SwissTargetPrediction: A web server for target prediction of bioactive small molecules

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 42, Issue W1, 2014, Pages

  Gfeller, David ^a   Grosdidier, Aurélien ^a   Wirth, Matthias ^a   Daina, Antoine ^a   Michielin, Olivier ^a,b   Zoete, Vincent ^a  

^a SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

^b LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIOACTIVE SMALL MOLECULE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA BASE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOLECULE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CATTLE; DRUG DISCOVERY; HUMANS; INTERNET; LIGANDS; MICE; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; PROTEINS; RATS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84904793576     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku293     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Keiser,M.J., Roth,B.L., Armbruster,B.N., Ernsberger,P., Irwin,J.J. and Shoichet,B.K. (2007) Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry. Nat. Biotechnol., 25, 197-206.
2. Oprea,T.I., Bauman,J.E., Bologa,C.G., Buranda,T., Chigaev,A., Edwards,B.S., Jarvik,J.W., Gresham,H.D., Haynes,M.K., Hjelle,B. et al. (2011) Drug Repurposing from an Academic Perspective. Drug Discov. Today. Therapeutic Strategies, 8, 61-69.
3. Jorgensen,W.L. (2009) Efficient drug lead discovery and optimization. Acc. Chem. Res., 42, 724-733.
4. Ziegler,S., Pries,V., Hedberg,C. and Waldmann,H. (2013) Target identification for small bioactive molecules: finding the needle in the haystack. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 52, 2744-2792.
5. Karaman,M.W., Herrgard,S., Treiber,D.K., Gallant,P., Atteridge,C.E., Campbell,B.T., Chan,K.W., Ciceri,P., Davis,M.I., Edeen,P.T. et al. (2008) A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat. Biotechnol., 26, 127-132.
6. Bento,A.P., Gaulton,A., Hersey,A., Bellis,L.J., Chambers,J., Davies,M., Kruger,F.A., Light,Y., Mak,L., McGlinchey,S. et al. (2014) The ChEMBL bioactivity database: an update. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D1083-D1090.
7. Bolton,E., Wang,Y., Thiessen,P.A. and Bryant,S.H. (2008), Annual Reports in Computational Chemistry, Vol. 4. American Chemical Society, Washington DC.
8. Irwin,J.J., Sterling,T.,Mysinger,M.M., Bolstad,E.S. and Coleman,R.G. (2012) ZINC: a free tool to discover chemistry for biology. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 52, 1757-1768.
9. Clemons,P.A. (2004) Complex phenotypic assays in high-throughput screening. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 8, 334-338.
10. Inglese,J., Johnson,R.L., Simeonov,A., Xia,M., Zheng,W., Austin,C.P. and Auld,D.S. (2007) High-throughput screening assays for the identification of chemical probes. Nat. Chem. Biol., 3, 466-479.
11. Smith,A.M., Ammar,R., Nislow,C. and Giaever,G. (2010) A survey of yeast genomic assays for drug and target discovery. Pharmacol. Ther., 127, 156-164.
12. Mestres,J., Gregori-Puigjane,E., Valverde,S. and Sole,R.V. (2009) The topology of drug-target interaction networks: implicit dependence on drug properties and target families. Mol. Biosyst., 5, 1051-1057.
13. Lounkine,E., Keiser,M.J., Whitebread,S., Mikhailov,D., Hamon,J., Jenkins,J.L., Lavan,P., Weber,E., Doak,A.K., Cote,S. et al. (2012) Large-scale prediction and testing of drug activity on side-effect targets. Nature, 486, 361-367.
14. Kola,I. and Landis,J. (2004) Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 3, 711-715.
15. Keiser,M.J., Setola,V., Irwin,J.J., Laggner,C., Abbas,A.I., Hufeisen,S.J., Jensen,N.H., Kuijer,M.B., Matos,R.C., Tran,T.B. et al. (2009) Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs. Nature, 462, 175-181.
16. Issa,N.T., Kruger,J., Byers,S.W. and Dakshanamurthy,S. (2013) Drug repurposing a reality: from computers to the clinic. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol., 6, 95-97.
17. Dunkel,M., Gunther,S., Ahmed,J., Wittig,B. and Preissner,R. (2008) SuperPred: drug classification and target prediction. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, W55-W59.
18. Gfeller,D., Michielin,O. and Zoete,V. (2013) Shaping the interaction landscape of bioactive molecules. Bioinformatics, 29, 3073-3079.
19. Gong,J., Cai,C., Liu,X., Ku,X., Jiang,H., Gao,D. and Li,H. (2013) ChemMapper: a versatile web server for exploring pharmacology and chemical structure association based on molecular 3D similarity method. Bioinformatics, 29, 1827-1829.
20. Wang,L., Ma,C., Wipf,P., Liu,H., Su,W. and Xie,X.Q. (2013) TargetHunter: an in silico target identification tool for predicting therapeutic potential of small organic molecules based on chemogenomic database. AAPS J., 15, 395-406.
21. Campillos,M., Kuhn,M., Gavin,A.C., Jensen,L.J. and Bork,P. (2008) Drug target identification using side-effect similarity. Science, 321, 263-266.
22. Willett,P. (2011) Similarity searching using 2D structural fingerprints. Methods Mol. Biol., 672, 133-158.
23. Wirth,M. and Sauer,W.H.B. (2011) Bioactive molecules: perfectly shaped for their target. Mol. Inform., 30, 677-688.
24. Ballester,P.J. and Richards,W.G. (2007) Ultrafast shape recognition to search compound databases for similar molecular shapes. J. Comput. Chem., 28, 1711-1723.
25. Sastry,G.M., Dixon,S.L. and Sherman,W. (2011) Rapid shape-based ligand alignment and virtual screening method based on atom/feature-pair similarities and volume overlap scoring. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 51, 2455-2466.
26. Liu,X., Jiang,H. and Li,H. (2011) SHAFTS: a hybrid approach for 3D molecular similarity calculation. 1. Method and assessment of virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 51, 2372-2385.
27. Armstrong,M.S., Finn,P.W., Morris,G.M. and Richards,W.G. (2011) Improving the accuracy of ultrafast ligand-based screening: incorporating lipophilicity into ElectroShape as an extra dimension. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 25, 785-790.
28. Perez-Nueno,V.I., Venkatraman,V., Mavridis,L. and Ritchie,D.W. (2012) Detecting drug promiscuity using Gaussian ensemble screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 52, 1948-1961.
29. Armstrong,M.S., Morris,G.M., Finn,P.W., Sharma,R.,Moretti,L., Cooper,R.I. and Richards,W.G. (2010) ElectroShape: fast molecular similarity calculations incorporating shape, chirality and electrostatics. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 24, 789-801.
30. Safran,M., Dalah,I., Alexander,J., Rosen,N., Iny Stein,T., Shmoish,M., Nativ,N., Bahir,I., Doniger,T., Krug,H. et al. (2010) GeneCards Version 3: the human gene integrator. Database (Oxford), doi: 10.1093/database/baq020.
31. UniProt,C. (2013) Update on activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D43-D47.
32. Kupfer,D. and Bulger,W.H. (1990) Inactivation of the uterine estrogen receptor binding of estradiol during P-450 catalyzed metabolism of chlorotrianisene (TACE). Speculation that TACE antiestrogenic activity involves covalent binding to the estrogen receptor. FEBS Lett., 261, 59-62.
33. Kiefer,F., Arnold,K., Kunzli,M., Bordoli,L. and Schwede,T. (2009) The SWISS-MODEL repository and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D387-D392.
34. Loewenstein,Y., Raimondo,D., Redfern,O.C., Watson,J., Frishman,D., Linial,M., Orengo,C., Thornton,J. and Tramontano,A. (2009) Protein function annotation by homology-based inference. Genome Biol., 10, 207.
35. Klabunde,T. (2007) Chemogenomic approaches to drug discovery: similar receptors bind similar ligands. Br. J. Pharmacol., 152, 5-7.
36. Kruger,F.A. and Overington,J.P. (2012) Global analysis of small molecule binding to related protein targets. PLoS Comput. Biol., 8, e1002333.
37. Paricharak,S., Klenka,T., Augustin,M., Patel,U.A. and Bender,A. (2013) Are phylogenetic trees suitable for chemogenomics analyses of bioactivity data sets: the importance of shared active compounds and choosing a suitable data embedding method, as exemplified on Kinases. J. Cheminform., 5, 49.
38. Vilella,A.J., Severin,J., Ureta-Vidal,A., Heng,L., Durbin,R. and Birney,E. (2009) EnsemblCompara GeneTrees: complete, duplication-aware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates. Genome Res., 19, 327-335.
39. Schreiber,F., Patricio,M., Muffato,M., Pignatelli,M. and Bateman,A. (2014) TreeFam v9: a new website, more species and orthology-on-the-fly. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D922-D925.
40. Waterhouse,R.M., Tegenfeldt,F., Li,J., Zdobnov,E.M. and Kriventseva,E.V. (2013) OrthoDB: a hierarchical catalog of animal, fungal and bacterial orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D358-D365.
41. Yang,W., Hu,Y., Yang,Y.S., Zhang,F., Zhang,Y.B., Wang,X.L., Tang,J.F., Zhong,W.Q. and Zhu,H.L. (2013) Design, modification and 3D QSAR studies of novel naphthalin-containing pyrazoline derivatives with/without thiourea skeleton as anticancer agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem., 21, 1050-1063.
42. Wirth,M., Zoete,V., Michielin,O. and Sauer,W.H. (2013) SwissBioisostere: a database of molecular replacements for ligand design. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D1137-D1143.
43. Jacob,L. and Vert,J.P. (2008) Protein-ligand interaction prediction: an improved chemogenomics approach. Bioinformatics, 24, 2149-2156.
44. Grosdidier,A., Zoete,V. and Michielin,O. (2011) SwissDock, a protein-small molecule docking web service based on EADock DSS. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, W270-W277.
45. Morris,G.M., Huey,R., Lindstrom,W., Sanner,M.F., Belew,R.K., Goodsell,D.S. and Olson,A.J. (2009) AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem., 30, 2785-2791.
46. Zoete,V., Cuendet,M.A., Grosdidier,A. and Michielin,O. (2011) SwissParam: a fast force field generation tool for small organic molecules. J. Comput. Chem., 32, 2359-2368.
47. Gfeller,D., Michielin,O. and Zoete,V. (2013) SwissSidechain: a molecular and structural database of non-natural sidechains. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D327-D332.
48. Gfeller,D., Michielin,O. and Zoete,V. (2012) Expanding molecular modeling and design tools to non-natural sidechains. J. Comput. Chem., 55, 1525-1535.
49. Wallace,I.M., Urbanus,M.L., Luciani,G.M., Burns,A.R., Han,M.K., Wang,H., Arora,K., Heisler,L.E., Proctor,M., St Onge,R.P. et al. (2011) Compound prioritization methods increase rates of chemical probe discovery in model organisms. Chem. Biol., 18, 1273-1283.
50. Frearson,J.A. and Collie,I.T. (2009) HTS and hit finding in academia-from chemical genomics to drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today, 14, 1150-1158.