Analysis and status of post-combustion carbon dioxide capture technologies

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 45, Issue 20, 2011, Pages 8624-8632

  Bhown, Abhoyjit S ^a   Freeman, Brice C ^a  

^a ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE; ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE; MINIMUM ENERGY; PARASITIC LOADS; POST-COMBUSTION; TECHNOLOGY READINESS LEVELS;

PLANTS (BOTANY); TECHNOLOGY;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; COMBUSTION; ENERGY USE; LANDSCAPE; POWER PLANT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

ARTICLE; COMBUSTION; ENERGY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GREENHOUSE GAS; POSTCOMBUSTION CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; TECHNOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

AIR POLLUTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; POWER PLANTS;

EID: 80054694132     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es104291d     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Center for Global Development, Science Daily, November 15, 2007; http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/11/071114163448.htm.
2. $45.3 Billion in US Coal-Fired Power Plants Cancelled in 2007; Resource Media, January 8, 2009.
3. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Electric Power Annual 2009; DOE/EIA-0348 (2009); Washington, DC, 2011.
4. U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA). Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States, 2010; http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/carbon.html (accessed June 25, 2011).
5. U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2008; http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ usinventoryreport.html (accessed June 25, 2011).
6. 2 Emissions Nat. Geosci. 2010, 3, 811-812
7. 2 Capture Process Overview and Coal-Fired 500 ton per day Demonstration Project Update, Tenth Annual Carbon Capture & Sequestration Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, May 4, 2011.
8. Metz, B.; Davidson, O.; Coninck, H. C. d.; Loos, M.; Meyer, L. A., Eds. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage; Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovenmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005.
9. Carbon Dioxide Capture from Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants; DOE/NETL-401/110907; National Energy Technology Laboratory, November 2007.
10. Finkeenrath, M. Cost and Performance of Carbon Dioxide Capture from Power Generation; International Energy Agency, 2011.
11. 2 Capture Technology for Existing Plants R&D Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, March 2009.
12. 2 Capture; Product ID 1014223; EPRI: Palo Alto, CA, 2008.
13. 2 Capture Options Currently Under Development; PID 1012796; EPRI: Palo Alto, CA, 2007.
14. 2 Capture Technology Development; PID 1016995; EPRI: Palo Alto, CA, 2008.
15. 2 Capture Technology Development; PID 1017644; EPRI: Palo Alto, CA, 2009.
16. 2 Capture Technology Development; PID 1019812; EPRI: Palo Alto, CA, 2010.
17. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2010 November EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File, Sources EIA-923 and EIA-860; http://www.eia.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/eia906-920.html (accessed June 25, 2011).
18. Guide to the Business of Chemistry; American Chemistry Council: Washington, DC, 2003.
19. American Chemistry Council. Production Index, 2008, 2009, 2010.
20. C&EN Staff Gains In Chemical Output Level Off Chem. Eng. News 2008, 86, 61-70
21. Worell, E.; Phylipsen, D.; Einstein, D.; Martin, N. Energy Use and Energy Intensity of the U.S. Chemical Industry; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Berkeley, CA, 2010; http://escholarship.org/uc/item/2925w8g6;jsessionid= 8B5AC06A6916F20CA2C9D4F3894CB980#page-1 (accessed June 25, 2011).
22. Role of Enhanced Oil Recovery in Accelerating the Deployment of Carbon Capture and Sequestration, A Massachusetts Institute of Technology Energy Initiative and Bureau of Economic Geology at the University of Texas at Austin Symposium, (Austin), TX, July 23, 2010.
23. McGlashan, N. R.; Marquis, A. J. Availability Analysis of Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Systems: Minimum Work Input Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C 2007, 221, 1057-1065
24. 2 Compressor Characteristics and Integration in Post Combustion Carbon Capture Carbon Sequestration Comparative Economic Analysis. In Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2010, June 14-18, 2010, Glasgow, UK.
25. Rao, Y. V. C. Postulational and Statistical Thermodynamics; Allied Publishers: New Delhi, 1994.
26. 2 Capture and Storage Energy Policy 2007, 35, 4444-4454
27. 2 Capture for Ultra-Supercritical Pulverized Coal Power Plant Applications, Phase II Task 3 Final Report; PID 1017515; EPRI: Palo Alto, CA, 2010.
28. Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants. Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity, Revision 2; DOE/2010/1397; National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2010.
29. Mankins, J. Technology Readiness Levels: A White Paper; NASA, April 1995.
30. Nolte, W. Technology Readiness Level Calculator; Air Force Research Laboratory, October 2003.
31. U.S. Department of Energy. Technology Readiness Assessment Guide; DOE G 413.3-4; October 12, 2009.
32. Ericson, A. The Role of CCS in the Decarbonization of Power. Presentation at 8th Annual Conference on Carbon Capture and Sequestration, Pittsburgh, PA, May 5, 2009.
33. 2 Capture Technology Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, September 2010.
34. 2 from Gas Streams. US Patent 7,056,482, June 6, 2006.
35. 2 Capture Energy Procedia 2009, 1, 1419-1426
36. Freeman, S.; Dugas, R.; Van Wagener, D. H.; Nguyen, T.; Rochelle, G. T. Carbon Dioxide Capture with Concentrated, Aqueous Piperazine Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4 (2) 119-124
37. 2 Exploiting the Catalytic Power of Carbonic Anhydrase. Seventh Annual Conference on Carbon Capture & Sequestration, Pittsburgh, PA, May 5-8, 2008.
38. 2 Separations in Imidazolium-Based Room Temperature Ionic Liquids Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48 (6) 2739-2751
39. 2 Capture ChemSusChem 2010, 3 (8) 919-930
40. 2 Capture Fuel 2010, 89 (6) 1298-1306
41. Radosz, M.; Hu, X.; Krutkramelis, K.; Shen, Y. Flue Gas Carbon Capture on Carbonaceous Sorbents: Toward a Low-Cost Multifunctional Carbon Filter for Green Energy Producers Indus. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47 (10) 3783-3794
42. Deng, H.; Doonan, C.; Furukawa, H.; Ferreira, R.; Towne, J.; Knobler, C.; Wang, B.; Yaghi, O. Multiple Functional Groups of Varying Ratios in Metal-Organic Frameworks Science 2010, 327 (5967) 846-850
43. 2 Binding in a Water-Stable, Triazolae-Bridged Metal-Organic Framework Functionalized with Ethylenediamine J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 (25) 8784-8786
44. Keskin, S.; van Heest, T.; Sholl, D. Can Metal-organic Framework Materials Play a Useful Role in Large-Scale Carbon Dioxide Separations? ChemSusChem 2010, 3 (8) 879-891
45. Liang, Y.; Harrison, P; Gupta, R. P.; Green, A.; McMichael, W. J. Carbon Dioxide Capture Using Dry Sodium-Based Sorbents Energy Fuels 2004, 18 (2) 569-575
46. Gupta, H.; Fan, L. S. Carbonation-Calcination Cycle Using High reactivity Calcium Oxide for Carbon Dioxide Separation from Flue Gas Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41 (16) 4035-4042
47. Baker, R. W.; Lokhandwala, K. Natural Gas Processing with Membranes: An Overview Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47 (7) 2109-212
48. Pakala, N.; Bhown, A. Effect of Particulate Matter on Mass Transfer through Microporous Hollow Fiber Membranes J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 111 (1) 71-79
49. Merkel, T.; Lin, H.; Wei, X.; Baker, R. Power Plant Post-Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture: An Opportunity for Membranes J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 359 (1-2) 126-139