The influence of context on recognition memory in monkeys: Effects of hippocampal, parahippocampal and perirhinal lesions

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 285, Issue , 2015, Pages 89-98

  Bachevalier, Jocelyne ^a   Nemanic, Sarah ^a,b   Alvarado, Maria C ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contextual binding; Contextual memory; Rhesus monkey; Visual paired comparison

Indexed keywords

IBOTENIC ACID;

ANIMAL; FEMALE; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NEUROSURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RECOGNITION; RHESUS MONKEY; TEMPORAL LOBE;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; HIPPOCAMPUS; IBOTENIC ACID; MACACA MULATTA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 84939892350     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Albasser M.M., Chapman R.J., Amin E., Iordanova M.D., Vann S.D., Aggleton J.P. New behavioral protocols to extend our knowledge of rodent recognition memory. Learn Mem 2010, 17:407-419.
2. Alvarado M.C., Wright A.A., Bachevalier J. Object and spatial relational memory in adult rhesus monkeys is impaired by neonatal lesions of the hippocampal formation but not the amygdaloid complex. Hippocampus 2002, 12:421-433.
3. Bachevalier J., Nemanic S. Spatial memory in monkeys as measured with the visual paired-comparison task: effects of selective hippocampal, perirhinal and areas TH/TF lesions. Hippocampus 2008, 18:64-80.
4. Bar M., Aminoff E. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 2003, 38:347-358.
5. Bucci D.J., Phillips R.G., Burwell R.D. Contributions of postrhinal and perirhinal cortex to contextual information processing. Behav Neurosci 2000, 114:882-894.
6. Bucci D.J., Saddoris M.P., Burwell R.D. Contextual fear discrimination Is impaired by damage to the postrhinal or perirhinal cortex. Behav Neurosci 2002, 116:479-488.
7. Buckley M.J., Gaffan D. Perirhinal cortex ablation impairs visual object identification. J Neurosci 1998, 18:2268-2275.
8. Burgess N., Maguire E.A., Spiers H.J., O'Keefe J. A temporoparietal and prefrontal network for retrieving the spatial context of lifelike events. Neuroimage 2001, 14:439-453.
9. Burwell R.D., Witter M.P., Amaral D.G. Perirhinal and postrhinal cortices of the rat: a review of the neuroanatomical literature and comparison with findings from the monkey brain. Hippocampus 2002, 5:390-408.
10. Bussey T.J., Saksida L. The organization of visual object representations: a connectionist model of the effects of lesions in perirhinal cortex. Eur J Neurosci 2002, 15:355-364.
11. Bussey T.J., Saksida L. Object memory and perception in the medial temporal lobe: an altenative approach. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005, 15:730-737.
12. Canas J., Nelson D. Recognition and environmental context: the effect of testing by phone. Bull Psychonomic Soc 1986, 24:407-409.
13. Cann A., Ross D. Olfactory stimuli as context cues in human memory. Am J Psychol 1989, 102:91-102.
14. Chun M.M., Phelps E.A. Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nat Neurosci 1999, 2:844-847.
15. Cohen N.J., Eichenbaum H. Memory amnesia and the hippocampal system 1993, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
16. Cowell R.A., Bussey T.J., Saksida L. Components of recognition memory: dissociable cognitive processes or just differences in representational complexity. Hippocampus 2010, 20:1245-1262.
17. Dalton P. The role of stimulus familiarity in context-dependent recognition. Mem Cognit 1993, 21:223-234.
18. Davachi L. Item, context, and relational episodic encoding in humans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2006, 16:693-700.
19. Dellu F., Fauchey V., Le Moal M., Simon H. Extension of a new two-trial memory task in the rat: influence of environmental context on recognition processes. Neurobiol Learn Mem 1997, 67:112-120.
20. Diana R.A., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: a three-component model. Trends Cogn Sci 2007, 11:379-386.
21. Dix S.L., Aggleton J.P. Extending the spontaneous preference test of recognition: evidence of object-location and object-context recognition. Behav Brain Res 1999, 99:191-200.
22. Dolan RJ, Strange BA. Hippocampal novelty responses studied with functional imaging. In: Neuropsychology of memory (Squire LR, Schacter DL, eds.), pp. 204-214. New York: Guilford; 2002.
23. Dore F.Y., Thornton J.A., White N.M. Murray EA selective hippocampal lesions yield nonspatial memory impairments in rhesus monkeys. Hippocampus 1998, 8:323-329.
24. Eacott M.J., Gaffan E.A. The roles of perirhinal cortex, postrhinal cortex, and the fornix in memory for objects, contexts, and events in the rat. Quart J Exp Psychol 2005, 58B:202-217.
25. Eichenbaum H. The hippocampus and declarative memory: cognitive mechanisms and neural codes. Behav Brain Res 2001, 127:199-207.
26. Eichenbaum H., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu Rev Neurosci 2007, 30:123-152.
27. Emmerson P. Effects on environmental context on recognition memory in an unusual environment. Percept Mot Skills 1986, 63:1047-1050.
28. Ennaceur A., Aggleton J.P. Spontaneous recognition of object configurations in rats: effects of fornix lesions. Exp Brain Res 1994, 100:85-92.
29. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598-601.
30. Epstein R.A., Higgins J.S. Differential parahippocampal and retrosplenial involvement in three types of visual scene recognition. Cer Cor 2006, 17:1680-1693.
31. Epstein R.A., Ward E.J. How reliable are visual context effects in the parahippocampal place area. Cer Cor 2010, 20:294-303.
32. Gaffan D. Normal forgetting, impaired acquisition in memory for complex naturalistic scenes by fornix-transected monkeys. Neuropsychologia 1993, 31:403-406.
33. Gaffan D. Dissociated effects of perirhinal cortex ablation, fornix transection and amygdalectomy: evidence for multiple memory systems in the primate temporal lobe. Exp Brain Res 1994, 99:411-422.
34. Gaffan D. Scene-specific memory for objects: a model of episodic memory impairment in monkeys with fornix transections. J Cogn Neurosci 1994, 6:605-620.
35. Gaffan D., Parker A. Interaction of perirhinal cortex with fornix-fimbria: memory for objects and object-in-place memory. J Neurosci 1996, 16:5864-5869.
36. Gallyas F. Silver staining of myelin by means of physical development. Neurol Res 1979, 1:203-209.
37. Geiselman E., Bjork R. Primary versus secondary rehearsal in imagined voices: differential effects on recognition. Cog Psych 1980, 12:188-205.
38. Goh J.O.S., Siong S.C., Park D., Gutchess A., Hebrank A., Chee M.W.L. Cortical areas involved in object, background, and object-background processing revealed with functional magnetic resonance adaptation. J Neurosci 2004, 24:10223-10228.
39. Guzowski J.F., McNaughton B.L., Barnes C.A., Worley P.F. Environment-specific expression of the immediate-early gene Arc in hippocampal neuronal ensembles. Nat Neurosci 1999, 2:1120-1124.
40. Hayes S.M., Ryan L., Schnyer D.M., Nadel L. An fMRI study of episodic memory: retrieval of object, spatial, and temporal information. Behav Neurosci 2004, 118:885-896.
41. Hayes S.M., Nadel L., Ryan L. The effect of scene context on episodic object recognition: parahippocampal cortex mediates memory encoding and retrieval success. Hippocampus 2007, 17:873-889.
42. Hollingworth A. Scene and position specificity in visual memory of objects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2006, 32:58-69.
43. Horner A.J., Gadian D.G., Fuentemilla L., Jentschke S., Vargha-Khadem F., Duzel E. A rapid, hippocampus-dependent, item-memory signal that initiates context memory in humans. Curr Biol 2012, 22:2369-2374.
44. Howard L.R., Kumaran D., Ólafsdóttir H.F., Spiers H.J. Double dissociation between hippocampal and parahippocampal responses to object-background context and scene novelty. J Neurosci 2011, 31:5253-5261.
45. Kesner R.P., Hardy J.D. Long-term memory for contextual attributes: dissociation of amygdala and hippocampus. Behav Brain Res 1983, 8:139-149.
46. Köhler S., Crane J., Milner B. Differential contributions of the parahippocampal place area and the anterior hippocampus in human memory for scenes. Hippocampus 2002, 12:718-723.
47. Komorowski R.W., Manns J.R., Eichenbaum H. Robust conjunctive item-place coding by hippocampal neurons parallels learning what happens where. J Neurosci 2009, 29:9918-9929.
48. Light L., Carter-Sobel L. Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 1970, 9:1-11.
49. Machado C.J., Bachevalier J. The impact of selective amygdala, orbital frontal cortex or hippocampal formation lesions on established social relationships in monkeys. Behav Neurosci 2006, 120:761-786.
50. Machado C.J., Bachevalier J. The effects of selective amygdala, orbital frontal cortex or hippocampal formation lesions on reward assessment in nonhuman primates. Eur J Neurosci 2007, 25:2885-2904.
51. Machado C.J., Bachevalier J. Measuring reward assessment in a semi-naturalistic context: the effects of selective amygdala, orbital frontal or hippocampal lesions. Neuroscience 2007, 148:599-611.
52. Malkova L., Lex C.K., Mishkin M., Saunders R.C. MRI-based evaluation of locus and extent of neurotoxic lesions in monkeys. Hippocampus 2001, 11:361-370.
53. Manns J.R., Eichenbaum H. A cognitive map for object memory in the hippocampus. Learn Mem 2009, 16:616-624.
54. Maratos E.J., Dolan R.J., Morris J.S., Henson R.N., Rugg M.D. Neural activity associated with episodic memory for emotional context. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:910-920.
55. Martin C.B., McLean D.A., O'Neil E.B., Köhler S. Distinct familiarity-based response patterns for faces and buildings in perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex. J Neurosci 2013, 33:10915-10923.
56. Mayes A.R., MacDonald C., Donlan L., Pears J., Meudell P.R. Amnesics have a disproportionately severe memory deficit for interactive context. Quart J Exp Psychol 1992, 45A:265-297.
57. Meunier M., Bachevalier J., Mishkin M., Murray E.A. Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys. J Neurosci 1993, 13:5418-5432.
58. Montaldi D., Mayes A.R. The role of recollection and familiarity in the functional differentiation of the medial temporal lobes. Hippocampus 2010, 20:1291-1314.
59. Moses S.N., Sutherland R.J., McDonald R.J. Differential involvement of amygdala and hippocampus in responding to novel objects and contexts. Brain Res Bull 2002, 58:517-527.
60. Mumby D.G., Gaskin S., Glenn M.J., Schramek T.E., Lehmann H. Hippocampal damage and exploratory preferences in rats: memory of objects, places and contexts. Learn Mem 2002, 9:49-57.
61. Mundy M.E., Downing P.E., Dwyer D.M., Honey R.C., Graham K.S. A critical role for the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex in perceptual learning of scenes and faces: complementary findings from amnesia and fMRI. J Neurosci 2013, 33:10490-10502.
62. Murray E.A., Bussey T.J., Saksida L. Visual perception and memory: a new view of medial temporal lobe function in primates and rodents. Ann Rev Neurosci 2007, 30:99-122.
63. Nemanic S., Alvarado M.C., Price R.E., Jackson E., Bachevalier J. Assessment of locus and extent of neurotoxic lesions in monkeys using neuroimaging techniques: a replication. J Neurosci Methods 2002, 121:1-11.
64. Nemanic S., Alvarado M.C., Bachevalier J. The hippocampal/parahippocampal regions and recognition memory: insights from visual paired-comparison versus object delayed nonmatching in monkeys. J Neurosci 2004, 24:2013-2026.
65. Norman G., Eacott M.J. Dissociable effects of lesions to the perirhinal cortex and the postrhinal cortex on memory for context and objects in rats. Behav Neurosci 2005, 119:557-566.
66. O'Brien N., Lehmann H., Lecluse V., Mumby D.G. Enhanced context-dependency of object recognition in rats with hippocampal lesions. Behav Brain Res 2006, 170:156-162.
67. O'Keefe J., Nadel L. The hippocampus as a cognitive map 1978, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
68. Oliva A., Torralda A. The role of context in object recognition. Trends Cogn Sci 2007, 11:520-527.
69. Park D.C., Puglisi J.T., Sovacool M. Picture memory in older adults: effects of contextual detail at encoding and retrieval. J Gerontol 1984, 39:213-215.
70. Park D.C., Puglisi J.T., Smith A.D., Dudley W.N. Cue utilization and encoding specificity in picture recognition in older adults. J Gerontol 1987, 42:423-425.
71. Parkin A.J., Leng N.R., Hunkin N.M. Differential sensitivity to context in diencephalic and temporal lobe amnesia. Cortex 1990, 26:373-380.
72. Pascalis O., Bachevalier J. Neonatal aspiration lesions of the hippocampal formation impair visual recognition memory when assessed by paired-comparison task but not by delayed nonmatching-to-sample task. Hippocampus 1999, 9:609-616.
73. Pascalis O., Hunkin N.M., Bachevalier J., Mayes A.R. Change in background context disrupts performance on visual paired comparison following hippocampal damage. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:2107-2113.
74. Pedhazur E.J. Multiple regression in behavioral research: explanation and prediction. 1992, New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 2nd ed.
75. Piterkin P., Cole E., Cossette M-P., Gaskin S., Mumbu D.G. A limited role for the hippocampus in the modulation of novel-object preference by contextual cues. Learn Mem 2008, 15:785-791.
76. Radulovic J., Kammermeier J., Spiess J. Relationship between fos production and classical fear conditioning: effects of novelty, latent inhibition, and unconditioned stimulus preexposure. J Neurosci 1998, 18:7452-7461.
77. Reder L., Anderson J., Bjork R. A semantic interpretation of encoding specificity. J Exp Psych 1974, 14:632-649.
78. Ridley R.M., Hardy A., Maclean C.J., Baker H.F. Non-spatial acquisition and retention deficits following small excitotoxic lesions within the hippocampus in monkeys. Neuroscience 2001, 107:239-248.
79. Rugg M.D., Vilberg K.L., Mattson J.T., Yu S.S., Johnson J.D., Suzuki M. Item memory, context memory and the hippocampus: fMRI evidence. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:3070-3079.
80. Russo R., Ward G., Geurts H., Scheres A. When unfamiliarity matters: changing environmental context between study and test affects recognition memory for unfamiliar stimuli. Learn Mem Cog 1999, 25:488-499.
81. Smith D.M., Mizumori S.J.Y. Hippocampal cells, context, and episodic memory. Hippocampus 2006, 16:716-729.
82. Smith S. Environmental context and recognition memory reconsidered. Bull Psychonomic Soc 1985, 23:173-176.
83. Smith S. Environmental context dependent recognition memory using short term memory for task input. Mem Cognit 1986, 14:347-354.
84. Smith S.M., Vela E. Outshining-the relative effectiveness of cues. Bull Psychon Soc 1986, 24:30.
85. Spiers H.J., Burgess N., Hartley T., Vargha-Khadem F., O'Keefe J. Bilateral hippocampal pathology impairs topographical and episodic memory but not visual pattern matching. Hippocampus 2001, 11:715-725.
86. Spiers H.J., Burgess N., Maguire E.A., Baxendale S.A., Hartley T., Thompson P.J., O'Keefe J. Unilateral temporal lobectomy patients show lateralized topographical and episodic memory deficits in a virtual town. Brain 2001, 124:2476-2489.
87. Stumpfel V., Kirsner K. Context effects in word identification and episodic recognition: a single dissociation. Bull Psychonomic Soc 1986, 24:175-178.
88. Sutherland R.J., Rudy J.W. Configural association theory: the role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia. Psychobiology 1989, 17:129-144.
89. Tort A.B., Komorwoski R.W., Manns J.R., Kopell N.J., Eichenbaum H. Theta-gamma coupling increases during the learning of item-context associations. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:20942-20947.
90. Tulving E., Thompson D. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psych Rev 1973, 80:353-370.
91. Vann S.D., Brown M.W., Erichsen J.T., Aggleton J.P. Fos imaging reveals differential patterns of hippocampal and parahippocampal subfield activation in rats in response to different spatial memory tests. J Neurosci 2000, 20:2711-2718.
92. von Bonin G., Bailey P. The neocortex of Macaca mulatta 1947, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
93. Webster M.J., Ungerleider L.G., Bachevalier J. Connections of inferior temporal areas TE and TEO with medial temporal-lobe structures in infant and adult monkeys. J Neurosci 1994, 11:1095-1116.