Protein homology reveals new targets for bioactive small molecules

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 16, 2015, Pages 2721-2727

  Gfeller, David ^a,b   Zoete, Vincent ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUKARYOTA;

MOLECULAR LIBRARY; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; MOLECULAR LIBRARY; PHARMACOLOGY; PROTEIN DATABASE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; AREA UNDER CURVE; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SMALL MOLECULE LIBRARIES; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84939488957     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv214     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Altenhoff, A. M. et al. (2012) Resolving the ortholog conjecture: orthologs tend to be weakly, but significantly, more similar in function than paralogs. PLoS Comput. Biol. , 8, e1002514.
2. Armstrong, M. S. et al. (2011) Improving the accuracy of ultrafast ligand-based screening: incorporating lipophilicity into ElectroShape as an extra dimension. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. , 25, 785-790.
3. Ballester, P. J. and Richards, W. G. (2007) Ultrafast shape recognition to search compound databases for similar molecular shapes. J. Comput. Chem. , 28, 1711-1723.
4. Bento, A. P. et al. (2014) The ChEMBL bioactivity database: An update. Nucleic Acids Res. , 42, D1083-D1090.
5. Boumendjel, A. et al. (2002) Recent advances in the discovery of flavonoids and analogs with high-affinity binding to P-glycoprotein responsible for cancer cell multidrug resistance. Med. Res. Rev. , 22, 512-529.
6. Campillos, M. et al. (2008) Drug target identification using side-effect similarity. Science, 321, 263-266.
7. Clemons, P. A. (2004) Complex phenotypic assays in high-throughput screening. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. , 8, 334-338.
8. Davis, M. I. et al. (2011) Comprehensive analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat. Biotechnol. , 29, 1046-1051.
9. Dunkel, M. et al. (2008) SuperPred: drug classification and target prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. , 36, W55-W59.
10. Gao, Z. et al. (2008) PDTD: A web-accessible protein database for drug target identification. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 104.
11. Gebruers, E. et al. (2013) A phenotypic screen in zebrafish identifies a novel small-molecule inducer of ectopic tail formation suggestive of alterations in non-canonical Wnt/PCP signaling. PLoS One, 8, e83293.
12. Gfeller, D. et al. (2013) Shaping the interaction landscape of bioactive molecules. Bioinformatics, 29, 3073-3079.
13. Gfeller, D. et al. (2014) SwissTargetPrediction: A web server for target prediction of bioactive small molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. , 42, W32-W38.
14. Giaever, G. et al. (2004) Chemogenomic profiling: identifying the functional interactions of small molecules in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 793-798.
15. Howe, K. et al. (2013) The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature, 496, 498-503.
16. Inglese, J. et al. (2007) High-throughput screening assays for the identification of chemical probes. Nat. Chem. Biol. , 3, 466-479.
17. Iorio, F. et al. (2010) Discovery of drug mode of action and drug repositioning from transcriptional responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 14621-14626.
18. Karaman, M. W. et al. (2008) A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat. Biotechnol. , 26, 127-132.
19. Keiser, M. J. et al. (2009) Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs. Nature, 462, 175-181.
20. Keiser, M. J. et al. (2007) Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry. Nat. Biotechnol. , 25, 197-206.
21. Kiefer, F. et al. (2009) The SWISS-MODEL repository and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. , 37, D387-D392.
22. Klabunde, T. (2007) Chemogenomic approaches to drug discovery: similar receptors bind similar ligands. Br. J. Pharmacol. , 152, 5-7.
23. Krüger, F. A. and Overington, J. P. (2012) Global analysis of small molecule binding to related protein targets. PLoS Comput. Biol. , 8, e1002333.
24. Laggner, C. et al. (2012) Chemical informatics and target identification in a zebrafish phenotypic screen. Nat. Chem. Biol. , 8, 144-146.
25. Lee, A. Y. et al. (2014) Mapping the cellular response to small molecules using chemogenomic fitness signatures. Science, 344, 208-211.
26. Liu, X. et al. (2013) HitPick: A web server for hit identification and target prediction of chemical screenings. Bioinformatics, 29, 1910-1912.
27. Loewenstein, Y. et al. (2009) Protein function annotation by homology-based inference. Genome Biol. , 10, 207.
28. Lounkine, E. et al. (2012) Large-scale prediction and testing of drug activity on side-effect targets. Nature, 486, 361-367.
29. Matthews, L. R. et al. (2001) Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or "interologs". Genome Res. , 11, 2120-2126.
30. Mestres, J. et al. (2009) The topology of drug-target interaction networks: implicit dependence on drug properties and target families. Mol. Biosyst. , 5, 1051-1057.
31. Paricharak, S. et al. (2013) Are phylogenetic trees suitable for chemogenomics analyses of bioactivity data sets: The importance of shared active compounds and choosing a suitable data embedding method, as exemplified on kinases. J. Cheminform. , 5, 49.
32. Pollock, S. N. et al. (2008) Scaffold topologies. 1. Exhaustive enumeration up to eight rings. J. Chem. Inf. Model. , 48, 1304-1310.
33. Rahman, S. A. et al. (2009) Small molecule subgraph detector (SMSD) toolkit. J. Cheminform. , 1, 12.
34. Ridges, S. et al. (2012) Zebrafish screen identifies novel compound with selective toxicity against leukemia. Blood, 119, 5621-5631.
35. Rohrer, S. G. and Baumann, K. (2008) Impact of benchmark data set topology on the validation of virtual screening methods: exploration and quantification by spatial statistics. J. Chem. Inf. Model. , 48, 704-718.
36. Schomburg, K. T. et al. (2014) Facing the challenges of structure-based target prediction by inverse virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. , 54, 1676-1686.
37. Schreiber, F. et al. (2014) TreeFam v9: A new website, more species and orthology-on-the-fly. Nucleic Acids Res. , 42, D922-D925.
38. Schuffenhauer, A. et al. (2003) Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. , 43, 391-405.
39. Seiler, K. P. et al. (2008) ChemBank: A small-molecule screening and cheminformatics resource database. Nucleic Acids Res. , 36, D351-D359.
40. Sugane, T. et al. (2013) Atropisomeric 4-phenyl-4H-1, 2, 4-triazoles as selective glycine transporter 1 inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. , 56, 5744-5756.
41. Taylor, J. S. et al. (2001) Comparative genomics provides evidence for an ancient genome duplication event in fish. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. , 356, 1661-1679.
42. Vilella, A. J. et al. (2009) EnsemblCompara GeneTrees: Complete, duplicationaware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates. Genome Res. , 19, 327-335.
43. Wang, J.-C. et al. (2012a) idTarget: A web server for identifying protein targets of small chemical molecules with robust scoring functions and a divide-and-conquer docking approach. Nucleic Acids Res. , 40, W393-W399.
44. Wang, Y. et al. (2012b) PubChem's BioAssay Database. Nucleic Acids Res. , 40, D400-D412.
45. Waterhouse, R. M. et al. (2013) OrthoDB: A hierarchical catalog of animal, fungal and bacterial orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. , 41, D358-D365.
46. Willett, P. (2011) Similarity searching using 2D structural fingerprints. Methods Mol. Biol. , 672, 133-158.
47. Young, D. W. et al. (2008) Integrating high-content screening and ligandtarget prediction to identify mechanism of action. Nat. Chem. Biol. , 4, 59-68.
48. Ziegler, S. et al. (2013) Target identification for small bioactive molecules: finding the needle in the haystack. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. , 52, 2744-2792.
49. Zon, L. I. and Peterson, R. T. (2005) In vivo drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. , 4, 35-44.