Prospective randomized trial on radiation dose estimates of CT angiography applying iterative image reconstruction the PROTECTION v study

JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 888-896

  Deseive, Simon ^a   Chen, Marcus Y ^b   Korosoglou, Grigorios ^c   Leipsic, Jonathon ^d   Martuscelli, Eugenio ^e   Carrascosa, Patricia ^f   Mirsadraee, Saeed ^g   White, Charles ^h   Hadamitzky, Martin ^a   Martinoff, Stefan ^a   Menges, Anna Leonie ^a   Bischoff, Bernhard ^a   Massberg, Steffen ^a   Hausleiter, Jörg ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^f Department of Computed Tomography   (Argentina)

^g UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

computed tomography angiography; coronary; iterative image reconstruction; radiation dose

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST TO NOISE RATIO; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY CALCIUM SCORE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DOSIMETRY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NOISE REDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ALGORITHM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; DENSOVIRINAE; IMAGE PROCESSING; MULTICENTER STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; DENSOVIRINAE; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84939493727     PISSN: 1936878X     EISSN: 18767591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.02.024     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. M.J. Budoff, D. Dowe, J.G. Jollis, and et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial J Am Coll Cardiol 52 2008 1724 1732
2. S.L. Guo, Y.M. Guo, Y.N. Zhai, B. Ma, P. Wang, and K.H. Yang Diagnostic accuracy of first generation dual-source computed tomography in the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis from 24 studies Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27 2011 755 771
3. D.B. Mark, D.S. Berman, M.J. Budoff, and et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2010 2663 2699
4. J. Menke, C. Unterberg-Buchwald, W. Staab, J.M. Sohns, A. Seif Amir Hosseini, and A. Schwarz Head-to-head comparison of prospectively triggered vs retrospectively gated coronary computed tomography angiography: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose Am Heart J 165 2013 154 163.e3
5. S. Achenbach, M. Marwan, D. Ropers, and et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition Eur Heart J 31 2010 340 346
6. J. Hausleiter, B. Bischoff, F. Hein, and et al. Feasibility of dual-source cardiac CT angiography with high-pitch scan protocols J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3 2009 236 242
7. J. Hausleiter, S. Martinoff, M. Hadamitzky, and et al. Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II Trial J Am Coll Cardiol Img 3 2010 1113 1123
8. J. Hausleiter, T.S. Meyer, E. Martuscelli, and et al. Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study J Am Coll Cardiol Img 5 2012 484 493
9. W. Hosch, N.P. Hofmann, D. Mueller, and et al. Body mass index-adapted prospective coronary computed tomography angiography: determining the lowest limit for diagnostic purposes Eur J Radiol 82 2013 e232 e239
10. D.J. Brenner, and E.J. Hall Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure N Engl J Med 357 2007 2277 2284
11. K.N. Prasad, W.C. Cole, and G.M. Haase Radiation protection in humans: extending the concept of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) from dose to biological damage Br J Radiol 77 2004 97 99
12. J. Leipsic, T.M. Labounty, B. Heilbron, and et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography AJR Am J Roentgenol 195 2010 649 654
13. Y. Hou, X. Liu, S. Xv, W. Guo, and Q. Guo Comparisons of image quality and radiation dose between iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection reconstruction algorithms in 256-MDCT coronary angiography AJR Am J Roentgenol 199 2012 588 594
14. A. Moscariello, R.A. Takx, U.J. Schoepf, and et al. Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection Eur Radiol 21 2011 2130 2138
15. M.Y. Chen, M.L. Steigner, S.W. Leung, and et al. Simulated 50 % radiation dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using adaptive iterative dose reduction in three-dimensions (AIDR3D) Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29 2013 1167 1175
16. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, et al. European Guidelines for Multislice Computed Tomography. Funded by the European Commission, Contract number FIGM-CT2000-20078-CT-TIP 2004.
17. American Association of Medical Physicists (AAPM) Task Group 23: CT dosimetry. The measurement, reporting and management of radiation dose in CT. Available at: https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT-96.pdf. Accessed July 6, 2015.
18. J. Hausleiter, T. Meyer, F. Hermann, and et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography JAMA 301 2009 500 507
19. A.J. Einstein Effects of radiation exposure from cardiac imaging: how good are the data? J Am Coll Cardiol 59 2012 553 565
20. M. Brand, M. Sommer, S. Achenbach, and et al. X-ray induced DNA double-strand breaks in coronary CT angiography: comparison of sequential, low-pitch helical and high-pitch helical data acquisition Eur J Radiol 81 2012 e357 e362
21. S. Singh, M.K. Kalra, M.D. Gilman, and et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study Radiology 259 2011 565 573
22. O. Gosling, R. Loader, P. Venables, and et al. A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography Heart 96 2010 922 926
23. U. Ebersberger, F. Tricarico, U.J. Schoepf, and et al. CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction Eur Radiol 23 2013 125 132
24. S. Baumueller, A. Winklehner, C. Karlo, and et al. Low-dose CT of the lung: potential value of iterative reconstructions Eur Radiol 22 2012 2597 2606
25. M. Renker, J.W. Nance Jr., U.J. Schoepf, and et al. Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction Radiology 260 2011 390 399
26. A. Schuhbaeck, S. Achenbach, C. Layritz, and et al. Image quality of ultra-low radiation exposure coronary CT angiography with an effective dose <0.1 mSv using high-pitch spiral acquisition and raw data-based iterative reconstruction Eur Radiol 23 2013 597 606
27. W.H. Yin, B. Lu, N. Li, and et al. Iterative reconstruction to preserve image quality and diagnostic accuracy at reduced radiation dose in coronary CT angiography: an intraindividual comparison J Am Coll Cardiol Img 6 2013 1239 1249