Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 374-382

  Saywell Jr , Robert M ^a,b   Champion, Victoria L ^b   Skinner, Celette Sugg ^c   McQuillen, Diane ^b   Martin, Daniel ^b   Maraj, Maltie ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Compliance rates; Cost effectiveness; Mammography screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT COUNSELING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0344991689     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0568     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, Wingo P. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 1998;48:6-29.
2. Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer B, Shapiro S. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Nat Cancer Inst 1993;85:1644-56.
3. Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Duffy S. The Gothenburg breast screening trial: results from 11 years of follow up. In: NIH Consensus Development Conference, Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49, Programs and Abstracts, 1997. Bethesda, MD: NIH, 1997:63-4.
4. Champion VL. The relationship of selected variables to breast cancer detection behaviors in women 35 and older. Oncol Nurs Forum 1991;18:733-9.
5. Howard J. Using mammography for cancer control: an unrealized potential. CA Cancer J Clin 1987;37:33-48.
6. Chevarley F, White E. Recent trends in breast cancer mortality among white and black US women. Am J Public Health 1997; 87:776-81.
7. Blustein J, Weiss LJ. The use of mammography by women aged 75 and older: factors related to health, functioning, and age. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46:941-6.
8. Friedman LC, Neff NE, Webb JA, Latham CK. Age-related differences in mammography use and in breast cancer knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. J Cancer Educ 1998;13:26-30.
9. King E, Rimer BK, Benincasa T, Harrop C, Amfoh K, Bonney G, Kornguth P, Demark-Wahnefried W, Strigo T, Engstrom P. Strategies to encourage mammography use among women in senior citizens' housing facilities. J Cancer Educ 1998;13:108-15.
10. Racial & ethnic patterns. Cancer facts and figures 1997. American Cancer Society, 1997:18-22.
11. Becker MH. The health belief model and personal health behavior. Thorofore, NJ: Charles B. Slack, 1974.
12. Rutledge DN, Hartmann WH, Kinman PO, Winfield AC. Exploration of factors affecting mammography behaviors. Prev Med 1988;17:412-22.
13. Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B, Balshen A, Engstrom PF. Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med 1990;19:279-90.
14. Hoffman-Goetz L, Breen NL, Meissner H. The impact of social class on the use of cancer screening within three racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Ethn Dis 1998;8:43-51.
15. Nielson CC. Women's use of mammographic screening: the role of information, cues, and reinforcement. Connecticut Med 1990; 54:373-7.
16. Nattinger AB, Danzer RJ, Janus J. Improving the utilization of screening mammography screening in primary care practices. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:2087-92.
17. Dorsch M, Cheko F, Ingham H. The effectiveness of invitations from general practitioners in recruiting women to mammography screening. Med J Aust 1991;155:623-5.
18. Phillips KA, Kerlikowske K, Baker LC, Chang SW, Brown ML. Factors associated with women's adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Health Serv Res 1998;33:29-53.
19. Hurley S, Jolley D, Livingston P, Reading D, Cockburn J, Flint-Richter D. Effectiveness, costs and cost-effectiveness of recruitment strategies for a mammography screening program to detect breast cancer. J Nat Cancer Inst 1994;84:855-63.
20. Smith R, Haynes S. Barriers to screening for breast cancer. Cancer 1992;69:1968-78.
21. Wagner T. The Effectiveness of mailed patient reminders on mammography screening: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 1998: 14:64-70.
22. Turnbull D, Irwig L, Adelson P. A randomized trial of invitations to attend for screening mammography. Aust J Public Health 1991;15:33-6.
23. Sharp DJ, Peters TJ, Bartholomew J, Shaw A. Breast screening: a randomized controlled trial in UK general practice of three interventions designed to increase uptake. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996;50:72-6.
24. Entwistle C, Hendry PJ. Effect of issuing an invitation for RAM breast cancer screening of women aged 65 to 69. J Med Screening 1996;3:88-9.
25. Somkin C, Hiatt R, Hurley L, Gruskin I, Ackerson L, Larson P. The effect of patient and provider reminders or mammography and Papanicolaou smear screening on a large health maintenance organization. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1658-64.
26. Kinsinger L, Harris R, Qaqish B, Strecher V, Kaluzny A. Using an office system intervention to increase breast cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:507-14.
27. Davis N, Nash E, Bailey C, Lewis J, Rimer B, Koplan J. Evaluation of three methods for improving mammography rates in a managed care plan. Am J Prev Med 1997;13:298-302.
28. Burack RC, Gimotty PA, George PA, Simon S, Dews P, Moncrease A. The effect of patient and physician reminders on use of screening mammography in a health maintenance organization: results of a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 1996;78:1708-21.
29. McGovern PG, Lurie N, Margolies KL, Slater JS. Accuracy of self-report of mammography and Pap smear in a low-income urban population. Am J Prev Med 1998;14:201-8.
30. Warner KE, Luce BR. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis in health care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1982:78.
31. Kinney A, Vernon S, Shui W, Weber D, Schell M, Vogel V. Validation of a mode predicting enrollment status in a chemoprevention trial for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998;7:591-5.