The Family Health Promotion Project (FHPP): Design and baseline data from a randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in high risk families

Contemporary Clinical Trials

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 426-435

  Lowery, Jan T ^a,b   Marcus, Al ^a   Kinney, Anita ^c   Bowen, Deborah ^d   Finkelstein, Dianne M ^e   Horick, Nora ^e   Garrett, Kathleen ^a   Haile, Robert ^f   Sandler, Robert ^g   Ahnen, Dennis J ^a,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b Global Health and Health Disparities   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Colonoscopy; High risk; Intervention; Randomized trial

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FAMILY HEALTH; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; HEALTH PROMOTION; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTIVATION; PATIENT COUNSELING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STUDY DESIGN; TELECONSULTATION;

COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FAMILY HEALTH; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MORBIDITY; REGISTRIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84856221705     PISSN: 15517144     EISSN: 15592030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ries L., Melbert D., Krapcho M., Stinchcomb D., Howlader N., Horner M., et al. SEER cancer statistics review 1975-2005, http://seer.Cancer.gov/csr/1975-2005/, based on November 2007 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site 2008, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
2. American Cancer Society Colorectal cancer facts and figures 2011-13 2011, American Cancer Society, Atlanta.
3. Levin B., Lieberman D.A., McFarland B., et al. American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008, 134:1570-1595.
4. Fuchs C.S., Giovannucci E.L., Colditz G.A., Hunter D.J., Speizer F.E., Willet W.C. A prospective study of family history and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Eng J Med 1994, 331:1669-1674.
5. Burt R.W., DiSario J.A., Cannon-Albright L. Genetics of colon cancer: impact of inheritance on colon cancer risk. Annu Rev Med 1995, 46:371-379.
6. Vasen H.F., Wijnen J.T., Menko F.H., et al. Cancer risk in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer diagnosed by mutation analysis. Gastroenterology Apr 1996, 110(4):1020-1027.
7. Aarnio M., Sankila R., Pukkala E., et al. Cancer risk in mutation carriers of DNA-mismatch repair genes. Int J Cancer Apr 12 1999, 81(2):214-218.
8. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: colon cancer, version 1.2011 2010, Accessed August. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/colon.pdf.
9. Jarvinen H.J., Aarnio M., Mustonen H., et al. Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2000, 118:829-834.
10. Renkonen-Sinisalo L., Aarnio M., Mecklin J.P., Jarvinen H.J. Surveillance improves survival of colorectal cancer in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cancer Detect Prev 2000, 24:137-142.
11. Niv Y., Dickman R., Figer A., Abuksis G., Fraser G. Case-control study of screening colonoscopy in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2003, 98:486-489.
12. Hadley D.W., Jenkins J.F., Dimond E., de Carvalho M., Kirsch I., Palmer C.G. Colon cancer screening practices after genetic counseling and testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004, 22:39-44.
13. Halbert C.H., Lynch H., Lynch J., et al. Colon cancer screening practices following genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) mutations. Arch Intern Med 2004, 164:1881-1887.
14. Kinney A., Hicken B., Simonsen S., et al. Colorectal cancer surveillance behaviors among members of typical and attenuated FAP families. Am J Gastroenterol Jan 2007, 102(1):153-162.
15. Fletcher R.H., Lobb R., Bauer M.R., et al. Screening patients with a family history of colorectal cancer. J Gen Intern Med 2007, 22:508-513.
16. Rees G., Martin P.R., Macrae F.A. Screening participation in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: a review. Eur J Cancer Care 2007, 17:221-232.
17. Manne S., Markowitz A., Winawer S., et al. Correlates of colorectal cancer screening compliance and stage of adoption among siblings of individuals with early onset colorectal cancer. Health Psychol 2002, 21:3-15.
18. Codori A.M., Petersen G.M., Migliorett D.L., Boyd P. Health beliefs and endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer: potential for cancer prevention. Prev Med 2002, 33:128-136.
19. Madlensky L., Esplen M.J., Galinger S., McGlaughlin J.R., Goel V. Relatives of colorectal cancer patients - factors associated with screening behavior. Am J Prev Med 2003, 25:187-194.
20. Bleiker E.M.A., Menko F.H., Taal B.G., et al. Screening behavior of individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2005, 128:280-287.
21. Anton-Culver H., Ziogas A., Finkelstein D., et al. Cancer genetics network: recruitment results and pilot studies. Community Genet 2003, 6(3):171-177.
22. Newcomb P.A., Baron J., Cotterchio M., et al. Colon cancer family registry: an international resource for studies of the genetic epidemiology of colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Nov 2007, 16(11):2331-2343.
23. Lundahl B., Burke B.L. The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing; a practice-friendly review of four meta analyses. J Clin Psychol 2009, 65(11):1232-1245.
24. Miller W.R., Rose G.S. Toward a theory of motivational interviewing. Am Psychol 2009, 64(6):527-537.
25. Bonis P.A., Trikalinos T.A., Chung M., et al. Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: diagnostic strategies and their implications. Evid Rep Technol Assess May 2007, 150:1-180.
26. Janz N.K., Becker M.H. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q 1984, 11(1):1-47. 1984.
27. Janz N.K., Champion V.L., Strecher V.J. The health belief model. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice 2002, 45-66. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA. 3rd Edition. K. Glanz, B.K. Rimer, F.M. Lewis (Eds.).
28. Ajzen I. Theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991, 50:179-211.
29. Ajzen I., Madden T.J. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. J Exp Soc Psychol 1986, 22:453-474.
30. Montano D.E., Kasprzyk D. The theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice 2002, 67-98. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA. 3rd Edition. K. Glanz, B.K. Rimer, F.M. Lewis (Eds.).
31. Prochaska J.O., DiClemente C.C. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983, 51:390-395.
32. Prochaska J.O. Strong and weak principles for progressing from precontemplation to action based on twelve problem behaviors. Health Psychol 1994, 13:47-51.
33. Prochaska J.O., Redding C.A., Evers K.E. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice 2002, 99-120. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA. 3rd Edition. K. Glanz, B.K. Rimer, F.M. Lewis (Eds.).
34. Miller W.R., Rollnick Motivational interviewing: 2nd edition: preparing people to change 2002, The Guilford Press, New York, NY.
35. Rollnick S., Miller W.R., Butler C.C. Motivational interviewing in health care: helping patients change behavior 2008, The Guilford Press, New York, New York.
36. Wilson G.T., Schlam T.R. The transtheoretical model and motivational interviewing in the treatment of eating and weight disorders. Clin Psychol Rev 2004, 24(3):361-378.
37. Miller W.R. Motivational interviewing in service to health promotion. Am J Health Promot 2004, 18(3):A1-A10.
38. Garrett K., Heimendinger J., Barnes D., Coffey-Kluhsman B., O'neil C., Vanonni C. Healthy options and personal exploration (HOPE): results of a telephone counseling study using motivational interviewing and print material to address the informational and healthy lifestyle concerns of breast cancer survivors. Abstracted submitted to the APOS 5th Annual Conference Feb 28-March 2 2008.
39. Ludman E.J., Curry S.J., Meyer D., Taplin S.H. Implementation of outreach telephone counseling to promote mammography participation. Health Educ Behav 1999, 26(5):689-702.
40. Wahab S., Menon U., Szalacha L. Motivational interviewing and colorectal cancer screening: a peek from the inside out. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 72:210-217.
41. Marcus A., Ahnen D., Cutter G., Calonge N., Russell S., Sedlacek S., et al. Promoting cancer screening among the first-degree relatives of breast and colorectal cancer patients: the design of two randomized trials. Prev Med March 1999, 28(3):229-242.
42. Vernon S.W., Tiro J.A., Vojvodic R.W., et al. Reliability and validity of a questionnaire to measure colorectal cancer screening behaviors: does mode of survey administration matter?. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008, 17:758-767.
43. Partin M.R., Grill J., Noorbaloochi S., et al. Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behavior from a mixed-mode survey of veterans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008, 17:768-776.
44. Rauscher G.H., Johnson T.P., Cho Y.I., Walk J.A. Accuracy of self-reported cancer screening histories: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Prev 2008, 17:748-757.
45. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986, 51:1173-1182.
46. Holmbeck N. Toward terminology, conceptual and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. J Consult Clin Psychol 1997, 65:599-610.
47. Subramanian S., Klosterman M., Amonkar M.M., Hunt T.L. Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review. Prev Med 2004, 38:536-550.
48. Beydoun H.A., Beydoun M.A. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 2008, 19:339-359.
49. Guessous I., Dash C., Lapin P., Doroshenk M., Smith R., Klabunde C.N. Colorectal cancer screening barriers and facilitators in older persons. Prev Med 2010, 50:3-10.
50. Berkowitz Z., Hawkins N.A., Peipins L.A., White M.C., Nadel M.R. Beliefs, risk perceptions, and gaps in knowledge as barriers to colorectal cancer screening in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc Feb 2008, 56(2):307-314.
51. Klabunde C.N., Vernon S.W., Nadel M.R., Breen N., Seeff L.C., Brown M.L. Barriers to colorectal screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average risk adults. Med Care Sept 2005, 43(9):939-944.