Assessment of calcium-based chemical looping options for gasification power plants

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 2306-2317

  Cormos, Calin Cristian ^a   Cormos, Ana Maria ^a  

^a BABE BOLYAI UNIVERSITY   (Romania)

Author keywords

Calcium based chemical looping; Gasification; Hydrogen and power co generation

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; CALCIUM CARBONATE; CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; COAL COMBUSTION; COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANTS; COMBUSTION; GAS TURBINES; GASIFICATION; HYDROGEN; PRECOMBUSTION; QUALITY CONTROL; WATER GAS SHIFT;

CHEMICAL LOOPING; CO-GENERATION; COMBINED CYCLE GAS TURBINE; INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE PLANTS; PLANT FLEXIBILITIES; POST-COMBUSTION CAPTURES; PROCESS INTEGRATION; QUALITY SPECIFICATIONS;

GAS GENERATORS;

EID: 84874110633     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.128     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, www.ipcc.ch; 2007.
2. European Commission. A European strategic energy technology plan (SET Plan) - towards a low carbon future. COM; 2007. 723 final.
3. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Carbon dioxide capture and storage, www.ipcc.ch; 2005.
4. European Commission. Fuel cell and hydrogen. Joint undertaking, http://www.fch-ju.eu; 2012 (the last accessed on 03.09.12.).
5. Andrews J, Shabani B. Re-envisioning the role of hydrogen in a sustainable energy economy. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012; 37:1184-203.
6. Higman C, van der Burgt M. Gasification. 2nd ed. Burlington: Gulf Professional Publishing, Elsevier Science; 2008.
7. 2 capture; 2003. Report PH4/19.
8. Cormos CC, Starr F, Tzimas E. Use of lower grade coals in IGCC plants with carbon capture for the co-production of hydrogen and electricity. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35:556-67.
9. 2 capture; 2007. Report 13/2007.
10. Adams TA, Barton PI. Combining coal gasification and natural gas reforming for efficient polygeneration. Fuel Process Technol 2011;92:639-55.
11. Pires JCM, Martins FG, Alvim-Ferraz MCM, Simões M. Recent developments on carbon capture and storage: an overview. Chem Eng Res Des 2011;89:1446-60.
12. 2 capture technology - the U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program. Int J Green Gas Con 2008;2:9-20.
13. Gibbins J, Chalmers H. Carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy 2008;36:4317-22.
14. Kohl A, Nielsen R. Gas purification. 5th ed. Huston: Gulf Publishing Company; 1997.
15. Mangalapally HP, Notz R, Asprion N, Sieder G, Garcia H, Hasse H. Pilot plant study of four new solvents for post combustion carbon dioxide capture by reactive absorption and comparison to MEA. Int J Green Gas Con 2012;8:205-16.
16. Raynal L, Bouillon PA, Gomez A, Broutin P. From MEA to demixing solvents and future steps, a roadmap for lowering the cost of post-combustion carbon capture. Chem Eng J 2011;171:742-52.
17. 2 capture. Energy Procedia 2011;4:2612-9.
18. Padurean A, Cormos CC, Cormos AM, Agachi PS. Multicriterial analysis of post-combustion carbon dioxide using alkanolamines. Int J Green Gas Con 2011;5:676-85.
19. Pennline H, Luebke D, Jones K, Myers C, Morsi B, Heintz Y, et al. Progress in carbon dioxide capture and separation research for gasification-based power generation point sources. Fuel Process Technol 2008;89:897-907.
20. Petrakopoulou F, Tsatsaronis G. Production of hydrogen-rich fuels for pre-combustion carbon capture in power plants: a thermodynamic assessment. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012; 37:7554-64.
21. 2 capture process in a natural gas combined cycle power plant. Int J Green Gas Con 2009;3:385-92.
22. Padurean A, Cormos CC, Agachi PS. Pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture by gaseliquid absorption for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plants. Int J Green Gas Con 2012;7:1-11.
23. Erlach B, Schmidt M, Tsatsaronis G. Comparison of carbon capture IGCC with pre-combustion decarbonisation and with chemical-looping combustion. Energy 2011;36:3804-15.
24. Fan LS. Chemical looping systems for fossil energy conversions. Wiley-AIChE; 2010.
25. Chen S, Xue Z, Wang D, Xiang W. Hydrogen and electricity co-production plant integrating steam-iron process and chemical looping combustion. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012;37:8204-16.
26. Martinez A, Lara Y, Lisbona P, Romeo LM. Energy penalty reduction in the calcium looping cycle. Int J Green Gas Con 2012;7:74-81.
27. Cormos CC. Evaluation of iron based chemical looping for hydrogen and electricity co-production by gasification process with carbon capture and storage. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35:2278-89.
28. Kang KS, Kim CH, Bae KK, Cho W, Kim SH, Park CS. Oxygencarrier selection and thermal analysis of the chemicallooping process for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35:12246-54.
29. Cleeton JPE, Bohn CD, Muller CR, Dennis JS, Scott SA. Clean hydrogen production and electricity from coal via chemical looping: identifying a suitable operating regime. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34:1-12.
30. 2 capture in a novel compact fluidized bed: simulation and operation requirements. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011;36:4887-99.
31. 2 capture. Appl Energy 2012;95:285-94.
32. 2 capture in an existing power plant. Energy Procedia 2011;4:1699-706.
33. 2 fixation by flue-gas treatment using methane tri-reforming or coke/coal gasification combined with lime carbonation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34:8061-6.
34. 2 capture. Prog Energy Combust 2010;36:260-79.
35. Connell DP, Lewandowski D, Ramkumar S, Phalak N, Statnick R, Fan SL. Process simulation and economic analysis of the Calcium Looping Process (CLP) for hydrogen and electricity production from coal and natural gas. Fuel, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.006; 2012.
36. 2 capture from power generation, cement manufacture and hydrogen production. Chem Eng Res Des 2011;89:836-55.
37. 2 sorbent. Fuel Process Technol 2012;96:27-36.
38. 2 capture technologies in cement manufacturing process. J Clean Prod 2012;32:251-61.
39. Starr F, Tzimas E, Peteves S. Critical factors in the design, operation and economics of coal gasification plants: the case of the flexible co-production of hydrogen and electricity. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007;32:1477-85.
40. 2 capture. Energy 2012;45:101-6.
41. Meerman JC, Ramírez A, Turkenburg WC, Faaij APC. Performance of simulated flexible integrated gasification polygeneration facilities. Part A: a technical-energetic assessment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2011;15:2563-87.
42. 2 quality recommendations. Int J Green Gas Con 2008;2:478-84.
43. Cormos CC. Hydrogen production from fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage based on chemical looping systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011;36:5960-71.
44. Kunze C, Spliethoff H. Modelling of an IGCC plant with carbon capture for 2020. Fuel Process Technol 2010;91:934-41.
45. 2 capture from power plant flue gas. Chem Eng Sci 2012;69:257-69.
46. 3 looping. Int J Green Gas Con 2012;11:25-33.
47. 2 capture and opportunities for integration. J Power Technol 2011;91:6-13.
48. Cormos CC. Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS). Energy 2012;42:434-45.
49. Cormos CC. Evaluation of syngas-based chemical looping applications for hydrogen and power co-generation with CCS. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012;37:13371-86.
50. Ylätalo J, Ritvanen J, Arias B, TynjäläT, Hyppänen T. 1- dimensional modelling and simulation of the calcium looping process. Int J Green Gas Con 2012;9:130-5.
51. Besancon BM, Hasanov V, Imbault-Lastapis R, Benesch R, Barrio M, Mølnvik MJ. Hydrogen quality from decarbonized fossil fuels to fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34: 2350-60.
52. Hoogers G. Fuel cell technology handbook. CRC Press; 2003.
53. Toonssen R, Woudstra N, Verkooijen A. Exergy analysis of hydrogen production plants based on biomass gasification. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008;33:4074-82.
54. Cormos CC. Evaluation of energy integration aspects for IGCCbased hydrogen and electricity co-production with carbon capture and storage. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35:7485-97.
55. Jerndal E, Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A. Thermal analysis of chemical-looping combustion. Chem Eng Res Des 2006;84: 795-806.
56. Smith R. Chemical processes: design and integration. West Sussex, England: Wiley; 2005.
57. Varghese J, Bandyopadhyay S. Improved area - energy targeting for fired heater integrated heat exchanger networks. Chem Eng Res Des 2012;90:213-9.
58. 2 systems in existing coal power plants. Int J Green Gas Con 2010;4:647-54.
59. Bandyopadhyay S. Design of renewable energy systems incorporating uncertainties through pinch analysis. Comput Aided Chem Eng 2011;29:1994-8.
60. 2 capture efficiency and energy requirement analysis of power plant using modified calcium-based sorbent looping cycle. Energy 2012; 36:1590-8.
61. 2 sequestration in magnesium silicate rock - a comparative study. Energy Convers Manag 2012;55:116-26.
62. Pehnt M, Henkel J. Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide capture and storage from lignite power plants. Int J Green Gas Con 2009;3:49-66.
63. 2. Int J Green Gas Con 2008;2:448-67.
64. 2 intensive carbon-based energy vectors. Energy 2012;41:280-97.
65. Gangadharan P, Zanwar A, Zheng K, Gossage J, Lou H. Sustainability assessment of polygeneration processes based on syngas derived from coal and natural gas. Comput Chem Eng 2012;39:105-17.
66. 2 capture based on coal gasification. Fuel 2010;89:1070-6.
67. 2 recovery. Energy Convers Manag 2011;52: 274-83.
68. 2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: performance and emissions. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2005;30:747-67.
69. 2 capture. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012;37:11805-14.
70. Budzianowski W. Decarbonized energy via syngas routes. In: Indarto A, Palgunadi J, editors. Syngas: production, applications and environmental impact. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2012.