Tailored telephone counseling increases colorectal cancer screening

Health Education Research

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 622-637

  Rawl, Susan M ^a,b   Christy, Shannon M ^b,c   Monahan, Patrick O ^b   Ding, Yan ^b,d   Krier, Connie ^a   Champion, Victoria L ^a,b   Rex, Douglas ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^d OPTUM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUNSELING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; FAMILY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; PROCEDURES; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; TELEPHONE; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COUNSELING; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FAMILY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; PAMPHLETS; TELEPHONE;

EID: 84939608002     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyv021     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. American Cancer Society, Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2014-2016. In: American Cancer Society (ed.), Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2014.
2. Colditz GA, Atwood KA, Emmons K et al. Harvard report on cancer prevention volume 4: Harvard Cancer Risk Index. Risk Index Working Group, Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention. Cancer Causes Control 2000; 11: 477-88.
3. National Cancer Institute. Conquering Colorectal Cancer: A Blueprint for the Future. Betheseda: Colorectal Cancer Progress Review Group, 2000.
4. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM et al. Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154: 22-30.
5. Cafferty FH, Sasieni PD, Duffy SW. A deterministic model for estimating the reduction in colorectal cancer incidence due to endoscopic surveillance. Stat Methods Med Res 2009; 18: 163-82.
6. Citarda F1, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R et al. Italian Multicentre Study Group. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 2001; 48: 812-5.
7. Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J et al. Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999; 34: 414-20.
8. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterol 1997; 112: 594-642.
9. Ahsan H, Neugut AI, Garbowski GC et al. Family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps and increased risk for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 900-5.
10. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Gerdes H et al. Risk of colorectal cancer in the families of patients with adenomatous polyps. National polyp study workgroup. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 82-7.
11. Nakama H, Fukazawa K. Colorectal cancer risk in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal adenomatous polyp. Hepatogastroenterology 2002; 49: 157-9.
12. Nakama H, Zhang B, Fukazawa K et al. Family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps as a risk factor for colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36: 2111-4.
13. Gupta S. Colorectal polyps: the scope and management of the problem. Am J Med Sci 2008; 336: 407-17.
14. Pho K, Geller A, Schroy PC. Lack of communication about familial colorectal cancer risk associated with colorectal adenomas. Cancer Causes Control 2000; 11: 543-6.
15. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al. American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008; 58: 130-60.
16. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60: 99-119.
17. Rimer BK, Halabi S, Sugg Skinner C et al. The short-term impact of tailored mammography decision-making interventions. Patient Educ Couns 2000; 1429: 1-17.
18. Saywell RM, Champion VL, Skinner CS et al. Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening. Prev Med 1999; 29: 374-82.
19. Ludman EJ, Curry SJ, Meyer D et al. Implementation of outreach telephone counseling to promote mammography participation. Health Educ Behav 1999; 26: 689-702.
20. King ES, Rimer BK, Seay J et al. Promoting mammography use through progressive interventions: is it effective? Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 104-6.
21. Basch CE, Wolf RL, Brouse CH et al. Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 2246-53.
22. Carney PA, Harwood BG, Greene MA et al. Impact of a telephone counseling intervention on transitions in stage of change and adherence to interval mammography screening. Cancer Causes Control 2005; 16: 799-807.
23. Saywell RM Jr, Champion VL, Skinner CS et al. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening. J Women's Health 2004; 13: 909-18.
24. Walsh JM, Salazar R, Nguyen TT et al. Healthy colon, healthy life: a novel colorectal cancer screening intervention. Am J Prev Med 2010; 39: 1-14.
25. Champion V, Skinner CS, Hui S et al. The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence. Patient Educ Counsel 2007; 65: 416-23.
26. Lowery JT, Horick N, Kinney AY et al. A randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in members of high-risk families in the Colorectal Cancer Family Registry and Cancer Genetics Network. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014; 23: 601-10.
27. Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Evers KE. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds). Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1997, 60-84.
28. Strecher VJ, Rosenstock IM. The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer B (eds). Health Behavior and Health Education. 2nd edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1997, 41-59.
29. Rosenstock IM. Adoption and maintenance of lifestyle modifications. Am J Prev Med 1988; 4: 349-52.
30. Wahab S, Menon U, Szalacha L. Motivational interviewing and colorectal cancer screening: a peek from the inside out. Patient Educ Couns 2008; 72: 210-7.
31. Costanza ME, Luckmann R, Stoddard AM et al. Using tailored telephone counseling to accelerate the adoption of colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Detect Prev 2007; 31: 191-8.
32. Manne SL, Coups EJ, Markowitz A et al. A randomized trial of generic versus tailored interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among intermediate risk siblings. Ann Behav Med 2009; 37: 207-17.
33. Menon U, Belue R, Wahab S et al. A randomized trial comparing the effect of two phone-based interventions on colorectal cancer screening adherence. Ann Behav Med 2011; 42: 294-303.
34. Luckmann R, Costanza ME, Rosal M et al. Referring patients for telephone counseling to promote colorectal cancer screening. Am J Manag Care 2013; 19: 702-8.
35. Pengchit W, Walters ST, Simmons RG et al. Motivation-based intervention to promote colonoscopy screening: an integration of a fear management model and motivational interviewing. J Health Psychol 2011; 16: 1187-97.
36. White MJ, Stark JR, Luckmann R et al. Implementing a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) system to increase colorectal cancer screening: a process evaluation. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 61: 419-28.
37. Lowery JT, Marcus A, Kinney A et al. The Family Health Promotion Project (FHPP): design and baseline data from a randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in high risk families. Contemp Clin Trials 2012; 33: 426-35.
38. Green BB, Wang CY, Anderson ML et al. An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158: 301-11.
39. Skinner CS, Buchanan A, Champion V et al. Process outcomes from a randomized controlled trial comparing tailored mammography interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 85: 308-12.
40. Rawl SM, Skinner CS, Perkins SM et al. Computer-delivered tailored intervention improves colon cancer screening knowledge and health beliefs of African Americans. Health Educ Res 2012; 27: 868-85.
41. Russell KM, Champion VL, Monahan PO et al. Randomized trial of a lay health advisor and computer intervention to increase mammography screening in African American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19: 201-10.