Who regenerates the kidney tubule?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 903-910

  Kramann, Rafael ^a,b,c   Kusaba, Tetsuro ^a,b   Humphreys, Benjamin D ^a,b,d  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d HARVARD STEM CELL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

acute kidney injury; dedifferentiation; stem cell; tubular repair

Indexed keywords

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; CD106+ LYMPHOCYTE; CD133+ LYMPHOCYTE; CD24+ LYMPHOCYTE; CELL ACTIVATION; CELL DEDIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; EPITHELIUM CELL; HUMAN; KIDNEY TUBULE; KIDNEY TUBULE CELL; LYMPHOCYTE; LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REVIEW; RISK REDUCTION; TISSUE REGENERATION; TISSUE REPAIR; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CYTOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REGENERATION; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC; STEM CELL;

ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; HUMANS; KIDNEY TUBULES; REGENERATION; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC; STEM CELLS;

EID: 84939599871     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfu281     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Basile DP, Anderson MD, Sutton TA. Pathophysiology of acute kidney injury. Compr Physiol 2012; 2: 1303-1353
2. Coca SG, Singanamala S, Parikh CR. Chronic kidney disease after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Int 2012; 81: 442-448
3. Uchida S, Endou H. Substrate specificity to maintain cellular ATP along the mouse nephron. Am J Physiol 1988; 255(5 Pt 2): F977-F983
4. Lieberthal W, Nigam SK. Acute renal failure. I. Relative Importance of Proximal vs. Distal Tubular Injury. Am J Physiol 1998; 275(5 Pt 2): F623-F631
5. Bonventre JV, Yang L. Cellular pathophysiology of ischemic acute kidney injury. J Clin Invest 2011; 121: 4210-4221
6. Heyman SN, Rosenberger C, Rosen S. Experimental ischemia-reperfusion: biases and myths-the proximal vs. distal hypoxic tubular injury debate revisited. Kidney Int 2010; 77: 9-16
7. Grgic I, Campanholle G, Bijol V et al. Targeted proximal tubule injury triggers interstitial fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis. Kidney Int 2012; 82: 172-183
8. Humphreys BD, Xu F, Sabbisetti V et al. Chronic epithelial kidney injury molecule-1 expression causes murine kidney fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2013; 123: 4023-4035
9. Kusaba T, Humphreys BD. Controversies on the origin of proliferating epithelial cells after kidney injury. Pediatr Nephrol 2014; 29: 673-679
10. Humphreys BD, Valerius MT, Kobayashi A et al. Intrinsic epithelial cells repair the kidney after injury. Cell Stem Cell 2008; 2: 284-291
11. Little MH, Bertram JF. Is there such a thing as a renal stem cell? J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20: 2112-2117
12. Rinkevich Y, Montoro DT, Contreras-Trujillo H et al. In vivo clonal analysis reveals lineage-restricted progenitor characteristics in Mammalian kidney development, maintenance, and regeneration. Cell Rep 2014; 7: 1270-1283
13. Maeshima A, Yamashita S, Nojima Y. Identification of renal progenitor-like tubular cells that participate in the regeneration processes of the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 3138-3146
14. Oliver JA, Maarouf O, Cheema FH et al. The renal papilla is a niche for adult kidney stem cells. J Clin Invest 2004; 114: 795-804
15. Oliver JA, Klinakis A, Cheema FH et al. Proliferation and migration of label-retaining cells of the kidney papilla. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20: 2315-2327
16. Oliver JA, Maarouf O, Cheema FH et al. SDF-1 activates papillary label-retaining cells during kidney repair from injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2012; 302: F1362-F1373
17. Humphreys BD, Czerniak S, DiRocco DP et al. Repair of injured proximal tubule does not involve specialized progenitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 9226-9231
18. Kitamura S, Yamasaki Y, Kinomura M et al. Establishment and characterization of renal progenitor like cells from S3 segment of nephron in rat adult kidney. FASEB J 2005; 19: 1789-1797
19. Langworthy M, Zhou B, de Caestecker M et al. NFATc1 identifies a population of proximal tubule cell progenitors. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20: 311-321
20. Sagrinati C, Netti GS, Mazzinghi B et al. Isolation and characterization of multipotent progenitor cells from the Bowman's capsule of adult human kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17: 2443-2456
21. Lazzeri E, Crescioli C, Ronconi E et al. Regenerative potential of embryonic renal multipotent progenitors in acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18: 3128-3138
22. Ronconi E, Sagrinati C, Angelotti ML et al. Regeneration of glomerular podocytes by human renal progenitors. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20: 322-332
23. Lindgren D, Bostrom AK, Nilsson K et al. Isolation and characterization of progenitor-like cells from human renal proximal tubules. Am J Pathol 2011; 178: 828-837
24. Angelotti ML, Ronconi E, Ballerini L et al. Characterization of renal progenitors committed toward tubular lineage and their regenerative potential in renal tubular injury. Stem Cells 2012; 30: 1714-1725
25. Kim K, Park BH, Ihm H et al. Expression of stem cell marker CD133 in fetal and adult human kidneys and pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis. Histol Histopathol 2011; 26: 223-232
26. Smeets B, Boor P, Dijkman H et al. Proximal tubular cells contain a phenotypically distinct, scattered cell population involved in tubular regeneration. J Pathol 2013; 229: 645-659
27. Berger K, Bangen JM, Hammerich L et al. Origin of regenerating tubular cells after acute kidney injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: 1533-1538
28. Appel D, Kershaw DB, Smeets B et al. Recruitment of podocytes from glomerular parietal epithelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20: 333-343
29. Kemper K, Sprick MR, de Bree M et al. The AC133 epitope, but not the CD133 protein, is lost upon cancer stem cell differentiation. Cancer Res 2010; 70: 719-729
30. Angelotti ML, Lazzeri E, Lasagni L et al. Only anti-CD133 antibodies recognizing the CD133/1 or the CD133/2 epitopes can identify human renal progenitors. Kidney Int 2010; 78: 620-621; author reply 621
31. Vogetseder A, Picard N, Gaspert A et al. Proliferation capacity of the renal proximal tubule involves the bulk of differentiated epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2008; 294: C22-C28
32. Kusaba T, Lalli M, Kramann R et al. Differentiated kidney epithelial cells repair injured proximal tubule. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: 1527-1532
33. Madjdpour C, Bacic D, Kaissling B et al. Segment-specific expression of sodium-phosphate cotransporters NaPi-IIa and -IIc and interacting proteins in mouse renal proximal tubules. Pflugers Arch 2004; 448: 402-410
34. Romagnani P. Of mice and men: the riddle of tubular regeneration. J Pathol 2013; 229: 641-644
35. Tata PR, Mou H, Pardo-Saganta A et al. Dedifferentiation of committed epithelial cells into stem cells in vivo. Nature 2013; 503: 218-223
36. Stange DE, Koo BK, Huch M et al. Differentiated Troy+ chief cells act as reserve stem cells to generate all lineages of the stomach epithelium. Cell 2013; 155: 357-368