A limited role for the hippocampus in the modulation of novel-object preference by contextual cues

Learning and Memory

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 785-791

  Piterkin, Pavel ^a   Cole, Emily ^a   Cossette, Marie Pierre ^a   Gaskin, Stephane ^a   Mumby, Dave G ^a  

^a and Applied Physiology   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BRAIN DAMAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTATE GYRUS; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; NONHUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; PLACE PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RECOGNITION;

ANIMALS; CUES; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MEMORY; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 53549086937     PISSN: 10720502     EISSN: 15495485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/lm.1035508     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baddeley, A. 1990. Human memory. Theory and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
2. Barrientos, R.M., O'Reilly, R.C., and Rudy, J.W. 2002. Memory for context impaired by injecting anisomycin into dorsal hippocampus following context exploration. Behav. Brain Res. 134: 299-306.
3. Besheer, J. and Bevins, R.A. 2000. The role of environmental sample-exposure in novel-object preference. Behav. Proc. 50: 19-25.
4. Broadbent, N.J., Squire, L.R., and Clark, R.E. 2004. Spatial memory, recognition memory, and the hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101: 14515-14520.
5. Clark, R.E., Zola, S.M., and Squire, L.R. 2000. Impaired recognition memory in rats after damage to the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 20: 8853-8860.
6. Dellu, F., Fauchey, V., Le Moal, M., and Simon, H. 1997. Extension of a new two-trial memory task in the rat: Influence of environmental context on recognition processes. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 67: 112-139.
7. Domjan, M. 2006. The principles of learning and behavior, 5th edition. Thomson Wadsworth, Stamford, CT.
8. Ennaceur, A. and Delacour, J. 1988. A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. I: Behavioral data. Behav. Brain Res. 31: 47-59.
9. Ennaceur, A., Neave, N., and Aggleton, J.P. 1996. Neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex do not mimic the behavioural effects of fornix transection in the rat. Behav. Brain Res. 80: 9-25.
10. Ennaceur, A., Neave, N., and Aggleton, J.P. 1997. Spontaneous object recognition and object location memory in rats: The effects of lesions in the cingulate cortices, the medial prefrontal cortex, the cingulum bundle and the fornix. Exp. Brain Res. 113: 509-519.
11. Forwood, S.E., Winters, B.D., and Bussey, T.J. 2005. Hippocampal lesions that abolish spatial maze performance spare object recognition memory at delays of up to 48 h. Hippocampus 15: 347-355.
12. Frankland, P.W., Cestari, V., Filipkowski, R.K., McDonald, R.J., and Silva, A.J. 1998. The dorsal hippocampus is essential for context discrimination but not for contextual conditioning. Behav. Neurosci. 112: 863-874.
13. Gaskin, S., Tremblay, A., and Mumby, D.G. 2003. Anterograde and retrograde object-recognition memory in rats with hippocampal lesions. Hippocampus 13: 962-969.
14. Gaskin, S., Chai, S.-C., and White, N.M. 2005. Inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus does not affect learning during exploration of a novel environment. Hippocampus 15: 1085-1093.
15. Good, M. and Honey, R.C. 1991. Conditioning and contextual retrieval in hippocampal rats. Behav. Neurosci. 105: 499-509.
16. Gould, T.J., Rowe, W.B., Heman, K.L., Mesches, M.H., Young, D.A., and Rose, G.M. 2002. Effects of hippocampal lesions on patterned motor learning in the rat. Brain Res. Bull. 58: 581-586.
17. Hirsch, R. 1974. The hippocampus and contextual retrieval of information from memory: A theory. Behav. Biol. 12: 421-444.
18. Kim, J.J. and Fanselow, M.S. 1992. Modality-specific retrograde amnesia of fear. Science 256: 675-677.
19. Kim, J.J., Rison, R.A., and Fanselow, M.S. 1993. Effects of amygdala, hippocampus, and periaqueductal gray lesions on short- and long-term contextual fear. Behav. Neurosci. 107: 1093-1098.
20. Lehmann, H., Carfagnini, A., Yamin, S., and Mumby, D.G. 2005. Context-dependent effects of hippocampal damage on memory in the shock-probe test. Hippocampus 15: 18-25.
21. Maren, S. and Faneslow, M.S. 1997. Electrolytic lesions of the fimbria/fornix, dorsal hippocampus, or entorhinal cortex produce anterograde deficits in contextual fear conditioning in rats. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 67: 142-149.
22. Mumby, D.G. 2001. Perspectives on object-recognition memory following hippocampal damage: Lessons from studies in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 127: 159-181.
23. Mumby, D.G. 2005. Object recognition. In Behaviour of the laboratory rat: A handbook with tests (eds. B. Kolb and I.Q. Whishaw). Oxford University Press, UK.
24. Mumby, D.G., Gaskin, S., Glenn, M.J., Schramek, T.E., and Lehmann, H. 2002. Hippocampal damage and exploratory preferences in rats: Memory for objects, places, and contexts. Learn. Mem. 9: 49-57.
25. Mumby, D.G., Tremblay, A., Lecluse, V., and Lehmann, H. 2005. Hippocampal damage and anterograde object-recognition in rats after long retention intervals. Hippocampus 15: 1050-1056.
26. Nadel, L. and Wilner, J. 1980. Context and conditioning: A place for space. Physiol. Psychol. 8: 218-228.
27. O'Brien, N., Lehmann, H., Lecluse, V., and Mumby, D.G. 2006. Enhanced context-dependency of object recognition in rats with hippocampal lesions. Behav. Brain Res. 170: 156-162.
28. Paxinos, G. and Watson, C. 1998. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic Press, Toronto, Canada.
29. Rudy, J.W. and O'Reilly, R.C. 1999. Contextual fear conditioning, conjuctive representations, pattern completion, and the hippocampus. Behav. Neurosci. 113: 867-880.
30. Rudy, J.W., Barrientos, R.M., and O'Reilly, R.C. 2002. The hippocampal formation supports conditioning to memory of a context. Behav. Neurosci. 116: 530-538.
31. Sheldon, A.B. 1969. Preference for familiar versus novel stimuli as a function of the familiarity of the environment. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 67: 516-521.
32. Steck, S.D. and Mallot, H.A. 2000. The role of global and local landmarks in virtual environment navigation. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9: 69-83.
33. Sutherland, R.J. and McDonald, R.J. 1990. Hippocampus, amygdala, and memory deficits in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 37: 57-79.
34. Sutherland, R.J. and Rudy, J.W. 1989. Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning memory and amnesia. Psychobiology 17: 129-144.
35. Warburton, E.C. and Aggleton, J.P. 1999. Differential deficits in the Morris water maze following cytotoxic lesions of the anterior thalamus and fornix transection. Behav. Brain Res. 98: 27-38.
36. Wiltgen, B.J., Sanders, M.J., Anagnostaras, S.G., Sage, J.R., and Fanselo, M.S. 2006. Context fear learning in the absence of the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 26: 5484-5491.
37. Winters, B.D., Forwood, S.E., Cowell, R.A., Saksida, L.M., and Bussey, T.J. 2004. Double dissociation between hippocampus and perirhinal cortex on tests of spatial and object recognition memory: Heterogeneity of function within the medial temporal lobe. J. Neurosci. 24: 5901-5908.
38. Young, S.L., Bohenek, D., and Fanselow, M.S. 1994. NMDA processes mediate anterograde amnesia of contextual fear conditioning induced by hippocampal damage: Immunization against amnesia by context pre-exposure. Behav. Neurosci. 108: 19-29.