskpower Boundary Dam ICCS Project. 12th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol. 2014, vol. 63:6106-6110. 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.642.
55. 2 capture from a coal-fired power plant. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2009, 32:435-442. 10.1002/ceat.200800569.
56. Ströhle J., Junk M., Kremer J., Galloy A., Epple B. Carbonate looping experiments in a 1MWth pilot plant and model validation. Fuel 2014, 127:13-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.12.043.
57. 2. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51:7177-7184. 10.1021/ie2030129.
58. Valverde J.M. A model on the CaO multicyclic conversion in the Ca-looping process. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 228:1195-1206.
59. 2 capture from a lignite fired power plant. Fuel 2013, 113:826-836. 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.087.
60. Wang J., Anthony E.J. A common decay behavior in cyclic processes. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2007, 194:1409-1420. 10.1080/00986440701401594.
61. 2 capture. Int. J. Energy Res. 2010, 34:321-332. 10.1002/er.1559.
62. Yan K., Wu X., Hoadley A., Xu X., Zhang J., Zhang L. Sensitivity analysis of oxy-fuel power plant system. Energy Convers. Manage. 2015, 98:138-150. 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.03.088.
63. 2 capture system. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:603-612. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.01.004.
64. 2. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6:25-40. 10.1039/c2ee22890.