High-resolution mapping of a major effect QTL from wild tomato Solanum habrochaites that influences water relations under root chilling

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 128, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1713-1724

  Arms, Erin M ^a   Bloom, Arnold J ^a   St Clair, Dina A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRUITS; GENES; MAINTENANCE; MAPPING;

ABIOTIC STRESS TOLERANCES; GENOME SEQUENCES; HIGH RESOLUTION; HIGH-RESOLUTION MAPPING; NEAR ISOGENIC LINES; REPLICATED EXPERIMENT; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER RELATIONS;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON HIRSUTUM;

WATER;

CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; COLD; DROUGHT; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT ROOT; PLANT STOMA; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SHOOT; SOLANUM; TOMATO;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; COLD TEMPERATURE; DROUGHTS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOTYPE; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PHENOTYPE; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT SHOOTS; PLANT STOMATA; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SOLANUM; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; WATER;

EID: 84939471252     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-015-2540-y     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alpert KB, Tanksley SD (1996) High-resolution mapping and isolation of a yeast artificial chromosome contig containing fw2.2: a major fruit weight quantitative trait locus in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:15503–15507
2. Andaya VC, Tai TH (2006) Fine mapping of the qCTS12 locus, a major QTL for seedling cold tolerance in rice. Theor Appl Genet 113:467–475. doi:10.1007/s00122-006-0311-5
3. Aroca R, Tognoni F, Irigoyen JJ, Sánchez-Díaz M, Pardossi A (2001) Different root low temperature response of two maize genotypes differing in chilling sensitivity. Plant Physiol Biochem 39:1067–1073. doi:10.1016/s0981-9428(01)01335-3
4. Aroca R, Porcel R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2012) Regulation of root water uptake under abiotic stress conditions. J Exp Bot 63:43–57. doi:10.1093/jxb/err266
5. Assmann SM, Wang X-Q (2001) From milliseconds to millions of years: guard cells and environmental responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:421–428. doi:10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00195-3
6. Bloom AJ, Zwieniecki MA, Passioura JB, Randall LB, Holbrook NM, St. Clair DA (2004) Water relations under root chilling in a sensitive and tolerant tomato species. Plant Cell Environ 27:971–979. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01200.x
7. Bombarely A et al (2011) The Sol Genomics Network (solgenomics.net): growing tomatoes using Perl. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D1149–D1155. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq866
8. Catala R, Salinas J (2010) Temperature-perception, molecules and mechanisms. J Appl Biomed 8:189–198. doi:10.2478/v10136-009-0026-4
9. Chaves MM, Maroco J, Pereira SJ (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol 30:239–264. doi:10.1071/FP02076
10. Chen K-Y, Tanksley SD (2004) High-resolution mapping and functional analysis of se2.1: a major stigma exsertion quantitative trait locus associated with the evolution from allogamy to autogamy in the genus Lycopersicon. Genetics 168:1563–1573. doi:10.1534/genetics.103.022558
11. Chen K-Y, Cong B, Wing R, Vrebalov J, Tanksley SD (2007) Changes in regulation of a transcription factor lead to autogamy in cultivated tomatoes. Science 318:643–645. doi:10.1126/science.1148428
12. Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Zhu JK (2006) Gene regulation during cold acclimation in plants. Physiol Plant 126:52–61. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00596.x
13. Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R (2008) The zinc finger network of plants. Cell Mol Life Sci 65:1150–1160. doi:10.1007/s00018-007-7473-4
14. Collins NC, Tardieu F, Tuberosa R (2008) Quantitative trait loci and crop performance under abiotic stress: where do we stand? Plant Physiol 147:469–486. doi:10.1104/pp.108.118117
15. Consortium TTG (2012) The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485:635–641. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v485/n7400/abs/nature11119.html#supplementary-information
16. Cramer GR, Urano K, Delrot S, Pezzotti M, Shinozaki K (2011) Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective. BMC Plant Biol 11. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-11-163
17. Cruz RPd, Sperotto RA, Cargnelutti D, Adamski JM, de FreitasTerra T, Fett JP (2013) Avoiding damage and achieving cold tolerance in rice plants. Food Energy Secur 2:96–119. doi:10.1002/fes3.25
18. Damour G, Simonneau T, Cochard H, Urban L (2010) An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. Plant Cell Environ 33:1419–1438. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02181.x
19. dos Reis SP, Lima AM, de Souza CRB (2012) Recent molecular advances on downstream plant responses to abiotic stress. Int J Mol Sci 13:8628–8647. doi:10.3390/ijms13078628
20. Easlon HM, Asensio JSR, St.Clair DA, Bloom AJ (2013) Chilling-induced water stress: variation in shoot turgor maintenance among wild tomato species from diverse habitats. Am J Bot 100:1991–1999. doi:10.3732/ajb.1200508
21. Elizondo R, Oyanedel E (2010) Field testing of tomato chilling tolerance under varying light and temperature conditions. Chil J Agric Res 70:552–558
22. Epstein E, Bloom A (2005) Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives. Sinauer, Sunderland
23. Flint J, Mott R (2001) Finding the molecular basis of quantitative traits: successes and pitfalls. Nat Rev Genet 2:437–445. doi:10.1038/35076585
24. Frary A et al (2000) fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289:85–88. doi:10.1126/science.289.5476.85
25. Fulton T, Chunwongse J, Tanksley S (1995) Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 13:207–209. doi:10.1007/BF02670897
26. Geisenberg C, Stewart K (1986) Field crop management. In: Atherton JG, Rudich J (eds) The tomato crop: a scientific basis for improvement. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 511–557
27. Goodstal JF, Kohler G, Randall L, Bloom A, St.Clair D (2005) A major QTL introgressed from wild Lycopersicon hirsutum confers chilling tolerance to cultivated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Theor Appl Genet 111:898–905. doi:10.1007/s00122-005-0015-2
28. Haggard JE, Johnson EB, St Clair DA (2013) Linkage relationships among multiple QTL for horticultural traits and late blight (P. infestans) resistance on chromosome 5 introgressed from wild tomato Solanum habrochaites. G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics 3:2131–2146. doi:10.1534/g3.113.007195
29. Henderson IR (2012) Control of meiotic recombination frequency in plant genomes. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15:556–561. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2012.09.002
30. Johnson EB, Haggard JE, St.Clair DA (2012) Fractionation, stability, and isolate-specificity of QTL for resistance to Phytophthora infestans in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics 2:1145–1159. doi:10.1534/g3.112.003459
31. Jompuk C, Fracheboud Y, Stamp P, Leipner J (2005) Mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with chilling tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings grown under field conditions. J Exp Bot 56:1153–1163. doi:10.1093/jxb/eri108
32. Juenger TE (2013) Natural variation and genetic constraints on drought tolerance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16:274–281. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2013.02.001
33. Jung S, Steffen KL, Lee HJ (1998) Comparative photoinhibition of a high and a low altitude ecotype of tomato (Lycopersicon hirsutum) to chilling stress under high and low light conditions. Plant Sci 134:69–77
34. Kalladan R et al (2013) Identification of quantitative trait loci contributing to yield and seed quality parameters under terminal drought in barley advanced backcross lines. Mol Breed 32:71–90. doi:10.1007/s11032-013-9853-9
35. Kiełbowicz-Matuk A (2012) Involvement of plant C2H2-type zinc finger transcription factors in stress responses. Plant Sci 185–186:78–85. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.11.015
36. Kleunen Mv, Fischer M (2005) Constraints on the evolution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in plants. New Phytol 166:49–60. doi:10.2307/1514650
37. Korol AB (2013) Recombination. In: Simon AL (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Waltham, pp 353–369. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-384719-5.00120-9
38. Koseki M, Kitazawa N, Yonebayashi S, Maehara Y, Wang Z-X, Minobe Y (2010) Identification and fine mapping of a major quantitative trait locus originating from wild rice, controlling cold tolerance at the seedling stage. Mol Genet Genomics 284:45–54. doi:10.1007/s00438-010-0548-1
39. Krasensky J, Jonak C (2012) Drought, salt, and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. J Exp Bot 63:1593–1608. doi:10.1093/jxb/err460
40. LAWR (2013) UCD/NOAA Climate Station. Land air and water resources. http://atm.ucdavis.edu/wxauto/. Accessed 12 April 2014
41. Liu J, Van Eck J, Cong B, Tanksley SD (2002) A new class of regulatory genes underlying the cause of pear-shaped tomato fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:13302–13306. doi:10.1073/pnas.162485999
42. Mackay TFC, Stone EA, Ayroles JF (2009) The genetics of quantitative traits: challenges and prospects. Nat Rev Genet 10:565–577. http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v10/n8/suppinfo/nrg2612_S1.html
43. Matsuba Y et al (2013) Evolution of a complex locus for terpene biosynthesis in Solanum. Plant Cell 25:2022–2036. doi:10.1105/tpc.113.111013
44. Nibau C, H-m Wu, Cheung AY (2006) RAC/ROP GTPases: ‘hubs’ for signal integration and diversification in plants. Trends Plant Sci 11:309–315. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.04.003
45. Nobel PS (1999) Physiochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego
46. Oyanedel E, Wolfe DW, Monforte AJ, Tanksley SD, Owens TG (2001) Using Lycopersicon hirsutum as a source of cold tolerance in processing tomato breeding. Acta Hortic 542:387–392
47. Rick C (1983) Genetic variability in tomato species. Plant Mol Biol Report 1:81–87. doi:10.1007/bf02680303
48. Roelfsema MRG, Hedrich R (2005) In the light of stomatal opening: new insights into ‘the watergate’. New Phytol 167:665–691. doi:10.2307/3694429
49. Saxton A (1998) A macro for converting means separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed. Paper presented at the In Proc. 23rd SAS Users Group Intl., Cary, NC, March 22–25
50. SGN (solgenomics.net) Sol genomics network. http://solgenomics.net/. Accessed 20 April 2014
51. Studer AJ, Doebley JF (2011) Do large effect QTL fractionate? A case study at the maize domestication QTL teosinte branched1. Genetics 188:673–681. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.126508
52. Tanksley SD, Fulton TM (2007) Dissecting quantitative trait variation—examples from the tomato. Euphytica 154:365–370. doi:10.1007/s10681-006-9192-6
53. Tattersall ER et al (2007) Transcript abundance profiles reveal larger and more complex responses of grapevine to chilling compared to osmotic and salinity stress. Funct Integr Genomics 7:317–333. doi:10.1007/s10142-007-0051-x
54. Truco MJ, Randall LB, Bloom AJ, St. Clair DA (2000) Detection of QTLs associated with shoot wilting and root ammonium uptake under chilling temperatures in an interspecific backcross population from Lycopersicon esculentum × L. hirsutum. Theor Appl Genet 101:1082–1092. doi:10.1007/s001220051583
55. Uauy C, Distelfeld A, Fahima T, Blechl A, Dubcovsky J (2006) A NAC gene regulating senescence improves grain protein, zinc, and iron content in wheat. Science 314:1298–1301. doi:10.1126/science.1133649
56. Vallejos CE, Pearcy RW (1987) Differential acclimation potential to low temperatures in two species of Lycopersicon: photosynthesis and growth. Can J Bot 65:1303–1307
57. Van Ooijen J (2006) JoinMap 4, Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Kyazma BV, Wageningen, Netherlands
58. Venema JH, Posthumus F, De Vries M, Van Hasselt PR (1999) Differential response of domestic and wild Lycopersicon species to chilling under low light: growth, carbohydrate content, photosynthesis and the xanthophyll cycle. Physiol Plant 105:81–88. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.105113.x
59. Venema JH, Linger P, van Heusden AW, van Hasselt PR, Brüggemann W (2005) The inheritance of chilling tolerance in tomato (Lycopersicon spp.). Plant Biol 7:118–130. doi:10.1055/s-2005-837495
60. Vernieri P, Lenzi A, Figaro M, Tognoni F, Pardossi A (2001) How the roots contribute to the ability of Phaseolus vulgaris L. to cope with chilling-induced water stress. J Exp Bot 52:2199–2206
61. Wang S, Basten CJ, Zeng ZB (2011) Windows QTL Carographer 2.5. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh
62. Xu K et al. (2006) Sub1A is an ethylene-response-factor-like gene that confers submergence tolerance to rice. Nature 442:705–708. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v442/n7103/suppinfo/nature04920_S1.html
63. Yadaw RB et al (2013) A QTL for high grain yield under lowland drought in the background of popular rice variety Sabitri from Nepal. Field Crop Res 144:281–287. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.01.019
64. Zhang H, Han B, Wang T, Chen S, Li H, Zhang Y, Dai S (2011) Mechanisms of plant salt response: insights from proteomics. J Proteome Res 11:49–67. doi:10.1021/pr200861w
65. Zhou L et al (2010) Fine mapping a QTL qCTB7 for cold tolerance at the booting stage on rice chromosome 7 using a near-isogenic line. Theor Appl Genet 121:895–905. doi:10.1007/s00122-010-1358-x