Basic needs, stress and the effects of tailored health communication in vulnerable populations

Health Education Research

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 591-598

  Cappelletti, Erika R ^a   Kreuter, Matthew W ^b   Boyum, Sonia ^b   Thompson, Tess ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGED; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MENTAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; MISSOURI; POVERTY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; VERY ELDERLY; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HEALTH COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MISSOURI; POVERTY; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 84939619433     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyv033     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 2010; 51: 214-21.
2. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 673-93.
3. Sohl SJ, Moyer A. Tailored intervention to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med 2007; 45: 252-61.
4. Ryan P, Lauver DR. The efficacy of tailored interventions. J Nurs Scholarsh2002; 34: 331-7.
5. Lancaster T, Stead L, Silagy C et al. Effectiveness of interventions to help people stop smoking: findings from the cochrane library. BMJ 2000; 321: 355-8.
6. Skinner CS, Campbell MK, Rimer BK et al. How effective is tailored print communication? Ann Behav Med 1999; 21: 290-8.
7. Strecher VJ. Computer-tailored smoking cessation materials: a review and discussion. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 107-17.
8. Brug J, Campbell M, van Assema P. The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 145-56.
9. Skinner CS, Kobrin SC, Monahan PO et al. Tailored interventions for screening mammography among a sample of initially non-adherent women: When is a booster dose important? Patient Educ Couns 2007; 65: 87-94.
10. Saywell RM Jr, Champion VL, Skinner CS et al. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2004; 13: 909-18.
11. West DS, Greene P, Pulley L et al. Stepped-care, community clinic interventions to promote mammography use among low-income rural African American women. Health Educ Behav 2004; 31: 29S-44S.
12. Jibaja-Weiss ML, Volk RJ, Kingery P et al. Tailored messages for breast and cervical cancer screening of low-income and minority women using medical records data. Patient Educ Couns 2003; 50: 123-32.
13. McCaul KD, Wold KS. The effects of mailed reminders and tailored messages on mammography screening. J Community Health 2002; 27: 181-90.
14. Blazer DG, Sachs-Ericsson N, Hybels CF. Perception of unmet basic needs as a predictor of depressive symptoms among community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol A 2007; 62: 191-5.
15. Sachs-Ericsson N, Schatschneider C, Blazer DG. Perception of unmet basic needs as a predictor of physical functioning among community-dwelling older adults. J Aging Health 2006; 18: 852-68.
16. Ng W, Diener E, Arora R et al. Affluence, feelings of stress, and well-being. Soc Indic Res 2009; 94: 257-71.
17. Wargo E. Understanding the have-knots: the role of stress in just about everything. ObserveR 2007; 20: 18-23.
18. Miller GE, Blackwell E. Turning up the heat: inflammation as a mechanism linking chronic stress, depression, and heart disease. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 2006; 15: 269-72.
19. Haushofer J, Fehr E. On the psychology of poverty. Science 2014; 344: 862-7.
20. Kerner JF, Dusenbury L, Mandelblatt JS. Poverty and cultural diversity: challenges for health promotion among the medically underserved. Annu Rev Public Health 1993; 14: 355-77.
21. Mullainathan S, Shafir E. Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much. New York: Times Books, 2013.
22. Kreuter MW. Reach, effectiveness, and connections: the case for partnering with 2-1-1 to eliminate health disparities. Am J Prev Med 2012; 43: S420-1.
23. Purnell JQ, Kreuter MW, Eddens KS et al. Cancer control needs of 2-1-1 callers in Missouri, North Carolina, Texas, and Washington. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2012; 23: 752-67.
24. Kreuter MW, Eddens KS, Alcaraz KI et al. Use of cancer control referrals by 2-1-1 callers: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med 2012; 43: S425-34.
25. Eddens KS, Kreuter MW. Proactive screening for health needs in united way's 2-1-1 information and referral service. J Soc Serv Res 2011; 37: 113-23.
26. Segal S, Silverman C, Temkin T. Empowerment in self-help agency practice. Soc Work 1993; 38: 705-12.
27. Blazer DG, Sachs-Ericsson N, Hybels CF. Perception of unmet basic needs as a predictor of mortality among community-dwelling older adults. Am J Public Health 2005; 95: 299-304.
28. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983; 24: 385-96.
29. Cohen S, Williamson G. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In: Spacapam S, Oskamp S (eds). The Social Psychology of Health: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988.
30. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Eq Model Multidisc J 1999; 6: 1-55.
31. Radel R, Clement-Guillotin C. Evidence of motivational influences in early visual perception: Hunger modulates conscious access. Psychol Sci 2012; 23: 232-4.
32. Spears D. Economic decision-making in poverty depletes behavioral control. B.E. J Econ Anal Policy 2011; 11: 1-44.
33. von Wagner C, Good A, Whitaker KL et al. Psychosocial determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: a conceptual framework. Epidemiol Rev 2011; 33: 135-47.
34. Kreuter MW, Steger-May K, Bobra S et al. Sociocultural characteristics and responses to cancer education materials among African American women. Cancer Control 2003; 10: 69-80.
35. Kreuter MW, Bull FC, Clark EM et al. Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. Health Psychol 1999; 18: 487-94.
36. Webb MS, Simmons VN, Brandon TH. Tailored interventions for motivating smoking cessation: using placebo tailoring to examine the influence of expectancies and personalization. Health Psychol 2005; 24: 179-88.
37. Hawkins RP, Kreuter MW, Resnicow K et al. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ Res 2008; 23: 454-66.
38. The Guide to Community Preventive Services. 2012. Available at: http://www.thecommunityguide.org/index. html. Accessed: 1 May 2015.
39. Piette JD, Lun KC, Moura LA et al. Impacts of e-health on the outcomes of care in low-and middle-income countries: where do we go from here? Bull World Health Organ 2012; 90: 365-72.
40. Thompson T, Kreuter M, Boyum S. Promoting health by addressing basic needs: effect of problem resolution on contacting health referrals. Health Educ Behav, in press.